:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從數學與文化的關係探討數學文化素養之內涵--理論與案例分析
書刊名:臺灣數學教育期刊
作者:劉柏宏 引用關係
作者(外文):Liu, Po-hung
出版日期:2016
卷期:3:1
頁次:頁55-83
主題關鍵詞:數學文化數學文化素養數學素養數學與文化Mathematical cultureLiteracy for mathematical cultureMathematical literacyMathematics and culture
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(10) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:8
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:33
數學是人類重要的智識遺產,可是卻鮮少人注意它和文化的關係。本文嘗試從數學與文化的關係出發,特別是數學與東西方文化的互動關係,探討數學文化的內涵,並主張數學文化包含「文化中的數學」和「數學中的文化」兩大構面。再者,數學素養一詞雖為大眾所耳熟能詳,然對其真正概念仍認識不清,而目前文獻對其內涵的論述仍然莫衷一是,難以釐清,甚至國際間的用詞也不盡相同。本文整理國際間數學素養相關文獻,分析相關詞彙定義的異同之處,以具體界定數學素養的概念。此外,本研究結合數學文化和數學素養,進一步提出數學文化素養的定義。希望透過培養學生的數學文化素養,能增進他們對數學本質的理解和學習認同。為釐清數學文化素養的概念,本文分別從「文化中的數學」和「數學中的文化」兩大構面中各介紹與分析一個具體案例,以做為數學文化素養之參考教材。我們希望經由定義數學文化素養、論述數學文化素養的內涵、和實際分析數學文化案例等程序,能夠建立一個概念框架,以做為數學文化相關的教學、評量、與實證研究的理論基礎。
Mathematics is a vital intellectual heritage of human beings, but few are aware of its relationship with culture. This study attempted to identify the constituents of mathematical culture in terms of the interrelationship between mathematics and culture, particularly the interaction of mathematics with Eastern and Western culture. We claim that mathematics in culture and culture in mathematics are the two main facets of mathematical culture. Furthermore, though the term “mathematical literacy” is well-known by the general public in Taiwan, its components and constituents are interpreted differently in the educational literature. In this study, we conducted an international comparison by reviewing and organizing relevant literature discussing mathematical literacy, and clarified the vagueness of similar concepts to find commonalities. This study then defined literacy for mathematical culture by integrating mathematical culture and mathematical literacy. Hopefully educating students in literacy for mathematical culture may increase students’ understanding of the nature of mathematics and their positive attitudes toward the learning of mathematics. In addition, we propose two exemplary cases, one for mathematics in culture and the other for culture in mathematics, to illustrate the prototype of the literature for mathematical culture. We hope that our works of defining the literacy for mathematical culture, discussing the constituents of literacy for mathematical culture, and analyzing the exemplary cases of mathematical culture may provide as
期刊論文
1.丘成桐(2013)。一本具國際觀的數學普及雜誌。數理人文,1。  延伸查詢new window
2.苟長義、顧沛(2008)。以數學文化的融入改進文科數學教學。數學教育學報,6,5-7。  延伸查詢new window
3.張之傑(19970900)。文藝復興時期藝術家對科學的貢獻。科學月刊,28(9),736-740。  延伸查詢new window
4.張維忠、唐恒鈞(20081200)。民族數學與數學課程改革。數學傳播,32(4),80-87。  延伸查詢new window
5.Pugalee, D. K.(1999)。Constructing a model of mathematical literacy。The Clearing House,73(1),19-22。  new window
6.阮圓真(20121000)。一個公式α,β□的推演。科學教育,353,45-48。  延伸查詢new window
會議論文
1.蕭文強(2008)。從離散數學到數學文化。2008組合數學暨新苗研討會。國立交通大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.Højgaard, T.(2009)。Competencies, skills, and assessment。The 32nd annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia。Palmerston North:MERGA。225-231。  new window
3.Wilder, R. L.(1950)。Cultural basis of mathematics。The International Congress of Mathematicians。Providence, RI:American Mathematical Society。258-271。  new window
4.Niss, M.(2003)。Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project。The 3rd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematical Education。Athens:The Hellenic Mathematical Society。115-124。  new window
研究報告
1.張一蕃(1997)。資訊時代之國民素養與教育。  延伸查詢new window
2.李國偉、黃文璋、楊德清、劉柏宏(2013)。教育部提升國民素養實施方案--數學素養研究計劃結案報告。  延伸查詢new window
3.黃友初(2013)。歐美數學素養發展狀況簡述。  延伸查詢new window
4.Kouba, V. L.、Champagne, A. B.、Piscitelli, M.、Havasy, M.、White, K.、Hurley, M.(1998)。Literacy in the national science and mathematics standards: Communication and reasoning。  new window
圖書
1.Struik, Dirk J.(1948)。A Concise History of Mathematics。New York, NY:Dover Publications, Inc.。  new window
2.Ernest, P.(1998)。Social constructivism as a philosophy of mathematics。State University of New York Press。  new window
3.Bullock, A.(1985)。The Humanist Tradition in the West。London。  new window
4.洪萬生(1991)。孔子與數學。臺北:明文書局。  延伸查詢new window
5.National Research Council(2001)。Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
6.Lakatos, Imre(1976)。Proofs and Refutations: The Logic of Mathematical Discovery。Cambridge。  new window
7.Hersh, R.(1997)。What is mathematics, really?。Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Kline, Morris(1980)。Mathematics: The Loss of Certainty。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Polya, G.(1954)。Mathematics and plausible reasoning。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
10.UNESCO(2003)。Literacy: a UNESCO perspective。Paris:New York, NY:UNESCO。  new window
11.方延明(2007)。數學文化。北京:清華大學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
12.Kline, M.(1953)。Mathematics in Western Culture。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
13.汪曉勤(2013)。數學文化透視。上海:上海科技。  延伸查詢new window
14.易南軒、王芝平(2007)。多元視角下的數學文化。北京:科學出版社。  延伸查詢new window
15.張楚廷(2006)。數學文化。北京:高等教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
16.張維忠(2005)。文化視野中的數學與數學教育。北京:人民教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
17.張維忠(2011)。數學教育中的數學文化。上海:上海教育出版社。  延伸查詢new window
18.Byers, W.(2007)。How mathematicians think: Using ambiguity, contradiction, and paradox to create mathematics。Princeton, NJ:Princeton University Press。  new window
19.Cajori, F.(1928)。A history of mathematical notations。Open Court Publishing。  new window
20.Crowther, G.(1959)。15 to 18: A report of the Central Advisory Council for Education。London:Her Majesty's Stationary Office。  new window
21.Derbyshire, J.(2006)。Unknown quantity: A real and imaginary history of algebra。Washington, DC:Joseph Henry Press。  new window
22.Descartes, R.、Veitch, J.(1997)。A discourse on method。London:J.M. Dent。  new window
23.International Life Skills Survey(2000)。Policy research initiative。Ottawa:Statistics Canada。  new window
24.Katz, V. J.(1998)。A history of mathematics: An introduction。New York, NY:Addison-Wesly。  new window
25.Kline, M.(1972)。Mathematical thought from ancient to modern times。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
26.Livio, M.(2006)。The equation that couldn't be solved: How mathematical genius discovered the language of symmetry。New York, NY:Simon and Schuster。  new window
27.Lockhart, P.(2009)。A mathematician's lament: How school cheats us out of our most fascinating and imaginative art form。New York, NY:Bellevue Literary Press。  new window
28.Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development(2013)。PISA 2012 assessment and analytical framework: Mathematics, reading, science, problem solving and financial literacy。Paris:Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development。  new window
29.Singh, S.(1998)。Fermat's enigma: The epic quest to solve the world's greatest mathematical problem。New York, NY:Anchor Books。  new window
30.Steen, L. A.(1990)。On the shoulders of giants: New approaches to numeracy。Washington, DC:National Academy Press。  new window
31.Kirsch, I. S.、Jungeblut, A.、Jenkins, L.、Kolstad, A.(2002)。Adult literacy in America: A first look at the findings of the national adult literacy survey。Washington, DC:U.S. Department of Education。  new window
32.Kroeber, Alfred L.、Kluckhohn, Clyde(1952)。Culture: A Critical Review of Concepts and Definitions。Cambridge, Mass:The Peabody Museum。  new window
其他
1.何定照(20121209)。數學皇帝丘成桐:盲求奧林匹亞畸形發展。  延伸查詢new window
2.張奠宙(20051223)。數學文化,http://www.pep.com.cn/czsx/jszx/jxyj_1/zjlt_1/201008/t20100824_713684.htm。  new window
3.Niss, M.,Højgaard, T.(2011)。Competencies and mathematical learning: Ideas and inspiration for the development of mathematics teaching and learning in Denmark,Roskilde University。,https://rucforsk.ruc.dk/ws/portalfiles/portal/35932281/IMFUFA_485.pdf。  new window
圖書論文
1.陳進傳(1982)。峰迴路轉:明代的科技。中國文化新論.科技篇--格物與成器。聯經。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉昭民(1982)。理性的發皇:燦爛的宋金元科技。中國文化新論.科技篇--格物與成器。臺北:聯經。  延伸查詢new window
3.De Lange, J.(2003)。Mathematics for literacy。Quantitative literacy: Why numeracy matters for schools and colleges。National Council on Education and Disciplines。  new window
4.Plato(1952)。The Republic。Great books of the western world。Chicago, Illinois:Encyclopedia Britannica。  new window
5.Steen, L. A.、Burrill, G.、Ganter, S.、Goroff, D. L.、Greenleaf, F. P.、Grubb, W. N.、Wallace, D.(2001)。The case for quantitative literacy。Mathematics and democracy: The case for quantitative literacy。Princeton, NJ:National Council on Education and the Disciplines。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE