:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:圖書教師與社會領域教師協作教學之行動研究
書刊名:區域與社會發展研究
作者:賴苑玲 引用關係伍桐慰沈佩怡陳曉萍蔡如惠
作者(外文):Lai, Yuang-lingWu, Tong-weiShen, Pei-yiChen, Siao-pingTsai, Ru-huei
出版日期:2013
卷期:4
頁次:頁3-27
主題關鍵詞:圖書教師21世紀學習者標準協作教學探究式學習Teacher librariansStandards for the 21st-century learnerCo-teachingInquiry learning
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:32
  • 點閱點閱:3
美國圖書館員協會(AASL)為因應科技所帶來的資訊潮流,於2009年推出「21世紀學習者標準」。其核心主軸為學習與創新能力、生活與職涯能力及資訊媒體科技能力,以培育學童在資訊社會中所需之能力;社會學習領域內涵之地球、歷史、政策、經濟主題皆為21世紀核心學科,且該學習領域重於批判思考、價值判斷、研究溝通、解決問題等能力的培養,與21世紀學習者所需之能力相呼應。本研究透過Big 6資訊素養模式,以此標準設計國小五年級社會領域之「日本統治下的臺灣」教學單元,探究社會領域與圖書教師的協作教學歷程、教學過程中遇到的問題,以及學生學習反應。本研究為期三週共12節課,以行動研究為架構,配合參與觀察、文件分析與問卷調查等方式進行。研究結果發現在教學的部分,社會領域與圖書教師可依照「直接教學」、「示範引導與練習」、「獨立練習」與「分享與反思」四大教學活動,完成協作教學。過程中,由於時間不足、學童未能有效利用關鍵詞進行搜尋、單元知識性內容過多,以及在電子資料庫與網路資源教學與練習安排得太緊湊等問題下,整體教學時間由原本預計的9節課修正至12節課,課程單元才能順利完成。透過學生對本次學習的自我評量中,發現所學到最多的是網頁搜尋以及團隊合作,且其所展現的積極度、小組合作程度,亦明顯影響其學習成果。因此,選擇合宜探究主題,並加強資訊檢索能力、增加練習時間與提升小組合作意願,是未來所需努力的方向。
To cope with the technology trend and equip students with necessary abilities in the era of technology, the American Association of School Librarians (AASL) issued the ”Standards for the 21st-Century Learner” in 2009, in which the main concerns are ability to learn and innovate, ability to manage life and career, and ability to cope with media and technology. In Taiwan, the field of social studies not only encompasses topics which are important in the 21st century such as the earth, history, policies, and economy but also stresses cultivation of abilities such as critical thinking, value judgment, research and communication, problem solving which are valued in the ”Standards for the 21st-Century Learner”. Therefore, this study aims to explore how social studies teachers and teacher librarians co-teach the unit ”Taiwan in Japanese Colonial Period” based on the Big6 Mode and the ”Standards for the 21st-Century Learner” in 2009.The teaching lasted for 3 weeks, 12 classes in total. Action Research was employed as the basis while observation, document analysis and questionnaire survey were also used. The results indicate that social studies teachers and teacher librarians could follow the four stages-”direct instruction”, ”demonstration and guided practice”, ”independent practice”, and ”reflection”-to complete their co-teaching of the given unit. In teaching, problems such as limited teaching hours, students' ineffectiveness in search for information with key words, too much informative content of the given unit, and over intensive courses and practices of e-database and online resources made the whole teaching hours prolonged from 9 classes to 12 classes to better complete the teaching. The results of students' self-evaluation of this unit show that what they learnt most was webpage search and team work and that how well they engaged in learning and cooperated with other team members significantly influenced their learning results. Therefore, it is suggested that research topic should be carefully selected, practice hours should be prolonged, willingness to do teamwork should be elevated to better enhance the ability to search for information.
期刊論文
1.Andrews, S.、Gann, L.(2011)。An information literacy progression。School Library Media Activities Monthly,28(2),21-23。  new window
2.林菁(20110600)。資訊素養融入國小一年級「校園生物大搜索」主題探究:以Super3模式為例。教育資料與圖書館學,48(4),539-570。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.林菁、洪美齡(20051000)。資訊素養融入國小社會「中華文化」主題探究。圖書館學與資訊科學,31(2),108-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.謝宜芳(20011200)。資訊素養的相關概念。國立中央圖書館臺灣分館館刊,7(4),91-103。  延伸查詢new window
5.林菁(20040400)。資訊素養融入國小社會學習領域--以Big6理念架構為例。視聽教育雙月刊,45(5)=269,2-16。  延伸查詢new window
6.周愫嫻(20000800)。臺灣教育改革的「巴洛可現象」:論教育改革對國小教育與國小社會科的影響。國民教育,40(6),21-33。  延伸查詢new window
7.Needham, J.(2010)。Meeting the new AASL standards for the 21st-century learner via Big6 problem solving。Library Media Connection,28(6),42-43。  new window
8.Mardis, M. A.(2008)。Thirty Helens agree 2007 research supports AASL's standards for the 21st-Century learner。School Library Media Activites Monthly,24,56-58。  new window
9.Saunders, W.(1992)。The constructivist perspective: Implications for teaching strategies for social studies。School Science and Mathematics,92(3),16-27。  new window
10.Scahill, M.(2011)。Social studies: Where am I? I know my community。School Literacy Monthly,27(5),19-20。  new window
11.Stephens, C. G.、Franklin, P.(2009)。Managing AASL's new standards for the 21st-Century learner。School Literacy Monthly,26(4),34-36。  new window
12.黃道遠(20050400)。從認知發展論檢視社會科教學問題--以Piaget、Vygotsky為中心。國教輔導,44(4)=366,34-40。  延伸查詢new window
13.吳美美(19960800)。課程改革和資訊素養教育。社教雙月刊,74,32-39。  延伸查詢new window
14.林菁、李佳憓(20091200)。國小圖書老師與班級教師合作設計資訊素養融入教學。教育資料與圖書館學,47(2),199-230。new window  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.吳宜家、王渝禎、方宣懿、黃天志(2012)。以21 世紀學習者標準為目標之課程設計--國小二年級生活領域為例。「2012 十二年國教中的課程與教學改革研究生論文交流研討會」會議,中興大學教師專業發展所 。臺中市。  延伸查詢new window
2.Campbell, S.(2004)。Defining information literacy in the 21st century。The annual meeting of World Library and Information Congress: 70th IFLA General Conference and Council。Buenos Aires。  new window
學位論文
1.董松喬(2011)。運用互動式電子白板進行社會領域問題導向學習之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北教育大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Catts, R.、Lau, J.(2008)。Towards information literacy indicators。Paris:UNESCO。  new window
2.Kuhlthau, Carol C.(1993)。Seeking Meaning: A Process Approach to Library and Information Services。Ablex Publishing。  new window
3.Curzon, S.、Lampert, L.(2007)。Proven strategies for building an information literacy program。New York:Neal-Schuman Publishers。  new window
4.教育部(2000)。國民中小學九年一貫課程暫行綱要。台北:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
5.Doyle, C. S.(1994)。Information literacy in an information society: A concept for the information age。Syracuse, N. Y.:ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology。  new window
6.American Association of School Librarians、Association for Educational Communication and Technology(1998)。Information Power: Building Partnerships for Learning。Chicago, IL:American Library Association。  new window
7.陳國彥(2001)。九年一貫社會領域課程研究。高雄市:復文圖書。  延伸查詢new window
8.黃炳煌(2002)。社會學習領域課程設計與教學策略。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
9.American Association of School Librarians(2009)。Standards for the 21st-century learner in action。Chicago, IL:American Association of School Librarians。  new window
10.教育部(2008)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
11.Chapin, J. R.、Messick, R. G.(1996)。Elementary social studies: Practical guide。New York:Longman publishers。  new window
12.Taba, H.(1967)。Teacher's handbook for elementary social studies。Addison Wesley。  new window
13.白亦方(1999)。社會科課程設計的發展與願景。台北:師大書苑。  延伸查詢new window
單篇論文
1.Hoge, J. D.(1986)。Improving the use of elementary social studies textbooks,Bloomington, IN:ERIC Clearinghouse for Social Studies/ Social Science Education。(ED274582)。  new window
圖書論文
1.Van Cleave, K.(2007)。Collaboration。Proven strategies for building an information literacy program。NY:Neal-Schuman Publishers。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE