:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:跨國移工權利分析--歐盟經驗
書刊名:社會政策與社會工作學刊
作者:盧倩儀 引用關係
作者(外文):Lu, Chien-yi
出版日期:2004
卷期:8:2
頁次:頁125-158
主題關鍵詞:跨國移工歐盟人員自由流動歐洲整合移工社會權移工政治權非歐盟公民Transnational migrant workersThe European UnionFree movement of personsEuropean integrationMigrants' social rightsMigranst' political rightsThird country nationals
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:59
  • 點閱點閱:72
跨國移工權利在台灣是一個我們越來越需要去正視的問題。本文以跨國移工權利發展方面經驗最為豐富的歐盟為分析對象,檢視跨國移工在歐盟內部所享之政治以及社會權,並且對歐盟高度發展的會員國間之跨國移工權利提出解釋。歐盟內部跨國移工所享權利之分水嶺為「歐盟公民」身份之具備與否。首先,在具有「歐盟公民」身份之移工部份,跨國移工之權利是隨著歐洲整合的進程在向前移動。社會權部份,雖然「社會救助」及「健康保險」方面歐盟內部跨國的實質整合仍受到層層限制,但歐盟正持續不斷在朝更深入的整合努力。而「社會安全」之整合,則已使得歐盟在移工權利之發展上居於世界領導地位。政治權方面,對於具有歐盟公民身份之跨國移工而言,「歐 盟公民」之建立使得移工在地主國投票、參選的權利獲得了相當程度的保障。至於來自非歐盟會員國之移工權利是近來歐盟移工權利發展中,最值得玩味的一個部份。長久以來,「非歐盟公民」一直不受「人員自由流動」之保障。在「歐盟公民」建立後,非歐盟公民與歐盟公民間的差距更為顯著。然而正由於此一強烈對比,迫使歐盟會員國必須正視這個問題,進而改變對待非歐盟公民的方式。唯本文分析顯示,目前「非歐盟公民」權利的擴張基本上仍僅限於社會權部份;非歐盟公民在歐盟所享之政治權,在近期內則並無顯著改善的跡象。
As a country that has been importing foreign workers for 14 years, Taiwan needs to seriously examine the way foreign workers have been treated in our society. This article examines how rights of transnational migrants have been developed in the EU and provides explanations for the high level of migrant rights-especially with respect to migrants from other EU member states-achieved in this area. Migrant rights and the process of regional integration moved forward side by side in Europe. With respect to social rights, whereas substantial integration in “social assistance” and “health insurance” are still limited, the EU has done remarkably in integrating “social security” schemes of its Member States. With regard to political rights, the creation of “Union citizenship” has warranted migrants’, right to vote and to participate in elections to a certain degree. The most interesting developments, however, pertain to the expansion of the rights of “third country nationals”. For decades, third country nationals were treated as outsiders in European societies. The creation of Union citizenship further widened the differences between the insiders and the outsiders Alarmed by such a development, the Member State governments finally agreed to change the EU-level policies towards third country nationals. As this article will demonstrate, however, significant improvements in the treatment of third country nationals are confined to social rights. So far as political rights are concerned, third country nationals continue to be treated largely as outsiders.
期刊論文
1.Castles, Stephen(2002)。Migration and Community Formation under Conditions of Globalization。The International Migration Review,36(4),1143-1168。  new window
2.盧倩儀(20030900)。從歐盟與會員國公民概念之比較評估歐洲公民之實質化。問題與研究,42(5),55-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.藍佩嘉(20021200)。跨越國界的生命地圖:菲籍家務移工的流動與認同。臺灣社會研究季刊,48,169-218。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Agence Europe(2004)。An Unpleasant, but Largely Imaginary Aspect of Enlargement。Bulletin Quotidien Europe。  new window
5.Agence Europe(2004)。Enlarged Commission Debates Working Programme up to November - Mr. Prodi to Raise Issue of Free Movement of Workers at European Council。Bulletin Quotidien Europe。  new window
6.Elman, A.(2000)。The Limits of Citizenship: Migration, Sex Discrimination and Same-Sex Partners in EU Law。Journal of Common Market Studies,38(5),729-749。  new window
7.European Commission(2000)。Freedom of Movement and Social Security - Rights of Citizens Moving。European Union Newsletter,6。  new window
8.Groenendijk, K.、Guild, E.(2001)。Converging Criteria: Creating an Area of Security of Residence for Europe's Third Country Nationals。European Journal of Migration and Law,3,37-59。  new window
9.Kostakopoulou, T.(2002)。Long-Term Resident Third-Country Nationals in the European Union: Normative Expectations and Institutional Openings。Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,28(3),443-462。  new window
10.Martin, P. L.、Teitelbaum, M. S.(2001)。The Mirage of Maxican Guest Workers。Foreign Affairs,80(6),116-131。  new window
11.Menz, G.(2002)。Patterns in EU Labor Immigration Policy: National Initiatives and European Responses。Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,28(4),723-742。  new window
12.Nic Shuibhne, N.(2002)。Free Movement of Persons and the Wholly Internal Rule: Time to Move On?。Common Market Law Review,39,731-771。  new window
13.Warnes, A. M.(2002)。The Challenge of Intra-Union and In-Migration to 'Social Europe'。Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies,28(1),135-152。  new window
圖書
1.Esping-Anderson, G.(1996)。Welfare States in Transition: National Adaptations in Global Economies。London:Sage。  new window
2.Weiss, F.、Wooldridge, F.(2002)。Free Movement of Persons within the European Community。New York, NY:Kluwer Law International。  new window
3.Soysal, Yasemin Nuhoglu(1994)。Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe。University of Chicago Press。  new window
4.Esping-Andersen, Gøsta(1990)。The Three World of Welfare Capitalism。Oxford:Polity Press。  new window
5.藍佩嘉(2003)。外籍女性勞工之人權概況。婦權會2003臺灣婦女人權報告書。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.Council of Europe(2004)。Foreigners' Integration and Participation in European Cities。Foreigners' Integration and Participation in European Cities。Strasbourg。  new window
7.Eurostat(1996)。Social Partrait of Europe。Social Partrait of Europe。Luxembourg。  new window
8.Eurostat(2002)。The Social Situation in the European Union 2002。The Social Situation in the European Union 2002。Luxembourg。  new window
9.Eurostat(2004)。First Demographic Estimate 2003。First Demographic Estimate 2003。Luxembourg。  new window
10.Eurostat(2004)。Social Protection in Europe between 1992 and 2001。Social Protection in Europe between 1992 and 2001。Luxembourg。  new window
11.Van Der Mei, A. P.(2003)。Free Movement of Persons within the European Community - Cross-Border Access to Public Benefits。Free Movement of Persons within the European Community - Cross-Border Access to Public Benefits。Oxford。  new window
其他
1.Chenard, A.(1999)。Opening Statement for the Conference 'What Participation by Foreign Residents in Public Life at Local Level?,Strasbourg。  new window
2.Euobserver(2004)。Ireland Set to Be Only EU State Not Restricting Worker Access,沒有紀錄。  new window
3.Euobserver(2004)。Swedish Parliament May Reject Labour Restrictions,沒有紀錄。  new window
4.European Commission(2000)。Communication from the Commission on the Application of Directive 93/109/EC to the June 1999 Elections to the European Parliament - Right of Union Citizens Residing in a Member State of Which They Are Not Nationals to Vote and Stand in Elections to the Eu,Brussels, Belgium。  new window
5.European Commission(2003)。Communication from the Commission Concerning the Introduction of a European Health Insurance Card,Brussels, Belgium。  new window
6.Gillig, M. H.(1999)。Opening Statement for the Conference 'What Participation by Foreign Residents in Public Life at Local Level?,Strasbourg。  new window
7.Van Kersbergen, K.(1997)。Double Allegiance in European Integration: Public, Nation States, and Social Policy,Florence, Italy。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE