:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:個人與社會責任模式融入飛盤爭奪賽後非行少年責任層級之表現情形
書刊名:臺東大學體育學報
作者:李柏昂闕月清
作者(外文):Li, Po-angKeh, Nyit-chin
出版日期:2016
卷期:24
頁次:頁33-55
主題關鍵詞:個人與社會責任模式飛盤爭奪賽非行少年責任層級TPSRTeaching personal and social responsibility modelUltimate frisbeeJuvenile delinquentsResponsibility levels
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:2
  • 共同引用共同引用:121
  • 點閱點閱:13
目的:本研究旨在探討個人與社會責任模式融入飛盤課程,非行少年的責任表現情形。方法:飛盤課程實施於花蓮縣收容男性青少年的某中途之家,進行10週20堂50分鐘的課程,參與學生共19名,平均年齡16.2歲;量化資料採Hsu等人2014設計之PSRQ問卷;質性資料以學習單、學生與輔導老師的訪談、教師教學日誌為主,分別進行統計與樣版式分析法。結果:在資料分析中:(一)層級一:學生對組成要素的認知從無到有、學會尊重不再打斷老師說話;大欺小的舊有文化有所改善、學習化解比賽中的不愉快;與老師的衝突減少,並尋求老師協助解決衝突;能接納能力較差的同學一起運動,並願意給予機會去嘗試。(二)層級二:學習態度從被動轉為主動;願意學習新的技術,並積極努力嘗試;從小團體到願意彼此和睦的練習。(三)層級三:願意在課外時間執行學習單的練習項目;高三同學則以順利畢業為自己設定適當的目標;都要學著面對課程以外給予的質疑與壓力,專注於享受這項運動。(四)層級四:開始學會去關心挨罵或受傷的同學、當受傷的同學回到學園,在輔導老師面前以支持代替過去的訕笑;學會觀察其他同學練習的態度與比賽情況,並用活躍的表現和感謝的言語回應老師的教學;學生因產生成就感和獲勝的動機而彼此鼓勵。(五)層級五:自我肯定與人際關係的改善、在學業與職場中設定目標、力求提升自己的表現,成為他人的榜樣。結論:每位學生在課程介入期間都有不同層次的成長與變化,亦能將各層級的學習遷移出體育館,應用在日常生活中,對非行少年的責任表現有正向改善。
The purpose of this study was to investigate juvenile delinquents' performance of responsibility after the implementation of Teaching Personal and Social Responsibility Model (TPSR) in a Frisbee program. It was conducted in a Hualien County halfway house for 10 weeks with 2 fifty-minute sessions per week. The participants were 9 males with an average age of 16.2. Quantitative data was collected through Personal and Social Responsibility self-report Questionnaire (Hsu, Pan, Chou, Lee & Lu, 2014) while qualitative data through worksheets, interviews and teaching log. Both data were analyzed with statistics and template analysis respectively. The findings from qualitative data indicated that: (1) Level 1: The students' knowledge of Goals emerged and learned to respect teachers; The incidents of bullying declined as the students learned to resolve disagreement; Students looked for teacher's assistance in dealing conflicts; Students accepted less skilled peers and played with them. (2) Level 2: The students' attitude toward learning shifted from passive to active and made effort to master new skill; They broke away from small groups and be friendly to everyone. (3) Level 3: The students were willing to do their assignments; They were able to set appropriate goals, especially the 12-graders; They were capable of facing peer pressure and focused on enjoying the sport. (4) Level 4: The students started to concern and care for their peers; They were more appreciative towards their teacher; They generated a sense of achievement and capable of encouraging one another. (5) Level 5: The students improved their self-approval and interpersonal relationships, and worked hard to become others' model. This study concluded that the students achieved responsibility level performance to some degree and were able to transfer their learning outside the gym and apply in daily lives.
期刊論文
1.林瑞欽(19990600)。未犯罪與犯罪青少年之自我意像比較研究。犯罪學期刊,4,153-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Buchanan, A. M.(2001)。Contextual challenges to teaching responsibility in a sports camp。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,20,155-171。  new window
3.潘義祥(20130600)。個人與社會責任教學融入運動教育模式之整合課程規劃。中華體育季刊,27(2)=105,105-112。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Gordon, B. A.(2010)。An examination of the responsibility model in a New Zealand secondary school physical education program。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,29,21-37。  new window
5.Li, W.、Wright, P. M.、Rukavina, P. B.、Pickering, M.(2008)。Measuring Students' Perceptions of Personal and Social Responsibility and the Relationship to Intrinsic Motivation in Urban Physical Education。Journal of Teaching in Physical Education,27(2),167-178。  new window
6.賴碧怡(20100600)。司法保護少年與工作者之依附關係及其行為控制之相關性研究。青少年犯罪防治研究期刊,2(1),103-131。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.黃德祥、洪福源(20040200)。美國品格教育的內涵與實施。臺灣教育,625,17-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.Walsh, D.、Ozaeta, J.、Wright, P.(2010)。Transference of responsibility model goals to the school exploring the impact of coaching club program。Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy,15(1),15-28。  new window
9.Hellison, D.、Walsh, D.(2002)。Responsibility-based youth programs evaluation: Investigating the investigations。Quest,54(4),292-307。  new window
10.徐偉庭、周宏室、潘義祥(20140900)。以自我決定理論為架構檢驗體育課學生的責任行為。體育學報,47(3),425-436。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.田續鴻、蔡俊賢(20111000)。不同體育教學法對國中撞球教學個人與社會責任知覺之影響。高師大體育,9,55-68。  延伸查詢new window
12.林靜萍、丁立宇(20130600)。體育課中發展品格--個人與社會責任模式。中等教育,64(2),157-177。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.顏宛平、掌慶維(20130600)。國中體育課實施個人與社會責任模式之學生經驗。中等教育,64(2),15-38。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.黃俊傑、王淑女(20010900)。家庭、自我概念與青少年偏差行為。應用心理研究,11,45-68。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.闕月清(20130600)。體育教學中的品德教育:個人與社會責任模式之源起與發展。中等教育,64(2),6-14。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.林憶如(20130600)。個人與社會責任融入國中體育教學實務分享。中等教育,64(2),178-191。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.陳志福、張榮升、黃正杰(20130300)。淺談飛盤運動對中學生的影響。國北教大體育,7,196-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
18.郭豐州、黃奕仁(20071200)。大專體育教學中的情意系統。中華體育季刊,21(4)=83,53-60。new window  延伸查詢new window
19.黃玫玉、林惠雅(20121200)。國中青少年知覺導師管教行為與其在校偏差行為之相關研究。輔仁民生學誌,18(2),145-166。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Walsh, D. S.、Ozaeta, J.、Wright, P. M.(2010)。Transference of responsibility model goals to the school environment: Exploring the impact of coaching club program。Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy,15(1),15-28。  new window
21.Hsu, Wei-Ting、Pan, Yi-Hsiang、Chou, Hung-Shih、Lee, Wei-Ping、Lu, Frank Jing-Horng(2014)。Measuring Students' Responsibility in Physical Education Instrument Development and Validation。Youth social development in physical education,45,1-17。  new window
22.周宏室、徐偉庭(20120300)。個人與社會責任課程模式之探究。中華體育季刊,26(1)=100,99-106。new window  延伸查詢new window
23.潘義祥(20121200)。體育課程個人與社會責任模式之研究發展趨向。中華體育季刊,26(4)=103,491-497。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.胡凱揚、周嘉琪(20050900)。非行少年動起來!運動讓你找回自己。輔導季刊,41(3),61-67。new window  延伸查詢new window
25.林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(20050600)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究,3(2),122-136。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.徐興權(2012)。運動教育模式對國小學童個人與社會責任及比賽表現之影響(碩士論文)。國立體育大學,桃園。  延伸查詢new window
2.丁立宇(2010)。青出於籃--品格教育融入籃球教學之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.胡琨(2011)。飛盤爭奪賽得分之探討--以2009年世界運動會為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣體育運動大學。  延伸查詢new window
4.尤虔怡(2013)。高關懷學生在個人與社會責任模式之敘說探究--以獨輪車學習為例(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
5.陶秀珠(2013)。球類教學融入個人與社會責任模式之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
6.鄧貴安(2012)。理解式籃球教學法應用於個人與社會責任模式之行動研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學,臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Siedentop, Daryl(1994)。Sport Education: Quality PE Through Positive Sport Experiences。Human Kinetics。  new window
2.鞏正偉(2002)。學校體育改革與發展論。北京:北京體育大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.Altrichter, Herbert、Posch, Peter、Somekh, Bridget、夏林清(1997)。行動研究方法導論--教師動手做研究。台北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Hellison, D.、Martinek, T.(2006)。Social and individual responsibility programs。The handbook of physical education。Sage。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE