:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:國民參與審判的省思
書刊名:檢察新論
作者:洪光煊
出版日期:2013
卷期:14
頁次:頁120-129
主題關鍵詞:國民參與審判制度人民觀審制度陪審參審國民參與審判
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:13
  • 點閱點閱:96
期刊論文
1.張永宏、王靜琳(2013)。韓國國民參與審判制度之現狀與展望(上)。司法周刊,1642,2-3。  延伸查詢new window
2.Park, Ryan Y.(2010)。The Globalizing Jury Trial: Lessons and Insights from Korea。American Journal of Comparative Law,58(3),525-582。  new window
3.Lloyd-Bostock, Sally、Thomas, Cheryl(1999)。Decline of the “Little Parliament”: Jury Reform in England and Wales。Law & Contemp. Probs,62(2),7-40。  new window
4.Castle, Alex(1990)。Now and Then--The Unmarked Bicentennial of Jury Usage in Australia and Some Consequences of Its Decline。Australia L. J.,64。  new window
5.Fukurai, Hiroshi、Chan, Kay-Wah、Miyazawa, Setsuo(2010)。The Resurgence of Lay Adjudicatory System in East Asia。ASIAN-PACIFIC L. & POl ’Y J.,12。  new window
6.O’Leary, Jodie(2011)。Twelve Angry Peers or One Angry Judge: An Analysis of Judge Alone Trials in Australia。Criminal L. J.,35,154。  new window
7.Weigend, Thomas(20120831)。德國刑事審判中之人民參與(三),法務部司法院交通大學合辦人民審判權研討會演講内容。法務通訊,2610。  延伸查詢new window
8.申東雲、王靜琳(20110825)。韓國的國民參與裁判制度。司法周刊,1557(別冊),4-16。  延伸查詢new window
9.張永宏、王靜琳(20130502)。韓國國民參與審判制度之現狀與展望(下)。司法週刊,1643,2-3。  延伸查詢new window
10.呂寧莉(20130100)。日本裁判員制度實施三年之檢討。檢察新論,13,278-289。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.(20130408)。Top Court Review Should Lead to Improve Lay Judge Trial。Editorial, Daily Yomiuri Online。  new window
12.Hans, Valerie P.(2007)。Citizens as Legal Decision Makers: An International Perspective。CORNELL INT’L L. J.,40,303。  new window
13.洪光煊(20060511)。日本實施國民參審制前之因應措施。法務通訊,2288,4-6。  延伸查詢new window
14.(20121019)。司法週刊1616。  延伸查詢new window
15.張永宏(201301)。論國民參與刑事審判制度的基本理念(上)--兼評人民觀審試行條例草案之立法宗旨。月旦法學雜誌,212,130-133。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.張永宏(20110527)。韓國國民參與審判制度介紹。司法週刊,1544(別冊),1-20。  延伸查詢new window
17.何賴傑(20121100)。從德國參審制談司法院人民觀審制。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,41(特刊),1189-1243。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Law Commission(200102)。Juries in Criminal Trials。Wellington, New Zealand。  new window
2.Law Commission(1988)。Juries in Criminal Trials。Wellington, New Zealand。  new window
3.韓福、華仁、陳澄子、張定绮(199903)。李光耀各國之鑰。天下文化。  延伸查詢new window
4.Young, Warren、Cameron, Neil、Tinsley, Yvette(199911)。Juries in Criminal Trials。Wellington, New Zealand。  new window
5.洪光煊等(200109)。九十年度檢察官赴新加坡考察報告。法務部。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(20101013)。司法院長賴浩敏上任要4C司法改革。  延伸查詢new window
2.(20120112)。人民觀審草案出爐。  延伸查詢new window
3.(19680611)。Singapore Parliament Reports (Hansard)。  new window
4.Munsterman, G. Thomas,Strickland, Shauna(2013)。The Vanishing Trials?,http://www.ncsc-jurystudies.orgWhat-We-Do~mediaMicrositesFilesCJSJury%20NewsTHE%20VANISHING%20TRIAL.ashx, 2013/01/16。  new window
5.(20091021)。New Jury System Fails to Meet Expectation。  new window
6.(20121109)。Supreme Court Criticize Prolongation of Trials。  new window
7.(20130107)。Improve Lay Judge System’s Reliability by Conducting a Thorough Review。  new window
8.(20130420)。Former Lay Judge Diagnosed with Acute Stress Disorder。  new window
9.Thalwitzer, Aaron B.。The Decline in Jury Trials: We Are Not Just Getting Along,http://tacticalip.com/2011/02/17/the-decline-in-jury-trials-we-are-not-just-getting-along/, 2013/01/16。  new window
10.Gee, Brandon(20110502)。As Jury Cases Decline, So Does Art of Trial Lawyers。  new window
11.(20090929)。Public Warming to Lay Judge Role。  new window
12.(20120124)。Trust in Court。  new window
13.(20130212)。Unjust Bail Decision。  new window
14.(20110603)。Tougher Rules on Ex-officials' Hiring to Curb Cronyism。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE