:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:政府委託研究案代理問題之探討:一個結合賽局理論與代理人理論的研究取向
書刊名:行政暨政策學報
作者:柯于璋 引用關係
作者(外文):Ke, Yu-chang
出版日期:2013
卷期:57
頁次:頁1-35
主題關鍵詞:政府業務委外委託研究案代理問題賽局理論代理人理論Government commissioned studiesGovernment affairs contracting outAgency problemsGame theoryAgency theory
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:305
  • 點閱點閱:103
政府委託研究案愈來愈多,但是也引發不同的問題,其中代理問題是大家較為關注的議題;以往探討政府業務委外的代理問題有幾項缺失,例如後設、靜態、欠缺對於重複賽局的考量。本研究特別提出整合賽局理論與代理人理論的研究取向,並利用文獻蒐集、內容分析與個案研究方法,探討高雄市溫室氣體減量策略計畫委託研究案的代理問題。本研究一方面從文獻整理提出代理問題的三大類型與七大代理問題,另一方面利用賽局理論探討政府委託研究案(賽局)的參與者、規則、策略與報酬。研究結果顯示,結合賽局理論的研究取向,對於代理問題的產生有較好的解釋力,也揭示委託人與代理人基於理性的策略互動是代理問題產生的主要原因之一。最後,本研究結果對於未來如何降低政府委託研究案的代理問題也有具體的建議與對策。
There has been more government commissioned studies causing a variety of problems. Agency problems are one of the problems that attract most attention. There are some shortcomings for previous studies that focused on the agency problems of government commissioned studies, such as meta- and static approach, and the lack of repeated games. Therefore, this study proposes an approach to integrating Game Theory and Agency Theory, and then uses literature review, content analysis and case study to explore the agency problems of the commissioned study of the Kaohsiung City GHG Strategy Program. On one hand, this study proposes three types of agency problems and seven agency problems; on the other hand, this study integrates Game Theory to explore the participants, rules, strategies, and payoffs of government commissioned studies. The research results show that the research approach of integrating Game theory presenting players' strategy interdependence is one of the most important causes for agency problems. The results also show that not only the integration of Game Theory can describe the agency problems better, but also addresses the strategies and actions that few studies ever addressed. Lastly, this study also proposes concrete suggestions and solutions to the agency problems of government commissioned studies.
期刊論文
1.林森田、洪維廷(20090500)。農地違規使用管理簽約外包之研究。臺灣土地研究,12(1),1-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.廖坤榮(20041200)。臺灣金融管制政策的困境:代理人途徑個案分析。中山人文社會科學期刊,12(2)=27,51-86。  延伸查詢new window
3.廖坤榮(20051200)。臺灣農會信用部經營管理的道德危險研究。公共行政學報,17,83-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.葛傳宇(2009)。代理人理論之侷限性--以世界銀行之環保政策變遷為例。公共事務評論,10(1),1-20。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.簡龍鳳、賴宗裕(2006)。以代理人理論觀點探討民間參與區段徵收開發之規模。都市與計劃,33(3),169-188。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Boston, J.(1994)。Purchasing Policy Advice: The Limits to Contracting Out。Governance,7(1),1-30。  new window
7.Brinkerhoff, D. W.、J. M. Brinkerhoff(2011)。Public-private Partnerships: Perspectives on Purposes。Public Administration and Development,31,2-14。  new window
8.Dicke, L. A.(2002)。Ensuring Accountability in Human Services Contracting: Can Stewardship Theory Fill the Bill?。American Review of Public Administration,324,455-470。  new window
9.Hodge, G. A.、Greve, C.(2009)。PPPs: The Passage of Time Permits a Sober Reflection。Economic Affairs,29(1),33-39。  new window
10.Raudla, R.(2012)。Pitfalls of Contracting for Policy Advice: Preparing Performance Budgeting Reform in Estonia。Governance,26(4),605-629。  new window
11.Sekwat, A.(2000)。Principlal-agent Theory: A Framework for Improving Health Care Reform in Tennessee。Journal of Health and Human Service Administration,223,277-291。  new window
12.Jensen, M. C.(1983)。Organization Theory and Methodology。Accounting Review,58,319-339。  new window
13.蔡允棟(20011200)。官僚組織回應力之研究--個案實證分析。政治科學論叢,15,209-240。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.郭昱瑩、洪綾君(20120300)。行政及政策類委託研究計畫適用政府採購法問題之探討:代理人理論觀點。競爭力評論,15,7-40。  延伸查詢new window
15.蕭代基、張瓊婷、郭彥廉(20031000)。自然資源的參與式管理與地方自治制度。臺灣經濟預測與政策,34(1),1-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.陳敦源、林靜美(20050700)。有限理性下的不完全契約:公部門績效管理制度的反思。考銓季刊,43,96-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.陳敦源、徐仁輝(20000600)。從「權力授予」概念看臺灣的行政立法互動關係:以八十七年預算法修正為例。空大行政學報,10,155-186。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.王文良、林信惠(20061000)。以賽局觀點探討軟體外包延宕類型。資訊管理學報,13(專刊),17-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Waterman, Richard W.、Meier, Kenneth J.(1998)。Principal-Agent Models: An Expansion?。Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,8(2),173-202。  new window
20.李柏諭(20110900)。跨部門治理的理論與實踐:以蓮潭國際文教會館的委外經驗為例。公共行政學報,40,41-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.陳金哲(20060600)。準市場機制與區域治理--以秀傳醫院、署立醫院及臺北市立醫院之執行經驗為例。公共行政學報,19,91-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.孫煒(20040600)。非營利管理的責任問題:政治經濟研究途徑。政治科學論叢,20,141-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.林森田、洪維廷(20040600)。代理結構與制度執行:以臺灣土地使用分區制度執行為例。公共行政學報,11,77-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.徐仁輝(19950600)。組織經濟學的緣起與發展。中國行政評論,4(3),105-126。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.莫永榮(20041200)。政府服務委託外包的理論與實務:臺灣經驗。行政暨政策學報,39,75-104。new window  延伸查詢new window
26.余致力(20060900)。倡廉反貪與民主治理。臺灣民主季刊,3(3),165-175。new window  延伸查詢new window
27.陳敦源(20021200)。績效制度設計的資訊問題:訊號、機制設計與代理成本。行政暨政策學報,35,45-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
28.朱鎮明(20051200)。政策網絡中協力關係的成效:理論性的探討。公共行政學報,17,113-158。new window  延伸查詢new window
29.Bloomfield, Pamela(2006)。The Challenging Business of Long-Term Public Private Partnerships: Reflections on Local Experience。Public Administration Review,66(3),400-411。  new window
30.曾冠球(20100300)。「問題廠商」還是「問題政府」?電子化政府公私合夥協力困境之個案分析。公共行政學報,34,77-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
31.陳敦源、張世杰(20100700)。公私協力夥伴關係的弔詭。文官制度季刊,2(3),17-71。new window  延伸查詢new window
32.Fama, Eugene F.(1980)。Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm。Journal of Political Economy,88(2),288-307。  new window
33.劉淑瓊(20050900)。績效、品質與消費者權益保障:論社會服務契約委託的責信課題。社會政策與社會工作學刊,9(2),31-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
34.Jensen, Michael C.、Meckling, William H.(1976)。Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure。Journal of Financial Economics,3(4),305-360。  new window
35.吳秀光、吳宗憲(2008)。台北市政府促進民間參與公共建設政策之研究。政策研究學報,8,23-76。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.張金環(2003)。制度設計與代理人問題研究--政府委託研究案為例(碩士論文)。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.張筵儀(2002)。不完全契約與政府外包--從代理人理論分析台北市政府拖吊業務(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.高雄市政府環保局(2007)。高雄市溫室氣體減量策略計畫。高雄市:高雄市政府環保局。  延伸查詢new window
2.Dixit, A.、S. Skeath(2004)。Games of Strategy。N.Y.:W. W. Norton and Company。  new window
3.Furbotn, E. G.、R. Richter(1991)。The New Institutional Economics: A Collection of Articles from the Journal of Institutional and theoretical economics。Texas:Texas A & M University Press。  new window
4.Kreps, D. M.(1990)。Game Theory and Economic Modelling。Oxford:Clarendon Press。  new window
5.Wetzstein, M.(2005)。Microeconomic Theory: Concepts and Connections。Mason, Oh.:Thomson:South-Western。  new window
6.Lane, Jan-Erik(2005)。Public Administration and Public Management: The Principal-Agent Perspective。London:Routledge。  new window
7.張維迎、劉楚俊(1999)。賽局理論與信息經濟學。臺北:茂昌圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.Katz, M. L.、Rosen, H. S.(1998)。Microeconomics。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill:Irwin。  new window
9.Parsons, Wayne(1995)。Policy: An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis。Cheltenham:Edward Elgar Publishing Limited。  new window
10.Ordeshook, Peter C.(1986)。Game Theory and Political Theory。Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Williamson, Oliver E.(1996)。The Mechanisms of Governance。The Free Press。  new window
12.Williamson, Oliver E.(1975)。Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications。New York, NY:Free Press。  new window
13.李宗勳(2002)。政府業務委外經營:理論與實務。台北市:智勝文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Coase, Ronald Harry(1988)。The Firm, The Market, and The Law。University of Chicago Press。  new window
15.Williamson, Oliver E.(1985)。The Economic Institutions of Capitalism: Firms Markets, Relational Contracting。Macmillan, Ltd:Free Press。  new window
16.McCarty, N.、Meirowitiz, A.(2007)。Political game theory: an introduction。New York:Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.高雄市政府(2004)。高雄市政府專題委託研究實施要點,高雄市政府。  延伸查詢new window
2.Watkins, T.(2012)。The Transaction Cost Approach to the Theory of the Firm,http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/coase.htm, 2012/06/30。  new window
圖書論文
1.Arrow, Kenneth(1986)。Agency and Market。Handbook of Mathematical Economics。New York, NY:Elsevier。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE