:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:一名音樂資優生以類比法的音樂創作行動歷程
書刊名:特殊教育學報
作者:梁斐瑜高振耀 引用關係
作者(外文):Liang, Feei-yuKao, Chen-yao
出版日期:2015
卷期:42
頁次:頁27-58
主題關鍵詞:音樂資優類比法創造力Musical giftednessAnalogyCreativity
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:66
  • 點閱點閱:58
本研究為一行動研究,透過觀察、訪談、行動契約以及文件分析等方式蒐集資料,目的旨在透過類比法解決一名音樂資優生小琴在創作音樂時所面臨的困境。行動分為三個階段,第一階段是以Mozart 的Sonata K545 第一樂章作為訓練小琴音樂創作的類比典範;第二階段除繼續以Mozart 的Sonata K545第一樂章讓小琴練習外,創作重點則是在作詞部分:第三階段是作曲技巧的類化情境應用,產出音樂作品。本行動研究發現:(1)音樂創作初期係一從熟悉到陌生之歷程,創作困境為「天才型的創作迷思」與「從無到有的實踐力」,所採取之類比策略為「擬人類比」與「直接類比」;(2)音樂創作中期係一同步歷程,創作困境為「不穩定性」與「創作倦怠」,所採取之類比策略為「擬人類比」與「壓縮衝突」;(3)音樂創作後期係一從陌生回到熟悉之歷程,創作困境為「創作技巧類化」與「產品候選因子的拾捨兩難」,所採取之類比策略為「直接類比」。
The purpose of this study, an action research study, was to investigate the difficulties in music creation by the musically gifted student Tsiao-Chin, as well as to help her with music creation through analogical skills. There were three stages of action research. At the first stage, the first movement of Mozart's Sonata K545 was used as a training model for musical creation of analogy. At the second stage, in addition to continuing training with the first movement of Mozart's Sonata K545, creation training placed emphasis on lyrics. At the third stage, compositional techniques were applied and musical works were created. Through observation, action contracts, file analysis, and interviews, the conclusions of this study are outlined as follows. (a) Early music creation was a process which ranged from the familiar to the unfamiliar. Creation difficulties included the myth of genius creation and the practicing from scratch. Both the strategies of personal and direct analogy were used to achieve results. (b) Mid-music creation was a process of synchronicity. Creation difficulties were instability and creation burnout. Both the strategies of personal analogy and compressed conflicts were used. (c) Late music creation was a process that stretched from the unfamiliar to the familiar. Creation difficulties were the analogy of creation skills and the dilemma of deciding to choose the product candidate factor. The strategy of direct analogy was used.
期刊論文
1.Gentner, D.(2010)。Bootstrapping the minds: Analogical processes and symbol systems。Cognitive Sciences,34,752-775。  new window
2.許嘉容、吳裕益(20100600)。高雄市國小一般智能與藝術才能資優生在因應策略與學校適應之研究。特殊教育與復健學報,22,65-95。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.邵俊德(19950600)。高中音樂資優生自我效能與生涯決定之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,12,295-317。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.吳永怡(20091200)。音樂才能優異學生家庭教養對其音樂成就影響之初探研究--以東部地區為例。東臺灣特殊教育學報,11,79-100。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.高振耀(20140600)。從類比的角度探討創造思考過程。特教論壇,16,79-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.黃揚婷、蔡典謨(20110300)。探訪傑出作曲家的樂曲創作歷程。特殊教育研究學刊,36(1),85-107。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Christie, S.、Gentner, D.(2014)。Where hypotheses come from: Learning new relations by structural alignment。Journal of Cognition and Development,11(3),356-373。  new window
8.French, R. M.(2002)。The computational modeling of analogy-making。Trends in Cognitive Sciences,6(5),200-205。  new window
9.Marek-Schroer, M. F.、Schroer, N. A.(1993)。Identifying and providing for musically gifted young children。Roeper Review,16(1),33-36。  new window
10.Marques, J. F.、McCall, C.(2005)。The application of interrater reliability as a solidification instrument in a phenomenological study。Qualitative Report,10(3),439-462。  new window
11.高振耀(20120600)。解開創造力的奧秘:創造力的四個P。特教論壇,12,1-12。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.張琳筑(20020300)。音樂資優兒童天賦特質研究--以莫札特童年期為例。資優教育,82,18-24。  延伸查詢new window
13.Webster, P. R.(1990)。Creativity as Creative Thinking。Music Educators Journal,76(9),22-28。  new window
14.Gentner, D.(1983)。Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy。Cognitive Science,7(2),155-170。  new window
15.陳昭儀(20060900)。傑出音樂家創作歷程之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,31,221-239。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.郭靜姿、王雅奇、林美和、吳舜文、簡維君、張靖卿、胡寶玉、謝佳男、周佩蓉(20090300)。五位高中資優班畢業優秀女性之人格特質與生涯發展分析。特殊教育研究學刊,34(1),47-73。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Haroutounian, J.(2000)。The delights and dilemmas of the musically talented teenager。Journal of Secondary Gifted Education,12(1),3-16。  new window
18.Reis, S. M.(2002)。Internal barriers, personal issues,and decisions faced by gifted and talented females。Gifted Child Today,25(1),14-28。  new window
圖書
1.Starko, A. J.(2005)。Creativity in the classroom: Schools of curious delight。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.。  new window
2.張世彗(2013)。創造力:理論、技法與教學。臺北市:五南。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Kaufman, James C.、Sternberg, Robert J.、黃曉嵐、蔡淑君、胡翠茵、張芝萱(2014)。創造力:理論與當代議題面面觀。華騰文化股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
4.Treffinger, Donald J.、Schoonover, Patricia F.、Selby, Edwin C.、鄭聖敏、王曼娜、桑慧芬、顏靖芳、潘裕豐(2014)。創造力與創新教育:創造力教學實務指引。台北:華騰。  延伸查詢new window
5.Davis, Gary A.、Rimm, Sylvia B.(2004)。Education of the Gifted and Talented。Allyn & Bacon。  new window
6.鈕文英(2013)。研究方法與論文寫作。臺北市:雙葉書廊。  延伸查詢new window
7.Gardner, Howard(1999)。Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century。New York, NY:Basic Books。  new window
8.Merriam, Sharan B.(1998)。Qualitative research and case study applications in education。Jossey-Bass。  new window
9.蔡清田(2000)。教育行動研究。五南圖書出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE