:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:SQRS對學生閱讀理解能力影響之研究
書刊名:教育研究月刊
作者:吳佳娣張玟慧林芳仰劉遠楨 引用關係
作者(外文):Wu, Chia-tiZhang, Wen-huiLin, Fang-yangLiu, Yuan-chen
出版日期:2016
卷期:265
頁次:頁110-126
主題關鍵詞:自我提問閱讀理解QARSelf-questioningReading comprehension
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:4
  • 點閱點閱:26
本研究建置一個自我提問閱讀系統(self-questioning reading system, SQRS),目的在提升學生的閱讀理解能力,研究對象為臺灣新北市都會地區某國小六年級的學生。將研究對象立意取向分成三組,進行系統所提供的三種學習模組,分別為實驗組一:QAR(question-answer relationship)自我提問閱讀學習模組(N = 25)、實驗組二:一般自我提問閱讀學習模組(N = 25)與控制組:傳統閱讀學習模組(N = 26)。研究採準實驗研究進行,實施期程為10週,共10堂課、400分鐘。研究結果發現,經過自我提問閱讀系統的練習,閱讀理解成就均顯著優於控制組,因此,自我提問閱讀系統的確能有效提升學生的閱讀理解能力。
This study aims to guide students to learn self-questioning strategies on the self-questioning learning website, based on reading literacy assessment. This website contains three reading learning modules-QAR self-questioning reading learnings (N = 25), general self-questioning reading learnings (N = 25), and traditional reading learnings (N = 26). There are ten articles for three sixth grade classes over a ten-week period. Statistical analysis is performed before and after the reading comprehension. The results of this study: Learning results for “QAR self-questioning reading learnings groups” and “general self-questioning reading learnings groups” are better than “traditional reading learnings groups”. Thus, self questioning reading comprehension learning system can indeed effectively enhance students’ reading comprehension.
期刊論文
1.Padron, Y. N.、Knight, S. L.、Waxman, H. C.(1986)。Analyzing Bilingual and Monolingual Students' Perceptions of Their Reading Strategies。The reading Teacher,39(5),430-433。  new window
2.Raphael, Taffy E.(1986)。Teaching question answer relationships, revisited。The Reading Teacher,39(6),516-522。  new window
3.陳淑娟(19970600)。「指導--合作學習」策略應用於國小閱讀教學之理論探討。臺中師院學報,11,65-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Call, P. E.(1991)。SQ3R + What I know sheet = One strong strategy (open to suggestion)。Journal of Reading,35(1),50-52。  new window
5.King, A.(1990)。Raciprocal peer guestioning: A strategy for teaching students how to learn through lectures。The Clearing House,64(2),131-136。  new window
6.King, A.(1995)。Designing the instructional process to enhance critical thinking across the curriculum: Inquiring minds really do want to know: Using questioning to teach critical thinking。Teaching of Psychology,22(1),13-17。  new window
7.Paris, S. G.、Cross, D. R.、Lipson, M. Y.(1984)。Informed strategies for learning: a program to improve children's reading awareness and comprehension。Journal of Educational Psychology,76(6),1239-1252。  new window
學位論文
1.劉素娟(2009)。相互教學法對國小中年級學生閱讀理解影響之行動研究(碩士論文)。淡江大學,臺北縣。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lerner, Janet W.(1989)。Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies。Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
2.Robinson, F. P.(1946)。Effective study。New York:Harper and Brothers。  new window
3.Bruning, R. H.、Schraw, G. J.、Norby, M. M.、Ronning, R. R.(2004)。Cognitive psychology and instruction。Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall。  new window
4.Burns, M. S.、Griffin, P.、Snow, C. E.、NRC、柯華葳、游婷雅(2001)。踏出閱讀的第一步。臺北:信誼。  延伸查詢new window
5.Lerner, J. W.(1993)。Learning disabilities: Theories, diagnosis, and teaching strategies。Boston, MA:Houghton Mifflin Company。  new window
6.陳欣希、劉振中、連瑞琦、許育健、林冬菊、吳燕燕(2011)。閱讀理解:文章與試題範例。臺北市:教育部。  延伸查詢new window
7.Brown, A.、Palincsar, A.(1986)。Guided cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition。Cambridge, MA:Department of Education Technical。  new window
8.Gagné, Ellen D.(1985)。The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning。Little, Brown and Company。  new window
圖書論文
1.Brown, Ann L.、Bransford, J. D.、Ferrara, R. A.、Campione, J. C.(1983)。Learning, Remembering and Understanding。Handbook of child psychology: formerly Carmichael's Manual of child psychology。New York:John Wiley。  new window
2.Baker, L.、Brown, A. L.(1984)。Metacognitive skills and reading。Handbook of Reading Research。New York, NY:Longman。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE