臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：國小教師藝能科教學信念之調查研究--以美勞科教師為例
書刊名：教育研究集刊
作者：甄曉蘭 引用關係／周立勳
作者(外文)：Chen, Hsiao-lan／Chou, Li-hsiun
出版日期：2003
卷期：49:4
頁次：頁219-249
主題關鍵詞：藝能科教學；教學信念；建構論；Teaching of art；Teachers' beliefs about teaching art；Constructivism
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:25
  • 點閱點閱:34
本研究旨在探討國小教師的藝能科教學信念現況，分析美勞科教學信念有關之教師背景與教學實務因素，以作為協助國小教師改進藝能科教學的基礎。研究者根據訪談11位國小美勞科教師結果，自編「國小教師美勞科教學信念問卷」，針對雲林、嘉義三縣市90學年度擔任美勞科教學之國小教師，以分層隨機取樣抽取400人為樣本，進行調查。調查結果經以因素分析、變異數分析，以及典型相關等統計方法處理，結果發現：當前國小教師之藝能科教學信念較傾向傳授指導的教學觀，較相信美勞科學習須具備特殊能力，教學上強調傳授指導、維持常規以及作品表現評量；教師的教學信念會因不同的背景而有差異，此種差異較多與教師參與研習的經驗與任教職務有關；國小教師之藝能科教學信念因素能有效預測選擇教學策略的偏向，接近建構取向教學信念者偏向採用分享互動之教學策略，而接近傳授指導者則偏向採用完成任務之教學策略。
The purpose of this study was twofold: to examine elementary school teachers’ beliefs about teaching art, and to analyze relevant variables such as teachers’ backgrounds and their teaching practice. It is hoped that the results of this study may provide guidelines to help elementary school teachers improve their teaching of art. Drawn from the results of interviews with 11 elementary art teachers, the researchers developed a “Teachers’ Beliefs about Teaching Art” questionnaire to conduct this survey. Applying proportionate strati­fied random sampling techniques, the study investigated 400 elementary art teachers’ pedagogi­cal practice in the 2001 school year in the Chiayi-Yunlin area. Then factor analy­sis, canoni­cal correlation analysis, and ANOVA statistics methods were applied to the sur­vey data. The results showed that most elementary school teachers’ beliefs about teaching art tend to favor the “transmitting-guiding” teaching perspective. Most of them believe that “learning art” requires a specific talent, so in their teaching they emphasize knowledge transmission, guidance of skill development, assessment of art works, and maintaining or­der in the class­room. There are also differences between and among art teachers’ beliefs about teaching art due to their different backgrounds like the degree of workshop experi­ence they have had and their teaching responsibilities. It is quite obvious that teachers’ beliefs about teaching art can effectively predict their preference with respect to teaching strategies: those who tend to favor the “constructivist” approach prefer to apply interactive sharing strategies, but those who are used to the traditional “transmitting-guiding” approach usu­ally focus their teaching on helping students complete their design task.
期刊論文
1.黃壬來(19990500)。藝術教育的三C策略。美育，107，6-25。  延伸查詢new window
2.Simpson, J. W.(1996)。Constructivism and connection making in art education。Art Education，49(1)，53-59。  new window
3.劉得劭(1998)。從建構論觀點談自主性導向之美勞教學。研習資訊，15(6)，30-41。  延伸查詢new window
4.Eisner, E. W.(1998)。Does experience in the arts boost academic achievement?。Art Education: Journal of the National Art Education Association，51(1)，7-15。  new window
5.Howard, B. C.、McGee, S.、Schwartz, N.、Puecell, S.(2000)。The Experience of Constructivism: Transforming Teacher Epistemology。Journal of Research on Computing Education，32(4)，455-465。  new window
6.Stout, C. J.(1999)。Artists as writers: Enriching perspectives in art appreciation。Studies in Art Education，40(3)，226-236。  new window
7.郭禎祥(19990400)。廿一世紀藝術教育的展望。美育，106，1-9。  延伸查詢new window
8.Applefield, J. M.、Huber, R.、Moallem, M.(2001)。Constructivism in theory and practice: Toward a better understanding。High School Journal，84(2)，35-53。  new window
9.邱文彬(20010400)。創造力發展模型與教學觀：從全人生發生認識論與建構論取向。嶺東學報，12，151-180。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Prawat, R. S.(1992)。Teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning: a constructivist perspective。American Journal of Education，100(3)，353-395。  new window
11.Efland, A.(1992)。Ralph Smith's concept of aesthetic experience and its curriculum implications。Studies in Art Education，33(4)，201-209。  new window
12.Prater, M.(2001)。Constructivism and technology in art education。Art Education，54(6)，43-48。  new window
13.郭禎祥(19990800)。描繪新世紀藝術教育藍圖。美育雙月刊，110，1-9。  延伸查詢new window
14.Lyons, N.(1990)。Dilemmas of knowing: Ethical and epistemological dimensions of teachers' work and development。Harvard Educational Review，60(2)，159-180。  new window
15.Cunliffe, Leslie(1998)。Gombrich on art: A social-constructivist interpretation of his work and its relevance to education。Journal of Aesthetic Education，32(4)，61-77。  new window
16.Darby, J. T.、Catterall, J. S.(1994)。The fourth R: The arts and learning。Teachers College Record，96(2)，299-328。  new window
17.DiBlasio, M. K.(1997)。Harvesting the cognitive revolution: Reflections on the arts, education, and aesthetic knowing。Journal of Aesthetic Education，31(1)，95-110。  new window
18.Wilson, B.(1994)。Reflections on the relationships among art, life, and research。Studies in Art Education，35(4)，197-208。  new window
會議論文
1.郭禎祥(2001)。新世紀藝術教育的變動。新世紀藝術教育理論與實務國際學術研討會，國立臺灣師範大學美術學系主辦 。台北市：國立台灣師範大學美術學系。33-47。  延伸查詢new window
2.甄曉蘭(2002)。從學科觀點探究建構教學理念於國小各科教學之應用－研究經驗分享與省思。臺北。147-178。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.甄曉蘭、周立勳(2000)。從學科觀點探究建構教學理念於國小各科教學之應用--以國語科教學為例 (計畫編號：NSC892413H003034)。  延伸查詢new window
2.甄曉蘭、周立勳(1998)。從學科觀點探究建構教學理念於國小各科教學之應用--以數學科教學為例 (計畫編號：NSC 87AFAOAK0050002)。  延伸查詢new window
3.甄曉蘭、周立勳(1999)。從學科觀點探究建構教學理念於國小各科教學之應用--以自然科教學為例 (計畫編號：NSC892413H003034)。  延伸查詢new window
4.甄曉蘭、周立勳(2001)。從學科觀點探究建構教學理念於國小各科教學之應用（IV）－以社會科教學為例。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Eisner, E. W.(1994)。The Educational Imaginations: On the Design and Evaluation of School Programs。New York, NY：Macmillan。  new window
2.Vygotsky, L.(1924)。The Psychology of Art。Cambridge：The M. I. T. Press。  new window
3.Dewey, J.(1934)。Art as experience。New York：Perigee Books。  new window
4.Fosnot, C. T.(1996)。Constructivism : Theory, perspectives, and practice。New York：Teacher College, Columbia University。  new window
5.詹志禹(20020000)。建構論：理論基礎與教育應用。臺北：正中。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Lowenfeld, Viktor、Brittain, W. Lambert(1987)。Creative and mental growth。Macmillan。  new window
7.(1992)。Arts as education。Arts as education。Cambridge, MA。  new window
8.Greene, M.(1996)。A constructivist perspective on teaching and learning in the arts。Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice。New York, NY。  new window
9.(1992)。The arts, education, and aesthetic knowing。The arts, education, and aesthetic knowing。Chicago, IL。  new window
其他
1.Armistead, M. E.(1996)。Constructivism and arts based programs，沒有紀錄。  new window
2.Oreck, B.(2000)。Artistic choices: How and why teachers use the arts in the classroom，沒有紀錄。  new window
圖書論文
1.Von Glasersfeld, E.(1995)。A constructivist approach to teaching。Constructivism in Education。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.Clark, Christopher M.、Peterson, Penelope L.(1986)。Teachers' thought processes。Handbook of Research on Teaching。Macmillan。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：469（臺灣：463，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67528452
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上