資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(3.144.159.187)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
《易經》早期管理決策模式與西方管理決策模式之比較分析
書刊名:
管理學報
作者:
徐木蘭
/
陳必碩
/
許金田
/
孔祥科
作者(外文):
Hsu, Mu-lan
/
Chen, Pi-so
/
Hsu, Chin-tien
/
Kung, Syang-ke
出版日期:
2006
卷期:
23:3
頁次:
頁289-307
主題關鍵詞:
管理決策模式
;
易經
;
中國式管理
;
內容分析
;
比較式研究
;
Managerial decision-making model
;
I-Ching
;
Chinese management
;
Content analysis
;
Comparative study
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
4
) 博士論文(
1
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
3
共同引用:
37
點閱:119
《易經》是中國古人的智慧結晶,千百年來一直備受後人於日常生活決策時的重視與參考依據。近年來,不論中外都開始盛行將《易經》思想發揮運用於企業的經營管理實務中,然而相關的文章論述大多屬於古文的說文解字式,或是使用者的主觀經驗表達式,較少見源自代社會科學方法基礎下的研究結果。緣此,本研究首先利用內容分析方法,試圖找出《易經》之卦名、卦辭和爻辭中,常見的單字所可能蘊含的現代管理決策概念意義。接著,透過《易經》早期管理決策模式的整理,包含決策的前提假定、情境與步驟等要素,再將之與西方的完全理性決策模式、有限理性決策模式、偏愛決策模式、直覺決策模式與垃圾桶決策模式進行比較性分析。
以文找文
”I-Ching”, also called as ”Book of Changes”, the ancient Chinese wisdom book, has been often used for helping people to make decision in daily life for thousands of years. Recently, Eastern and Western scholars have started to discuss how to apply the wisdom of ”I-Ching” to the field of business administration and decision-making practices. But the majority scholar to study ”I-Ching” throw energy into ”practice divination” research of respect, only paying attention to the interpretation or critique of the text. So, ”I-Ching”s own values and thoughts of decision-making are limited within the range of the narrow and small one. Unfortunately, related literatures based upon social science research foundation are few. If ”I-Ching”s spirit, principles, thoughts, and methods of decision-making, could be scientifically summed up and arranged, and further to be combined together with modern west decision-making management thoughts. If will produce a meaningful cross-cultural comparison result of managerial decision-making thoughts, Thererfore, this research hopes to be based on modern administrative decision theory structure, analyzing ”I-Ching” Early Management Decision-making Model. Therefore, the authors, first, adopt content analysis method to find out the possible modern management decision-making constructs, i.e. single words frequently appeared in the context of ”I-Ching”. This method attempts to explore ”I-Ching”s administrative decision-making meaning contained. But the analysis result finds that even these 100 single words that appear often most are for the auxiliary word that indicates the trouble or good fortune, unable to appear what kind of obvious modern managerial decision-making meanings or concepts which it contains. Trace it to its cause, single Chinese word is difficult to be determined censured meaning in tension finally. Usually, only a whole phrase or context can be confirmed its explanations or meanings of managerial decision-making result. And then, the authors explain the managerial decision-making model of ”I-Ching”, which includes the premises, the decision contingencies, and the decision process. To represent ”I-Ching” of the eastern early managerial decision-making thought, it was turned into the vocabulary of modernized managerial decision-making academy. Then, by way of managerial decision-making academy in the comparative analysis method, ”I-Ching”s Early Management Decision-making Model is compared with Western management decision models which include rational decision-making model, bounded-rationality decision-making model, intuitive decision-making model, implicit favorite decision-making model, and garbage-can decision-making model, to tentatively interpret the similarities and differences on a great deal of managerial decision-making characteristics. ”I-Ching”s Early Management Decision-making Model is the same as bounded-rationality decision-making model, intuitive decision-making model, implicit favorite decision-making model, and garbage-can decision-making model. All these models argue that individuals are unable to reach full rationality. Because of bounded rationality, difficulty degree of managerial decision-making will increase, but a different one is that bounded-rationality decision-making model, intuitive decision-making model, and implicit favorite decision-making model argue that, the policymaker get used to choose the final solution in accordance with oneself's passing relevant experience. In other words, while managerial decision-making is processing, it emphasize the entity of policymaker, and the degree of policymaker's involvement in the decision process is very high, including setting favorite decision-making principles, choosing alternatives to be considered, and the following cost-effective evaluation. According to ”I-Ching”, managers are under the state of medium degrees of rationality, they are unable to grasp enough necessary information of carrying on managerial decisions. They must make final managerial decisions which depend on probability or life intelligence of ancient to obtain messages of predicting the future. In addition, possible variation tendency of making final decisions are seldom to be emphasized in that above-mentioned western management decision-making theories, namely comparatively lack the concept of contingency in tactics of making managerial decision. But ”I-Ching”s Early Management Decision-making Model has offered this view, it could tell sudden change possibility and provide answers of managers' state of affair in advance. It means that after the managers (the persons who divine) get alike and possible Yao of a divinatory symbol through divining, they make the final decision with the annotation of Kwa Ts'i (卦辭) and Yao Ts'i (爻辭), and making preparation in advance via the annotation of Yao's variation(move Yao's position) which points out the possible change direction of decision situation that may cause the things better or worse. Therefore, managers could build up a quasi information system to authorizing themselves to constantly revising and modifying the decision process. It lets managers have psychological preparation in advance in order to predict or accept the result of the final managerial decision result, even finely tune the behavior a little while the implementation of managerial decision carries out finally, in order to control the appearing of final managerial decision result. Therefore, we could argue that, with respect to western managerial decision-making theories, ”I-Ching”s Early Management Decision-making Model relatively allow managers more interpretation flexibility on making the final decision. In other words, ”I-Ching”s Early Management Decision-making Model permits managers to make final decisions more contingent. We can't regard the practise divination of ”I-Ching” as the mysticism. Although ”I-Ching” can give play to the role of predicting, but itself doesn't has any mysterious strength to help us to surmise the future, However, ”I-Ching” has inherent philosophy reason and concepts. By emphasizing ”I-Ching”s scientific and logical characteristics in evaluating each possible situations, its dynamic thinking holds the prediction function of divining correctly, and embody the meaning to be graspedded by it properly.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
林建煌(19940200)。孫子的策略形成與執行思想探討。中國行政,55,17-28。
延伸查詢
2.
羅庚辛(19950200)。孫子領導理論與實證研究。中國行政,57,67-88。
延伸查詢
3.
Boar, B.(1995)。Sun Tzu and Machiavelli on Strategy。Journal of Business Strategy,16(1),16-18。
4.
Frosch, R. A.(2000)。Learning from Lao Tzu: A Leadership Primer。Research Technology Management,43(3),27-28。
5.
Wong, Y. Y.、Maher, T. E.、Lee, G.(1998)。The Strategy of an Ancient Warrior: An Inspiration for International Managers。Multinational Business Review,6(1),83-93。
6.
Floyd, R. E.(1992)。The Art of War and the Art of Management。Industrial Management,34(5),25-26。
7.
Power, D. J.、Aldag, R. J.(1985)。Soelberg's job search and choice model: A clarification, review, and critique。Academy of Management Review,10(1),48-58。
8.
謝長宏、方清輝(19861100)。「論語」顯示之儒家管理理念。管理科學學報,3(2),115-128。
延伸查詢
9.
徐木蘭、余坤東、沈介文(19970300)。傳統文化中企業倫理之探討--中國古籍之研究。中山管理評論,5(1),49-73。
延伸查詢
10.
Simon, H. A.(1986)。Rationality in psychology and economics。Journal of Business,59(4),S209-S224。
11.
徐木蘭、陳必碩、許金田、蘇建勳(20030900)。臺灣資訊軟體業的生態軌跡--多元開放性組織理論的觀點。人文及社會科學集刊,15(3),431-474。
延伸查詢
12.
Katz, Robert L.(1974)。Skills of an Effective Administrator。Harvard Business Review,52(5),90-102。
13.
林國雄(19970700)。吉凶禍福的數理解析初探--以食品業為例。交大管理學報,17(2),81-97。
延伸查詢
14.
楊宏聲(1996)。西方「易經」研究的傾向及思考,上。中華易學,17(6),59-62。
延伸查詢
15.
楊宏聲(1996)。西方「易經」研究的傾向及思考,中。中華易學,17(7),64-67。
延伸查詢
16.
楊宏聲(1996)。西方「易經」研究的傾向及思考,下。中華易學,17(8),69-72。
延伸查詢
17.
楊石隱(1996)。儒家思想與管理的關係。孔學與人生,4,89-93。
延伸查詢
18.
曾仕強(1991)。管理講究象數理占-易經在管理上的四大功能。管理雜誌,209,140-144。
延伸查詢
19.
張文儒(1994)。「孫子兵法」與現代科學思惟。哲學與文化,21(1),74-83。
延伸查詢
20.
Behling, O.、Eckel, N. L.(1991)。Making Sense out of Intuition。The Academy of Management Executive,February,46-47。
21.
Forester, J.(1984)。Bounded Rationality and the Politics of Muddling Through。Public Administration Review,January-February,23-31。
22.
Hensler, D. A.、Edgeman, R. L.、Guerrero-Cusumano, J. L.(2000)。East Meets West: Weaving the Threads of Deming, da Vinci and the Tao Te Ching。Total Quality Management,11(4/6),501-508。
23.
徐志銳(1991)。「周易」經綸治國論-陰陽說與管理科學。中華易學,12(10),15-21。
延伸查詢
24.
羅庚辛(1996)。孔子管理思想在臺灣企業管理實務上應用情況之調查研究。中國行政,60,47-79。
延伸查詢
25.
Rarick, C. A.(1996)。Ancient Chinese Advice for Modern Business Strategists。Sam Advanced Management Journal,Winter,38-43。
26.
Simon, H. A.(1987)。Making Management Decisions: The Role of Intuition and Emotion。The Academy of Management Executive,February,59-60。
27.
Soelberg, P. O.(1967)。Unprogrammed Decision Making。Industrial Management Review,Spring,19-29。
28.
Wee, C. H.(1994)。Sun Tzu's Art of War: Selected Applications to Strategic Thinking and Business Practices。International Review of Strategic Management,5,83-109。
研究報告
1.
謝雲飛(1995)。Probing into the Modern's Personnel Management from Han Feizi's Skill。0。
學位論文
1.
黃鶯杉(1986)。Management Thoughts of "Military School's Thought" - Strategy and Implementation,0。
2.
管偉宏(1998)。A New Classification of Organization Climate on the Basis of Change the Theory,0。
圖書
1.
施純協、孫劍秋(2000)。易經與企業經營。臺北市:知行文化事業公司。
延伸查詢
2.
楊先舉(1996)。老子管理學。臺北:遠流出版事業公司。
延伸查詢
3.
李世俊、楊先舉、賈家瑞(1995)。活用孫子兵法,經營篇:經營者的決策 / 管理 / 行銷 / 領導寶典。臺北市:遠流。
延伸查詢
4.
Kreitner, Robert、Kinicki, Angelo(2001)。Organizational Behavior。New York, NY:McGraw-Hill。
5.
Greenberg, J.(1999)。Managing Behavior in Organizations。Prentice-Hall。
6.
Robbins, Stephen P.(2003)。Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies, applications。Prentice-Hall, Inc.。
7.
Simon, H. A.(1997)。Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization。New York:Free Press。
8.
Berelson, Bernard(1952)。Content analysis in communication research。Free Press。
9.
Budd, Richard W.、Thorp, Robert K.、Donohew, Lewis(1967)。Content Analysis of Communications。Macmillan Publishing Company。
10.
楊國樞(1988)。中國人的銳變。中國人的銳變。臺北市。
延伸查詢
11.
余英時(1996)。Religion Ethics and Businessman's Spirit in Modern times in China。Religion Ethics and Businessman's Spirit in Modern times in China。Taipei。
12.
曾仕強(1997)。Management Theory of I-Ching in 21st Century。Management Theory of I-Ching in 21st Century。Taipei。
13.
程振清、何成正(1999)。易經與現代管理。易經與現代管理。臺北縣新店市。
延伸查詢
14.
Harrison, E. F.(1981)。The Managerial Decision-making Process。The Managerial Decision-making Process。Boston, MA。
15.
Klein, G.(1998)。Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions。Cambridge:MIT Press。
16.
March, J. G.、Olsen, J. P.(1986)。Garbage-can Models of Decision Making in Organizations。Ambiguity and Command: Decision Making in Military Organizations。0。
圖書論文
1.
楊孝濚(1989)。內容分析。社會及行為科學研究法。臺北市:東華。
延伸查詢
2.
Bowers, John W.(1970)。Content Analysis。Methods of Research in Communication。Houghton Mifflin。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
臺灣產業史的軌跡--以製傘業為例
2.
易經的管理實務應用模式
3.
《韓非子》與西方人力資源管理內涵之系統性比較
4.
從內家修練看「資源基礎觀」的資源建構機制
5.
以多元組織理論觀點探討電腦周邊產業生態發展軌跡
6.
中國社會主義環境下代理問題與組織道德對經理人專案評估決策之影響
7.
詭道與動態能力之對比
8.
中國式領導對學校領導的省思與啟示
9.
《孫子兵法》與西方策略管理思想之系統性比較
10.
新儒學經營因果循環分析未採用聯立方程法的論述
11.
管理學研究的跨域與融合
12.
臺灣網際網路加值產業生態演進之探索--開放性組織理論的觀點
13.
綠色採購與ISO 14001環境管理之互動模式研究
14.
倫理評價、倫理判斷與行為意圖關係之研究--以不動產仲介從業人員為例
15.
中國式領導理論的發展和應用
1.
多國籍企業和平文化經營理念與員工士氣關係之研究-兼論企業倫理政策落實程度之中介效果
2.
跨部門及組織間協力關係網之研究: 以多元就業開發方案中彰投區為例
3.
從中西方觀點建構謙讓概念以及驗證謙讓對職權、信任與順服之調節效果
4.
整合的公司創業動態模型:以綠能科技為例
5.
我國製造業安全領導風險知覺與安全績效之相關研究
6.
我國政府機關主管領導行為、向下影響策略與領導效能關係之研究
1.
企業倫理的重要性與發展
2.
職場員工的工作倫理
3.
職場倫理的內涵
4.
從孫子兵法的戰略思維探討資訊科技的策略決策
5.
台灣的組織行為研究 : 過去、現在及未來
無相關著作
1.
易學的審美觀及其對中國繪畫的影響
2.
易經哲學的時中理念
3.
論中國經典詮釋的二個基型:直釋與旁通--以《易經》的詮釋為例
4.
易經思維的身體觀和太極導引身體體現的相關探討
5.
《易經》形式結構中所蘊涵之義理
QR Code