:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從胚胎法律地位談胚胎植入數目
書刊名:軍法專刊
作者:林忠義
作者(外文):Lin, Chung-yi
出版日期:2015
卷期:61:3
頁次:頁153-172
主題關鍵詞:胚胎胚胎植入數目人工生殖法生殖輔助醫療多胞胎妊娠多胎減數術胎兒法律地位EmbryoThe number of embryos implantedArtificial Reproductive LawAssisted reproductive technologyMultiple pregnancyMultifetal pregnancy reductionThe legal status of fetus
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:62
  • 點閱點閱:33
面對不孕夫妻飽受不孕的痛苦,生殖專家們念茲在茲的是如何幫助他們順利懷孕 生下寶寶,過程中就希望經由排卵藥,多取幾個卵子,製造多一些胚胎,然後多植入 胚胎,以增加懷孕率及活產率。這裡就產生幾個問題,胚胎是否跟人類其他細胞一 樣,未植入人體前,只是物,乃單純權利客體,所有人可以支配、處分及交易,或是 胚胎具有某種法律地位,國家對之有保護義務?尚未植入或植入剩餘胚胎可否任意進 行研究或銷毀?得否為研究而製造胚胎?胚胎植入前,為確定是否帶有遺傳性疾病, 甚至僅是為了訂製「完美寶寶」,可否進行植入前基因篩檢?能否為增加懷孕率多植 入胚胎?誰來決定該植入多少個胚胎?植入胚胎該不該有數目限制?現行人工生殖法 的植入數目限制適當否?多胞胎妊娠對孕婦、胎兒、其家庭,甚至整個社會都有很嚴 重的負面效應,要如何避免生殖輔助所產生的多胞胎妊娠?面對多胞胎妊娠,是否可 以任意進行減胎術?以上這些問題都不容易回答,不過重視胚胎法律地位,可以讓我 們對胚胎的實際應用抱持著審慎的態度,瞭解胚胎帶有人的因素,不能過度侵犯,但 也不需因噎廢食,胚胎合理使用對於人類社會還是利大於弊。
Facing with infertile couples who suffer from infertility, reproductive experts have thought about how to help them have babies successfully. And the reproductive experts hope that through the use of ovulation drugs, they can get more eggs, manufacture more embryos, and then implant more embryos in order to increase the pregnancy rate and birth rate. Some questions thus arise here, whether embryos are the same as any other human cells that are just objects of private rights before implantation, so the owner can dominate, dispose and trading, or the embryo has some kind of legal status that the government has the duty to protect it? The embryos before implantation or surplus embryos after implantation can be used for research or be destroyed casually? Whether it is permitted to create embryos for research? Prior to implantation, for the purpose of diagnosis if there are hereditary diseases, even only for making "perfect baby", shall we take a pre-implantation genetic screening? Could we implant more embryos to increase pregnancy rates? Who has the right to decide how many embryos should be implanted? Shouldn't there be any restrictions for the number of embryos implanted? Are the limits of the number of embryos implanted in Artificial Reproductive Law of Taiwan appropriate or not? Multiple pregnancy for pregnant women, fetuses, their families, and even the society as a whole has very serious negative effects, so how to avoid it generated from the assisted reproductive technology? Facing with multiple pregnancy, can we proceed the multifetal pregnancy reduction arbitrarily? These questions are not easy to answer, but if we appreciate the legal status of the embryos, that will allow us keep prudential attitude to the practical applications of the embryos, and we can understand the human embryos are with humane factors. Neither can they be over infringed, nor can they be stunted. Reasonable use of human embryos to this society will bring more benefits than harm.
期刊論文
1.洪銘洲(2011)。人工生殖技術治療的新趨勢。婦幼關懷雜誌,18,8-11。  延伸查詢new window
2.陳文珊(20080200)。論胚胎是否具有生命權。應用倫理研究通訊,45,80-91。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.莊錦秀(20080200)。代孕人工生殖法草案之芻議。臺灣本土法學雜誌,103,17-36。  延伸查詢new window
4.大家尚文(2006)。医療と社会規範--代理出產をめぐって。大阪教育大学紀要,54(2),129。  延伸查詢new window
5.辰井聡子(2009)。生命の論じ方。法律時報,81(6),53。  延伸查詢new window
6.Hennette-Vauchez, Stephanie(2009)。How Interest in Stem Cells Has Made the Embryo Available: A Look at the French Law of Bioethics。Medical law review,17(1),52-53。  new window
7.范建得(200912)。近期國際法令政策。生物科技與法律研究通訊,28,12。  延伸查詢new window
8.Wolfe, Alexander D.(2008)。Wrongful Selection: Assisted Reproductive Technologies, Intentional Diminishment, and the Procreative Right。Thomas M. Cooley law review,25,475-501。  new window
9.Siegel, Laurel R.(2000)。Re-Engineering The Laws Of Organ Transplantation。Emory Law Journal,49,917-951。  new window
10.Latham, Stephen R.(2000)。Richard Epstein on Healthcare。Quinnipiac Law Review,19,727-729。  new window
11.滕曉雲(19970400)。器官移植的供需問題。應用倫理研究通訊,2,32-33。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.フランス刑法研究會(1999)。フランス生命倫理三法の基本構想。国学院法学,37(2),110。  延伸查詢new window
13.Glennon, Theresa(2010)。Choosing One: Resolving the Epidemic of Multiples in Assisted Reproduction。Villanova Law Review,55,158-161。  new window
14.Velikonja, Urska(2009)。The Costs of Multiple Gestation Pregnancies in Assisted Reproduction。Harvard Journal of Law and Gender,32,468-481。  new window
15.洪賢秀(2007)。韓国法における生殖補助医療の規制状況--立法化にむけての動き。法律時報,79(11),63。  延伸查詢new window
16.Sivinski, Stephanie N.(2010)。Putting too many (Fertilized) eggs in one basket: Methods of reducing multifetal pregnancies in the United States。Texas Law Review,88,897-898。  new window
17.甲斐克則(2007)。生殖補助医療と刑事規制。法律時報,79(11),40-41。  延伸查詢new window
18.野畑健太郎(2005)。憲法的視点から見た生殖補助医療--「生命倫理法案」の生殖補助医療規定をきっかけに。憲法論叢,12,1-28。  延伸查詢new window
19.謝榮堂、吳佩珊(20091200)。幹細胞爭議與各國立法規範研究。軍法專刊,55(6),106-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.陳英鈐(20020400)。德國對胚胎幹細胞研究的管制:幹細胞法的意義。應用倫理研究通訊,22,47-57。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.蘇怡寧(20090900)。胚胎著床前基因診斷之現況與發展。生物醫學,2(3),202-204。  延伸查詢new window
22.蔣欣欣、張天韻(20040800)。德國基因檢測公民會議共識報告。應用倫理研究通訊,31,62-69。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.原新、涂肇慶(20041200)。中國大陸出生性別比偏高之分析。人口學刊,29,147-181。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.何建志(19990700)。胚胎植入前遺傳診斷的倫理與法律問題。生物科技與法律研究通訊,3,28-32。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳盈秀(1991)。器官的價格與生命的價值(碩士論文)。國立清華大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.林火旺(1999)。倫理學。臺北市:國立空中大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.江正傑(2000)。輕鬆求子指導手冊。婦幼家庭出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.王澤鑑(1989)。民法總則。王澤鑑。  延伸查詢new window
4.厚生科学審議会生殖補助医療部会(2003)。精子.卵子.胚の提供等による生殖補助医療制度の整備に関する報告書。  延伸查詢new window
5.施啟揚(1987)。民法總則。臺北:施啟揚。  延伸查詢new window
6.林山田(1999)。刑法各罪論。臺大法學院圖書部。  延伸查詢new window
7.甘添貴(19960000)。刑法之重要理念。臺北:瑞興圖書股份有限公司。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.內政部戶政司。「出生數及粗出生率」統計表,http://www.ris.gov.tw/zh_TW/346, 2015/03/31。  延伸查詢new window
2.衛生福利部國民健康署。人工生殖機構許可通過名單,http://www.hpa.gov.tw/BHPNet/Web/HealthTopic/TopicBulletin.aspx?No=201109300003&parentid=201109210001, 2015/03/31。  延伸查詢new window
3.台灣生殖醫學會(2007)。胚胎植入數目指導原則,http://www.tsrm.org.tw/news/, 2015/03/31。  延伸查詢new window
4.黃菊珍。Between hello and goodbye,www.pbf.org.tw/html/download.asp?file=20080714143237.pdf, 2015/03/24。  new window
圖書論文
1.(2005)。生命倫理法案--生殖医療.親子関係.クローンをめぐって。生命科学の発展と法--生命倫理法試案。有斐閣。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE