:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:關於Candrakīrti的二諦說中的幾個問題(下)
書刊名:法鼓佛學學報
作者:釋見弘 引用關係
作者(外文):Shi, Jien-hong
出版日期:2007
卷期:1
頁次:頁1-33
主題關鍵詞:CandrakīrtSatyadvayaSa□v□tisatyaSvabhāva月稱二諦
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(1) 專書論文(1)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:73
本論文旨在針對眾多研究月稱 Candrakīrti 的二諦說(satyadvaya)的論文 中,未曾注意到或未曾詳細探究的若干問題點,加以進一步的檢討。本篇(下 篇)重點放在月稱所主張的世俗諦與自性(svabhāva)之關連。依據月稱的陳 述,世俗諦之確立與「有自性」一事,是密不可分的。因為無明凡夫誤以為事 物有自性, 執此為真實, 佛陀乃說它不是真實的自性, 是「世俗諦」 (saṃvṛtisatya)。但相對於此,月稱也多次強調:「於二諦中都沒有自性。」如 何整合地理解這二個立場,是本論文的出發點。由此疑問點出發,在分析檢視 了《入中論》Madhyamakāvatāra-bhāṣya 及《明句論》Prasannapadā 等著作 中,關於世俗諦設立基準的相關描述之後,筆者發現與「自性」有著二重面向 關係的「世俗諦」,不論是在佛教真理論的建立或是修道論乃至教育論的施設 上,都擔負極重要的功能。因此,筆者以為,與其從斷絕的角度來理解月稱的 二諦說,不如從「它與勝義諦是相輔相成的」之動態(dynamic)立場來觀 察,更能掌握其二諦說的精髓。
This article deals with various issues in Candrakīrti’s theory of two truths that have not been addressed in detail by scholars. As the second of two articles, it deals with Candrakīrti’s association of svabhāva with conventional truth. According to Candrakīrti, the establishment of conventional truth is closely related to possession of svabhāva. Because reality for ordinary deluded people is formed by their attachments to what they mistakenly believe to be svabhāva, the Buddha explains that svabhāva is not real, but should be understood as conventional truth (saṃvṛtisatya). In contrast with this, Candrakīrti also frequently states that svabhāva does not exist in either of the two truths. This article is an attempt to reconcile these two positions. As such, it analyzes Candrakīrti’s descriptions of the criteria for establishing conventional truth in the Madhyamakāvatāra-bhāṣya and Prasannapadā. It is found that because of svabhāva’s twofold relationship with conventional truth, the latter plays an important role in the establishment of a theory of truth, a theory of religious practice, and even of a theory of educational methods. As a result, the author finds that, rather than interpreting Candrakīrti’s theory of two truths from a perspective of discontinuity, if we regard it from a dynamic perspective in which it is complementary to the ultimate truth, we may gain a deeper understanding of the theory of two truths.
期刊論文
1.三友健容(1972)。『俱舎論』におけるsvabhävaについて。印度學佛教學研究,21(1),359-362。  延伸查詢new window
2.小澤千晶氏(2006)。清辨と相互依存の緣起。印度學佛教學研究,55(1),454-458。  延伸查詢new window
3.丹治昭義(1987)。チャンドラキルテイの自立論證批判。南都佛教,57,51-81。  延伸查詢new window
4.吉水千鶴子(1997)。Upādāyaprajñaptiについて--MūlamadhyamakakārikāXXIV18を考える。成田山佛教研究所紀要,20,95-155。  延伸查詢new window
5.李泰昇(2004)。中観學派における緣起の概念--此緣性--について。印度學佛教學研究,105(53-1),141-143。  延伸查詢new window
6.赤羽律氏(2003)。年確定の指標としてavicāraikaramaņīya。南都佛,83,33-59。  延伸查詢new window
7.船山徹(2002)。捨身の思想--六朝佛敎史の一斷面。東方學報,74,311-358。  延伸查詢new window
8.宮下晴輝(1997)。有部の論書における自性の用例。仏教セミナᅳ,65,80-94。  延伸查詢new window
9.Poussin, Louis de La Valée(1911)。Madhyamakāvatāra, Introduction au Traité du milieu du I'Ācārya Candrakirti avec le commentaire de l’auteur, traduit d’aprés la version tibétaine。Muséon,12,235-328。  new window
10.Ames, W. L.(1982)。The Notion of svabhāva in the Thought of Candrakirti。Toumal of Indian Philosophy,10,161-177。  new window
11.齋藤明(1981)。空七十註におけるCandrakirtiの二諦解釈。印度學佛教學研究,29(2),156-157。  延伸查詢new window
12.Yoshimizu, Chizuko(1994)。On ran gi mtsban nid kyis grub pa III。Journal of Naritasan Institute for Buddhist Studies,17,343-348。  new window
圖書
1.de La Vaiée Poussin, Louis(1907)。Madhyamakāvatāra par Candrakīrti。St. Pétersbourg。  new window
2.Nagao, G. M.(1964)。Madhyāntavibhāgabhāsya a Buddhist philosophical treatise edited for the first time from a Sanskrit manuscript。Tokyo:Suzuki Research Foundation。  new window
3.de La Valée Poussin, Louis(1903)。Mūlamadhyamakakārikās de Nāgārjuna, avec la prasannapadā commentaire de Candrakīrti。St. Pétersbourg。  new window
4.de La Valée Poussin, Louis(1901)。Prajnākaramati's Commentary to the Bodhicaryāvatāra of Śāntideva。Calcutta。  new window
5.Suzuki, Kōshin(1994)。Sanskrit Fragments and Tibetan Translation of Candrakīrti's Bodh isattvayogācāracatuhśatakaţīkā。Tokyo:Sankibo Press。  new window
6.Hayashima, K.、Takasaki, J.、Yamaguchi, Z.、Ejima, Y.(1978)。sDe dge edition of the Madhyamakāvatāra-bhāsya = sDe dge Tibetan Tripiţaka bsTan hgyur- preserved at the Faculty of Letters, University of Tokyo (Dbu mā)。Tokyo:University of Tokyo。  new window
7.Wagihara, U.(1971)。Bodhisattvabhūmi。Tokyo:Sankibo Buddhist Book Store。  new window
8.Scherrer-Schaub, Cristina Anna(1991)。Yuktişaţikāvrtti Commentaire à la soixantaine sur le raisonnement ou Du vrai enseignement de la causalité par le Maître indien Candrakīrti。Bruxelle:Institut Beige des Hautes Etudes Chinoises。  new window
9.上田昇(1994)。チャンドラキ--ルティ著『四百論注』第ᅳ~八章和譯。東京:山喜房佛書林。  延伸查詢new window
10.小川一乘(1976)。空性思想の研究--人中論の解讀。京都:文榮堂。  延伸查詢new window
11.丹治昭義(1992)。實在と認識中觀思想研究。大阪:關西大學出版部。  延伸查詢new window
12.丹治昭義(1988)。中論釋明らかなことば。大阪:關西大學出版部。  延伸查詢new window
13.安井廣濟(1970)。中觀思想の研究。京都:法藏館。  延伸查詢new window
14.江島惠教(1980)。中觀思想の展開。東京:春秋社。  延伸查詢new window
15.吉元信行(1982)。アビダルマ思想。京都:法藏館。  延伸查詢new window
16.法尊(1991)。入中論。台北:新文豐出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.Lamotte, E.(1981)。Le traite de la grande vertu de sagesse de Nāgārjuna (Mahāprajñāpāramitāśāstra)。Louvain:Institut Orientaliste, Universite de Louvain。  new window
18.Williams, P.(1988)。The Reflexive Nature of Awareness A Tibetan Madhyamaka Defence。Surrey:Curzon Press。  new window
19.Schmithausen, L.(1987)。Älayavijnäna。Tokyo:The International Institute for Buddhist Studies。  new window
20.張怡蓀(1993)。藏漢大辭典。北京市:民族出版社。  延伸查詢new window
21.摩河般若波羅蜜經。  延伸查詢new window
22.大智度論。  延伸查詢new window
23.成實論。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.丹治昭義(1988)。生死即淫藥--中論、特にブラサンナパダ--を中心にして。佛教思想10死。京都:平樂寺書店。  延伸查詢new window
2.江島惠教(1980)。『中論』註における「緣起」の語義解釈。佛教思想史3:佛教內部における對論インド。京都:平樂寺書店。  延伸查詢new window
3.加藤純章(1985)。自性と自相--三世實有説の展開。佛教思想の諸問題。東京:春秋社。  延伸查詢new window
4.立川武藏(1982)。III歸讓證派。講座.大乘佛教7中観思想。東京:春秋社。  延伸查詢new window
5.高崎直道(1982)。upādāna(取)について--『中論』の用例をめぐって。田村芳朗博士還暦記念論集佛教教理の研究。東京:春秋社。  延伸查詢new window
6.松本史朗(1998)。空について。緣起と空。東京:大藏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE