臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：促進抑或是阻礙創新？從法律經濟學角度審視美國商業方法專利之適格性爭議--以In Re Bilski案為例
書刊名：政大智慧財產評論
作者：胡心蘭 引用關係／蔡岳勳 引用關係
作者(外文)：Hu, Hsin-lan／Tsai, Yueh-hsun
出版日期：2009
卷期：7:2
頁次：頁125-176
主題關鍵詞：商業方法專利；專利適格性；法律經濟學；Business method patent；Patentability；Law and economics
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:38
  • 點閱點閱:53
期刊論文
1.周德宇(200001)。智慧財產權之經濟淺析--靜態效率與動態效率之弔詭。智慧財產季刊，32。  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡昕皓。在In re Bilski之後的生技醫療診斷方法專利。北美智權報，25。  延伸查詢new window
3.Eisenberg, Rebecca S.(2007)。Commentary, The Supreme Court and the Federal Circuit: Visitation and Custody of Patent Law。Michigan Law Review First Impressions，106，28-33。  new window
4.Holoubek, Charles、Shaughnessy, Timothy M.(2005)。Market Reaction to Business Method Patents: An Empirical Analysis。COMP. L. REV. & TECH. J.，9，279。  new window
5.Locke, Scott D.、Schmidt, William D.(2008)。Business Method Patents: The Challenge of Coping with an Ever Changing Standard of Patentability。Fordham Intell. Prop. Media & Ent. L. J.，18，1079-1086。  new window
6.Merges, Robert P.(1999)。As Many as Six Impossible Patents Before Breakfast: Property Rights for Business Concepts and Patent System Reform。Berkeley Technology Law Journal，14。  new window
7.Raskind, Leo J.(1999)。SYMPOSIUM: The State Street Bank Decision: The Bad Business of Unlimted Patent Protection for Methods of Doing Business。ORDHAM INTELL. PROP. MEDIA & ENT. L.J.，10，61。  new window
8.Risch, Michael(2008)。Everything is Patentable。TENN. L. REV.，75，591。  new window
9.Barnett, Jonathan M.(2004)。Private Protection of Patentable Goods。Cardozo Law Review，25，1251-1313。  new window
10.Allison, John R.、Tiller, Emerson H.(2003)。The Business Method Patent Myth。BERKELEY TECH. L.J.，18，987。  new window
11.Grusd, Jared Earl(1999)。Internet Business Methods: What Role Does and Should Patent Law Play?。VA. J.L. & TECH.，4，9。  new window
12.Guntersdorfer, Michael(2009)。The Death of State Street?。WAKE FOREST INTELL. PROP. L.J.，9，61-84。  new window
13.Kuester, Jeffrey R.、Thompson, Lawrence E.(2001)。Risks Associated with Restricting Business Method and E-Commerce Patents。GA. ST. U.L. REV.，17，657。  new window
14.Lee, Nari(2005)。Patent Eligible Subject Matter Reconfiguration and the Emergence of Proprietarian Norms -- The Patent Eligibility of Business Methods。IDEA，45，321。  new window
15.Lunney, Glynn S. Jr.(1996)。Reexamining Copyright’s Incentives-Access Paradigm。VAND. L. REV.，49，483。  new window
16.Wiese, William D.(2000)。Death of A Myth: The Patenting of Internet Business Models After State Street Bank。MARQ. INTELL. PROP. L. REV.，4，17。  new window
17.Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper(2000)。Essay: Are Business Method Patents Bad for Business?。SANTA CLARA COMPUTER & HIGH TECH. L.J，16，263。  new window
18.顏上詠、陳帝利(20041200)。歐洲與美國商業方法專利學理之研究。東海大學法學研究，21，243-283。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.Burk, Dan L.、Lemley, Mark A.(2003)。Policy Levers in Patent Law。Virginia Law Review，89(7)，1575-1696。  new window
20.胡心蘭(20081100)。非顯而易知之非顯而易知性--美國最高法院KSR案判決評析。興大法學，4，193-238。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Rich, Giles S.(1942)。The Relation Between Patents Practices and the Anti-Monopoly Laws。Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society，24，159。  new window
圖書
1.Cooter, Robert、Ulen, Thomas(2000)。Law and Economic。  new window
2.Harrison, Jeffery L.(2000)。Law and Economics。  new window
3.馮震宇(2003)。智慧財產權發展趨勢與重要問題研究。元照出版有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(1999)。First Inventor Defense Act, Pub. L.，http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=106_cong_public_laws&docid=f:publ113.106， 2009/07/03。  new window
2.USPTO。“A USPTO WHITE PAPER”, AUTOMATED FINANCIAL OR MANAGEMENT DATA PROCESSING METHODS (BUSINESS METHODS)，http://www.uspto.gov/web/menu/busmethp/index.html#intro， 2009/04/17。  new window
3.USPTO。CLASS 705 APPLICATION FILING AND PATENTS ISSUED DATA，http://www.uspto.gov/web/menu/pbmethod/applicationfiling.htm， 2009/04/17。  new window
4.USPTO。CLASS 705 DEFINITION，http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/def/705.htm， 2009/04/17。  new window
5.USPTO。U.S. PATENT CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM - CLASSIFICATION DEFINITIONS AS OF JUNE 30, 2000, CLASS 705, DATA PROCESSING: FINANCIAL, BUSINESS PRACTICE, MANAGEMENT, OR COST/PRICE DETERMINATION，http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/ac/ido/oeip/taf/def/705.htm。  new window
6.AmosWEB ECONOMIC。GLOSS • arama，http://www.amosweb.com/cgi-bin/awb_nav.pl?s=gls， 2009/07/12。  new window
7.Collins, Kevin Emerson(20081101)。An Initial Comment on In re Bilski: Tangibility Gone Meta，http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/11/professor-colli.html， 2009/07/07。  new window
8.Crouch, Dennis D.(20081113)。Post-Bilski BPAI Approves of Beauregard Claims，http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/11/post-bilski-bpa.html， 2009/07/07。  new window
9.Duffy, John F.(20080721)。The Death of Google's Patents?，http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/2008/07/the-death-of-go.html， 2009/07/07。  new window
10.Fusco, Stefania(2009)。Is In re Bilski a Déjà Vu?，http://stlr.stanford.edu/pdf/fusco-bilski-deja-vu.pdf， 2009/07/07。  new window
11.Lindholm, Stephen。Marking the Software Patent Beast，http://pascal.case.unibz.it/retrieve/1065/SSRN-id642123.pdf， 2009/07/10。  new window
12.McGurk, Mike R.，McNeill, Rebecca M.，Van Horn, Charles E.(199912)。Report: The American Investors Protection Act of 1999，http://www.finnegan.com/resources/articles/articlesdetail.aspx?news=36da41a7-178f-4385-b359-6f276f05c303， 2009/07/03。  new window
13.(20081222)。Patent Docs，http://www.patentdocs.org/2008/12/classenimmunotherapies-inc-v-biogen-idec-fed-cir-2008.html， 2009/07/09。  new window
14.Noonan, Kevin E.(20090601)。The Supreme Court, In re Bilski and the Lingering Question of Labcorp v. Metabolite, Patent Docs，http://www.patentdocs.org/2009/06/the-supreme-court-in-re-bilski-and-the-lingering-question-of-labcorp-v-metabolite.html， 2009/07/09。  new window
15.Patent, Hawk(20050417)。Patent Economics: Part 4 – Incentives，http://www.patenthawk.com/blog/2005/04/patent_economics_part_4_incent.html， 2009/07/10。  new window
16.First Inventor Defense Act, The IT Law Wiki,，http://itlaw.wikia.com/wiki/First_Inventor_Defense_Act， 2009/07/03。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：618（臺灣：614，外國：4） ／ 本年度總使用人次：2042760 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67857694
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上