資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.117.154.220)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
自我建構與自我複雜度對共品牌評價的影響
書刊名:
管理學報
作者:
蕭至惠
/
蔡進發
/
郭依儒
作者(外文):
Hsiao, Chih-hui
/
Tsai, Chin-fa
/
Kuo, Yi-ru
出版日期:
2011
卷期:
28:3
頁次:
頁267-287
主題關鍵詞:
自我建構
;
自我複雜度
;
契合度
;
共品牌評價
;
Self-construal
;
Self-complexity
;
Fitness
;
Co-brand evaluation
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
9
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:
4
共同引用:
5
點閱:52
過去文獻中顯示,「契合度」是影響共品牌評價最主要的因素之一,本研究將契合度細分為「品牌性格」、「領導品牌對共品牌產品」、「夥伴品牌對共品牌」等三種個別的契合度以及「總體契合度」,並探討前三種契合度與「總體契合度」的相關性為何?以及「總體契合度」與品牌評價的相關性為何?另外,本研究參照Mongo and Lau-Gesk(2007)的研究方法,分別以「自我建構」及「自我複雜度」兩個心裡變數搭配共品牌組合變數,以two-way ANCOVA來探討共品牌評價的影響。本研究共分六項前側以及兩個正式試驗,並選擇240位大學生為受測者。實驗一為2(自我建構:獨立我、相依我)×2(共品牌性格組合:單一性格、雙重性格)的實驗設計。2(自我參照:有、無)×2(共品牌性格組合:單一性格、雙重性格)的實驗設計,各自分別探討對共品牌評價的影響。實驗結果如下:1「品牌性格」、「領導品牌對共品牌產品」、「夥伴品牌對共品」等三種契合度與整體契合度呈現顯著正相關,2整體契合度與共品牌評價呈現顯著正相關。3自我複雜度的不同,對整體契合度並不具有顯著影響,4當獨立自我因素促發是,受刺激者單一性格共品牌的評價顯著高於雙重性格者。5最後,在自我複雜度情境下,受測者對單一或雙重性格共品牌的評價並沒有顯著差異;但在低自我難度情境下,相對於雙重性格共品牌,受測者對單一性格之共品牌會有顯著較高的評價。
以文找文
Existing co-branding research indicates that "fitness" is one of the major factors to influence co-brand evaluation. We divided "fitness" info four variables, including "brand personality fitness", the fitness of leading brand to co-branding production "the fitness of partner brand to co-branding production" and "total fitness", then we examined the relationship between the first three fitness and total fitness, and the relationship between total fitness and co-brand evaluation. Especially we followed Mango and Lau-Desk's footsteps, exploring the influences of "self-construal" and "se/f-complexity" on co-branding evolution with co-branding personality combination as a moderator.This study included six pre-tests and two experiments, and we chose 240 university students as our subjects. Experiments 1 investigated 2(self-construals: independent, dependent) ×2(co-brand personality: single, double) experimental design. Experiment 2 conducts 2self-refrrencing: 1os high) ×2(co-brand personality: single, double) experimental design. Our research sifted Moto brand as a leading brand, and Nike brand as a partner brand from three pre-tests. Then we exposed the simulating co-brand "Moto-Nike" cell phone to 240 university students by plane advertisement. We can conclude five results from these two experiments. 1. The positive relationship between the first three fitness and total fitness is significant. 2. The positive relationship between total fitness and co-brand evaluation is significant. 3. Different se/f-complexities do not s significant affect total fitness. 4. When the independent self is primed, subjects evaluate the double personality more favorable than double: when dependent self is primed, subjects evaluate the single personality more favorable than double. 5. On the situation of high self-complexity, theme are not significant differences between single and double personality co-brand evaluation. Nevertheless, on the situation of low self-complex facing single personality co-brand subjects have higher co-brand evaluation compared with double personality co-brand.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
別蓮蒂(20030800)。消費者認知的廠商移轉能力、產品製造困難度與品牌聯想對品牌延伸合適性的影響。臺灣管理學刊,3:2,頁65-83。
延伸查詢
2.
邱志聖、謝佳宏、葉相億(20031200)。國際購併組合及品牌名稱對消費者態度之影響--以銀行業為例。管理學報,20(6),1123-1158。
延伸查詢
3.
Uggla, Henrik(2004)。The Brand Association Base: A Conceptual Model for Strategically Leveraging Partner Brand Equity。Journal of Brand Management,12(2),105-123。
4.
Linville, P. W.(1987)。Self-complexity as a Cognitive Buffer against Stress-related Illness and Depression。Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,52(4),663-676。
5.
Kim, C. K.、Lavack, A. M.(1996)。Vertical brand extensions: current research and managerial implications。Journal of Product and Brand Management,5(6),24-37。
6.
Monga, Alokpama B.、Lau-Gesk, Loraine(2007)。Blending Cobrand Personalities: An Examination of the Complex Self。Journal of Marketing Research,44(3),389-400。
7.
Aaker, Jennifer L.、Williams, P.(1998)。Empathy versus Pride: The Influence of Emotional Appeals across Cultures。Journal of Consumer Research,25(3),241-261。
8.
Linville, Patricia W.(1985)。Self-complexity and Affective Extremity: Don't Put all of Your Eggs in one Cognitive Basket。Social Cognition,3(1),94-120。
9.
Markus, Hazel Rose、Kitayama, Shinobu(1991)。Cultural and the Self: Implications for Cognition, Emotion, and Motivation。Psychological Review,98(2),224-253。
10.
Burnkrant, Robert E.、Unnava, H. Rao(1995)。Effects of self-referencing on persuasion。Journal of Consumer Research,22(1),17-26。
11.
Biswas, Abhijit(1992)。The Moderating Role of Brand Familiarity in Reference Price Perception。Journal of Business Research,25(3),251-262。
12.
Boush, D. M.、Loken, B.(1991)。A Process-Tracing Study of Brand Extension Evaluations。Journal of Marketing Research,28(1),16-28。
13.
Rao, A. R.、Ruekert, R. W.(1994)。Brand alliances as signals of product quality。Sloan Management Review,36(1),87-97。
14.
Milewica, John、Herbig, Paul(1994)。Evaluating the brand extension decision using a model of reputation building。Journal of Product & Brand Management,3(1),39-47。
15.
Tauber, Edward M.(1988)。Brand leverage: strategy for growth in a cost-controlled world。Journal of Advertising Research,28(4),26-30。
16.
Simonin, Bernard L.、Ruth, Julie A.(1998)。Is a Company Known by the Company It Keeps? Assessing the Feedback Effects of Brand Alliances on Consumer Brand Attitudes。Journal of Marketing Research,35(1),30-42。
17.
Aaker, David A.(2004)。Leveraging the Corporate Brand。California Management Review,46(3),6-18。
18.
Fitzsimons, G. M.、Chartrand, T. L.、Fitzsimons, G. J.(2008)。Automatic effects of brand exposure on motivated behavior: How Apple makes you "think different"。Journal of Consumer Research,35(1),21-35。
19.
Aaker, David A.(1996)。Measuring Brand Equity Across Products and Markets。California Management Review,38(3),102-120。
20.
Aaker, Jennifer L.(1997)。Dimensions of brand personality。Journal of Marketing Research,34(3),347-356。
21.
Trafimow, David、Triandis, Harry C.、Goto, Sharon G.(1991)。Some tests of the distinction between the private self and the collective self。Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,60(5),649-655。
22.
Aaker, David A.、Keller, Kevin Lane(1990)。Consumer Evaluations of Brand Extensions。Journal of Marketing,54(1),27-41。
23.
Hong, Ying Yi、Morris, Michael W.、Chiu, Chi Yue、Benet-Martínez, Verónica(2000)。Multicultural minds: A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition。American Psychologist,55(7),709-720。
24.
Broniarczyk, Susan M.、Alba, Joseph W.(1994)。The importance of the brand in brand extension。Journal of Marketing Research,31(2),214-228。
25.
Park, Choong Whan、Milberg, Sandra、Lawson, Robert(1991)。Evaluation of Brand Extensions: The Role of Product Feature Similarity and Brand Concept Consistency。Journal of Consumer Research,18(2),185-193。
26.
Smith, Daniel C.、Park, C. Whan(1992)。The Effects of Brand Extensions on Market Share and Advertising Efficiency。Journal of Marketing Research,29(3),296-313。
27.
Aaker, Jennifer L.(1999)。The Malleable Self: The Role of Self-expression in Persuasion。Journal of Marketing Research,36(1),45-57。
28.
Aaker, Jennifer L.、Lee, Angela Y.(2001)。"I" Seek Pleasures and "We" Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion。Journal of Consumer Research,28(1),33-49。
29.
別蓮蒂、沈永正(2007)。品牌與品牌相似度及品牌與屬性相似度對消費者評估品牌延伸產品的影響。管理學報,24(5),551-567。
延伸查詢
30.
Burke, B.(1994)。Position, Personality, not Price should Frame Consumer Messages。Brandweek,35(36),20-43。
31.
Briley, Donnel A.、Morris, Michael W.、Simonson, I.(2000)。Reasons as Carriers of Culture: Dynamic versus Dispositional Models of Cultural Influence on Decision Making。Journal of Consumer Research,27(2),157-178。
32.
Macinnis, Deborah J.、Park, Whan C.(1991)。The Differential Role of Characteristics of Music on High-and Low-Involvement Consumers' Processing of Ads。Journal of Consumer Research,18(3),161-173。
33.
Park, Whan. C.、Jun, Sung Y.、Shocker, Alian D.(1996)。Composite Branding Alliances: An Investigation of Extension and Feedback Effect.。Journal of Marketing Researchy,33(4),453-466。
34.
Gardner, Wendi L.、Gabriel, S.、Lee, Angela Y.(1999)。'I' Value Freedom, But 'We' Value Relationships: Self-construal Priming Mirrors Cultural Differences in Judgment。Psychological Science,10(4),321-326。
35.
Kaiser, Henry F.、Horst, P.(1974)。A Score Matrix for Thurstone's Box Problem。Multivariate Behavioral Research,10(1),17-26。
36.
Stein, Karen F.(1994)。Complexity of the Self-schema and Responses to Disconfirming Feedback。Cognitive Therapy and Research,18(2),161-178。
會議論文
1.
陳振燧、陳欣怡(2002)。品牌個性契合度與品牌關係對品牌聯盟成效之影響。
延伸查詢
2.
錢玉芬、康家維(2008)。A Research on the Localization of Brand Personality。
圖書
1.
Keller, Kevin L.(2008)。Strategic Brand Management。New York:Prentice Hall。
2.
Guieford, J. P.(1965)。Fundamental statistics in phychology and education。N.Y:McGramn-Hill。
3.
Aaker, David A.、Joachimsthaler, Erich、高登第(2002)。品牌領導。臺北:天下文化。
延伸查詢
4.
Hair, Joseph F. Jr.、Black, William C.、Babin, Barry J.、Anderson, Rolph E.、Tatham, Ronald L.(2006)。Multivariate data analysis。Pearson Prentice Hall。
5.
Hawkins, D. I.、Best, R. J.、Coney, K. A.(2004)。Consumer Behavior: Building Marketing Strategy。New York:Boston:McGraw-Hill。
6.
Batra, R.、Lehmann, Donald R.、Singh, D.(1993)。The Brand Personality Component of Brand Goodwill: Some Antecedents and Consequences。Brand Equity and Advertising: Advertising's Role in Building Strong Brands.。New York。
7.
Triandis, Harry C.(1989)。Cross-Culture Studies of Individualism and Collectivism。Nebraska Symposium of Motivation.。Lincoln。
其他
1.
Szczepanski, C. M.(2006)。General and Special Interest Magazine Advertising and the Elaboration Likelihood Model: A Comparative Content Analysis and Investigation of the Effects of Differential Route Processing Execution Strategies。
圖書論文
1.
Baumeister, R. F.(1998)。The self。Handbook of social psychology。New York:McGraw-Hill。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
哀兵與優勢者品牌傳記的相對效果:以品牌概念形象、產品知覺身體風險為干擾
2.
求偶思維對自我複雜度、共品牌契合度與雌雄同體共品牌評價之影響
3.
數位時代之消費者依附風格對於品牌親密與品牌忠誠之影響:品牌個性之干擾效果
4.
元件品牌的品牌依附和品牌形象、共品牌契合度、共品牌評價與共品牌購買意願關係之研究
5.
品牌贊助商的廣告溝通效果之研究--以倫敦奧運為例
6.
博物館文創商品共品牌評價因素之研究
7.
負面雙重危機效應對共品牌評價與購買意願之影響
8.
運用佛教系統方法論(BSM)與結構方程模型(SEM)來探討傳統產業永績發展之問題歸因--以臺灣傢俱業為案例
9.
依附風格、品牌個性、品牌依附與品牌評價之研究:共品牌觀點
10.
懷舊廣告果真為銷售萬靈丹?--從集體懷舊觀點探討懷舊廣告對臺灣嬰兒潮世代的影響
11.
品牌亦男女有別?探討「自我」對雌雄同體共品牌評價的影響:自我建構與自我複雜度觀點
12.
品牌權益、移轉能力與契合度對品牌反向延伸之影響--以消費性電子產品為例
13.
臺灣企業品牌價值與股價報酬關係之實證研究
14.
人格特質對產品多元專業屬性之偏好與廣告溝通效果之研究
15.
國際購併組合及品牌名稱對消費者態度之影響--以銀行業為例
1.
從行銷活動、企業形象探討品牌權益與品牌價值鏈之關聯性研究
無相關書籍
無相關著作
1.
臺灣生產與作業管理之相關期刊文獻回顧與前瞻:從工業3.0到工業3.5
2.
從網站服務品質觀點探討電子資源使用行為意圖
3.
商業模式初探:餐飲服務業之個案研究
4.
論金融危機與歐盟保險監理之改革--兼論我國保險監理之改進芻議
5.
線上購物網站網路社群經營關鍵成功因素之多重個案研究--以Facebook粉絲頁為例
6.
臺灣審計研究之回顧與前瞻
7.
見所未見:詮釋性個案研究方法探索
8.
大學圖書館網站資訊尋獲度之研究
9.
人力資源管理對組織承諾之影響--以敬業貢獻度為中介變項
10.
從計畫行為理論探討數位學習平臺知識分享行為
11.
The Risk Management Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility on Shareholder Value
12.
全募兵制之軍事轉型風險管理研究
13.
半導體工程師的生涯人際能力及其生涯成功分析
14.
主管與部屬互動中情緒勞動:回顧、釐清、及前瞻
15.
醫療資訊人員工作投入、工作壓力及工作滿意度之探討
QR Code