:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:兒少保護工作中降低施暴風險的策略初探:以強制性親職教育輔導的執行為例
書刊名:臺大社會工作學刊
作者:王行
出版日期:2005
卷期:12
頁次:頁139+141-198
主題關鍵詞:兒童少年保護強制性親職教育輔導風險研判風險管理Child protectionCompulsory program of education and guidance for parentsRisk assessmentRisk management
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(4) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:6
  • 共同引用共同引用:511
  • 點閱點閱:71
本研究採質性的詮釋研究方法,從台灣地區兒少保護體系中從事施虐者工作的經驗中搜集對次級性預防工作的觀點與策略,並從「風險研判」、「風險承擔」與「風險管理」的角度,歸納整理出與施虐者接觸的兒少保護工作者,對暴力再發生的感知與因應之道。 研究結果發現,工作者從經驗中認為(一)返家指標的建立對「風險研判」(二)親子態度(三)與工作者的關係建立(四)環境資源評估與(五)人格評估,對暴力再發生的「風險研判」是有幫助的;以及(一)「處罰」做為預防暴力再發生的策略、(二)「親職教育」做為預防暴力再發生的策略、(三)「關係的建立」做為預防暴力再發生的策略、(四)以「諮商」做為預防暴力再發生的策略、(五)提升孩子的自我保護能力。 本研究也將研究的結果進一步的延伸討論,在預防施虐者再發生暴力的次級預防性工作中,實務上一些做法在效用上的爭議性,以及如何降低暴力風險的可能性。最後研究者也提出將施虐者納入共同參與次級性預防的建議及一些具體原則,做為實務界的參考。
Hermeneutics point of view is the epistemology of this qualitative study to understand secondary prevention strategies of Compulsory program of education and guidance, especially the methods of risk assessment and management of those who in practice work for parents with violence. From the experiences of workers, there are several ways for the risk assessment of re-violence : (1) to construct the indicators of home coming for being replaced children, (2) to observe the attitudes of parenthood, (3) to evaluate the working relationship between abusers and workers, (4) to assess the recourses of environment, (5) to assess the personality of abusers, and several ways for risk management of re-violence as well : (1) referring abusers to the penalty by the order of law, (2) referring abusers to the compulsory education program by the order of law, (3) developing working relationship with abusers, (4) referring abusers to the counseling services, (5) promoting self protecting abilities of abused children. According the finding as above, the study has discussed some controversial issues for those ways being used by the workers for risk assessment and management, and also makes suggestions, especially inclusive the abusers into the secondary prevention system, to the field work of Child Protection System.
期刊論文
1.翁慧圓(1994)。兒童虐待個案的診斷、處置與評估。社會福利,114,37-40。  延伸查詢new window
2.Wald. M. S.、Woolverton, M.(1990)。Risk Assessment: The Emperor's New Clothes?。Child Welfare,69(6),483-511。  new window
3.翁酼秀(19990600)。親職壓力與兒童虐待--兼論兒童虐待的預防。社區發展季刊,86,262-279。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.翁開誠(20021200)。覺解我的治療理論與實踐--通過故事來成人之美。應用心理研究,16,23-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.王行、莫藜藜、李憶微、羅曉瑩(20050100)。執行兒少保護中「強制性親職教育輔導」理念任務之研究。臺大社會工作學刊,10,113+115-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Hare, R. D.(1996)。Psychopathy: A Clinical Construct Whose Times Has Come。Criminal Justice and Behavior,23,25-54。  new window
7.Murphy-Berman S.(1994)。A Conceptual Framework for Thinking About Risk Assessment and Case Management in Child Protective Service。Child Abuse & Neglect,18(2),193-201。  new window
8.Rooney, R.H.(1988)。Socialization Strategies for Involuntary Clients Social Casework。The Journal Of Contemporary Social Work。  new window
9.Smith, D.(2005)。Probation and Social Work。British Journal of Social Work,35,621-637。  new window
10.余漢儀(1998)。兒保工作中的社工決策。國立政治大學社會學報,28,81-116。  延伸查詢new window
11.林明傑(2000)。性犯罪危險之心理評估暨危險評估。社區發展季刊,92,316-340。  延伸查詢new window
12.Boyle, C.L.、Lutzker, J. R.(2005)。Teaching Young Children to Discriminate Abusive From Non-abusive Situations Using Multiple Exemplars in a Modified Discrete Teaching Format。Journal of Family Violence,20(2),55-67。  new window
研究報告
1.王行(2004)。兒少保護中強制性親職教育輔導實施方式之行動研究:從非自願性案主觀點介入研究結果報告書。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.廖秋芬(1997)。社會工作員對兒童保護案件處遇計畫的價值抉擇之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.許如悅(2002)。兒保工作員風險研判決策之初探性研究。東吳大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.朱侃如(2003)。權力與無知。臺北:張老師。  延伸查詢new window
2.Brizer, D. A.、Crowner, M. C.(1989)。Current approaches to the prediction of violence。Washington, D. C.:American Psychiatric Press。  new window
3.邱天助(2002)。布爾迪厄文化再制理論。台北市:桂冠圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.陳若璋(2001)。性罪犯心理學:心理治療與評估。臺北:張老師。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.余德慧(1998)。詮釋現象心理學。台北:會形文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃光國(2001)。社會科學的理路。臺北:心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.阮新邦(1993)。批判詮釋論與社會研究。八方文化。  延伸查詢new window
8.Harrington, D.、Dubowitz, H.(1993)。What Can Be Done To Prevent Child Maltreatment?。Family Violence: Prevention and Treatment \\ Hampton, R. (ed.)。London。  new window
9.Kaufman, J.、Zigler, E.(1992)。The Prevention of Child Maltreatment: Programming, Research, and Policy。Prevention of Child Maltreatment \\ Willis, D. ; Holden, E. W.,etc. (eds.)。New York。  new window
10.Pinard, G. F.、Pagani, L. A.(2001)。Clinical Assessment of Dangerousness。Unite Kingdom:Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Rice, L.、Greenberg, L.(1984)。The Pattern of Change: Intensive Analysis of Psychotherapy。New York。  new window
12.阮新邦、賀玉英(2004)。詮釋取向的社會工作實踐。新加坡。  延伸查詢new window
13.鄭添成(2004)。暴力犯之心理病理及危險評估。法律犯罪心理學。台北。  延伸查詢new window
14.Butcher, J.N.(2002)。Clinical Personality Assessment: Practical Approaches。New York。  new window
15.Cole,M.(1995)。The Violence of Man: New Techniques for Working with Abusive Families。New York。  new window
16.Finkelhor, D.、Hotaling, G.T.(1988)。Stopping Family Violence。London。  new window
17.Frude,N.(1989)。The Physical Abuse of Child。Clinical Approach to Violence \\ Howells, K. ; Hollin, C. V. (ed.)。New York。  new window
其他
1.中華兒童福利基金會(1999)。兒童少年保護工作手冊。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.林明傑(20040000)。危險評估方法學。法律犯罪心理學。臺北:雙葉書廊。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE