臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：臺灣北部地區中小學歌唱教學評量實施狀況之調查研究
書刊名：藝術教育研究
作者：潘宇文 引用關係
作者(外文)：Pan, Yu-wen
出版日期：2009
卷期：18
頁次：頁1-31
主題關鍵詞：多元評量；歌唱教學；歌唱教學評量；歌唱評量；Evaluation for singing；Evaluation for teaching singing；Multiple assessments；Teaching singing
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:12
  • 點閱點閱:42
本研究之目的爲探討臺北市、臺北縣、基隆市的國民小學、國民中學、高級中學音樂教師，進行音樂課堂歌唱教學評量的情形。研究工具係採用研究者自編之「音樂教師歌唱教學評量實施現況之調查問卷」，共寄發660份問卷，回收540份問卷，回收率爲81.8%。研究結果如下(1)音樂教師較重視歌唱情意與技能之教學目標；(2)音樂教師較重視教學後的總結性評量，與教學中的診斷性、形成性評量；(3)音樂教師在歌唱教學評量時，會納入相當多元的項目，較常涵蓋的項目有節奏與曲調正確度、歌詞意涵、相互聆聽及熟練度等項目內容；(4)音樂教師傾向採用較單一的評量方式，最常使用的方法有獨唱評量、教師評量、實作評量、分數形式工具及整體表現計分等。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the status of assessment in the process of teaching singing at the school music programs. The survey method was utilized in this study. The instrument, "The Survey of Practice Status of Assessment for Teaching Singing at School Music Programs," was developed by the investigator. The target population consisted of music teachers who taught at the public elementary, middle, and high schools in Taipei City, Taipei County, and Keelung City. A total of 660 teachers were selected to fill the questionnaires. 540 effective questionnaires were obtained. The return rate was 81.8 %. The major results of the survey were as follows: 1. The teachers' views of educational objectives for teaching singing were more inclined toward affective and psychomotor domains. 2. The teachers' views of assessing purposes were inclined toward summative, diagnostic, and formative evaluations. 3. The teachers often included various contents, such as melodic and rhythmic accuracy, lyric meaning, listening to each others, and familiarity while assessing their students' singing. 4. The teachers tended to use more singular ways to evaluate their students' singing, including individual solo test, teacher evaluation, performance-based assessment, global approach, and number point reporting.
期刊論文
1.潘宇文(20011000)。歌曲教學的基本技巧。國教天地，146，71-78。  延伸查詢new window
2.謝苑玫(20030800)。改善歌唱教學評量的實作與討論。國民教育，43(6)，71-78。  延伸查詢new window
3.林小玉(20011200)。由音樂藝術之本質探討多元評量於音樂教學之意涵與實踐。音樂藝術學刊，1，61-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Asmus, E. P.(1999)。Music Assessment Concepts。Music Educators Journal，86(2)，19-24。  new window
5.Darrow, A. A.、Marsh, K.(2006)。Examining the Validity of Self-report: Middle-level Singers' Ability to Predict and Assess Their Sight-singing Skills。International Journal of Music Education，24(1)，21-29。  new window
6.Kotora, E. J.(2005)。Assessment Practices in the Choral Music Classroom: A Survey of Ohio High School Choral Music Teachers and College Choral Methods Professors。Contributions to Music Education，32(2)，65-80。  new window
7.Asmus, Edward P.(1999)。Music Assessment Concepts。Music Educators Journal，86(2)，19-24。  new window
8.Darrow, Alice-Ann、Marsh, Kerry(2006)。Examining the validity of self-report: middle-level singers’ ability to predict and assess their sight-singing skills。International Journal of Music Education，24(1)，21-29。  new window
9.Kotora, E. James(2005)。Assessment Practices in the Choral Music Classroom: A Survey of Ohio High School Choral Music Teachers and College Choral Methods Professors。Contributions to Music Education，32(2)，65-80。  new window
10.紀雅眞Ji, Yazhen(2007)。國民中學音樂教學評量實施現況之調查研究Guomin zhongxue yinyue jiaoxue pingliang shishi xiankuang zhi diaocha yanjiu。未出版碩士論文Unpublished master's thesis。  延伸查詢new window
11.教育部Jiaoyu bu(2005)。藝術與人文學習領域六年級、九年級基本素養指標：解說手冊Yishu yu renwen xuexi lingyu liunianji。jiunianji jiben suyang zhibiao。  延伸查詢new window
12.謝苑玫Xie, Y-uanmei(2003)。改善歌唱教學評量的實作與討論Gaishan gechang jiaoxue pingliang de shizuo yu taolun。國民教育Guomin jiaoyu，43(6)，71-78。  延伸查詢new window
13.王文中Wang, Wenzhong(2004)。測驗與評量的意義與趨勢Ceyan yu pingliang de yiyi yu qushi。載於王文中In Wang。  延伸查詢new window
14.Asmus, E. P.(1999)。Music assessment concepts。Music Educators Journal 86(2)，19-24。  new window
15.Colwell, R.(2000)。Tools for music assessment In K。Seidel (Ed。  new window
16.Darrow, A. A., & Marsh, K.(2006)。Examining the validity of self-report。Middle-level singers' ability to predict and assess their sight-singing skills，24(1)，21-29。  new window
17.Kotora, E. J.(2005)。Assessment practices in the choral music classroom。A survey of Ohio high school choral music teachers and college choral methods professors，32(2)，65-80。  new window
18.Music Educators National Conference.(1994)。National standards for arts education。What every young American should know and be able to do in the Arts。  new window
19.Music Educators National Conference.(1996)。Performance standards for music。Reston。  new window
學位論文
1.紀雅真(2007)。國民中學音樂教學評量實施現況之調查研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.教育部(1973)。國民小學課程標準。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部國教司(2005)。藝術與人文學習領域六年級、九年級基本素養指標：解說手冊。臺北市：教育部國教司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Airasian, P. W.(1996)。Assessment in the classroom: A concise approach。New York：McGraw-Hill。  new window
4.Linn, R. L.、Gronlund, N. E.(2000)。Measurement and assessment in teaching。Merrill/Prentice Hall。  new window
5.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要藝術與人文學習領域。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
6.教育部國民小學課程標準編輯審查小組(1993)。國民小學課程標準。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
7.教育部(1995)。高級中學課程標準。台北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
8.教育部國教司(1994)。國民中學課程標準。臺北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
9.歐滄和(2002)。教育測驗與評量。台北：心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
10.李坤崇(1999)。多元化教學評量。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
11.Airasian, P. W.(1996)。Assessment in the classroom。New York：McGraw Hill。  new window
12.郭生玉(2004)。教育測驗與評量。精華。  延伸查詢new window
13.王文中(2004)。測驗與評量的意義與趨勢。教育測驗與評量：教室學習觀點。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
14.Colwell, R.(2000)。Tools for Music Assessment。Assessing Student Learning: A Practical Guide (CD-Rom: Chapter 17)。Cincinnati, OH。  new window
15.Music Educators National Conference(1994)。National Standards for Arts Education: What Every Young American Should Know and Be Able to Do in the Arts。National Standards for Arts Education: What Every Young American Should Know and Be Able to Do in the Arts。Reston, VA。  new window
16.Music Educators National Conference(1996)。Performance Standards for Music。Performance Standards for Music。Reston, VA。  new window
17.王文中(2004)。測驗與評量的意義與趨勢。教育測驗與評量：教室學習觀點。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
18.教育部(2005)。藝術與人文學習領域六年級、九年級基本素養指標：解說手冊。藝術與人文學習領域六年級、九年級基本素養指標：解說手冊。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
19.MENC(1994)。National Standards for Arts Education: What Every Young American Should Know and Be Able to Do in the Arts。National Standards for Arts Education: What Every Young American Should Know and Be Able to Do in the Arts。Lanham, MD。  new window
20.MENC(1996)。Performance standards for music。Performance standards for music。Reston, VA。  new window
其他
1.(2007)。2007年藝術與人文學習成效評量施測簡介。  延伸查詢new window
2.Colwell, Richard(2000)。Tools for music assessment，Cincinnati, Ohio。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：244（臺灣：239，外國：5） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67525680
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上