臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：資訊素養融入國小一年級「校園生物大搜索」主題探究: 以Super3模式為例
書刊名：教育資料與圖書館學
作者：林菁 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lin, Ching Chen
出版日期：2011
卷期：48:4
頁次：頁539-570
主題關鍵詞：自然與生活科領域；探究學習；資訊素養；Super3模式；Science；Inquiry learning；Information literacy；Super3
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(16) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:39
  • 點閱點閱:55
本研究旨在利用Super3模式將資訊素養融入國小一年級生活領域中的「校園生物大搜索」課程,以探討學生的資訊素養學習表現,以及在此融入課程中學科內容的低層次與高層次學習表現;此外,本研究也統整授課老師對於此課程的看法。此融入課程是依照Super3資訊素養模式設計,從計畫階段的問題定義開始,進入找尋資料的執行階段,最後以自我評量反省為終了。整個研究進行一個月,以參與觀察、訪談、測驗與文件分析等多元方法蒐集資料。研究結果發現經由Supr3模式可將資訊素養融入相關課程中,學生在提問、海報創作與反省上均表現不錯,但在口頭報告上則仍待改進。學生在自然與生活科技學習單元的低層次與高層次學習表現皆有顯著的進步,老師則對此課程表達了兩項意見。最後本研究提出四項仍待釐清的議題,包括Super3模式的調整、提問性質的影響、評量規準的執行,及體驗反省單的設計等。
The purpose of this study was to investigate the students’ performance of information literacy and subject contents on an integrated information literacy instruction in the first-grade science curriculum. The curriculum was designed based on the Super3 model which includes plan, do and review phases. The study lasted for one month, and data was gathered through participant observation, interviews, test, and document analysis. The results showed that information literacy could be integrated into lower-grade science curriculum using the Super3 model. The students performed well on posing questions, creating posters, and reflection; however, oral presentation needed to be improved. First-grade students’ science learning both on memory and comprehension was significantly different through inquiry learning. The teachers expressed two opinions about this instruction. At last, a couple of issues were posed for further clarification, such as revision of the Super3 model, types of posing questions, execution of rubrics, and design of reflection worksheets.
期刊論文
1.謝佩紋、林菁(20090400)。國小教師以CREATER模式推動資訊素養創新課程之歷程。圖書館學與資訊科學，35(1)，70-89。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.林菁(20100600)。應用辯論於國小六年級社會學習領域教學：為提升學生的資訊素養。教育資料與圖書館學，47(4)，499-530。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Lowery, J.(2005)。Information Literacy and Writing: Natural Partners in the Library Media Center。Knowledge Quest，34(2)，13-15。  new window
4.王美芬(20061200)。「自然與生活科技領域」的探究教學策略。教育研究，152，45-55。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.林菁、洪美齡、李秉蓉、彭雅雯(20070900)。「臺灣老照片數位博物館」融入國小歷史教學的歷程與結果。教育實踐與研究，20(2)，29-63。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張瓊穗、翁婉慈(20050900)。以資訊大六之觀點來檢驗國小高年級學童資訊素養之研究--以臺北市天母國小為例。國立臺北教育大學學報. 教育類，18(2)，297-322。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.林美英、熊漢琳、郭迺鋒(20040400)。以資訊六大技能強化知識之建構。圖書館學與資訊科學，30(1)，75-84。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Hurd, Paul DeHart(1998)。Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world。Science Education，82(3)，407-416。  new window
9.林菁、李佳憓(20091200)。國小圖書老師與班級教師合作設計資訊素養融入教學。教育資料與圖書館學，47(2)，199-230。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.黃萬居(1999)。九年一貫的自然與科技課程初探。科學教育研究與發展季刊，14，3-6。  延伸查詢new window
11.Weinstein, T.、Boulanger, F. D.、Walberg, H. J.(1982)。Science curriculum effects in high school: A quantitative synthesis。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，19(6)，511-522。  new window
12.Shymansky, J. A.、Hedges, L. V.、Woodworth, G.(1990)。A reassessment of the effects of inquiry-based science curriculum of the 60s on student performance。Journal of Research in Science Teaching，27，127-144。  new window
13.Cowan, K. W.、Cipriani, S.(2009)。Of water troughs and the sun: Developing inquiry through analogy。Young Children，64(6)，62-67。  new window
會議論文
1.Chang, C. Y.、Mao, S. L.(1998)。The effects of an inquiry-based instructional method on earth science students' achievement。San Diego, CA。  new window
研究報告
1.Bredderman, T.(1982)。Elementary school science process programs: A meta-analysis of evaluation studies。  new window
2.Thompson, H. M.、Henley, S. A.(2000)。Fostering information literacy: Connecting national standards, goals 2000, and the SCANS report。Englewood, CO。  new window
學位論文
1.邱孟月(2007)。Super 3教學模式融入國小健康與體育學習領域之行動研究。國立嘉義大學，嘉義縣。  延伸查詢new window
2.趙炳詠(2006)。運用Big6融入自然與生活科技教學以提升資訊素養之研究。國立高雄師範學院，高雄市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lambros, A.(2002)。Problem-based learning in k-8 classrooms--A teacher’s guide to implementation。Thousand Oaks, California：Crowin Press。  new window
2.Laase, L.、Clemmons, J.、林心茹(2002)。協助學生做最棒的報告。臺北：遠流。  延伸查詢new window
3.Audet, R.、Jordan, L.(2005)。Integrating inquiry across the curriculum。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin Press。  new window
4.Avery, E. F.(2003)。Assessing student learning outcomes for information literacy instruction in academic institutions。Chicago, IL：Association of College and Research Libraries。  new window
5.Eisenberg, M. B.、Robinson, G. A.(2007)。The Super3: Information skills for young learners。Worthington, OH：Linworth。  new window
6.Harada, V. H.、Yoshina, J. M.(2004)。Inquiry learning through librarian-teacher partnerships。Worthington, OH：Linworth。  new window
7.Andretta, S.(2005)。Information Literacy: A Practitioner's Guide。Oxford, UK：Chandos。  new window
8.Polman, J. L.(2000)。Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry。New York：Teachers College Press。  new window
9.Eisenberg, M. B.、Berkowitz, R. E.(2003)。The Definitive Big6 Workshop Handbook。Worthington, OH：Linworth。  new window
10.Grassian, E.、Kaplowitz, J.(2001)。Information Literacy Instruction: Theory and Practice。New York, NY：Neal-Schuman。  new window
11.Smith, J. B.(2005)。Teaching and Testing Information Literacy Skills。Teaching and Testing Information Literacy Skills。Worthington, OH：Linworth。  new window
12.Merriam, S. B.(1999)。Qualitative research and case study applications in education。San Francisco：Jossey-Bass。  new window
13.Eisenberg, M. B.、Berkowitz, R. E.(1999)。Teaching information & technology skills: The big6 in elementary schools。Linworth。  new window
14.Kuhlthau, C. C.、Maniotes, L. K.、Caspari, A. K.(2007)。Guided Inquiry: Learning in the 21st Century。Westport, CT：Libraries Unlimited。  new window
15.Springer, K.(2010)。Educational research: A contextual approach。Hoboken, NJ：Wiley。  new window
16.Orlichm, D.、Harder, R.、Callahan, R.、Gibson, H.(2001)。Teaching Strategies: A Guide to Better Instruction。Boston, MA：Houghton Mifflin。  new window
17.教育部(2003)。國民中小學九年一貫課程綱要，自然與生活科技學習領域。台北：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
18.Breivik, P. S.、Senn, J. A.(1998)。Information literacy: Educating children for the 21st century。Washington, DC：NEA Professional Library。  new window
19.American Association of School Librarians、Association for Educational Communication and Technology(1998)。Information Power: Building Partnerships for Learning。Chicago, IL：American Library Association。  new window
20.Delisle, R.(1997)。How to use problem-based learning in the classroom。Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development。  new window
21.National Research Council(1996)。National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
22.National Research Council(2000)。Inquiry and the National Science Education Standards。Washington, DC：National Academy Press。  new window
23.American Association of School Librarians(2009)。Standards for the 21st-century learning in action。Chicago, IL。  new window
24.Burke, K.(2006)。From standards to rubrics in 6 steps: Tools for assessing student learning, K-8。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
25.Burke, K.(2009)。How to assess authentic learning。Thousand Oaks, CA：Corwin Press。  new window
26.Martin, D. J.(2000)。Elementary science methods: A constructivist approach。Belmont, CA。  new window
27.Curzon, S.、Lampert, L.(2007)。Proven strategies for building information literacy program。New York。  new window
28.Haury, D. L.(1993)。Teaching science through inquiry。ERIC CSMEED Digest (ERIC Document Reproduction Service no. Ed 359048)。  new window
29.Iley, P.(2006)。Using literacy to develop thinking skills with children aged 5-7。Abingdon, Oxon。  new window
30.Lewin, L.、Shoemaker, B.(1998)。Great performances: Creating classroom-based assessment tasks。Alexandria, VI。  new window
31.MacDonell, C.(2007)。Project-based inquiry units for young children: First steps to research for grade pre-K-2。Worthington, OH。  new window
32.Ragains, P.(2006)。Information literacy instruction that works: A guide to teaching by discipline and student population。New York。  new window
33.Jordan, L.(2005)。Science inquiry。Integrating inquiry across the curriculum。Thousand Oaks, CA。  new window
34.Van Cleave, K.(2007)。Collaboration。Proven strategies for building an information literacy program。New York。  new window
35.Sapp, G.(2006)。Science。Information literacy instruction that works: A guide to teaching by discipline and student population。New York。  new window
其他
1.陳文典(2003)。「自然與生活科技」學習領域之課程及其實施，http://www.phy.ntnu.edu.tw/nstsc/doc/new/920908-1.doc， 20030920。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Partnership for 21st Century Skills(2009)。The intellectual and policy foundations of the 21st century skills framework，http://www.p21.org/route21/images/stories/epapers/skills_foundations_final.pdf， 20100806。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hung, W.、Jonassen, D. H.、Liu, R.(2008)。Problem-based learning。Handbook of research on educational communications and technology。Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
2.林佩璇(2000)。個案研究及其在教育研究上的應用。質的研究方法。麗文。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：730（臺灣：720，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1753550 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67547172
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上