:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:釋放臺灣的社會力:公共領域、資訊取得與知識共享
書刊名:圖書館學與資訊科學
作者:吳齊殷 引用關係陳怡蒨黃心怡 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Chyi-inChen, I-chienHuang, Shin-yi
出版日期:2007
卷期:33:1
頁次:頁17-29
主題關鍵詞:公共領域資訊取得知識共享公共財知識創新Public sphereInformation accessibilityKnowledge sharingKnowledge innovationPublic good
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(6) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:22
  • 點閱點閱:56
1990年代後隨著電腦科技與網際網路的發展直接影響了公共領域的結構轉變。國家力量的投入、私人領域的地位以及電子傳媒所帶來的影響等,皆為社會的變動帶來新動力。這篇文章中我們試圖去探討這股轉型力量是如何形成?是否能普遍地應用到不同社會脈絡的理解上?從這個基本問題出發,我們認為這個轉型力量主要是透過公共資訊、科技技術與社會活動的各種協力合作的方式所產生,資訊時代的技術、知識與連結網絡打破許多傳統階級社會的既定框架、地理距離的隔閡。資訊與知識、人際交往互動、地理環境之間所形成的社會距離與社會位置有了全新架構的可能,同時也帶來新的社會力量基礎。本文依循社會學的思考,討論資訊時代裡公共領域、資訊取得與知識分享之間的關連,並進一步討論三者相互合作、流通所帶來的轉型力量與可能性。我們認為釋放社會力的理論依據在於,知識取之於社會,也該回饋給社會。然而,公共領域裡公共資訊的開放流動是轉型力量的環境要件;而行動者本身的能力與行動者相互之間的溝通與知識共享則是知識創新、創發價值的重要機制。為了進一步具體說明,結合當下許多引起社會高度關注的共同創作與資訊共享的一些實例,來說明本文的理念與實際運作的結果。
Conventional digital libraries utilize access control and digital watermarking techniques to protect their digital content. These methods have some limitations. First, after passing the identity authentication process, authorized users can easily redistribute the digital assets. Second, it is impractical to expect a digital watermarking scheme to prevent all kinds of attacks. Thus, how to enforce property rights after digital content has been released to authorized users is a crucial and challenging issue. Digital rights management (DRM) systems have been proposed to address this issue by enforcing the rights access policies in a trusted computing environment. However, DRM systems can only be useful if the computing environment can be protected and compliant to the common rights policy throughout the lifecycle of digital objects. In this paper, we propose an integrated framework of content protection and tracking that aims to detect unlawful copyright infringements on the Internet, and combines the strengths of static rights enforcement and dynamic illegal content tracking. First, we introduce a wrapper-based approach to digital rights enforcement for content protection that integrates digital watermarking, cryptography, information protection technology, and a rights model. Also, we present a content tracking mechanism for multimedia-content near-replica detection as the second line of defense. In the rights enforcement environment, the behavior of all content players is monitored and digital content can only be accessed after certain usage rules have been satisfied. Furthermore, the proposed architecture can be easily integrated into any digital content player, or even existing DRM systems in digital libraries. With the protection of the proposed framework, the abuse of digital content can be drastically reduced. Our experiments demonstrate the efficacy of proposed framework and the accuracy of copy detection.
期刊論文
1.Stewart, John A.(1983)。Achievement and Ascriptive Processes in the Recognition of Scientific Articles。Social Forces,62(1),166-189。  new window
2.蘇國賢(20041200)。社會學知識的社會生產:臺灣社會學者的隱形學群。臺灣社會學,8,133-192。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Putnam, Robert D.(1995)。Bowling Alone: American's Declining Social Capital。Journal of Democracy,6(1),65-78。  new window
4.Burt, Ronald S.(2004)。Structural Holes and Good Ideas。American Journal of Sociology,110(2),349-399。  new window
5.Granovetter, Mark S.(1973)。The Strength of Weak Ties。American Journal of Sociology,78(6),1360-1380。  new window
6.Coleman, James S.(1988)。Social capital in the creation of human capital。American Journal of Sociology,94(suppl.),S95-S120。  new window
7.Arendt, Hannah(1990)。Philosophy and Politics。Social Research,57(1),73-103。  new window
8.沈昱全(2003)。從網路社會的特質看智慧財產權的定位。網路社會學通訊期刊,33。  延伸查詢new window
9.須文蔚(2002)。數位科技衝擊下的現代詩教學。Intergrams,4(1)。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.吳齊殷、蔡博方、李文傑(1999)。網民:一塊招牌、兩套人馬。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.李大嵩(1996)。電信、資訊、知識與教育變革。南港。  延伸查詢new window
研究報告
1.(2001)。Toward a Theory of Variation in Idea-Markets: Attracting Eyeballs to Websites during the Doc-Com Boom and Bust。  new window
圖書
1.Durkheim, Emile(2002)。社會分工論。社會分工論。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
2.Schutz, A.(1993)。社會世界的現象學。社會世界的現象學。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.Habermas, Jürgen、洪佩郁、藺青(1994)。交往行動理論‧第二卷論功能主義理性批判。重慶:重慶出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.胡述兆(1995)。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。圖書館學與資訊科學大辭典。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.Sandler, Todd、葉家興(2003)。經濟學與社會的對話。臺北:先覺出版社。  延伸查詢new window
6.Mannheim, Karl、艾彥(2001)。意識形態和烏托邦。北京:華夏出版社。  延伸查詢new window
7.Habermas, Jürgen、郭官義、李黎(1999)。認識與興趣。上海:學林出版社。  延伸查詢new window
8.Castells, Manuel、夏鑄九、王志爱、殷寶寧、溫蓓章、黃麗玲、魏慶嘉(1998)。網絡社會之崛起。臺北:唐山出版社。  延伸查詢new window
9.Meyrowitz, Joshua(1985)。No Sense of Place: The Impact of Electronic Media on Social Behavior。Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Putnam, Robert D.、Leonardi, Robert、Nanetti, Raffaella Y.(1993)。Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy。Princeton University Press。  new window
11.Coser, Lewis(1986)。古典社會學理論:馬克思、涂爾幹與韋伯。古典社會學理論:馬克思、涂爾幹與韋伯。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
12.Elias, Norbert(2005)。論文明、權力與知識。論文明、權力與知識。南京。  延伸查詢new window
13.Howard, Rheingold(2004)。Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution。Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution。  new window
14.江宜樺(200307)。公共領域中理性溝通的可能性。公共性與公共知識份子。江蘇人民出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.Habermas, J.(1990)。公共領域的結構轉型。公共領域的結構轉型。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
16.Durkheim, Emile(2000)。原始分類。原始分類。上海。  延伸查詢new window
17.錢永祥(2003)。公民、公共領域、公共型知識份子。再造公與義的社會與理性空間。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.David, P. A.(2003)。The Economic Logic of Open Science and the Balance between Private Property Rights and the Public Domain in Scientific Data and Information: A Primer。  new window
2.吳齊殷(2005)。推倒數位牆 大家e起來,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
3.謝清俊(1995)。公共資訊系統的實踐。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE