:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:探討閱讀理解能力與國中學生學習細胞相關概念的關係
書刊名:國立臺北教育大學學報. 數理科技教育類
作者:盧秀琴
作者(外文):Lu, Chow-chin
出版日期:2005
卷期:18:2
頁次:頁93-122
主題關鍵詞:閱讀理解能力重要概念科學詞彙邏輯推理分析預測Reading comprehensionImportant conceptsScientific glossariesLogical inferences and analytical predications
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:51
  • 點閱點閱:39
本研究利用RCTC、TIWM 和中華國語文能力測驗進行量化研究,發現個案學生的細胞相關課程閱讀理解能力和國語文能力、細胞相關概念的獲得都呈現顯著的正相關。學生由閱讀文章而獲得的細胞相關概念主要有:解剖顯微鏡可看到立體構造,影像和實物是相同方向的;依據生物特徵將生物分為原核生物、原生生物、菌物界、植物界和動物界,原核生物包含細菌和藍綠藻,多數細菌扮演分解者的角色,原生生物包括藻類、原生動物和原生菌類,扮演生產者、消費者和分解者的角色。 綜合課室觀察和學生訪談,發現學生閱讀文章時習慣於囫圇吞棗,並沒有真正的理解,只是尋找一些相關的語詞在回答問題;並習慣將科學詞彙和該字的字面意義產生聯想,或以日常生活經驗在解釋科學詞彙。學生的另有概念不容易改變,雖然從閱讀文章而理解文字說明的意涵,但仍堅持自己的另有概念是對的,中低分群學生對於科學文章的邏輯推理和分析預測能力不佳,習慣把複雜概念化約成簡單概念。本研究並根據這些發現,建議科學教師使用一些具體可行的閱讀教學策略:引導閱讀框架策略、文章可讀性的判斷標準和科學閱讀的交互建構模式。
This study used RCTC, TIWM and the Chinese language ability test to conduct the quantifiable research; data analysis showed that significant correlations were found between the student's cell-related reading comprehension and the Chinese language ability and between the cell-related concepts. The students read texts to obtain the cell-related concepts which included: (a) the three-dimensional structure could be observed by the dissecting microscope; (b)the image and the material object were the same direction; (c)based on the biological characteristic, the biology could be divided into Monera, Protista, Fungi, Plantae and Animalia; (d)Monera contains the bacterium and the cyanobacterium, and most bacteria act as disintegrators; and (e)the protist like the algae, the protozoon, and the primary fungus, acts as the producer, the consumer, and the disintegrator role. The qualitative research method included classroom observations and students' interview. The result indicated that the students were used to read without thinking so that they didn’t really understand but only seeked some related words to answer the question; they were also used to associate the scientific glossary with meanings of words, or explanate scientific glossary based on daily life experience. The students’ alternative conceptions weren’t easy to change. Although they comprehended the writing explained by reading text, they still persisted their alternative conceptions were right. The low and middle score group students were not good at logical inferences and analytical predictions regarding the scientific text; they were used to simplify complex concepts into simple concepts. According to these discoveries, this study suggested that the scientific teacher should use some feasible read teaching strategy, like guided-reading block strategy, judging the readability of text, and science reading interactive-constructive model.
期刊論文
1.盧秀琴(2004)。不同教學策略影響中小學學生學習顯微鏡相關課程之探究。國立臺北師範學院學報,17(1),147-172。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Bell, B. F.(1981)。When is an animal, not an animal?。Journal of biological education,5(3),213-218。  new window
3.Duran, B. J.(1998)。Language minority students in high school: the role of language in learning biology concepts。Science Education,82(3),311-331。  new window
4.Friedler, Y.、Amir, R.、Tamir, P.(1987)。High school students Mifficulties in understanding osmosis。International Journal of Science Education,9(5),541-551。  new window
5.Garaway, G. B.(1994)。Language, culture, and attitude in mathematics and science learning: A review of the literature。The Journal of Research and Development in Education,27(2),102-111。  new window
6.Lynch, P. P.、Benjamin, P.、Chapman, T.、Holmes, R.、Mccammon, R.、Smith, A.、Symmons, R.(1979)。Scientific language and the high school pupil。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,16(4),351-357。  new window
7.Warner, J.、Wallace, J.(1994)。Creative writing and student’s science learning in a science and technology context。The Australian Science Teachers Journal,40(4),71-75。  new window
8.Winne, R. H.、Graham, L.、Prock, L.(1993)。A model of poor readers’ text based inferences:Effects of explanatory feedback。Reading Research Quarterly,28,536-566。  new window
9.Yore, L. D.、Craig, M. T.、Maguire, T. O.(1998)。Index of Science reading awareness: An interactive-constructive model, test verification, and grades 4-8 results。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,35(1),27-51。  new window
10.Popplewell, S. R.、Doty, D. E.(2001)。Classroom instruction and reading comprehension: A comparison of one basal reader approach and the four-blocks framework。Reading Psychology,22,83-94。  new window
11.盧秀琴(20040900)。中小學「細胞相關課程閱讀理解能力測驗」的發展與效化。國立臺北師範學院學報. 數理科技教育類,17(2),83-114。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.盧秀琴(20030300)。顯微鏡下的世界兩階層診斷式紙筆測驗的發展與效化。國立臺北師範學院學報,16(1),127-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.曾千虹、耿正屏(19930400)。國小、國中及高中學生之細胞概念發展。科學教育,4,157-182。  延伸查詢new window
14.連啟瑞、盧玉玲(20020900)。九年一貫課程「自然與生活科技」領域中之創造思考。國立臺北師範學院學報. 數理科技教育類,15,229+231-261+263。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.張筱莉、林陳涌(20010900)。學童眼中的科學專有名詞。科學教育學刊,9(3),219-234。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Bamett, J.(1992)。Language in the science classroom: some issues for teachers。The Australian Science Teachers Journal,38(4),8-13。  new window
17.Bishop, R.(1970)。Big words bother me。Education Research,13(1),75。  new window
18.Evans, J. D.(1978)。Putting names to concepts in biology。Journal of Biological Education,12(4),261-266。  new window
19.Lehr, S.(1988)。The child's developing sense of theme。Reading Research Quarterly,23(3),337-357。  new window
20.林寶貴、楊慧敏、許秀英(19950600)。中華國語文能力測驗之編製及相關因素之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,12,1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.Odom, Arthur Louis、Barrow, Lloyd H.(1995)。Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction。Journal of Research in Science Teaching,32(1),45-61。  new window
22.Pearsall, N. R.、Skipper, J. E. J.、Mintzes, J. J.(1997)。Knowledge restructuring in the life sciences: A longitudinal study of conceptual change in Biology。Science Education,81(2),193-215。  new window
23.盧秀琴(20030900)。臺灣北部地區中小學學生的顯微鏡操作技能與相關概念之發展。國立臺北師範學院學報,16(2),161-186。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Osborn, R. J.、Bell, B. F.(1983)。Science teaching and children's views of the world。European Journal of Science Education,5(1),1-14。  new window
25.盧秀琴(20051200)。探討教科書與中小學學生學習細胞相關概念的關係。科學教育學刊,13(4),367-386。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.Chen, S. W.、Yang, W. J.(2005)。An analysis of the compound words in junior high science textbooks--an example of material。Science and Mathematics International Conference。National Changhua University of Education。  new window
2.Hsu, P. L.、Yang, W. J.(2005)。A systemic functional linguistics perspective of the effect of text and image integration on pupils, reading comprehension: An example of"moon phase"。Science and Mathematics International Conference。National Changhua University of Education。  new window
3.Moes, M.、Foertsch, D.、Stewart, J.、Dunning, D.、Rogres, T.、Seda-Santana, I.、Benjamin, L.、Pearson, P. D.(1984)。Effects of text structure on children's comprehension of expository material。The National Reading Conference。Rochester, NY。62-84。  new window
4.Yore, L. D.、Pimm, D.(2005)。Trends in reading and writing research Mathematics and Science Education。Science and Mathematics International Conference。National Changhua University of Education。  new window
5.盧秀琴(2003)。不同學生表徵影響國中學生學習顯微鏡相關課程之探究。92學年度國立臺北師院教育學術論文發表會。國立台北師院。231-250。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.黃秀英(1999)。國中生物科文本調整與學生閱讀理解之研究(碩士論文)。國立高雄師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Brown, H.、Camboume, B.(1987)。Read and retell。Portsmouth, NH:Heinemann Educational Books, Inc.。  new window
2.Norman, D. A.、Rumelhart, D. E.、The LNR research group(1975)。Explorations in cognition。San Francisco, CA:W. H. Freeman。  new window
3.Ames, L. B.、Ilg, F. L.、Baker, S. M.(1988)。Your ten- to fourteen-year-old。New York:Delacorte。  new window
4.Cook, D. M.(1986)。A guide to curriculum planning in reading。Madison, WI:Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction。  new window
5.Gunning, T. G.(1996)。Creating reading instruction for all children。Boston, MA:Allyn and Bacon。  new window
6.Huck, C. S.、Helper, S.、Hickman, J.(1993)。Children'€™s literature in the elementary school。New York:Holt, Rinehart and Winston。  new window
7.教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。台北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
8.Gagné, E. D.、Yekovich, C. W.、Yekovich, F. R.(1993)。The cognitive psychology of school learning。New York, NY:Harper Collins College Publishers。  new window
9.Kintsch, Walter(1974)。The representation of meaning in memory。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
圖書論文
1.Bell, B.、Freyberg, P.(1985)。Language in the science classroom。Learning in science: the implication of children’s science。NZ:Heinemann。  new window
2.Yore, L. D.(1985)。Readability, formulas, and procedures, reading metacognition inventory and interview。Inferences in text processing。Amaterdam:Elsevier Science Publishers。  new window
3.Sulzby, E.、Teale, W.(1991)。Emergent literacy。Handbook of reading research。Longman。  new window
4.Rickheit, G.、Schnotz, W.、Strohner, H.(1985)。The concept of inference in discourse comprehension。Inferences in text processing。Amsterdam, PA:Elsevier Science Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE