Albert, M. B., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. (1991). Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy, 20(3), 251-259.
Allen, T. (1977). Managing the flow of technology: Technology transfer and the dissemination of technological information within the research and development organization. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Anderson, J., Williams, K., Seemungal, D., Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1996). Human genetic technology: Exploring the links between science and innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 8(2), 135-156.
Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2009). The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 57(4), 637-676.
Balconi, M., Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data. Research Policy, 33(1), 127-145.
Banerjee, P., Gupta, B., & Garg, K. (2000). Patent statistics as indicators of competition an analysis of patenting in biotechnology. Scientometrics, 47(1), 95-116.
Barnes, B. (1982). The science-technology relationship: A model and a query. Social studies of science, 12(1), 166-172.
Bassecoulard, E., & Zitt, M. (2004). Patents and Publications. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 665-694). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bhattacharya, S., Kretschmer, H., & Meyer, M. (2003). Characterizing intellectual spaces between science and technology. Scientometrics, 58(2), 369-390.
Bhattacharya, S., & Meyer, M. (2003). Large firms and the science-technology interface patents, patent citations, and scientific output of multinational corporations in thin films. Scientometrics, 58(2), 265-279.
Bonaccorsi, A., & Thoma, G. (2007). Institutional complementarity and inventive performance in nano science and technology. Research Policy, 36(6), 813-831.
Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2008). Measuring science-technology interaction using rare inventor-author names. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 173-182.
Branstetter, L., & Ogura, Y. (2005). Is academic science driving a surge in industrial innovation? evidence from patent citations. National bureau of economic research working paper (Vol. 11561). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
Breschi, S., & Catalini, C. (2010). Tracing the links between science and technology: An exploratory analysis of scientists’ and inventors’ networks. Research Policy, 39(1), 14-26.
Brooks, H. (1994). The relationship between science and technology. Research Policy, 23(5), 477-486.
Brusoni, S., Prencipe, A., & Pavitt, K. (2001). Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: Why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(4), 597-621.
Butcher, J., & Jeffrey, P. (2005). The use of bibliometric indicators to explore industry-academia collaboration trends over time in the field of membrane use for water treatment. Technovation, 25(11), 1273-1280.
Calvert, J., & Patel, P. (2003). University-industry research collaborations in the UK: Bibliometric trends. Science and Public Policy, 30(2), 85-96.
Carpenter, M. P., Cooper, M., & Narin, F. (1980). Linkage between basic research literature and patents. Research Management, 23(2), 30-35.
Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R., & Zuniga, P. (2008). In search of performance effects of (in) direct industry science links. Industrial and Corporate Change, 17(4), 611-646.
Chakrabarti, A. K. (1991). Competition in high technology: Analysis of patents of US, Japan, UK, France, West Germany, and Canada. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(1), 78-84.
Collins, P., & Wyatt, S. (1988). Citations in patents to the basic research literature. Research Policy, 17(2), 65-74.
Coward, H., & Franklin, J. (1989). Identifying the science-technology interface: Matching patent data to a bibliometric model. Science, Technology & Human Values, 14(1), 50-77.
Czarnitzki, D., Glänzel, W., & Hussinger, K. (2007). Patent and publication activities of German professors: An empirical assessment of their co-activity. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 311-319.
D''Este, P., & Fontana, R. (2007). What drives the emergence of entrepreneurial academics? A study on collaborative research partnerships in the UK. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 257-270.
de Solla Price, D. (1965). Is technology historically independent of science? A study in statistical historiography. Technology and Culture, 6(4), 553-568.
Ellis, P., Hepburn, G., & Oppenheim, C. (1978). Studies on patent citation networks. Journal of Documentation, 34(1), 12-20.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (1995). The triple helix of University-industry-government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. Easst Review, 14(1), 14-19.
Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "Mode 2" to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.
Fuel Cell Today. (2011). The fuel cell today industry review 2011. Retrieved Oct. 14, 2011, from http://www.fuelcelltoday.com/analysis/industry-review/2011/the-industry-review-2011
Gardner, P. (1999). The representation of science-technology relationships in Canadian physics textbooks. International Journal of Science Education, 21(3), 329-347.
Garfield, E. (1964). Science citation index a new dimension in indexing. Science, 144(3619), 649-654.
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., & Scott, P. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
Gittelman, M., & Kogut, B. (2003). Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Science, 49(4), 366-382.
Glänzel, W. (2002). Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980-1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends, 50(3), 461-473.
Glänzel, W., & Meyer, M. (2003). Patents cited in the scientific literature: An exploratory study of ''reverse'' citation relations. Scientometrics, 58(2), 415-428.
Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2004). Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 257-276). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Tratjenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools (Working Paper 8498). Cambridge, MA.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Harhoff, D., Scherer, F., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy, 32(8), 1343-1363.
Hicks, D. (2000). 360 Degree linkage analysis. Research Evaluation, 9(2), 133-143.
Hicks, D., Breitzman, T., Olivastro, D., & Hamilton, K. (2001). The changing composition of innovative activity in the US: A portrait based on patent analysis. Research Policy, 30, 681-703.
Hicks, D., & Hamilton, K. (1999). Does university industry collaboration adversely affect university research? Issues in Science and Technology, 15(4), 74-75.
Huang, K., & Murray, F. (2009). Does patent strategy shape the long-run supply of public knowledge? Evidence from human genetics. The Academy of Management Journal, 52(6), 1193-1221.
Huang, K. G., & Murray, F. E. (2010). Entrepreneurial experiments in science policy: Analyzing the Human Genome Project. Research Policy, 39(5), 567-582.
Iversen, E. J. (2000). An excursion into the patent-bibliometrics of Norwegian patenting. Scientometrics, 49(1), 63-80.
Jaffe, A. B. (1989). Real effects of academic research. The American Economic Review, 79(5), 957-970.
Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patents, citations, and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577-598.
Kalhammer, F. R., Kopf, B. M., Swan, D. H., Roan, V. P., & Walsh, M. P. (2007). Status and prospects for zero emissions vehicle technology report of the ARB independent expert panel 2007. Sacramento, California: State of California Air Resources Board.
Karki, M. M. S. (1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 19(4), 269-272.
Katz, J. S., & Martin, B. R. (1997). What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26(1), 1-18.
Klitkou, A., Nygaard, S., & Meyer, M. (2007). Tracking techno-science networks: A case study of fuel cells and related hydrogen technology R&D in Norway. Scientometrics, 70(2), 491-518.
Kneller, R. (2007a). The beginning of university entrepreneurship in Japan: TLOs and bioventures lead the way. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(4), 435-456.
Kneller, R. (2007b). Japan''s new technology transfer system and the pre-emption of university discoveries by sponsored research and co-inventorship. Industry and Higher Education, 21(3), 211-220.
Kyvik, S. (2003). Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000. Scientometrics, 58(1), 35-48.
Leydesdorff, L. (2004). The university-industry knowledge relationship: Analyzing patents and the science base of technologies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(11), 991-1001.
Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2003). The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Scientometrics, 58(2), 191-203.
Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2008). Inventorship and authorship in patent-publication pairs: An enquiry into the economics of scientific credit (Working Papers 224). Milano, Italy: Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Universita'' Bocconi.
Lubango, L. M., & Pouris, A. (2010). Is patenting of technical inventions in university sectors impeding the flow of scientific knowledge to the public? A case study of South Africa. Technology in Society, 32(3), 241-248.
Lundvall, B. (1992). National system of innovation: Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Anthem Press.
Martín-Sempere, M. J., Rey-Rocha, J., & Garzón-García, B. (2002). The effect of team consolidation on research collaboration and performance of scientists: Case study of Spanish university researchers in geology. Scientometrics, 55(3), 377-394.
Martyn, J. (1993). Bibliographic coupling. Journal of Documentation, 20(4), 236.
McMillan, G., Narin, F., & Deeds, D. (2000). An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: The case of biotechnology. Research Policy, 29(1), 1-8.
Melin, G., & Persson, O. (1996). Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 36(3), 363-377.
Metcalfe, J. (1995). Technology systems and technology policy in an evolutionary framework. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 25-46.
Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: University-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835-851.
Meyer, M. (2000). Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29(3), 409-434.
Meyer, M. (2002). Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems. Scientometrics, 54(2), 193-212.
Meyer, M. (2006). Are co-active researchers on top of their class? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology (Working Paper 144). University of Sussex, Science and Technology Policy Research.
Meyer, M. (2006). Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology. Research Policy, 35(10), 1646-1662.
Meyer, M., Siniläinen, T., & Utecht, J. (2003). Towards hybrid triple helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors. Scientometrics, 58(2), 321-350.
Murray, F. (2002). Innovation as co-evolution of scientific and technological networks: Exploring tissue engineering. Research Policy, 31(8-9), 1389-1403.
Murray, F., & Stern, S. (2004). Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? Evidence from patent-paper pairs. Northwestern University and MIT Sloan School: unpublished paper.
Murray, F., & Stern, S. (2007). Do formal intellectual property rights hinder the free flow of scientific knowledge? An empirical test of the anti-commons hypothesis. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63(4), 648-687.
Murray, F., & Stern, S. (2008). Learning to live with patents: A dynamic model of a knowledge community''s response to legal institutional change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nagaoka, S. (2007). Assessing the r&d management of a firm in terms of speed and science linkage: Evidence from the US patents. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 16(1), 129-156.
Narin, F. (1994). Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30(1), 147-155.
Narin, F., CSIRO., & Council, A. R. (2000). Inventing our future: The link between Australian patenting and basic science. Canberra: AusInfo.
Narin, F., Hamilton, K., & Olivastro, D. (1997). The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy, 26(3), 317-330.
Narin, F., & Noma, E. (1985). Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 7(3), 369-381.
Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1988). Technology indicators based on patents and patent citations. In A. F. J. V. Raan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology (pp. 465-507). North Holland: Elsevier Publishers.
Narin, F., & Olivastro, D. (1998). Linkage between patents and papers: An interim EPO/US comparison. Scientometrics, 41(1), 51-59.
Nelson, R. (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science : Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Noyons, E., Buter, R., van Raan, A., Schmoch, U., Heinze, T., Hinze, S., & Rangnow, R. (2003a). Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe: Life sciences. Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies.
Noyons, E., Buter, R., van Raan, A., Schmoch, U., Heinze, T., Hinze, S., & Rangnow, R. (2003b). Mapping excellence in science and technology across Europe: Nanoscience and nanotechnology. Leiden: Centre for Science and Technology Studies.
Noyons, E. C. M., van Raan, A. F. J., Grupp, H., & Schmoch, U. (1994). Exploring the science and technology interface: Inventor-author relations in laser medicine research. Research Policy, 23(4), 443-457.
OECD. (1996). The knowledge-based economy. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
OECD. (1997). National innovation systems. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
OECD, Hertog, P., & Remoe, S. (2001). Innovative clusters: Drivers of national innovation systems. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation Development.
Owen-Smith, J. (2003). From separate systems to a hybrid order: Accumulative advantage across public and private science at rresearch one universities. Research Policy, 32(6), 1081-1104.
Peri, G. (2004). Knowledge flows and productivity. Rivista di Politica Economica, 94(2), 21-59.
Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2009). The two faces of collaboration: Impacts of university-industry relations on public research. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1033-1065.
Persson, O., Glänzel, W., & Danell, R. (2004). Inflationary bibliometric values: The role of scientific collaboration and the need for relative indicators in evaluative studies. Scientometrics, 60(3), 421-432.
Price, D. J. d. S. (1965). Is technology historically independent of science? A study in statistical historiography. Technology and Culture, 6(4), 553-568.
Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349.
Rabeharisoa, V. (1992). A special mediation between science and technology: When inventors publish scientific articles in fuel cells research. In H. Grupp (Ed.), Dynamics of science-based innovation (pp. 45-72). New York: Springer Verlag.
Rip, A. (1992). Science and technology as dancing partners. In P. Kroes & M. Bakker (Eds.), Technological development and science in the industrial age (pp. 231-270). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Sampat, B., Mowery, D., & Ziedonis, A. (2003). Changes in university patent quality after the Bayh-Dole Act: A re-examination. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21(9), 1371-1390.
Schmoch, U. (1993). Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators. Scientometrics, 26(1), 193-211.
Schmoch, U. (1997). Indicators and the relations between science and technology. Scientometrics, 38(1), 103-116.
Schmoch, U. (2004). The Technological Output of Scientific Institutions. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 717-731). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Schmookler, J. (1996). Invention and economic growth. London: Harvard University Press.
Shapley, D., & Roy, R. (1985). Lost at the frontier: US science and technology policy Adrift. Philadelphia: ISI Press.
Smith, K., Ekland, A., Iversen, E., Kaloudis, A., Patel, P., & Narula, R. (1998). Understanding science, technology and innovation indicators: A guide for policymakers. IDEA-Report.
Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur''s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Sun, Y., Negishi, M., & Nishizawa, M. (2007). Coauthorship linkages between universities and industry in Japan. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 299-309.
Tamada, S., Naito, Y., Gemba, K., Kodama, F., Suzuki, J., & Goto, A. (2004). Science linkages in technologies patented in Japan discussion paper series 04-E-034: Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry.
Tijssen, R. (2004). Measuring and evaluating science: Technology connections and interactions. In H. Moed, W. Glänzel & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research (pp. 695-715). London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Tijssen, R., Buter, R., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2000). Technological relevance of science: Validation and analysis of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics, 47(2), 389-412.
Tijssen, R., & Korevaar, J. (1997). Unravelling the cognitive and interorganisational structure of public/private r&d networks: A case study of catalysis research in the Netherlands. Research Policy, 25(8), 1277-1293.
Tijssen, R. J. W. (2001). Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy, 30(1), 35-54.
Tijssen, R. J. W. (2002). Science dependence of technologies: Evidence from inventions and their inventors. Research Policy, 31(4), 509-526.
Tomov, D., & Mutafov, H. (1996). Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science. Scientometrics, 37(2), 267-278.
Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics, 21(1), 172-187.
U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission. (2010). Horizontal merger guidelines. Retrieved Oct. 14, 2010, from http://www.justice.gov/atr/public/guidelines/hmg-2010.html.
Van Looy, B., Callaert, J., & Debackere, K. (2006). Publication and patent behavior of academic researchers: Conflicting, reinforcing or merely co-existing? Research Policy, 35(4), 596-608.
van Vianen, B. G., Moed, H. F., & van Raan, A. F. J. (1990). An exploration of the science base of recent technology. Research Policy, 19(1), 61-81.
Verbeek, A., Debackere, K., Luwel, M., Andries, P., Zimmermann, E., & Deleus, F. (2002). Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes. Scientometrics, 54(3), 399-420.
Verspagen, B. (1997). Measuring intersectoral technology spillovers: Estimates from the European and US patent office databases. Economic Systems Research, 9(1), 47-65.
Verspagen, B. (2000). The role of large multinationals in the Dutch technology infrastructure: A patent citation analysis. Scientometrics, 47(2), 427-448.
von Wartburg, I., Teichert, T., & Rost, K. (2005). Inventive progress measured by multi-stage patent citation analysis. Research Policy, 34(10), 1591-1607.
Wang, G., & Guan, J. (2010). The role of patenting activity for scientific research: A study of academic inventors from China''s nanotechnology. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 338-350.
Wang, G., & Guan, J. (2011). Measuring science–technology interactions using patent citations and author-inventor links: An exploration analysis from Chinese nanotechnology. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 13(12), 6245-6262.
Wilson, E. (1999). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage.
Wuchty, S., Jones, B. F., & Uzzi, B. (2007). The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science, 316(5827), 1036-1039.
Zitt, M., & Bassecoulard, E. (1998). Internationalization of scientific journals: A measurement based on publication and citation scope. Scientometrics, 41(1), 255-271.
Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. (1995). Virtuous circles of productivity: Star bioscientists and the institutional transformation of industry. Cambridge, Mass.: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. (1996). Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. The National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 93(23), 12709-12716.
尤如瑾（2007）。燃料電池市場發展。工業材料雜誌，250，103-105。
尤如瑾、洪傳獻、黃楓台、王啟川、陳金銘、唐震宸（2003）。微奈米技術於電機能源產業之應用研究。新竹縣：工業技術研究院。
毛宗強（2010）。加速發展氫能，積極推進低碳能源。上網日期：2010年5月24日。網址：http://www.npf.org.tw/post/12/7952。
向宸蔚（2010）。應用層級分析法評估臺灣燃料電池產業政策。未出版之碩士論文，國立交通大學管理學院碩士在職專班科技管理組，新竹市。
江愛群（2009）。燃料電池車(FCEV)發展之產業驅動力與限制因素。上網日期：2010年5月24日。網址：http://www2.itis.org.tw/netreport/NetReport_Detail.aspx?rpno=160720748。
行政院國家科學委員會（2004）。科技統計名詞定義手冊。台北：行政院國家科學委員會。
行政院經濟建設委員會（2000）。知識經濟發展方案。上網日期：2010年5月24日。網址：http://www.cepd.gov.tw/m1.aspx?sNo=0001546。
余鑑（2003）。科技與科學關係之探討。生活科技教育月刊，36（7），3-10。
宋隆裕、張文振、楊昌中 (2011)。日本「家用定置型燃料電池CHP系統」發展現況。能源報導，2011(11)，14-16。
林勝賢（2009）。酵素型生物燃料電池奈米質傳模擬與實作實驗量測。未出版之碩士論文，國立清華大學動力機械工程學系，新竹市。
高洪善 (2009)。歐盟科研計畫體制的創新之舉：歐盟聯合技術行動—歐盟在重大科技專項中首次引入私人資金。全球科技經濟瞭望，24(2)，5-8。
國立清華大學 (2011)。中國大陸燃料電池產業發展現況與臺灣競合策略分析報告。經濟部能源局99年度能源科技研究中心推動計畫-能源產業科技策略研究中心研究報告，經濟部能源局，台北市。
康志堅（2010）。韓國燃料電池產業發展現況。上網日期：2010年5月24日。網址：http://www.taiwangreenenergy.org.tw/Article/article-more.aspx?id=8B749DC032E000BA。
郭爵華（2009）。綠色能源產業發展之新契機。臺灣經濟研究月刊，32（6），20-26。陳世榮、李河清（2011）。中國燃料電池研發及其環境溝通。中國大陸研究，54（3），33-69。黃元鶴（2009）。由巨磁阻相關文獻探究科學與技術間的互動。圖書資訊學刊，7（1/2），53-76。黃慕萱、陳達仁、張瀚文（2003）。從專利計量的觀點評估國家科技競爭力。中國圖書館學會會報，70，18-30。黃樑傑（2010）。各國氫燃料電池車推動概況。上網日期：2011年2月24日。網址：http://www.artc.org.tw/chinese/03_service/03_02detail.aspx?pid=1593。
楊志忠、林頌恩、韋文誠（2003）。燃料電池的發展現況。科學發展，367期，30-33。
經濟部能源局（2010）。2010年能源產業技術白皮書。台北市：編者。
趙文衡、黃慧文（2009）。綠色能源產業的商機與挑戰。震旦月刊，458期，8-11。
劉信良（民92）。國家創新體系運作之觀察-以育成中心政策為實證研究。未出版之碩士論文，東海大學政治學系，台中縣。
蔡宜良（2010a）。國際燃料電池車輛發展策略與推動現況（上）。上網日期：2010年5月24日。網址：http://www.artc.org.tw/chinese/03_service/03_02detail.aspx?pid=1667。
蔡宜良（2010b）。國際燃料電池車輛發展策略與推動現況（下）。上網日期：2010年5月24日。網址：http://www.artc.org.tw/chinese/03_service/03_02detail.aspx?pid=1682。
蔡明月（民92）。資訊計量學與文獻特性。台北市：國立編繹館。賴俊吉 (民98)。厭氧醱酵與生質氫能。中工高雄會刊，17(1)，21-27。
顏君聿（2008）。日本氫能燃料電池園區－橫濱JHFC Park。能源報導，2008（6），17-18。
羅法聖（2008）。燃料電池專利分析與創新趨勢。物理雙月刊，30（4），399-405。
羅思嘉（2005）。從專利分析看台日韓遺傳工程研究之發展。圖書資訊學刊，2（3/4），45-57。