資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.191.201.95)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
成人依附的測量:成人世界中不同依附對象的測量差異與關連
書刊名:
中華心理衛生學刊
作者:
孫頌賢
/
修慧蘭
作者(外文):
Sun, Sung-hsien
/
Hsu, Hui-lan
出版日期:
2007
卷期:
20:1
頁次:
頁31-51
主題關鍵詞:
成人依附
;
成人依附光譜假說
;
依附對象
;
依附轉換模式
;
Adult attachment
;
The hypothetical continuum of adult attachment measures
;
Attachment objects
;
A model of attachment transfer processes
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
7
) 博士論文(
3
) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
6
共同引用:
20
點閱:156
研究目的:本研究欲比較關係特質取向(有指定對象,包括父、母、愛情)與個人特質取向(無特定對象)等兩種測量成人依附風格的差異性,並依據成人依附光譜假說與依附轉換模式,探討所得測量結果之間一維光譜的關連性,以及愛情依附與個人特質依附風格與親子依附風格之相關。研究方法:研究樣本共計185名大學生,男性59人,女性125人,平均年齡約19.95歲。以Bartholomew成人依附短文描述句為研究工具,請受試者依不同對象進行歸類,並以卡方檢定與MDS分析。研究結果:1.有無特定對象的依附風格歸類結果具差異性;2.光譜假說未獲得支持,但愛情依附風格與個人特質依附風格兩者分別與親子依附風格的分類結果有關連。研究結論:若依附測量需針對特定對象卻以無特定對象方式進行測量,會有高估不安全依附歸類的現象;個人特質上的不安全依附歸類結果與親子的不安全依附有關,愛情關係上的安全依附歸類結果則與親子的安全依附有關。
以文找文
Purpose: Bartholomew has integrated Bowlby's theory of internal working models in a four category classification scheme. Four prototypical adult attachment styles were measured in this study, including secure, preoccupied, fearful, and dismissing attachment styles. However, in the past, most of adult attachment researches ignored the difference between with-specific-object and without-specific-object measures. Therefore, the past results of adult attachment category had been criticized their over-evaluated or underevaluated trend. This study attempted to compare the difference between the two ways of measuring the adult attachment styles: relationship character approach (with specific objects, e.g., father, mother, or a dating partner) and individual character approach (without specific objects). Based on the hypothetical continuum of adult attachment (Bartholomew & Shaver, 1998) and the model of attachment transfer processes (Hazan & Shaver, 1994), this study also tried to investigate the one-way continuum correlation between the results of the different measurements, and the correlation among the results from dating relationship attachment styles, individual attachment styles, and parental attachment styles. The figure of hypothetical continuum of adult attachment indicated that when appropriate comparisons were drawn, one would find considerable evidence for convergence across various measures of adult attachment. This study supposed that the results of the measurements of adult attachment category with specific objects would be different from the measurements of adult attachment category without specific objects. Besides, according to the model of attachment transfer processes, the results of category in parental attachment styles would be positive correlated with the results of category in dating relationship attachment styles, and the results of category in parental attachment styles would be also positive correlated with the results of category in personal attachment styles. Methods: The study sample consisted of 185 college students, including 59 males and 125 females, and their average age was 19.95 years. None of them were from single family, and 61.6% students were living with their parents. Bartholomew's paragraph-long description form was used to categorize adult attachment styles. In addition, we conducted chi-square test and MDS to analyze the data. Results: First, there were differences between the results of the measurements of adult attachment category with specific objects and the measurements of adult attachment without specific objects. Second, the hypothetical continuum of adult attachment measures was not supported by MDS. Finally, there were positive correlations between dating relationship attachment styles and parental attachment styles, and between personal attachment styles and parental attachment styles. Conclusions: The article concluded with a discussion of unclear questions about adult attachment that rose from various measurement perspectives. First, this study supported that insecure parental attachment would be over-evaluated if without specific-object measurement of attachment styles was used to measure with-specific-object attachment styles. There is no 'best choice' between the two measured approaches. If one adult attachment research investigates specific situation (e.g., love relationship, peer relationship, mentor relationship, or parental relationship), the research will suggest that the way of measuring the adult attachment styles should use relationship character approach (with specific objects). Second, according to the model of attachment transfer processes, attachment style in personal character and in dating relationship were both positive correlate with attachment styles in parental relationships. More specifically, the insecure attachment style in personal character was positive related to the insecure attachment style in parental attachment, and the secure style in dating relationship was positive related to the secure style in parental attachment. In addition, implication for adult attachment measures in adult relationships was discussed. Research limitation was also explicated.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
王慶福(20000300)。當男孩愛上女孩:人際依附風格類型搭配、愛情關係與關係適應之研究。中華輔導學報,8,177-201。
延伸查詢
2.
Collins, N. L.、Read, S. J.(1990)。Adult Attachment, Working Models, and Relationship Quality in Dating Couples。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,58(4),644-663。
3.
Green, R. G.、Vosler, N. R.(1992)。Issues in the assessment of family practice: An empirical study。Journal of Social Service Research,15(3/4),1-19。
4.
Hazan, Cindy、Shaver, Phillip R.(1994)。Attachment as an organizational framework for research on close relationships。Psychological Inquiry,5(1),1-22。
5.
Pinsof, William M.(1992)。Toward a Scientific Paradigm for Family Psychology: The Integrative Process Systems Perspective。Journal of Family Psychology,5(3/4),432-447。
6.
Bartholomew, Kim、Horowitz, Leonard M.(1991)。Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,61(2),226-244。
7.
Hazan, Cindy、Shaver, Phillip R.(1987)。Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52(3),511-524。
8.
Duemmler, S. L.、Kobak, R.(2001)。Attachment Security as Relationship Construct。Journal of Adolescence,24,401-415。
9.
Lewis, M.(1994)。Does Attachment Imply a Relationship or Multiple Relation?。Psychological Inquiry,5(1),47-51。
10.
Berlin, L. J.、Cassidy, J.(2001)。Enhancing Early Child-parent Relationships: Implications of Adult Attachment Research。Infants & Young Children,14(2),64-76。
11.
Weiss, R. S.(1994)。Is the Attachment System of Adults a Development of Bowlby's Attachment Systems of Childhood?。Psychological Inquiry,5(1),65-67。
學位論文
1.
黃鈴喬(1998)。不同依附風格夫妻之關係期望 婚姻溝通與婚姻調適之關係研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。
延伸查詢
2.
何春慧(2000)。大學生的社會焦慮與其相關因素之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學,臺北市。
延伸查詢
3.
黃于娟(1994)。性別、依附風格與自我坦露、幽默、撒嬌之關係(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。
延伸查詢
4.
林秀娟(1999)。南區大學生依附類型與其性知識、性態度、性行為之關係研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。
延伸查詢
5.
邱碧慧(1994)。不同依附類型之成人在人際互動中的歸因差異,0。
延伸查詢
6.
羅立人(1999)。大學生的依附風格與寂寞感之相關研究,0。
延伸查詢
7.
陳勤惠(2000)。焦慮矛盾依附的女大學生之情傷經驗研究,0。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
費孝通(1948)。鄉土中國。香港:鳳凰出版社。
延伸查詢
2.
Teyber, Edward(2000)。Interpersonal Process in Psychotherapy--A Relational Approach。Pacific Grove, CA:Brooks/Cole/Thomson Learning。
3.
Solomon, Richard H.(1971)。Mao's Revolution and the Chinese Political Culture。Berkeley:University of California Press。
4.
Johnson, S. M.、Whiffen, V. E.(2003)。Attachment Processes in Couple and Family Therapy。New York, NY:Guilford Press。
5.
Fraley, R. C.、Waller, N. G.(1998)。Adult Attachment Patterns: A Test of the Typological。Attachment Theory and Close Relationship。New York, NY。
6.
Bartholomew, K.、Shaver, P. R.(1998)。Method of Assessing Adult Attachment: Do They Converge?。Attachment Theory and Close Relationship。New York, NY。
7.
Feeney, J. A.(1999)。Adult Romantic Attachment and Couple Relationships。Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Application。New York, NY。
單篇論文
1.
George, C.,Kaplan, N.,Main, M.(1985)。An Adult Attachment Interview: Interview Protocol,Berkeley, California:Department of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley。
圖書論文
1.
葉光輝(2002)。關係主義:論華人人際互動關係的要素、來源及變化歷程。從現代到本土:慶賀楊國樞教授七秩華誕論文集。台北:遠流。
延伸查詢
2.
Johnson, S. M.(2003)。Introduction to attachment : A therapist's guide to primary relationships and their renewal。Attachment processes in couple and family therapy。NY:The Guilford Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
公眾自我意識在年輕成人的父母依附與獨處經驗之中介角色分析研究
2.
婚姻治療中依戀創傷者的人我意義改變
3.
諮商初期晤談感受與諮商滿意之研究:以大學諮商中心焦慮依附風格傾向之學生為例
4.
兒時身體不當對待與成年女性之親密關係發展探究
5.
焦慮依附風格個案在諮商初期的晤談感受、工作同盟與諮商滿意之關係研究
6.
大學生親密關係中不同依附類型與性嫉妒之相關研究
7.
深情相擁:情緒取向未婚伴侶心理教育團體
8.
建立愛情關係中伴侶間人際行爲測量工具之研究
9.
大學生家庭價值觀、人際關係依附風格與婚姻態度之相關研究--以高雄市為例
10.
家庭分化與家庭暴力經驗對愛情依戀的預測
11.
以自重與尊重對方為導向之國中青少女戀愛關係團體諮商方案成效研究
12.
人際依附風格在MSN個人訊息聯繫情誼的動機與策略之差異研究:異性友誼觀點
13.
大學生共依附、愛情關係與分手調適之相關研究
14.
大學生親子三角關係配對類型及其親密關係滿意度:一個對偶資料的分析研究
15.
癌末病患家屬面臨喪慟因應行為、人際依附型態與預期性哀慟反應相關之研究
1.
華人家庭倫理脈絡下諮商師透過個人心理治療與母親情感關係改變之研究
2.
國中青少女戀愛關係團體諮商方案之成效研究
3.
團體層次與個人層次變項對於團體治療性因素的影響:多層次縱貫研究分析
4.
大學生伴侶間人際行為對愛情依附的影響
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
依附關係、低自我控制與青少年偏差行為關聯性之研究
2.
情緒抑制缺損或策略判斷失當?依附焦慮行為不適切性之機制檢驗
3.
成人依戀量表臺灣修訂版的心理計量特性與預測心理適應之探討
4.
成人依附、社交自我效能、困擾的自我揭露、寂寞與憂鬱之關係:以有戀愛經驗的大學生為例
5.
青少年知覺之家人關係型態與幸福感
6.
「中學生人際關係量表」之發展
7.
非行少年依附、解釋風格與自我概念之相關研究
8.
不同成人依附型態大學生在網路成癮傾向上之差異
9.
青少年的親子關係與共依附特質之相關研究
10.
An Empirical Study of Attachment, Psychosocial Adjustment, and Interpersonal Relationship in Adolescence
11.
大學生的成人依附、社交能力、社會支持、寂寞與憂鬱之關係
QR Code