臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：公平合理原則於金融消費評議制度所扮演之角色--以澳洲金融評議制度為核心
書刊名：東吳法律學報
作者：李志峰 引用關係
作者(外文)：Lee, Derek
出版日期：2016
卷期：28:1
頁次：頁55-86
主題關鍵詞：金融消費爭議；訴訟外替代性紛爭解決；評議人；公平合理原則；Financial consumer dispute；Alternative dispute resolution；Ombudsman and principles of fairness and reasonableness
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:16
  • 點閱點閱:24
我國於2011 年訂立金融消費者保護法時，除了明文設立屬訴訟外紛爭解決機制之金融消費爭議處理機構外，並於該法第二十條引進公平合理原則，作為金融消費評議中心處理金融消費爭議案件之準則。公平合理原則源自於英美法中之衡平法，並非我國法制上之固有概念，為使金融消費評議中心於金融消費紛爭之處理上，能更為精確掌握公平合理原則並將之運用於評議案件及其補償，本文參酌如同我國亦設有金融消費爭議處理機構，且以公平合理原則作為案件評議與補償基礎之國家之一即澳洲，介紹並分析澳洲金融評議服務機構如何運用公平合理原則決定爭議案件是否應予以補償及補償的範圍等，並以澳洲金融消費評議服務機構之規定及運作為借鏡，提出相關之建議，以作為我國金融消費評議中心未來使用公平合理原則之參考。
In 2011, the Financial Consumer Protection Act was enacted, the provisions include the establishment of an ombudsman body and Article 20 that the Financial Ombudsman Institution should determine the decision of the cases based on principles of fairness and reasonableness. Principles of fairness and reasonable arose from the Law of Equity in Common Law System instead of the traditional legal concept in Taiwan, one of the Civil Law countries. In order that the principles of fairness and reasonableness can be realized by and applied to the financial consumer disputes by Financial Ombudsman Institution, the author studies the ombudsman system in Australia which is similar financial ombudsman body in Taiwan. The author introduces and analyzes how the Financial Ombudsman Service Australia applied the principles of fairness and reasonableness to financial disputes in determination of the merit, remedy and so forth of the claims. In conclusion, the author presents the suggestions for the use of principles to t he financial consumer disputes to Financial Ombudsman Institution in the future with references to regulations and guidance of Financial Ombudsman Service Australia.
期刊論文
1.郭大維(20120100)。金融消費爭議解決機制之研究--我國法與英國法之比較。中正財經法學，4，47-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.蔡昌憲(20140501)。金融消費者保護法與民法之融合與續造--兼論法理扮演的角色／臺北地院100店簡527判決。臺灣法學雜誌，247，209-214。  延伸查詢new window
3.Lobel, Orly(2004)。The Renew Deal: The Fall of Regulation and the Rise of Governance in Contemporary Legal Thought。Minnesota Law Review，89(2)，342-470。  new window
4.王志誠(20111000)。金融行銷之控制及法制變革：金融消費者保護法之適用及解釋。萬國法律，179，2-10。  延伸查詢new window
5.杜怡靜(20150600)。從資訊弱勢者的觀點檢討我國法對於個人保證之保護--日本法之啟示。臺北大學法學論叢，94，107-162。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.張冠群、汪信君(20150800)。金融消費者保護法第二十條「公平合理原則」於保險爭議案件之適用。全國律師，19(8)，18-44。  延伸查詢new window
7.陳肇鴻(20150600)。零售市場投資產品之法律糾紛、訴訟風險及投資人保護--臺灣有關連動債及共同基金訴訟之實證研究。政大法學評論，141，109-196。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Ali, Shahla F.、Roza, Antonio Da(2012)。Alternative Dispute Resolution Design in Financial Markets--Some More Equal than Others: Hong Kong's Proposed Financial Dispute Resolution Center in the Context of the Experience in the United Kingdom, United States, Australia, and Singapore。Pac. Rim L. & Pol'y J.，21，485。  new window
9.Chaikin, David(2010)。A Critical Examination of How Contract Law Is Used by Financial Institutions Operating in Multiple Jurisdictions。Melb. U. L. Rev.，34，34。  new window
10.Cohen, Simon(201009)。Fair and Reasonable-An Industry Ombudsman's Guiding Principle。AIAL Form，63，20。  new window
11.Dee, Bill、Smith, Simon、Wood, John(2009)。Industry Ombudsman Schemes Twenty Years on World Benchmark or Industry Captured?。ALT. L. J.，34(3)，183。  new window
12.Donnelly, Mary(2012)。The Financial Services Ombudsman: Asking the “Existential Question”。D.U.L.J.，35，229。  new window
13.Garoupa, Nuno、Ligüerre, Carlos Gómez(2012)。The Evolution of the Common Law and Efficiency。Ga. J. Int'l & Comp. L.，40，307。  new window
14.Menkel-Meadow, Carrie(2002)。Practicing ‘In the Interests of Justice’ in the Twenty-First Century: Pursuing Peace as Justice。Fordham L. Rev.，70，1761。  new window
15.Nottage, Luke(2009)。Consumer ADR and the Proposed ‘Consumer Law’ in Australia: Room for Improvement。QUT L. Rev.，9，111。  new window
16.Omarova, Saule T.(2010)。Rethinking the Future of Self-regulation in the Financial Industry。Brook. J. Int'l L.，35，665。  new window
17.O'Shea, Paul、Rickett, Charles(2006)。In Defence of Consumer Law: The Resolution of Consumer Disputes。Sydney L. R.，28，139。  new window
18.Robinson, E. Daniel(2006)。Embracing Equity: A New Remedy for Wrongful Health Insurance Denials。Minn. L. Rev.，90，1447。  new window
19.Tilbury, Michael、Luntz, Harold(1995)。Punitive Damages in Australian Law。Loy. L. A. Int'l & Comp. L. J.，17，769。  new window
20.Waye, Vicki C.、Morabito, Vince(2012)。Collective Forms of Consumer Redress: Financial Ombudsman Service Case Study。Journal of Corporate Law Studies，12(1)，1-31。  new window
21.Williams, Jacqueline J.(2004)。Canadian Financial Services Ombudsmen: The Role of Reputational Persuasion。B.F.L.R.，20，41。  new window
22.張冠群(20090900)。金融商品銷售適合性原則之法制分析--兼論臺灣金融服務法草案第三十一條及相關規定。高大法學論叢，5(1)，133-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.林育廷(20090800)。從雷曼事件之處理檢視我國金融消費爭議之解決機制。全國律師，13(8)，45-59。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Lowry, John、Rawlings, Philip(2005)。Insurance Law: Doctrines and Principles。Hart Publishing。  new window
2.Eggers, Peter Macdonald、Picken, Simon、Foss, Patrick(2004)。Good Faith and Insurance Contracts。  new window
3.Clarke, Malcolm A.(2005)。Policies and Perceptions of Insurance Law in the Twenty-First Century。Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Ali, Shahla F.(2013)。Consumer Financial Dispute Resolution in A Comparative Context--Principles, Systems and Practice。  new window
5.Merkin, Rob、Steele, Jenny(2013)。Insurance and the Law of Obligations。  new window
6.Pynt, Greg(2011)。Australian Insurance Law: A First Reference。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：496（臺灣：479，外國：17） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1951065 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67754648
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上