臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：民眾參與與永續發展
書刊名：國立臺灣師範大學地理研究報告
作者：譚鴻仁 引用關係
作者(外文)：Tan, Hung-jen
出版日期：2003
卷期：38
頁次：頁55-65
主題關鍵詞：永續發展；溝通規劃；公共性；民眾參與；Sustainable development；Communicative planning；Public-ness；Public participation
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(9) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:24
民眾參與是環境規劃過程中的一個重要程序，在現行的法規上有其一定的法定地位。它代表了人民政權的行使，人民對自身福祉的關心與影響的實踐。不過，在台灣的經驗中，民眾的參與往往只作為訊息的提供以及合理化政策的工具。永續發展目的在重新評價人與人，以及人與環境的關係，來滿足現在人類與未來世代的需求。在21世紀議程中指出永續發展必須考慮弱勢者的利益，發展出以地方為中心的地方21世紀議程以達成永續發展的長遠目標。然而，自由民主的理念與永續發展有對立衝突的傾向。為解決此一衝突，本文以哈伯馬斯的溝通行動理論所發展出的溝通規劃理論為藍本，探討此衝突是否有解決的可能。
Public participation is an important procedure of environmental planning and it is also legally significant. It symbolizes the realization of public will, the concern with the welfare of the people. However, public participation is information-feeding and the legitimization of public policy in Taiwan. Sustainable development, on the other hand, aims to re-evaluate the relationship between people and between people and nature in order to satisfy the needs of the people and their future generations. It is necessary to take the interest of the disadvantaged in to consideration, according to Local agenda 21. Sustainable development can only be met the fulfillment of the local agenda 21 of each place, which is designed under each special circumstances. Nevertheless, liberal democracy tends to be in conflict with sustainable development. The author tries to proposes the idea of communicative planning, which is based on Habermas's communicative ethic theory, to solve the problem.
期刊論文
1.Healey, Patsy(1992)。Planning Through Debate。Town Planning Review，63(2)，143-162。  new window
2.Holden, Erling(1998)。Planning theory: democracy or sustainable development?-both (but don't bother about the bread, please)。Scandinavian Housing & Planning Research，15，227-247。  new window
3.Innes, Judith E.、Booher, David E.(1999)。Consensus building and complex adapLive systems: a framework for evaluating collaborative planning。Journal of the American Planning Association，65(4)，412-23。  new window
4.Rydin, Yvonne(1999)。Can we talk ourselves into sustainability? The role of discourse in the environmental policy process。Environmretal Values，8，467-84。  new window
5.Taylor, N.(1998)。Mistaken interests and the discourse model of planning。Journal of the American Planning Association，64(1)，64-75。  new window
6.Miller, David(1992)。Deliberative democracy and social choice。Political Studies XL，40(1)，54-67。  new window
學位論文
1.Tan Hung-Jen(2000)。The Meanings of Public Participation in Planning: Three case Studies in Taiwan(博士論文)。The University of Sheffield。  new window
圖書
1.Lively, Jack(1975)。Democracy。Oxford：Blackwell。  new window
2.王俊秀(1999)。環境社會學。台北：巨流。  延伸查詢new window
3.盧誌銘(1998)。永續國土發展講座彙編。中國文化大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.Arrow, Kenneth J.(1963)。Social Choice and Individual Values。New York：Wiley。  new window
5.Georgiou, S.、Whittington, D.、Pearce, D.、Moran, D.、Elgar, E.(1997)。Economic Values and the Environment in the Developing World。Cheltenham：Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc。  new window
6.Habermas, J.(1984)。The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and Rationalisation of Society。London：Heinemann。  new window
7.Holden, Barry(1993)。Understanding Liberal Democracy。Harvest Wheatsheaf。  new window
8.Nagel, Jack H.(1987)。Participation。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice-Hall, Inc。  new window
9.Olson, Mancur Jr.(1965)。The Logic of Collection: public goods and the theory of groups。Cambridge, Mass：Harvard University Press。  new window
10.World Commission on Environment and Development(1987)。Our Common Future。Oxford University Press。  new window
11.Gutmann, Amy、Thompson, Danis(1996)。Democracy and Disagreement。Belknap Press of Harvard University Press。  new window
12.Rousseau, Jean J.、Cranston, Maurice(1968)。The Social Contract。Harmondsworth：Penguin Books。  new window
13.Dahl, Robert A.(1956)。A Preface to Democratic Theory。Chicago：University of Chicago Press。  new window
14.Pateman, Carole(1970)。Participation and Democratic Theory。Cambridge University Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.Young, Iris Marion(1996)。Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy。Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political。Princeton：Princeton University Press。  new window
2.Dietz, Thomas(1993)。Democracy and Science in Ortwin Renn。Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation。Dordrecht：Kluwer Academic Publishers。  new window
3.Forester, John(1988)。Critical theory and planning practice。Critical Theory and Public Life。Cambridge, Mass：MIT Press。  new window
4.Kemp, Ray(1985)。Planning, public hearings, and the politics of discourse。Critical Theory and Public Life。Cambridge：MIT Press。  new window
5.Rosenbaum, Nelson M.(1978)。Citizen participation and democratic theory。Citizen Participation in America。Toronto：Lexington Books。  new window
6.Saward, Michael(1996)。Must democrats be environmentalists?。Democracy and Green Political Thought: sustainability, right and citizenship。London：Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：707（臺灣：705，外國：2） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1498098 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67292467
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上