:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:多元教學與評量對國小學童音樂學習態度與成就之探討
書刊名:新竹教育大學教育學報
作者:張育瑗
作者(外文):Chang, Yu-yuan
出版日期:2012
卷期:29:2
頁次:頁1-33
主題關鍵詞:多元評量音樂學習態度音樂學習成就Multiple assessmentsMusic-learning attitudeMusic-learning achievement
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:114
  • 點閱點閱:90
本研究旨在探討多元教學與評量對國小學生音樂學習態度與學習成就之影響。以新竹市某國小五年級學生為研究對象(n=103),經八週實驗教學後,進行實驗組與控制組之比較,對學生在教學前後之音樂態度與學習成就進行共變數分析、質性分析、獨立樣本t檢定與成對樣本t檢定。本研究結果如下:1. 實驗組與控制組在音樂學習態度上有顯著差異;2. 實驗中,實驗組與控制組在音樂成就之「紙筆測驗」無顯著差異,但實驗結束後,兩組有顯著差異;實驗組與控制組之「演奏評量」則無顯著差異;3. 歸納出實際可行的多元教學與評量途徑。最後提出若干建議供日後國小音樂課程進行多元教學與評量之參考。
This study examines the effects of multiple-teaching and assessment on the music-learning attitudes and academic achievements of elementary students. We applied convenience cluster sampling to fifth-year students from an elementary school in Hsinchu City (n = 103). After the 8-week experimental instruction, we compared the results between the experimental group and control group. We also analyzed the pre- and post-experimental attitudes and achievements of students by using ANCOVA, the independent-sample t test, paired-sample t test, and qualitative analysis. The results are as follows: (a) for music-learning attitudes, a significant difference was observed between the experimental group and the control group; and (b) for a paper test of music-learning achievement, no significant difference was observed between the experimental group and the control group during the experimental period. However, a substantial difference was observed between these groups after completing the experiment. (c) For performance evaluation, no significant difference was observed between the experimental group and the control group. A number of practical multiple-teaching and assessment methods are summarized. Finally, this study provides suggestions for future multiple-learning and assessments.
期刊論文
1.張麗麗(20001000)。「什麼樣的檔案才值得...?」--談自主學習檔案的基本要素。屏縣教育季刊,4,5-12。  延伸查詢new window
2.賴羿蓉、李田英(19990900)。多元智力與教學。科學教育月刊,222,2-15。  延伸查詢new window
3.Sternberg, R. J.(1998)。Abilities are forms of developing expertise。Educational Researcher,27(3),11-20。  new window
4.簡茂發(1999)。多元化評量之理論與方法。教師天地,99,11-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.田耐青(19990400)。由多元智慧理論的觀點談教學評量:一些臺灣的實例。教師天地,99,32-38。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳毓瑩(19980100)。我看、我畫、我說、我演、我想、我是誰呀?--卷宗評量之概念、理論、與應用。教育資料與研究,20,13-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.張麗麗(20020100)。評量改革的應許之地,虛幻或真實?--談實作評量之作業與表現規準。教育研究,93,76-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.吳耀明(20100400)。多元教學與評量對國小學童學習態度及學習焦慮之影響。教育研究學報,44(1),153-177。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.林怡呈、吳毓瑩(20080100)。多元評量的活化、迷思、與神話--教學歷程的個案研究。課程與教學,11(1),147-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.張玉茹(20020500)。因應小班教學多元化教學與評量在國中英語課的實驗行動研究。文藻學報,16,143-166。  延伸查詢new window
11.謝金定(20021000)。多元評量在國小學習領域之應用。國教天地,150,91-97。  延伸查詢new window
12.林小玉(20011200)。由音樂藝術之本質探討多元評量於音樂教學之意涵與實踐。音樂藝術學刊,1,61-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.盧雪梅(2000)。多元教學評量的理念和實務。教育研究月刊,76,56-66。  延伸查詢new window
14.莊明貞(1999)。多元的動態評量與教學-從維高斯基觀點談起。教師天地,99,25-31。  延伸查詢new window
15.吳鐵雄、洪碧霞(2000)。教學評量的反思與建言。測驗與輔導,159,3323-3324。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.吳明隆(1997)。國小學生數學學習行為與其電腦焦慮、電腦態度關係之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學,高雄市。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林美賢(2002)。國小社會科實施多元評量之個案研究(碩士論文)。國立新竹師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.洪德健(2001)。國小社會科真實評量實施之研究(碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳怡如(1999)。實作評量在國小數學科之應用研究(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
5.黃靜芳(2010)。電腦輔助國小四年級音樂欣賞教學之研究-以程式Max/MSP之應用為例(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
6.戴君佩(2001)。國民小學自然科卷宗評量對三年級學生學習動機之影響(碩士論文)。臺中師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
7.簡琇芳(2002)。實施實作評量對國小學童自然科學學習成就之影響。國立台中師範學院,臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Adams, D.、Hamm, M.(1994)。New designs for teaching and learning: Promotion active learning in tomorrow’s schools。San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers。  new window
2.陳峰津(2011)。杜威教育思想與教育理論。臺北:五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
3.Linn, R. L.、Gronlund, N. E.(2000)。Measurement and assessment in teaching。Merrill/Prentice Hall。  new window
4.Black, P. J.(1998)。Testing: Friend or foe? The theory and practice of assessment and testing。Falmer Press。  new window
5.鄭英耀、蔡佩玲、Danielso, Charlotte、Arutyn, Leslye(2000)。檔案教學。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
6.Lazear, D.(1999)。Multiple intelligence approaches to assessment。MA:Zephyr Press。  new window
7.Linn, R. L.、Miller, M. D.(2005)。Measurement and assessment in teaching。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Merrill。  new window
8.Gardner, Howard、李心瑩(2000)。再建多元智慧:21世紀的發展前景與實際應用。臺北市:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Slavin, R. E.(2003)。Educational Psychology: Theory and Practice。Boston。  new window
10.Gardner, H.(1983)。Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences。NY:Random House。  new window
11.Armstrong, Thomas、李平(1997)。經營多元智慧:開展以學生為中心的教學。遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.張春興(2002)。張氏心理學辭典。臺北:臺灣東華書局股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.教育部(1998)。國民教育階段九年一貫課程總綱綱要。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
14.李坤崇(1999)。多元化教學評量。心理出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.李坤崇(2006)。教學評量。台北:心理。  延伸查詢new window
16.Airasian, P. W.(1996)。Assessment in the classroom。New York:McGraw Hill。  new window
其他
1.王毓雅(2001)。國小中年級音樂課程分析及應用現況--達克羅茲、柯大宜及奧福教學法對中年級音樂課程之影響,嘉義。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳裕益(2002)。多元評量之發展與改進。  延伸查詢new window
3.郭生玉(2002)。如何落實多元評量。  延伸查詢new window
4.Asmus, E. P.(1999)。Music assessment concept. Music Education Journal。  new window
5.Boardman, E.(1996)。Fifth years of elementary general music: one person’s perspective.,Kansas City, MO.。  new window
6.Csiksentmihalyi, M., & Wolfe, R.(2001)。New Conceptions and Research Approaches to Creativity: Implications of a Systems Perspective for Creativity in Education.,Oxford, England:Pergamon。  new window
7.Glaser, R.(1990)。Toward new models for assessment.。  new window
8.Glaser, R., & Silver, E.(1994)。Assessment, testing, and instruction : Retrospect and prospect.。  new window
9.Hoffer, R. C.(1993)。Introduction to music education.,Belmoont, CA:A Division of Wadsworth。  new window
10.Radford, J. D.(1994)。The impact of multiple intelligences theory and flow theory in the school lices of thirteen children .,Indiana。  new window
11.Ramani, G. B., & Siegler, R. S.(2008)。Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children’s numerical knowledge through playing number boardgames.。  new window
12.Reimer, B.(1970)。Aesthetic behaviors in music.,Washington, DC。  new window
13.Scott, S. J.(2001)。A task-centered approach to performance based assessment.。  new window
14.Singer, D. G., Golinkoff, R., & Hirsh-Pasek, K.(2008)。Play = learning: How play motivates and enhances children’s cognitive and social-emotional growth.,New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
15.Vangilder, J. S. C.(1995)。A study of multiple intelligence as implemented by a Missouri school .,Arkansas。  new window
16.Wiggins, G.(1998)。Education assessment: Designing assessment to inform and improve student performance.,San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass。  new window
圖書論文
1.王文中(2000)。專文推薦:擴展多元智慧評量。落實多元智慧教學評量。臺北市:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
2.呂金燮(1999)。實作評量--理論。教育測驗與評量--教室學習觀點。台北:五南。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE