:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高中奈米科技課程的專家概念與情境式問卷之建構
書刊名:教育實踐與研究
作者:盧秀琴宋家驥
作者(外文):Lu, Chow-chinSung, Chia-chi
出版日期:2010
卷期:23:1
頁次:頁85-114
主題關鍵詞:奈米科技概念圖命題知識陳述情境式問卷焦點團體法NanotechnologyConcept mapDeclarative knowledge statementProblem situation questionnaireFocus group interview
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(3) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:19
  • 點閱點閱:59
為瞭解台灣地區「奈米國家型科技人才培育計畫」高中奈米科技課程開發的成效,用以分析高中學生對奈米科技概念應有的理解,本研究邀請奈米科技專家、科學教育專家和高中奈米科技教學的教師,組成研究團隊,使用焦點團體法共同發展台灣地區高中奈米科技課程的專家概念圖、命題知識陳述與情境式問卷,並外聘專家群完成內容效度的檢覈。研究結果包括:(1) 高中「奈米科技」的專家概念圖包含:認知、情意態度和技能發展等三個主概念,每一個主概念再各自從普遍概念發展到特殊概念,並以例子做說明,加以澄清其概念。(2) 由高中奈米科技專家概念圖發展成命題知識陳述,強調科學名詞的語意關係,並增加科學原理的說明。(3) 由高中奈米科技專家概念圖和命題知識陳述發展成情境式問卷,分成17 個「命題情境」,學生先閱讀「命題情境」後再回答該情境所出的1-3 開放式問題。(4) 情境式問卷可以蒐集學生的回答,作為編製二階層診斷式試題的參考,以便教師後續研究使用。
To understand the achievement of high school nanotechnology curriculum in the “Nanotechnology Human Resource Development Program” and to analyze high-school student’s knowledge of nanotechnology conception in Taiwan, this research developed an expert concept map, declarative knowledge statements and a situated questionnaire for high school nanotechnology curriculum by conducting focus group interviews with experts in nanotechnology, science education and high-school nanotechnology teachers. Content validity was confirmed by specialist sub-group’s review. The results were: 1. the high school “Nanotechnology” expert concept map includes three main domains: Cognitive, affection and skills development. Concepts in each domain are from general to specific, and examples are used to clarify these conception. 2. High school nanotechnology statement transform expert concepts map into declarative knowledge statement, emphasizing the meaning between scientific terms and increasing science principles description. 3. The expert concept map and declarative knowledge statements are transferred into a high school nanotechnology problem situation questionnaire, which contained 17 proposition situation. First, we ask students to read the “proposition situation”, and then answer one to three open-ended questions. 4. The situated questionnaire was administered and the responses collected from the students serve as a reference for the Two-Tier Diagnostic Test, and also serves as data for teacher's future study.
期刊論文
1.楊坤原、張賴妙理(20040300)。發展和應用二段式診斷工具來偵測國中一年級學生之遺傳學另有概念。科學教育學刊,12(1),107-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Peterson, R. F.、Treagust, D. F.、Garnett, P.(1989)。Development and application of a diagnostic instrument to evaluate grade-11 and -12 students' concepts of covalent bonding and structure following a course of instruction。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,26(4),301-314。  new window
3.Drane, D.、Swarat, S.、Light, G.、Hersam, M.、Mason, T.(2009)。An evaluation of the efficacy and transferability of a nanoscience module。Journal of Nano Education,1(1),8-14。  new window
4.陳均伊、張惠博、郭重吉(20040900)。光反射與折射的另有概念診斷工具之發展與研究。科學教育學刊,12(3),311-340。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Treagust, David F.(1988)。Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconceptions in science。International Journal of Science Education,10(2),159-169。  new window
6.Haslam, F.、Treagust, D. F.(1987)。Evaluating Secondary Students' Misconceptions of Photosynthesis and Respiration in Plants Using a Two-Tier Diagnostic Instrument。Journal of Biological Education,21(3),203-211。  new window
7.盧秀琴(20030300)。顯微鏡下的世界兩階層診斷式紙筆測驗的發展與效化。國立臺北師範學院學報,16(1),127-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Tan, K. C. D.、Goh, N. K.、Chia, L. S.、Treagust, D. F.(2002)。Development and application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students' understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,39(4),283-301。  new window
9.Odom, Arthur Louis、Barrow, Lloyd H.(1995)。Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,32(1),45-61。  new window
10.Wandersee, J. H.(1990)。Concept mapping and the cartography of cognition。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,27(10),923-936。  new window
11.李世光、林宜靜、吳政忠、黃圓婷、蔡雅雯(2003)。奈米科技人才培育計畫之推動規劃與展望:從K-12奈米人才培育試行計畫談起。物理雙月刊,25(3),435-461。  延伸查詢new window
12.Hersam, M. C., Luna, M.,、Light, G.(2004)。Implementation of interdisciplinary group learning and peer assessment in a nanotechnology engineering course。Journal of Engineering Education,93,49–57。  new window
13.Novak, J. D.(1993)。How do we learn our lesson?。Science Teacher,60(3),50-55。  new window
14.李世光、林宜靜、吳政忠、黃圓婷、蔡雅雯(2003)。奈米科技人才培育計畫之推動規劃與展望:從K-12奈米人才培育試行計畫談起。物理雙月刊,25(3),435-461。  延伸查詢new window
15.Hersam, M. C.、Luna, M.、Light, G.(2004)。Implementation of interdisciplinary group learning and peer assessment in a nanotechnology engineering course。Journal of Engineering Education,93,49-57。  new window
16.Novak, J. D.(1993)。How do we learn our lesson?。Science Teacher,60(3),50-55。  new window
會議論文
1.Treagust, D. F.(1997)。Diagnostic assessment of students’ science knowledge。Taipei。  new window
2.Treagust, D. F.(2000)。An instrument to diagnose students’ conceptions of breathing, gas exchange and respiration。New Orleans。  new window
3.陳麗文、陳淑思(2006)。中部地區國民小學教師對奈米科技之認識。台北。  延伸查詢new window
4.宋曜廷(2009)。概念圖的基礎:學科概念的萃取與階層的組織。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
5.陳學志(2009)。Camp Tools-概念圖免費軟體使用簡介。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
6.陳麗文、陳淑思(2006)。中部地區國民小學教師對奈米科技之認識。台北。  延伸查詢new window
7.譚克平(2009)。理論篇:概念圖的原理及製作。台北市。  延伸查詢new window
8.Treagust, D. F.(1997)。Diagnostic assessment of students' science knowledge。Taipei。  new window
9.Treagust, D. F.(2000)。An instrument to diagnose students' conceptions of breathing, gas exchange and respiration。New Orleans。  new window
研究報告
1.教育部(2002)。奈米國家型科技計畫規畫報告(全程計畫92年~97年)。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
2.教育部(2002)。奈米國家型科技計畫規畫報告(全程計畫92年~97年)。台北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.薛富盛、呂福興、吳宗明、曾東模(2008)。金顆億粒-奈米金粒子實驗。台中:GB國家網路書店。  延伸查詢new window
2.廖達珊、胡苓芝、潘彥宏、孫蘭芳(2004)。奈米科技交響曲-生物篇。台北:臺大出版中心。  延伸查詢new window
3.呂宗昕(2005)。圖解奈米科技與光觸媒。台北:商周出版社。  延伸查詢new window
4.Lemke, J. L.(1990)。Talking science: Language, learning, and value。Ablex。  new window
5.Ausubel, David P.、Novak, Joseph D.、Hanesian, Helen(1978)。Educational psychology: A cognitive view。New York:Holt, Rinehart & Winston。  new window
6.Novak, Joseph D.、Gowin, D. Bob(1984)。Learning How to Learn。Cambridge University Press。  new window
7.Treagust, D. F.(1996)。Concept mapping: A tool for improving science teaching and learning。Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics。New York。  new window
8.Campbell, N. A.,、Reece, J. B.(2006)。Biology concepts & connections (9th ed.)。San Francisco。San Francisco, CA。  new window
9.Campbell, N. A.、Reece, J. B.(2006)。Biology concepts & connections。San Francisco, CA。  new window
10.Treagust, D. F.(1996)。Concept mapping: A tool for improving science teaching and learning。Improving teaching and learning in science and mathematics。New York。  new window
其他
1.鄭湧涇(2000)。Using a diagnostic assessment instrument to assess understanding ofbiology concepts,臺北:國立台灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.宋曜廷(2009)。概念圖的基礎:學科概念的萃取與階層的組織,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
3.陳學志(2009)。CampTools-概念圖免費軟體使用簡介,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
4.譚克平(2009)。理論篇:概念圖的原理及製作,台北市。  延伸查詢new window
5.蘇俊鐘(2003)。蓮花效應,http://nano.nchc.gov.tw/dictionary/lotus_effect.html, 20050424。  new window
6.北區奈米科技K-12人才培育計畫(2009),http://www.nano.edu.tw/entry/album.htm, 20091025。  延伸查詢new window
7.Söderlin, P.(2009)。Problem formulation/Problem situation questionnair,http://www.triz-journal.com/forum/showthread.asp?messageID=1548, 20090123。  new window
圖書論文
1.Treagust, D. F.(1995)。Diagnostic assessment of students’ science knowledge。Learning science in the schools: Research reforming practice。New Jersey。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE