臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：藥物濫用者有無繼續施用傾向量表之量化修正研究
書刊名：犯罪學期刊
作者：林明傑 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, Min-chieh
出版日期：2008
卷期：11:1
頁次：頁45-74
主題關鍵詞：毒品犯罪者；吸毒犯；藥物濫用；再犯；再犯危險評估；再犯危險因子；Drug abuse；Substance abuse；Recidivism；Risk assessment；Risk marker
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(3) 專書(3) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:4
  • 共同引用共同引用:9
  • 點閱點閱:62
本研究將檢視現行使用之「有無繼續施用傾向評估紀錄表」，以統計精算之方法篩選各變項與再犯毒品犯罪與否之預測力大小，以發展更有科學研究爲基礎之毒品再犯危險評估量表。本研究以台中看守所附設觀察勒戒處所於90年7月、10月及12月出所之受觀察勒戒者爲樣本，追蹤其於95年9月有無再犯情況爲依變項來檢測該表各題項之再犯預測力。研究發現四年內再犯毒品相關罪名之再犯率爲56.9%，曾短期再犯、戒斷症狀、多重藥物使用、注射使用、社會功能及支持系統等六項具有預測力及正相關。本研究以Burgess法分別追蹤一年、二年、三年、及四年及各所篩選顯著之因素建立量表，發現預測效度各爲r=.156(ROC=.611)、r=.162(ROC=.588)、r=.271(ROC=.648)、及r=.391(ROC=.723)。而所修改之量表以預測出所後三與四年之再犯率爲主。相關之建議亦在討論中。
This study was to collect the currently used risk assessment tool to check the predictive validity, and then to establish the more precise re-abuse risk assessment scale. The substance abusers released from Taichung Observation and Rehabilitation House at 3 months of 2001 were observed their traits and were tracked whether they re-abused or not till October, 2006. It was found that the recidivism rate within 4 years after release was 56.9%, and the withdrawal symptom, re-abuse in short, multiple drug abuse, abuse by injection, social function, and support system could significantly predict and correlate to the re-abuse, and prior drug abuse record and the length of abuse term could significantly correlate to the re-abuse. The Pearson's r and ROC of the modified risk assessment scale were found r=.156 (ROC=.611), r=.162(ROC=.588), r=.271(ROC=.648), and r=.391(ROC=.723) for 1, 2, 3, and 4 years, respectively. The new modified risk assessment scale were formed to predict 3 and 4 years after the confined rehabilitation. Suggestions were also presented in this study.
期刊論文
1.Silver, Eric、Smith, William R.、Banks, Steven(2000)。Constructing actuarial devices for predicting recidivism。Criminal Justice and Behavior，27，733-764。  new window
2.Mossman, D.(1994)。Assessing predictions of violence: Being accurate about accuracy。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，62，783-792。  new window
3.林明傑、董子毅(2005)。〈台灣性犯罪靜態危險評估量表（TSOSRAS）之建立及其外在效度之研究〉。亞洲家庭暴力與性侵害期刊，1（1），49-110。  延伸查詢new window
4.任全鈞(2003)。〈美國毒品犯社區處遇的現況與成效的評估〉。《矯正月刊》，135。  延伸查詢new window
5.McLellan A. T. Luborsky L. Woody G. E.、O＇Brien C. P.(1980)。An Improved Diagnostic Instrument for Substance Abuse Patients: The Addiction Severity Index。Journal of Nervous and Mental Diseases，168，26-33。  new window
6.Skinner, H. A.(1982)。The Drug Abuse Screening Test。Addictive Behaviors，7，363-371。  new window
7.Sobell, L. C., Toneatto, T.,、Sobell, M. B.(1994)。Behavioral Assessment and Treatment Planning for Alcohol, Tobacco, and Other Drug Problems: Current Status with an Emphasis on Clinical Applications。Behavior Therapy，25，533-80。  new window
8.Tarter, R. E.,、Hegedus, A. M.(1991)。Drug Use Screening Inventory: Its Applications in the Evaluation and Treatment of Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse。Alcohol and Health Research World，15，65-75。  new window
會議論文
1.林健陽、陳玉書、柯雨瑞(2003)。毒品犯罪戒治成效影響因素之追蹤研究。犯罪矯治與觀護學術研討會。  延伸查詢new window
2.林瑞欽(2004)。〈海洛因用藥行為對其再吸食風險的預測效力研究〉。台北中央研究院。  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡德輝(2004)。〈青少年藥物濫用與防治對策〉。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.柯慧貞、黃徵男、林幸勳、廖德富(2003)。〈吸毒病犯之戒治處遇成效與再犯之預測因子研究〉。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.賴擁連(2000)。臺灣地區毒品犯罪者戒治處遇成效之研究(碩士論文)。中央警察大學，桃園。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃俊棠(2004)。毒品犯觀察勒戒成效之實證研究(碩士論文)。國立中正大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.林宗穎(2002)。〈一般犯罪理論對受保護管束之毒品犯罪者再犯之研究〉。  延伸查詢new window
4.簡惠霠(2000)。〈成年受保護管束人再犯預測之研究－以台灣板橋地方法院檢察署為例〉。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Nuffiled, J.(1982)。Parole Decesion-Making in Canada: Research towards Decision Guidelines。Ottawa：Solicitor General。  new window
2.Quinsey, Vernon L.、Cormier, Catherine A.、Harris, Grant T.、Rice, Marnie E.(1998)。Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk。American Psychological Association。  new window
3.楊士隆、林健陽(2001)。犯罪矯治：問題與對策。臺北：五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Hanson, R. Karl、Thornton, David(1999)。Static 99: Improving actuarial risk assessments for sex offenders。Department of the Solicitor General of Canada, Ottawa。  new window
5.孔繁鐘編譯(1997)。《DSM-IV精神疾病的診斷對統計》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
6.法務部(2005)。《法務部統計摘要》。台北。  延伸查詢new window
7.潘昱萱(2004)。〈藥物濫用之心理病理及危險評估〉。法律犯罪心理學。台北。  延伸查詢new window
8.Allen, J. P.,、Columbus, M. Eds.(1995)。Assessing Alcohol Problems: A Guide for Clinicians and Researchers。Bethesda, MD。  new window
9.Fisher, G. L.、Harrison, T.C.(2000)。Substance Abuse: Information for School Counselor, Social workers, Therapists, and Counselors。Massachusetts。  new window
10.Hanson, K.(1997)。The Development of a Brief Actuarial Risk Scale for Sexual Offense Recidivism( Rapid Risk Assessment for Sex Offense Recidivism( Rapid Risk Assessment for Sex Offense Recidivism, RRASOR)。  new window
11.Inciardi, J. A.(1994)。Screening and Assessment for Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse among Adults in the Criminal Justice System。Rockville, MD。  new window
12.Kinney, J.(1991)。Clinical Manual of Substance Abuse (2nd ed.)。St. Louis。  new window
13.McLellan, A. T., Kushner, H., Metzger, D.,、Peters, R.(1992)。The Fifth Edition of the Addiction Severity Index。Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment。  new window
14.Saltstone, R., Halliwell, S.,、Hayslip, M. A.(1994)。A Multivariate Evaluation of the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test and the Drug Abuse Screening Test in a Female Offender Population。Addictive Behaviors。  new window
圖書論文
1.林明傑(20040000)。危險評估方法學。法律犯罪心理學。臺北：雙葉書廊。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Burgess, E. W.(1928)。Factors determining success and failure on parole。The working on the indeterminate sentence law and the parole system in Illinois。Illinois State Board of Parole。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：870（臺灣：865，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1695817 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67488116
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上