:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:不動產有效稅率對房價影響分析--以臺北市大同區與內湖區為例
書刊名:臺灣土地研究
作者:彭建文 引用關係吳森田吳祥華
作者(外文):Peng, Chien-wenWu, Sun-tienWu, Shyang-hua
出版日期:2007
卷期:10:2
頁次:頁49-66
主題關鍵詞:不動產有效稅率不動產名目稅率資本化率資本化效果房價Effective property tax rateNominal property tax rateCapitalization rateCapitalization effectHousing prices
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(23) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:21
  • 共同引用共同引用:60
  • 點閱點閱:197
以往有關不動產稅對於房價影響的文獻,主要探討不同地區不動產稅率差異的資本化效果,本文認為即使不同地區的不動產名目稅率完全相同下,不動產有效稅率的差異亦會反映在房價上。本研究利用台北市大同區與內湖區的實際不動產交易案例推估其不動產有效稅率,發現兩者平均有效稅率約在0.0886% 到0.1304% 之間,明顯低於加權不動產名目稅率0.6% 約5倍之多。由房價影響因素的實證結果來看,雖然台灣各縣市名目的地價稅率與房屋稅率完全相同,但不動產有效稅率的提高確實會使房價降低,當不動產有效稅率每增加一個百分點,房價將會降低 2.02% 。在完全資本化假設下,若將不動產有效稅率與其加權名目稅率間的差額透過資本化率予以還原,以3% 的資本化率加以計算,房價應下降約15% 左右,依此計算台灣不動產稅的資本化效果約13% ,較國外一般不動產稅的資本化效果為低,背後隱含仍有相當高比例的不動產稅賦將轉嫁給購屋者負擔。
Most of the literature that discusses the effect of property taxes on housing values has focused on the degree of capitalization of the property taxes in different areas under different nominal tax rates. We argue that even under a uniform nominal tax rate across different areas, the difference of effective property tax rates will affect housing values. We try to provide some solid evidence in this regard with a careful estimation of the true effective tax rates of properties transacted in two representative districts of Taipei, Ta-Tung and Nei-Hu. After careful estimation, we found that the average effective rates for the sampled properties in the combined districts range from 0.0886 precent to 0.1304 precent. These rates account for only one-fifth of the weighted nominal rate stipulated by the authorities. From the empirical results, we found that the lifting of the effective property tax rate has significant negative effects on housing prices. When the effective property rate increases 1 percent, housing prices will decrease by 2.02 percent. With a 3 percent discount rate and infinite house life to discount the difference between the nominal tax rate and effective property tax rate, housing prices will drop 15 percent. The capitalization rate is about 13 percent, much lower than in other countries.
期刊論文
1.華昌宜(1997)。地價稅的意義與住宅建設。住宅學報,5,57-58。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.華昌宜(19940600)。最適房地價稅率及其在臺灣政策應用之探討。人文及社會科學集刊,6(2),63-77。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.彭建文、張金鶚(20000600)。預期景氣與宣告效果對房地產景氣影響之研究。管理學報,17(2),343-368。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Oates, W. E.(1969)。The Effect of Property Taxes and Local Public Spending on Property Values: An Empirical Study of Tax Capitalization and the Tiebout Hypothesis。Journal of Political Economy,77(6),957-971。  new window
5.彭建文、花敬群(2001)。住宅租買選擇行為之探討―住宅服務品質差異之影響。臺灣土地金融季刊,38(4),89-107。  延伸查詢new window
6.Capozza, D. R.、Helsley, R. W.(1989)。The fundamentals of land prices and urban growth。Journal of Urban Economics,26,295-306。  new window
7.謝文盛、林素菁(20000200)。租稅效果對住宅租買選擇影響之分析。住宅學報,9(1),1-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.周良惠(19990600)。地價稅與房屋稅對土地利用之經濟效果分析。土地經濟年刊,10,249-281。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.蔡吉源、林健次(19990900)。我國土地稅制下地價稅與土地增值稅對地價的影響。財稅研究,31(5),1-19。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Tiebout, Charles M.(1956)。A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures。Journal of Political Economy,64(5),416-424。  new window
11.彭建文(20041200)。臺灣出租住宅市場與自有住宅市場價格調整關係之研究。都市與計劃,31(4),391-412。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.梁仁旭(1998)。地價稅率變動對土地開發影響之理論與實證分析。土地經濟年刊,9,163-181。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.Brueckner, J. K.(1986)。A Modem Analysis of the Effects of Site Value Taxation。National Tax Journal,34(1),49-58。  new window
14.Bourassa, S. C.(1992)。Economic Effect of Taxes on Land: A Review。The American Journal of Economics and Sociology,51(1),109-114。  new window
15.Lea, M. J.(1982)。Local Tax and Expenditure Capitalization: Integration Evidence from the Market and Political Process。Public Finance Quarterly,10(1),95-117。  new window
16.Richardson, D. H.、Thalheimer, R.(1981)。Measuring the Extent of Property Tax Capitalization for Single Family Residences。Southern Economic Journal,47(3),674-689。  new window
17.Palmon, O.、Smith, B. A.(1998)。New Evidence on Property Tax Capitalization。Journal of Political Economy,106(5),1099-1111。  new window
18.Krantz, D. P.、Weaver, R. D.、Alter, T. R.(1982)。Residential Property Tax Capitalization: Consistent Estimates Using-micro Data。Land Economics,58(4),488-496。  new window
19.Edwards, M. E.(1984)。Site Value Taxation in Australia: Where Land is Taxed More Improvement Less, Average Housing Value and Stock Are Higher。The American Journal of Economics and Sociology,43(4),481-495。  new window
20.Grieson, R. E.(1974)。The Economics of Property Taxes and Land Value: The Elasticity of Supply of Structure。Journal of Urban Economics,1(4),367-381。  new window
21.Guilfoyle, J. P.(2000)。The Effect of Property Taxes on Home Values。Journal of Real Estate Literature,8(2),111-127。  new window
22.Bentick, B. L.(1979)。The Impact of Taxation and Valuation Practices in the Timing and Efficiency of Land Use。Journal of Political Economy,87(4),859-868。  new window
23.Lin, C. C.(1993)。The Relationship between Rents and Price of Owner-occupied Housing in Taiwan。The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics,6(1),25-54。  new window
24.Capozza, D. R.、Helsley, R. W.(1990)。The Stochastic City。Journal of Urban Economics,28(5),187-203。  new window
學位論文
1.李如君(1997)。台北地區住宅租金水準之研究(碩士論文)。國立政治大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.DiPasqual, Denise、Wheaton, William C.(1996)。Urban Economics and Real Estate Markets。Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey:Prentice Hall。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bloom, H. S.、Ladd, H. F.、Yinger, J.(1983)。Are Property Taxes Capitalized into House Value?。Local Provision of Public Service: The Tiebout Model After Twenty-Five Years。New York, NY:Academic Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE