:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:住宅負擔能力與住宅自有率之長期關係--追蹤資料共整合分析應用
書刊名:住宅學報
作者:彭建文 引用關係蔡怡純 引用關係
作者(外文):Peng, Chien-wenTsai, I-chun
出版日期:2012
卷期:21:2
頁次:頁1-27
主題關鍵詞:住宅自有率住宅負擔能力房價所得追蹤資料共整合分析Homeownership rateHousing affordabilityHouse priceHousehold incomePanel cointegration
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(7) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:7
  • 共同引用共同引用:65
  • 點閱點閱:126
本文透過追蹤共整合模型檢視住宅自有率的影響因素,發現住宅自有率與家戶所得、遷徙率、老年人口比率、有偶率等變數具有長期共整合關係,但與房價、家戶變動率、租金成長率沒有整合關係,住宅自有率與房價所得比的均衡關係亦僅在台北縣存在。然而,若將時間趨勢納入住宅自有率模型時,則會得住宅自有率與房價、房價所得比、租金成長率等變數間都有整合關係的結果。此外,從共整合向量可發現,老年人口比率與有偶率等人口屬性變數的影響大於房價與所得,但不同都市住宅自有率的最重要影響變數不同。
This paper uses the panel cointegration model to investigate the determinants of long-term homeownership rates for four cities in Taiwan. The results show that a long-run equilibrium relationship exists between homeownership rates and household income, the percentage of married couples, the percentage of elderly people, and mobility rates. No long-run cointegration relationship is found to exist between homeownership rates and house prices, changes in the number of households, or rental costs. In addition, homeownership rates and the house price-to-income ratio are cointegrated only in Taipei County. However, if we consider long-term trends in the model, then all variables are cointegrated with homeownership rates. Furthermore, the results of the cointegration vectors show that the influences of the percentage of elderly people and the percentage of married couples on homeownership rates are more significant than that of house prices and household income. However, the most important variables influencing homeownership rates differ in each of the four cities.
期刊論文
1.Pedroni, Peter(1999)。Critical Values for Cointegration Tests in Heterogeneous Panels with Multiple Regressors。Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,61(4),653-670。  new window
2.Bourassa, Steven C.(1994)。Gender, Marital Status, and Homeownership in Australia。Journal of Housing Economics,3(3),220-239。  new window
3.彭建文、蔡怡純(20101200)。不同縣市住宅自有率差異分析--縱橫資料分析法之應用。都市與計劃,37(4),433-454。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Kan, K.(1999)。Expected and unexpected residential mobility。Journal of Urban Economics,45(1),72-96。  new window
5.Linneman, P.、Megbolugbe, I. F.、Wachter, S. M.、Cho, M.(1997)。Do Borrowing Constraints Change U.S. Homeownership Rates?。Journal of Housing Economics,6,318-333。  new window
6.Linneman, P.、Wachter, S.(1989)。The Impacts of Borrowing Constraints on Homeownership。AREUEA Journal,17(4),389-402。  new window
7.謝文盛、林素菁(20000200)。租稅效果對住宅租買選擇影響之分析。住宅學報,9(1),1-17。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.彭建文、吳森田、吳祥華(20071100)。不動產有效稅率對房價影響分析--以臺北市大同區與內湖區為例。臺灣土地研究,10(2),49-66。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Johansen, S.(1991)。Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegrating Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Model。Econometrica,59(6),1551-1580。  new window
10.Pedroni, Peter(2000)。Fully Modified OLS for Heterogeneous Cointegrated Panels。Advances in Econometrics,15(1),93-130。  new window
11.Johansen, Søren(1988)。Statistical Analysis of Cointegration Vectors。Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control,12(2/3),231-254。  new window
12.Johansen, Søren、Juselius, Katarina(1990)。Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inference on Cointegration: with Applications to the Demand for Money。Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,52(2),169-210。  new window
13.Im, Kyung So、Pesaran, M. Hashem、Shin, Yongcheol(2003)。Testing for Unit Roots in Heterogeneous Panels。Journal of Econometrics,115(1),53-74。  new window
14.Sinai, T.、Souleles, N. S.(2005)。Owner Occupied Housing as a Hedge against Rent Risk。Quarterly Journal of Economics,120(2),763-789。  new window
15.Maddala, Gangadharrao S.、Wu, Shaowen(1999)。A Comparative Study of Unit Root Tests with Panel Data and a New Simple Test。Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics,61(S1),631-652。  new window
16.薛立敏、陳綉里(19970800)。臺灣一九八〇年代住宅自有率變化之探討。住宅學報,6,27-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.彭建文、王佳于(2005)。不同縣市住宅自有率差異原因分析。  延伸查詢new window
2.Baltagi, B. H.(2005)。EconometricAnalysis of Panel Data。  new window
3.Boehm, J.(1981)。Tenure Choice and Expected Mobility: A Synthesis。  new window
4.Borjas, G. J.(2002)。Homeownership in the Immigrant Population。  new window
5.Bourassa, S. C.(1995)。The Impacts of Borrowing Constraints on Home-ownership in Australia。  new window
6.Bourassa, S. C.(1996)。Measuring theAffordability of Home-ownership。  new window
7.Bourassa, S. C.(2000)。Ethnicity, Endogeneity, and Housing Tenure Choice。  new window
8.Brueckner, J.(1986)。The Downpayment Constraint and Housing Tenure Choice。  new window
9.Coulson, N. E.(1999)。Why Are Hispanic-and Asian- American Homeownership Rates So Low?: Immigration and Other Factors。  new window
10.Coulson, N. E.(2002)。Regional and State Variation in Homeownership Rates; or If California’s Home Prices Were as Low as Pennsylvania’s Would Its Ownership Rate Be as High?。  new window
11.Di, Z. X., Belsky, E. & Liu, X.(2007)。Do Homeowners Achieve More Household Wealth in the Long Run?。  new window
12.Dusansky, R. & Koc, C.(2007)。The Capital Gains Effect in the Demand for Housing。  new window
13.Eilbott, P. & Binkowski, E. S.(1985)。The Determinants of SMSA Homeownership Rates。  new window
14.Follian,J. R.(1982)。Does Inflation Affect Real Behavior: The Case of Housing。  new window
15.Goodman,A. C.(1988)。An Econometric Model of Housing Price, Permanent Income, Tenure Choice and Housing Demand。  new window
16.Goodman,A. C.(2003)。Following a Panel of Stayers: Length of Stay, Tenure Choice, and Housing Demand。  new window
17.Grange,A. L. & Pretorius, F.(2000)。Ontology, Policy and the Market: Trends to Home-ownership in Hong Kong。  new window
18.Green, R. K. & Vandell, K. D.(1999)。Giving Households Credit: How Changes in the U.S. Tax Code Could Promote Homeownership。  new window
19.Gwin, C. R. & Ong, S.(2004)。Do We Really Understand Home Ownership Rates? An International Study。  new window
20.Gyourko, J. & Linneman, P.(1996)。Analysis of the Changing Influences on Traditional Households’ Ownership Patterns。  new window
21.Haurin, D. R.(1991)。Income Variability, Homeownership, and Housing Demand。  new window
22.Haurin, D. R. & Kamara, D. A.(1992)。The Homeownership Decision of Female-headed Households。  new window
23.Haurin, D., Hendershott, P. & Kim, D.(1994)。Housing Decisions ofAmericanYouth。  new window
24.Ioannides, Y. M. & Kan, K.(1996)。Structural Estimation of Residential Mobility and Housing Tenure Choice。  new window
25.Jones, L. D.(1990)。Current Constrains on the Housing Demand of Young Owners。  new window
26.Mikhed, V. & Zemčík, P.(2009)。Testing for Bubbles in Housing Markets: A Panel Data Approach。  new window
27.Narwold,A. & Sonstelie, J.(1994)。State Income Taxes and Homeownership: ATest of the Tax Arbitrage Theory。  new window
28.Painter, G., Gabriel, S. & Myers, D.(2001)。Race, Immigrant Status, and Housing Tenure Choice。  new window
29.Painter, G. & Redfearn, C.(2002)。The Role of Interest Ratesin Influencing Long-run Homeownership Rates。  new window
30.Painter, G., Yang, L. & Yu, Z.(2003)。Heterogeneity in Asian American Home-ownership: The Impact of Household Endowments and Immigrant Status。  new window
31.Painter, G., Yang, L. & Yu, Z.(2004)。Homeownership Determinants for Chinese Americans: Assimilation, Ethnic Concentration and Nativity。  new window
32.Pedroni, P.(2001)。Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels。  new window
33.Rosen, H. S.(1979)。Housing Decisions and the U.S. Income Tax: An Econometric Analysis。  new window
34.Rosen, H. S. & Rosen, K. T.(1980)。Federal Taxes and Homeownership: Evidence from Time-series。  new window
35.Rosen, H. S., Rosen, K. T. & Holtz, E. D.(1984)。Housing Tenure, Uncertainty and Taxation。  new window
36.Stevens, B. J.(1979)。Employment, Permanent Income and the Demand for Housing。  new window
37.Tuner, T. M.(2003)。Does Investment Risk Affect the Housing Decision of Family?。  new window
38.Wachter, S. & Megbolugbe, I.(1992)。Racial and Ethnic Disparitiesin Homeownership。  new window
39.Wood, G., Watson, R. & Flatau, P.(2006)。Microsimulation Modelling of Tenure Choice and Grants to Promote Home Ownership。  new window
40.Zorn, P. M.(1988)。An Analysis of Housing Mobility and Tenure Choice: An Empirical Study of Korea。  new window
41.Yu, Z.(2006)。A Different Path to Homeownership: The Case of Taiwanese Immigrants in Los Angeles。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE