:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:非行少年依附、解釋風格與自我概念之相關研究
書刊名:輔導與諮商學報
作者:陳淑貞翁毓秀 引用關係
作者(外文):Chen, Shu-chenWeng, Betty Y.
出版日期:2006
卷期:28:1
頁次:頁29-49
主題關鍵詞:非行少年依附解釋風格自我概念Delinquency adolescentAttachmentExplanatory styleSelf-concept
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(11) 博士論文(5) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:11
  • 共同引用共同引用:108
  • 點閱點閱:150
本研究旨在探討非行少年之依附、解釋風格與自我概念之間的關係。 本研究以「青少年自我態度問卷」為研究工具,採問卷調查法,以台中高分院管轄之台中、彰化、苗栗及南投等四個地方法院,共296位保護管束少年為研究對象。調查結果以描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關及典型相關等統計方法進行分析與假設考驗。研究結果摘要如下: 一、非行少年之自我概念以學校我最高,學業我最低。不同性別非行少年的整體自我概念及情緒我有差異;不同教育程度非行少年的整體自我概念及能力我、學校我、生理我有差異;不同父母婚姻狀況非行少年的家庭我有差異。 二、非行少年的同儕依附最高、父親依附最低。 三、非行少年對正向事件,做內在、穩定、普遍性中等歸因;對負向事件,作內在、恆久性中等、特定歸因。不同教育程度非行少年對正向事件恆久性及普遍性有差異。 四、非行少年父親依附、母親依附、同儕依附及正向事件普遍性解釋風格與學校我、能力我、家庭我及生理我具典型相關存在。 本研究針對以上結果加以討論,並提出建議。
The purpose of the study is to explore the relationships between the attachment, explanatory style and self-concept of delinquent adolescents in central part of Taiwan. This is a quantitative research. The "Adolescents' Self Attitude Questionnaire" is introduced as the research measurement to collect the necessary data.. The measurement includes three subscales, which are "Inventory of Parent and Peer Attachment", "Explanatory Style Inventory for High School Student" and "Self-concept Scale and the Adolescents". The MANOVA, T-test, Pearson Correlation and Canonical Correlation were chosen as the statistics. The results are as follows. 1. For delinquent adolescents, the self-concept is above average, the score of school-self is the highest, and the score of achievement-self is the lowest. The total self-concept and emotion-self are different by gender; the total self-concept, ability-self, school-self and physical-self are different by educational levels; the family-self is different by marital status. 2. For the area of attachment, mother attachment is the highest, father attachment is the lowest. 3. For the area of explanatory style, delinquent adolescents explain positive events as "internal、stable、median pervasiveness" attribution, and explain negative events as "internal、median permanence、specific" attribution. 4. Father attachment, mother attachment, peer attachment and permanence of explanatory style to positive events are canonical correlated to school-self, ability-self, family-self and physical-self. Concrete recommendations are proposed for delinquent adolescents, probation officers, parents, teachers and school counselors.
