:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣高科技產業的組織美學實踐作為之初探--以新竹科學園區廠商為例
書刊名:管理學報
作者:李珊瑋劉仲矩 引用關係徐木蘭葉一璋 引用關係
作者(外文):Lee, Shan-weiLiu, Chung-chuHsu, Mu-lanYeh, I-jan
出版日期:2011
卷期:28:3
頁次:頁289-307
主題關鍵詞:美學組織美學組織行為空間產品訓練AestheticsOrganizational aestheticsOrganizational behaviorPhysical environmentProductTraining
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(13) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:13
  • 共同引用共同引用:28
  • 點閱點閱:81
美國經濟是近年來管理的熱門主題,除了提升產業競爭例外,生活中組織的美學也應受到重視。傳統的組織管理者眼於豬肚的設計與效率的追求,忽略對柔性與靈性的關懷。本文由美學內涵切入,定義組織美學內涵包括從空間、產品、訓練三構面進行產業觀察。研究目的有二,意識以新竹科學區廠商346價為對象,進行問卷普查,有效樣本118份,有效回收率34.1%,檢驗六大產業組織美學三構面的實踐;二是檢驗組織美學的實踐是否會應為廠商不同規模與營業有所差異。研究發現空間、產品訓練美學已落實於高科技廠商中,且此三構面具顯著的相關性;此外。廠商原工人數與營業額不同時,組織美學的落實狀況亦有所差異,員工總數與營業額愈大時,落實程度可能愈高。本文根據上述研究發現,提出對學術與實務的相關建議。
Organizational Aesthetics is a hot research topic in recent years. In addition to improving industry competitive advantage, the life with aesthetics should be emphasized. Traditional management focuses on system designed and efficiency searched and ignores the topic of soft and spiritual management in organizations. The purpose of this study is to explore the existence of organizational aesthetics in Taiwan and its moderating effect on size and capital. This research was conducted via survey questionnaires sent to companies in Taiwan‘s Hsinchu Science Park 346 questionnaires were sent out, with 118 responses, and of those, 34.1% were considered to be valid responses. This survey discovered that aesthetics in the work environment, products and training already exists in the Science Park. The overall findings are that Organizational Aesthetics already contributes to organizational quality in Taiwan’s high tech industries. We hope that this study marks the beginning of understanding another aspect of organizational effectiveness, and will spur further industry and academic study.
期刊論文
1.Patricia Ordonez de Pablos。Evidence of Intellectual Capital Measurement from Asia, Europe, and the Middle East。Journal of Intellectual Capital,3(3),287-302。  new window
2.Colbert, Barry A.(2004)。The Complex Resource-based Review: Implications for Theory and Practice in Strategic Human Resource Management。Academy of Management Review,29(3),341-358。  new window
3.Warren, S.(2007)。Empirical Challenges in Organizational Aesthetics Research: Towards a Sensual Methodology。Organization Studies,29(4),559-580。  new window
4.Witz, Anne、Warhurst, Chris、Nickson, Dennis(2003)。The labour of aesthetics and the aesthetics of organization。Organization,10(1),33-54。  new window
5.廖世義、黃鈺婷、譚子文(20090900)。行銷管理美學要素之初探。行銷評論,6(3),391-422。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Mayer, K. J.、Salomon, R. M.(2006)。Capabilities, contractual hazards, and governance: integrating resource-based and transaction cost perspectives。Academy of Management Journal,49(5),942-959。  new window
7.林朝順、鄒國英、劉正耀、胡彼得、楊育純(20051200)。醫學系筆試多項選擇題品質分析。輔仁醫學期刊,3(4),213-220。  延伸查詢new window
8.Barney, Jay B.(1991)。Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage。Journal of Management,17(1),99-120。  new window
9.陳美杏(2006)。構成企業人文主義美學空間之多重西洋古典美學座標。人文社會學報,2,19-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Issac, G.、Rajendran, C.、Anantharaman, R. N.(2004)。A Holistic Framework for TQM in Software Industry: A Confirmatory Factor Analysis Approach。Quality Management Journal,11(3),35-60。  new window
11.Mucha, Rochelle T.(2008)。Aesthetic Intelligence Cultivating an Artistic Mindset。Organization Development Journal,26(3),41-54。  new window
12.Strati, A.(1992)。Aesthetic Understanding of Organizational Life。Academy of Management Review,17(3),568-581。  new window
13.Taylor, Steven S.(2002)。Overcoming Aesthetic Muteness: Researching Organizational Members' Aesthetic Experience。Human Relations,55(7),821-840。  new window
14.Weggeman, M.、Lammers, I.、Akkermans, H.(2007)。Aesthetics from a Design Perspective。Journal of Organizational Change Management,20(3),346-358。  new window
會議論文
1.蕭元哲(2006)。公共管理典範之職場靈性研究初探:領導觀點。2006臺灣政治學會年會暨「再訪民主:理論、制度與經驗」學術研討會,(會議日期: 11月25-26日)。臺北:臺灣政治學會。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.游承軒(2007)。臺灣本土銀行業經營人文風格探討。世新大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.孫本初、吳復新、夏學理、許道然(1999)。組織發展。臺北:國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.徐木蘭(2004)。管理零距離--徐木蘭談管理。台北:天下雜誌股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.許濱松(1981)。論激勵管理與人力資源的有效運用。臺北:七友出版傳播事業公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.林欽榮(2004)。組織理論與管理。臺北:揚智文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
5.漢寶德(2007)。談美感。臺北市:聯經出版事業公司。  延伸查詢new window
6.李再長、Daft, Richard L.(2003)。組織理論與管理。台北:華泰文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.郭羿承(2007)。美力財富。臺北:電腦人文化事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
8.蔣勳、楊雅棠(2006)。美的覺醒:蔣勳和你談眼、耳、鼻、舌、身。臺北市:遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
9.Postrel, Virginia、閻蕙群、陳俐雯(2004)。風格美感經濟學:美感是生活必需。台北市:商智文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.漢寶德(2004)。漢寶德談美。台北:聯經出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
11.李茂興、陳夢怡、Tosi, Henry L.、Mero, Neal P.、Rizzo, John R.(2004)。組織行為管理學。台北。  延伸查詢new window
12.沈文玉、Osho(2003)。情緒:釋放你的憤怒、恐懼與嫉妒。台北。  延伸查詢new window
13.吳定、鄭勝分、李盈盈(2005)。組織發展理論與技術。台北市:智勝文化事業有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
14.徐木蘭(2006)。電影院裡的管理智慧。台北。  延伸查詢new window
15.簡明輝(2007)。組織行為。台北。  延伸查詢new window
16.董學文(2003)。美學概論。北京。  延伸查詢new window
17.Linstead, S.、Hopfl, H.(2000)。The Aesthetics of Organization。London:Sage Publications Ltd。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE