:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:唐代澤潞區的「從舊貫葬」與「不仕」
書刊名:中國歷史學會史學集刊
作者:張正田
作者(外文):Zhang, Zheng-tian
出版日期:2005
卷期:37
頁次:頁33-66
主題關鍵詞:唐代昭義軍澤潞區從舊貫葬不仕處士Tang dynastyZhaoyijunZe and Lu regionCongjiuguanzang
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:51
  • 點閱點閱:41
本文據前人對唐代士族「中央官僚化」的研究成果,以唐代河東道澤、溜二州地區所收墓誌銘主為例,作區域研究,發現本地區因地處貧瘠,鮮有士族存在,故現有所收墓誌銘多為社會階層較低的「小姓階層」,這些階級人士並在唐前期雖多仕官,卻未有明顯的中央官僚化現象,反多是安土重遷,「從舊貫葬」。此外本文也發現至晚唐時期,本區「不仕」與「歷代不仕」之「處士」人數明顯增加,這很可能是因為晚唐時期中央漸不能有效控制地方,甚至連本區所屬的昭義軍也不能有效控制內部。加上地主私有制勃興、或莊園經濟體興起後,新地主階層沒有積極地跟唐帝國或昭義軍的文武職官僚體系結合,進而取得功名。在這些因素影響下,造成晚唐本區「歷代不仕」、「處士」之比例大幅增加。其中若干歷代不仕者,由銘文也發現墓誌主家族很可能不會因父祖以來皆不仕而家道中落,反可能是當地豪強,在當地有一定社會影響力。推估前人研究所論晚唐時「莊園經濟體系」或「地主私有制」已漸發達,小姓階層不一定要依靠國家官僚體系,仍能維持一定社會地位,至少由本區所收墓誌銘,很可能可證明此論點。
This article aims at regional study in order to reflect the previous studies on the centralism by examing the hic jacets at the Ze 澤 and Lu 潞 regions, Hedong Dao. 河東道 The author finds that due to the barren s oil, Shizu 士族, the highest 1evel in social status, rarely existed in this region. What we had find out from the hic jacets is that Xiaoxing class 小姓階級 was the majority in this region. These people served for the Tang government in the early period of this dynasty. However, it did not show the appearance of centralism but Congjiuguanzang 從舊貫葬, deeply rooted in their hometown without moving. Besides, those who did not want to serve and those whose family had not served for the government for many generations had increasingly grown. It may due to the Tang government's and Zhaoyijun's 昭義軍, the local troop, unable to control the local situation. Moreover, as the growing of the privatization of land and manorial economic system, new landlord groups did not cooperate with either the Tang government or the Zhaoyijun. Under this influence, those who did not want to serve and those whose family had not served for the government for generations had increased in this region. For those whose family had not served for the government for generations, we find that their descendents might not declined because of this situation. Instead, they might have dominated the local society. Therefore, this article assumes that the Xiaoxing class could still have maintained their social status without depending on the bureaucractic system by the central government.
期刊論文
1.渡邊孝(2001)。唐代後半期の藩鎮辟召制についての再檢討--淮南、浙西藩鎮における幕職官の人的構成などを手がかりに。東洋史研究,60(1),30-68。  延伸查詢new window
2.胡阿祥(1993)。中古時期郡望郡姓地理分布考論。歷史地理,1993(11),111-140。  延伸查詢new window
3.王賽時(1988)。唐朝軍隊結構的變化與驕兵悍將的形成。齊魯學刊,1988(5),55-60。  延伸查詢new window
4.齊勇鋒(1988)。中晚唐五代兵制探索。文獻,1988(3),166-179。  延伸查詢new window
5.大澤正昭(1973)。唐代藩鎮?中央權力─德宗.憲宗朝?中心???。東洋史研究,32(2),1-22。  延伸查詢new window
6.日野開三郎(1954)。大唐府兵制時代?於??團結兵?稱呼???普及地域。史淵,61,1-26。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.王德權(1993)。唐五代地方官人事遞嬗之研究,臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.張正田(2002)。唐代昭義軍研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.嚴耕望(1986)。唐代交通圖考(五)。唐代交通圖考(五)。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.毛漢光(1984)。唐代墓誌銘彙編附考。台北:中央研究院歷史語言研究所。  延伸查詢new window
3.周紹良、趙超(2001)。唐代墓誌彙編。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.樂史(1993)。太平寰宇記。臺北:文海出版社。  延伸查詢new window
5.董誥(1996)。全唐文。上海:上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.劉昫(1998)。舊唐書。台北:藝文印書館。  延伸查詢new window
7.吳鋼(1994)。全唐文補遺。三秦出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.張國剛(1994)。唐代政治制度研究論集。文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.孫繼民(1995)。唐代行軍制度研究。臺北:文津出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.周紹良、趙超(1992)。唐代墓誌彙編。上海古籍出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.(清)胡聘之(1982)。山右石刻史料叢?。山右石刻史料叢?。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.孔經緯(1957)。關於唐朝土地所有制形式的發展變化問題。中國歷代土地制度問題討論集。北京。  延伸查詢new window
13.毛漢光(1988)。中古統治階層之社會成分。中國中古社會史論。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.胡如雷(1996)。唐宋之際中國封建社會的巨大變革。隋唐五代社會經濟史論稿。北京。  延伸查詢new window
15.孫國棟(1980)。晚唐中央政府組織之變遷。唐宋史論叢。香港。  延伸查詢new window
16.陳鍾毅、趙岡(1996)。中國土地制度史。中國土地制度史。臺北。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.栗原益男。安史?亂?藩鎮體制?展開。岩波講座世紀歷史(6)。東京。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(北宋)歐陽修(1998)。新唐書,北京。  延伸查詢new window
2.(北宋)司馬光(1995)。資治通鑑,北京。  延伸查詢new window
3.(清)李中白(1968)。潞安府志,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.胡如雷(1996)。唐五代時期的「驕兵」與藩鎮。隋唐五代社會經濟史論稿。北京:中國社會科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.毛漢光(1988)。從士族籍貫遷移看唐代士族之中央化。中國中古社會史論。臺北:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE