臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：實施個人與社會責任模式對降低學生知覺他人影響學習行為之探究
書刊名：臺大體育學報
作者：李文心 引用關係／楊裕隆 引用關係／林章榜
作者(外文)：Lin, Wen-hsin／Yang, Yu-long／Lin, Chang-pang
出版日期：2016
卷期：31
頁次：頁27-42
主題關鍵詞：品格教育；情意；體育課；責任；Character education；Affective；Physical education；Responsibility
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:46
  • 點閱點閱:28
目的：以 Hellison所提出之教導個人及社會責任模式 (Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility, TPSR) 為架構，以學生知覺他人行為影響學習因素為結果變項，檢驗 TPSR實施於高中體育課對於學生知覺他人行為影響學習的效果。 方法： 92位 16-17歲 (M=16.79; SD=0.42) 的高中學生參與本研究，其中男生 49人 (53.3%)、女生 43人 (46.7%)。以隨機方式區分為實驗組 (實施 16週的 TPSR課程； n=45; 48.9%) 及控制組 (實施 16週的傳統技能取向課程； n=47; 51.1%)。以學生知覺他人影響學習因素量表做為責任的負向指標，經標準化的施測及資料檢核等種種程序，採獨立樣本及成對樣本 t檢定等統計方式。預期實驗組及控制組學生知覺他人行為影響學習 8個分量表之後測皆優於前測，且實驗組優於控制組。 結果：結果顯示部分分量表獲得證實，且實驗組優於控制組。意即， TPSR課程實施有助於降低學生知覺他人行為影響學習，對學生知覺他人責任有所提升。 結論：雖然結果並不完全支持本研究的假設，但支持 TPSR有助於提昇責任的概念論述。未來得以此研究為基礎，持續探究我國文化實施 TPSR課程之效果。
PURPOSE: Using Hellison’s model for teaching personal and social responsibility (TPSR) as the input parameter and using students’ perception interruption of classmates’ learning behavior as the output parameter, the purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of implementing TPSR in the high school physical education class on students’ perception interruption of classmates’ learning behavior. METHODS: High school students of 16 to 17 years old (M=16.79; SD= 0.42), who volunteered for this study, were chosen. Among the 92 participants, there were 49 males (53.3%) and 43 females (46.7%). They were randomly divided into two groups: the experimental group with 45 (48.9%) students receiving 16 weeks of TPSR training and the controlled group with 47 (51.1%) students receiving 16 weeks of traditional technical training. Using students’ perception interruption of classmates’ learning behavior as the negative index and adopting the procedures of standard measurements and data examination, the results were analyzed by choosing the independent samples and t-test statistics. It was expected that both the experimental and the controlled groups performed better in terms of the 8 measurements after 16 weeks of training, and the experimental group was better than the controlled group. RESULT: The results validated some of the measurements, and the experimental group was better than the controlled group. This implied that implementation of TPSR was indeed helpful in decreasing students’ perception interruptions of classmates’ learning behavior. CONCLUSION: Although the results did not fully support the expectations based on the 8 measurements, the partial support proved that TPSR is helpful in enhancing the concept of responsibility. Using the results obtained from the present study as the basis, we will continue to explore the efficiency of implementing TPSR in our country.
期刊論文
1.Gordon, B.(2010)。An examination of the responsibility model in a New Zealand secondary school physical education programme。The Journal of Teaching in Physical Education，29(1)，21-37。  new window
2.Wright, P. M.、Burton, S.(2008)。Implementation and outcomes of a responsibility-based physical activity program integrated into an intact high school physical education class。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education，27(2)，138-154。  new window
3.Abbott, C. L.、Weinmann, C. A.、Bailey, C. I.(1999)。The relationship between sport salience and choice behaviour in division I collegiate baseball players。Sport Psychological，30(3)，369-380。  new window
4.Cecchini, J. A.、Montero, J.、Alonso, A.、Izquierdo, M.、Contreras, O.(2007)。Effects of personal and social responsibility on fair play in sports and self-control in school-aged youths。European Journal of Sport Science，7(4)，203-211。  new window
5.Lewis, R.(1999)。Teachers coping with the stress of classroom discipline。Social Psychology of Education，3，155-171。  new window
6.Borg, M. G.、Falzon, J. M.(1989)。Stress and job satisfaction among primary school teachers in Malta。Educational Review，41，271-279。  new window
7.Feiter, F.、Tokar, E.(1982)。Getting a handle on teacher stress: How bad is the problem?。Educational Leadership，39，456-458。  new window
8.Hellison, D.、Walsh, D.(2002)。Responsibility-based youth programs evaluation: Investigating the investigations。Quest，54(4)，292-307。  new window
9.Kavussanu, M.(2008)。Moral behaviour in sport: a critical review of the literature。International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology，1(2)，124-138。  new window
10.Weiss, M. R.、Bredemeier, B. J.(1983)。Developmental sport psychology: A theoretical perspective for studying children in sport。Journal of Sport Psychology，5，216-230。  new window
11.顏宛平、掌慶維(20130600)。國中體育課實施個人與社會責任模式之學生經驗。中等教育，64(2)，15-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.Trudeau, F.、Shephard, R. J.(2005)。Contribution of school programmes to physical activity levels and attitudes in children and adults。Sports Medicine，35(2)，89-105。  new window
13.林憶如(2013)。個人與社會責任融入國中體育教學實務分享。中等教育，64(2)，178-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.林章榜、林靜萍(2008)。編製學生知覺體育課同學行為影響學習因素量表。體育學報，41(3)，55-68。  延伸查詢new window
15.闕月清(2013)。體育教學中的品德教育:個人與社會責任模式之源起與發展。中等教育，64(2)，6-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Cothran, D. J.、Kulinna, P. H.、Garrahy, D. A.(2003)。This is kind of giving the secret away: Student perspectives on effective class management。Teaching and Teacher Education，19(4)，435-444。  new window
17.Kulinna, P. H.、Cothran, D. J.、Regualos, R.(2006)。Teachers' reports of student misbehavior in physical education。Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport，77(1)，32-40。  new window
18.McCormick, P. A.(1997)。Orienting attention without awareness。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance，23(1)，168-180。  new window
19.Wright, P. M.、Li, W.、Ding, S.、Pickering, M.(2010)。Integrating a personal-social responsibility program into a lifetime wellness course for urban high school students: Assessing implementation and educational outcomes。Sport, Education, and Society，15，277-298。  new window
20.王駿濠、蔡佳良(20090800)。以運動與身體活動預防失智症：文獻回顧。臺灣公共衛生雜誌，28(4)，268-277。new window  延伸查詢new window
21.吳修廷、廖主民(20110900)。臺灣9-15歲學生身體活動情形及參與動機之性別與年齡差異。體育學報，44(3)，407-422。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.Akiba, M.、LeTendre, G. K.、Baker, D. P.、Goesling, B.(2002)。Student victimization: National and school system effects on school violence in 37 nations。American Educational Research Journal，39，829-853。  new window
23.Borg, M. G.(1998)。Secondary school teachers' perceptions of pupils' undesirable behaviors。British Journal of Educational Psychology，68，67-79。  new window
24.Fernandez-Balboa, J. M.(1991)。Beliefs, interactive thoughts, and actions of physical education student teacher regarding pupil misbehaviors。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education，20，3-14。  new window
25.Houghton, S.、Wheldall, K.、Merrett, F.(1988)。Classroom behavior problems which secondary school teachers say they find most troublesome。British Educational Research Journal，14，297-312。  new window
26.Schottle, D. A.、Peltier, G. L.(1991)。Should schools employ behavior management consultants?。Journal of Instructional Psychology，23，128-130。  new window
27.Wright, P.、Li, W.、Ding, S.、Packering, M.(2010)。Integrating a personal and social responsibility program into a wellness course for urban high school students: assessing implementation and educational outcomes。Sport, Education and Society，12(3)，277-298。  new window
研究報告
1.教育部(2013)。學校體育統計年報。臺北市：教育部。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.Gordon, B.(2005)。An evaluation of a six month implementation of the responsibility model in a New Zealand secondary school(博士論文)。Massey University，New Zealand。  new window
圖書
1.Tabachnick, B. G.、Fidell, L. S.(2007)。Using multivariate statistics。Chestnut Hill Enterprises。  new window
2.Biddle, S. J. H.、Mutrie, N.(2001)。Psychology of physical activitydeterminants, well-being and intervention。New York：London：Routledge。  new window
3.Metzler, M. W.(2011)。Instructional models for physical education。Needham Heights, MA：Allyn and Bacon。  new window
4.Rink, J. E.(1998)。Teaching physical education for learning。McGraw-Hill。  new window
5.Edwards, C. H.(1993)。Classroom Discipline and Management。New York, NY：Macmillan。  new window
6.Hellison, D.(2011)。Teaching responsibility through physical activity。Champaign, IL：Human Kinetics。  new window
圖書論文
1.Hellison, D.(2003)。Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility。Student learning in physical education。Champaign, IL：Human Kinetics。  new window
2.Nicholls, J. G.(1992)。Students as educational theorists。Student self-perceptions in the classroom。Hillsdale, NJ：Lawrence Erlbaum Associates。  new window
3.Hellison, D.、Martinek, T.(2006)。Social and individual responsibility programs。The handbook of physical education。Sage。  new window
4.Solomon, G. B.(2004)。A lifespan view of moral development in physical activity。Developmental sport and exercise psychology: A lifespan perspective。Morgantown, WV：Fitness Information Technology。  new window
5.Mardia, K. V.(1985)。Mardia's test of multinormality。Encyclopedis of Statistical Science。  new window
6.Gould, D.(1996)。Sport psychology: Future directions in youth sport research。Children and youth in sport: A biopsychosocial perspective。Madison, WI：Brown & Benchmark。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：1057（臺灣：1047，外國：10） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67519870
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上