期刊論文
1.林瑞欽(19990600)。未犯罪與犯罪青少年之自我意像比較研究。犯罪學期刊,4,153-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.O'Koon, J.(1997)。Attachment to parents and peers in late adolescence and their relationship with self-image。Adolescence,32(126),471-482。  new window
3.Ainsworth, M. D. S.(1979)。Infant-mother attachment。American Psychologist,34(10),932-937。  new window
4.Ainsworth, M. D. S.(1989)。Attachments beyond infancy。American Psychologist,44(4),709-716。  new window
5.周愫嫻(20011100)。蛻變的青春--青少年自我概念形成原因之兩性差異。臺北市立師範學院學報,32,375-396。  延伸查詢new window
6.Decovic, M.、Meeus, W.(1997)。Peer relations in adolescence: Effects of parenting arid adolescents’ self-concept。Journal of Adolescence,20(2),163-176。  new window
7.鄭瑞隆(20000600)。暴力犯罪少年家庭特徵與家庭生活體驗。犯罪學期刊,5,49-78。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Abramson, L. Y.、Seligman, M. E. P.、Teasdale, J. D.(1978)。Learned Helplessness in Humans: Critique and Reformulation。Journal of Abnormal Psychology,87(1),49-74。  new window
9.邱皓政(20030300)。自我概念向度與成份雙維理論之效度檢驗與相關因素研究。教育與心理研究,26(1),85-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.王碧朗(20010600)。依附理論--探索人類情感的發展。教育研究資訊,9(3),68-85+a6。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.侯崇文(20010900)。家庭結構、家庭關係與青少年偏差行為探討。應用心理研究,11,25-43。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Kaitz, M., Bar-Haim, Y., Lehrer, M.,、Grossman, E.(2004)。Adult attachment style and interpersonal distance。Attachment & human development,6(3),285-304。  new window
13.Kao, E. M.、Nagata, D. K.、Peterson, C.(1997)。Explanatory style, family expressiveness, and self-esteem among Asian American and European American college students。The Journal of Social Psychology,137(4),435-444。  new window
14.Leung, J. P.,、Leung, K.(1992)。Life satisfaction, self-concept, and relationship with parents in adolescence。Journal of youth and adolescence,21(6),653-665。  new window
15.Levy,K. C.(1997)。The contributional of self-concept in the etiology of adolescent delinquency。Adolescence,32(127),671-686。  new window
16.Levy,K. C.(1997)。Multifactorial self-concept and delinquency in Austrialian adolescents。The Journal of social psychology,137(3),277-283。  new window
17.Poon, W. T.,、Lau, S.(1999)。Coping with failure: relationship with self-concept discrepancy and attributional style。The journal of social psychology,139 (5),639-653。  new window
18.Sakamoto, S.,、Kambara, M.(1998)。A longitudinal study of the relationship between attributional style, life events, and depression in Japanese undergraduates。The journal of social psychology,138 (2),229-240。  new window
19.Shavelson, R. J.,、Byrne, B. M.(1986)。One the structure of adolescent self-concept。Journal of educational psychology,78(6),474-481。  new window
20.Shavelson, R. J.、Hubner, J. J.、Stanton, G. C.(1976)。Validation of construct and interpretations。Review of educational research,46,407-441。  new window
學位論文
1.李君儀(2004)。犯罪少年與非犯罪少年法律集體意識之比較研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳培綺(2002)。輔導工作對犯罪少年生活適應成效之相關研究--以少年矯正學校為例(碩士論文)。靜宜大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.高民凱(2001)。中學生解釋風格量表之編製及其效度研究(碩士論文)。彰化師範大學,彰化市。  延伸查詢new window
4.林世欣(2000)。國中學生自我概念與同儕關係之相關研究(碩士論文)。屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳琦茂(2000)。少年父母教養知覺與親子衝突之研究--未犯罪與犯罪少年之比較(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.紀怡如(2002)。國中生依附關係、壓力知覺與其因應策略之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.張玉玲(2000)。尋找挑戰難題、打死不退的學生:國中學生解釋風格、自尊、學業失敗忍受力與挑戰學業難題行為之研究(碩士論文)。彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
8.張芝鳳(2000)。青少年與父母以及與同儕間的依附關係對其自我價值之影響研究(碩士論文)。國立花蓮師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
9.周珍珍(2001)。犯罪青少年自尊、困擾問題及其因應行為之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
10.柳勝國(1999)。一般少年與非行少年自我概念之比較(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
11.許瑞蘭(2002)。國中生依附關係、人際問題解決態度與學校生活適應之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立屏東師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
12.林家屏(2002)。青少年自我概念與行為困擾之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立成功大學。  延伸查詢new window
13.張秋蘭(2000)。青少年依附關係、自我尊重與身心健康之相關研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
14.陳美冠(2004)。犯罪青少年依附關係、解釋風格與自尊之研究(碩士論文)。國立彰化師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
15.陳建安(2001)。犯罪少年與一般少年到得認知發展之比較研究,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
16.蔡居邦(1999)。犯罪少年犯罪思考型態與偏差行為之研究,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.李淑娥(2001)。面對自己。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.Seligman, Martin E. P.、洪蘭(1997)。學習樂觀,樂觀學習。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
3.周愫嫻(2004)。少年犯罪。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林瑞欽(2002)。青少年暴力犯罪之成因--心理因素。青少年暴力行為 : 原因、類型與對策。臺北市:五南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE