:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:大湖地方性的構成--歷史向度的地理詮釋
書刊名:國立臺灣師範大學地理研究報告
作者:潘朝陽 引用關係
作者(外文):Pan, Chao-yang
出版日期:1996
卷期:25
頁次:頁1-42
主題關鍵詞:大湖
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(5) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:242
  • 點閱點閱:118
     This article will use "Humanistic Geography", which emphasizes the interpretation of history, as the basic method for further discussion of the placeness of Da-hu. Or, to put it another way, will interpret the "Local Characteristics" of Da-hu, which lies east of "Yi-Hsien", 「隘線」 deep in the "Yi-Ken District"「隘墾區」 of the inner mountains, in terms of local culture and historical development. This article will start with the frontier characteristics of Da-hu, its ecological environment and its former identity as a camphor forest. The "frontier characteristics" discussed in this article are based on descriptions in ancient Chinese texts which report a fear of the Da-hu "border", the negative evaluation of Da-hu from the standpoint of Feng-Shui theory and the argument that the "frontier" should belong to Atayal tribe; not the "Yang-Jan Pu-Di"「養贍埔地」of the Hou Long committee 「後?社」 and the Hsin Gang committee 「新港社」 of the Ping-Pu tribe.(平埔族) Drawing upon ancient Chinese texts & modern scholastic viewpoints, this article will then discuss Da-hu's basic terrain, climate and ecology in order to explain why this area was originally a camphor forest. In line with the above theories, this article will point out that the Chinese land developers used private force to invade Da-hu in search of the vast profit to be obtained from camphor trees. But fierce & bloody conflict with the Atayal tribe was inevitable. The Chinese land developers therefore united with the Ching Dynasty national military forces to conquer the Atayal tribe and successfully complete their invasion of their land. It is therefore the conclusion of this study that the formation of Da-hu placeness was only fully completed after the Chinese, in their pursuit of profit from natural resources, invaded the region and subdued the Atayal tribe through armed force.
期刊論文
1.黃卓權(1989)。廣泰成總墾號對大湖卓蘭地區之拓墾初探。苗栗文獻,1(5),186-205。  延伸查詢new window
2.施添福(19901200)。清代臺灣竹塹地區的土牛溝和區域發展:一個歷史地理學的研究。臺灣風物,40(4),1-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.臺灣文獻(19810300)。新竹、桃園、苗栗三縣地區開闢史。臺灣文獻,32(1),136-157。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.潘朝陽(1995)。石圍墻莊的建莊及其神聖空間。臺北:臺灣師大人文教育中心。623-636。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.陳正祥(1959)。台灣地誌。台北。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.潘朝陽(1994)。臺灣傳統漢文化區域構成及其空間性:以貓裏區域為例的文化歷史地理詮釋(博士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,台北。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.劉昭民(1992)。台灣先民看台灣。台北:台原。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃鼎松(1990)。苗栗史蹟巡禮。苗栗:苗栗縣文化中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉銘傳。劉壯肅公奏議。臺灣大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
4.周璽。彰化縣志。臺北:大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳文達。鳳山縣志。臺北:臺灣大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳培桂。淡水廳志。台灣大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
7.伊能嘉矩、溫吉(1957)。台灣番政志。台北:台灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
8.俞灝敏(1991)。風水探究。臺北:萬象。  延伸查詢new window
9.林朝綮(1957)。土地志.地理篇。台灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
10.伊能嘉矩(1991)。台灣文化志。台灣省文獻委員會。  延伸查詢new window
11.沈茂蔭。苗栗縣志。臺北:臺灣大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
12.郁永河。裨海紀遊。臺灣大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
13.周鍾瑄、陳夢林。諸羅縣志。臺灣大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃叔礅。臺海使槎錄。臺灣大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
15.劉璈。巡臺退思錄。臺灣大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳盛韶、劉卓英。問俗錄。  延伸查詢new window
17.清代臺灣大租調査書。臺灣大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.清代臺灣大租調査書。臺灣大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
19.林滿紅(19780000)。茶、糖、樟腦業與晚清臺灣。臺北:臺灣銀行經濟研究室。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.伊能嘉矩、森口雄稔(1992)。伊能嘉矩の台湾踏査日記。台湾風物雑誌社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.福康安。議臺灣屯丁疏。清奏疏選彙。臺灣大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳子光。紀諸山形勝。臺灣紀事。臺北:大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉克襄(1989)。一八七二年:前往雪山--馬偕醫師和巴克斯船長的西北海岸紀行。橫越福爾摩沙。台北:自立報系文化出版部。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳熾。種樟熬腦說。清經世文編選錄。臺灣大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.伍拉納。閩浙總督伍拉納奏為籌議臺灣新設屯所分撥埔地事宜摺。臺案彙錄甲集。臺灣大通書局。  延伸查詢new window
6.潘朝陽(1992)。存在空間的一個詮釋。建築現象學導論。臺北:桂冠圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE