:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:自然資源的參與式管理與地方自治制度
書刊名:臺灣經濟預測與政策
作者:蕭代基 引用關係張瓊婷 引用關係郭彥廉 引用關係
作者(外文):Shaw, DaigeeChang, Chiung-tingKuo, Yen-lien
出版日期:2003
卷期:34:1
頁次:頁1-37
主題關鍵詞:自然資源參與式管理權益相關者地方自治代理問題利益團體逐利問題Natural resourcesParticipatory managementStakeholderSelf-governancePrincipal-agent problemRent-seeking
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(13) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:12
  • 共同引用共同引用:46
  • 點閱點閱:358
臺灣的自然資源在中央科學管理與傳統地方自治下,呈現嚴重的代理問題與逐利問題。代理問題的產生乃由於代理人所考量的私人利益迥異於主人(所有的居民)利益,致使代理人不顧及主人的利益而聽從利益團體的逐利要求。針對這個問題,本文認為根本解決之道在於讓主人有誘因與能力去監督考核與獎懲代理人,使代理人的利益與主人的利益一致,才能促使代理人努力執行管理工作,符合主人的利益。 本文提出一個創新的自然資源管理制度,創新之處是建立以單一自然資源(如流域)管理為其唯一任務的地方自治團體,其基本原則包括:(1)單一資源管理,以各自然資源之分佈區域為管理轄區,(2)由權益相關者(stakeholders)組成該轄區之地方自治團體,(3)權益相關者參與的原則為「貢獻與權利相符原則」(principle of interest-participation)。
Due to the tradition of scientific management and governing various public affairs within one political district, serious principal-agent problems and rent-seeking phenomena have occurred in natural resource management in Taiwan. Usually, the public managers of natural resources, the agents, do not work mainly for the interests of their principals, the people. In order to solve this problem, we propose a new institution of natural resource management that provides principals with strong incentives and capacity to supervise their agents. The supervision would in turn provide agents with incentives to work for the best interests of their principals. This institution is governed by the stakeholders of the natural resource with participatory management. It follows three principles: (1) The management district of the natural resource is its distribution area. (2) The self-governance body of the natural resource is organized by all of stakeholders in this natural resource districit. (3) The participation of a stakeholder follows the Principle of Contribution and Participation.
期刊論文
1.林國慶(19920700)。以可移轉發展權制度維護農業區之可行性分析。經社法制論叢,10,55-82。  延伸查詢new window
2.阿部泰隆、陳立夫(19970500)。日本土地使用管制與損失補償。人與地,161,17-23。  延伸查詢new window
3.李秋靜(19980500)。保育與發展之均衡策略--英國國民環境信託簡介。臺灣經濟研究月刊,21(5)=245,32-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.湯京平、呂嘉泓(20020600)。永續發展與公共行政--從山美與里佳經驗談社區自治與「共享性資源」的管理。人文及社會科學集刊,14(2),261-287。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Tullock, Gordon(1967)。The Welfare Costs of Tariffs, Monopolists and Theft。Western Economic Journal,5(3),224-232。  new window
6.謝哲勝(19940700)。從美國法上的土地準徵收論既成道路公用地役權之妥當性。經社法制論叢,14,177-194。  延伸查詢new window
7.Tiebout, Charles M.(1956)。A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures。Journal of Political Economy,64(5),416-424。  new window
8.蕭代基(19950700)。自然資源保育與利用制度之檢討。臺灣經濟預測與政策,26(1),33-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Hardin, Garrett(1968)。The tragedy of the commons。Science,162(3859),1243-1248。  new window
10.Krueger, Anne O.(1974)。The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society。American Economic Review,64(3),291-303。  new window
11.Eichenberger, R.、Frey, B. S.(1996)。FOCJ: Competitive Governments for Europe。International Review of Law and Economics,16(3),315-327。  new window
12.Wright, J. B.(1993)。Conservation Easements: An Analysis of Donated Development Rights。Journal of the American Planning Association,59(4),487-493。  new window
13.Frey, B. S.(2001)。A Utopia? Government Without Territorial Monopoly。Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics,157(1),162-175。  new window
14.Andersen, M.(1999)。Governance by Green Taxes: Implementing Clean Water Policies in Europe 1970-1990。Environmental Economics and Policy Studies,2(1),39-63。  new window
15.Meur-Férec, Catherine(1997)。A comparative review of coastal conservation policies in France, and England and Wales。Journal of Coastal Conservation,3(2),121-132。  new window
會議論文
1.王鴻濬、羅丞書(2000)。自然資源保育與社區發展之協同思考-以嘉義縣之阿里山鄉達娜伊谷自然生態公園為例。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.李承嘉、顏愛靜(1995)。公有土地出售價款撥供購置大面積土地建立土地儲備制度之可行性研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Furubotn, E. G.、Richter, Rudolf(1998)。Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics。University of Michigan Press。  new window
2.Stevens, Sranley F.(1997)。Conservation through Cultural Survival: Indigenous Peoples and Protected areas。Washington, DC:Island Press。  new window
3.張維迎、劉楚俊(2000)。賽局理論與信息經濟學。臺北:茂昌圖書有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Smith, Adam(1976)。An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations。Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Mueller, Dennis C.(1989)。Public Choice II: A Revised Edition of Public Choice。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.World Commission on Environment and Development(1987)。Our Common Future。Oxford University Press。  new window
7.鄭欽龍、古曉燕(1998)。公眾參與社區森林資源管理之研究。八十六年度森林經營與林業經濟研究成果報告彙編。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
8.環境資源研究發展基金會(2002)。魯爾協會法(Gesetz uber den Ruhrverband,1990)。魯爾協會法(Gesetz uber den Ruhrverband,1990)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
9.環境資源研究發展基金會(2002)。魯爾協會費用估算規則(Ruhrverband Veranlagungsrichtlinien)。魯爾協會費用估算規則(Ruhrverband Veranlagungsrichtlinien)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
10.Carney, W. J.(1998)。From Stakeholders to Stockholders: A View From Organizational Theory。Who Owns the Environment?。Lanham, MD。  new window
11.Counghlin, R. E.、Keene, J. C.(1980)。The Protection of Farmland: A Reference Guidebook for State and Local Governments。National Agricultural Lands Study。沒有紀錄。  new window
12.Eaton, B. C.、Eaton, D. F.(1988)。Microeconomics。Microeconomics。New York, NY。  new window
13.(1995)。Waste Water Charge Schemes in the European Union。Waste Water Charge Schemes in the European Union。Amsterdam, Netherlands。  new window
14.Strong, A. L.(1979)。Land Banking: European Reality, American Prospect。Land Banking: European Reality, American Prospect。Baltimore, MD。  new window
15.Eichenberger, R.、Frey, B. S.(2001)。A Proposal for Dynamic European Federalism: FOCJ。Rules and Reason: Perspectives on Constitutional Political Economy。Cambridge。  new window
16.Frey, B. S.、Eichenberger, R.(2001)。Federalism with Overlapping Jurisdictions and Variable Levels of Integration: The Concept of FOCJ。Regionalism in Europe: Geometries and Strategies after 2000。Boston, MA。  new window
17.Frey, B. S.、Eichenberger, R.(2000)。Towards a New Kind of Eurofederalism。Hayek Revisited。Cheltenham, UK/ Northampton, MA。  new window
18.Eichenberger, R.、Frey, B. S.(1995)。Competition among Jurisdictions: The Idea of FOCJ。Competition among Institutions。London, UK。  new window
19.環境資源研究發展基金會(2002)。魯爾協會組織章程(Satzung fur den Ruhrverband,1996)。魯爾協會組織章程(Satzung fur den Ruhrverband,1996)。臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.United Nations Conference on Environment and Development(1992)。Agenda 21,http://habitat.igc.org/agenda21/index.htm, 。  new window
2.Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development(1996)。The Efficiency and Effectiveness of Water Pollution Charges in France, Germany and the Netherlands: A Synthesis of Available Evidence,Paris, France。  new window
3.Meinzen-Dick, R.,Rosegrant, M. W.,Dinar, A.(1997)。Water Allocation Mechanisms - Principles and Examples,沒有紀錄。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE