臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：我國動物保護行政組織診斷之研究--道德性政策理論的觀察
書刊名：中國行政評論
作者：吳宗憲 引用關係／蕭名凱
作者(外文)：Wu, Chuang-hsien／Hsiao, Ming-kai
出版日期：2017
卷期：23:2
頁次：頁30-69
主題關鍵詞：動物保護；動物保護檢查員；組織診斷；重要績效度分析；Animal protection；Animal protection inspectors；Organizational diagnosis；Importance-performance analysis；IPA
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:14
  • 點閱點閱:14
我國《動物保護法》隨著動物保護議題逐漸受到各界重視，自立法公布至今歷經數次修正，現行法規可謂相當嚴格，但仍見層出不窮的動保案件，這導因於動保議題具道德性政策之特色，產生立法雖快，卻面臨法律標準過高，致使行政機關面臨「徒法不足以自行」、「立法從嚴，執法從寬」的窘境。身為重要執法者的動保行政組織，卻無法隨著法律修訂而合適地調整，致使動保政策將難以有效落實。這些政策執行上的困境，會造成動保行政人員極大壓力，甚至產生同情疲勞等心理創傷而自我傷害，其已嚴重影響動保行政工作之效率，而這些類似的行政組織問題，也常見於消防業務、社會工作及醫療救助等繁重但較邊緣的行政業務性質上。 國內以往針對政府機構改革的分析，多由組織學者或內部工作者直觀的分析，極少以量化方式對行政組織設計進行研究，故有時流於各說各話的困境，尤其是上述邊緣業務性質的工作，就更缺乏深入調查。再者，過往組織理論，習於理性決策的模式，多半是透過組織整併、精簡層級或縮減員額之方式以提升組織效率，惟動保行政組織，因其道德性政策的性質，有其特殊的組織困境，是值得深究的問題。 據此，本研究以各地方動保行政機關的行政者為研究對象，根據組織設計、組織診斷理論來設計調查問卷，分析方法為「重要績效度分析」（Importance-Performance Analysis, IPA）。實務上，期望透過對動保行政組織的業務面、人資管理面與組織面調查，提出合理調整之政策建議；理論上，期望透過本次的嘗試性案例分析以回饋於組織設計理論，並做為未來其他政策領域行政組織調查的參考。
In Taiwan, the Animal Protection Act was enacted in 1998. As awareness of animal protection grew, the law went through several revisions over the years. However, animal protection is closely related to morality policy issue, so it causes the following circumstances: First, the law is amended quickly. Secondly, legislators make laws and regulations too stricter to enforce. Finally, for the public sectors, they face various administrative requirements but didn’t have enough manpower. As important law enforcers of the animal protection public sectors, now the officials are facing the dilemma that they don’t have enough recourse to enforce. It also makes the officials under so much pressure and suffering from compassion fatigue. Due to the difference between morality policy and ordinary policy, it also affects the organizational design. Therefore, the primary goal of this research is not only to diagnose the animal protection organization but also to know how to design it based on morality policy. The method used in this research is “Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA)” and the officials of Taiwan’s animal protection public sector as the study object. Through that, it will provide recommendations for policy practices and feedback to organizational design theory.
期刊論文
1.Haider-Markel, Donald P.(1999)。Morality Policy and Individual-Level Political Behavior: The Case of Legislative Voting on Lesbian and Gay Issues。Policy Studies Journal，27(4)，735-749。  new window
2.Roh, J.、Berry, F. S.(2008)。Modeling the Outcomes of State Abortion Funding Referenda: Morality or Redistributive Policy, or Both?。State Politics and Policy Quarterly，8(1)，66-87。  new window
3.陳寬裕、巫昌陽、林永森、高子怡(20120800)。澎湖目的地意象之關鍵屬性確認：基於結構方程模型的IPA方法。觀光休閒學報，18(2)，163-187。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Adams, R. E.、Boscarino, J. A.、Figley, C. R.(2006)。Compassion fatigue and psychological distress among social workers: A validation study。American Journal of Orthopsychiatry，76(1)，103-108。  new window
5.吳宗憲(20120600)。道德政策理論之應用：臺灣寵物業管理政策之個案研究。行政暨政策學報，54，121-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.吳宗憲、黃建皓(20120700)。論道德政策所引起的民主治理危機--以臺南市民流浪動物政策態度為例。政策研究學報，12，92-134。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.March, J. G.(1991)。Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning。Organization Science，2(1)，71-87。  new window
8.Badger, K.、Royse, D.、Craig, C.(2008)。Hospital social workers and indirect trauma exposure: An exploratory study of contributing factors。Health & Social Work，33(1)，63-71。  new window
9.Choi, G. Y.(2011)。Organizational impacts on the secondary traumatic stress of social workers assisting family violence or sexual assault survivors。Administration in Social Work，35(3)，225-242。  new window
10.Glick, H. R.、Hutchinson, A.(1999)。The Rising Agenda of Physician-Assisted Suicide: Explaining the Growth and Content of Morality Policy。Policy Studies Journal，27(4)，750-765。  new window
11.Meier, K. J.(1999)。Drugs, Sex, Rock, and Roll: A Theory of Morality Politics。Policy Studies Journal，27(4)，681-695。  new window
12.Mooney, C. Z.、Lee, M. H.(2000)。The Influence of Values on Consensus and Contentious Morality Policy: U.S. Death Penalty Reform, 1956-82。The Journal of Politics，62(1)，223-239。  new window
13.Mooney, Christopher Z.(1999)。The politics of morality policy: Symposium editor's introduction。Policy Studies Journal，27(4)，675-680。  new window
14.Mooney, Christopher Z.、Lee, Mei-Hsien(1999)。The temporal diffusion of morality policy: The case of death penalty legislation in the American States。Policy Studies Journal，27(4)，766-780。  new window
15.Rial, A.、Rial, J.、Varela, J.、Real, E.(2008)。An Application of Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) to The Management of Sport Centers。Managing Leisure，13(3/4)，179-188。  new window
16.Prati, G.、Pietrantoni, L.(2010)。An application of the social support deterioration deterrence model to rescue workers。Journal of Community Psychology，38(7)，901-917。  new window
17.Hollenhorst, Steve、Olson, David、Fortney, Ronal(1992)。Use of importance-performance analysis to evaluate state park cabins: The case of the West Virginia State Park System。Journal of Park and Recreation Administration，10(1)，1-11。  new window
18.Martilla, John A.、James, John C.(1977)。Importance-performance analysis。Journal of Marketing，41(1)，77-79。  new window
19.Sorenson, O.、Rivkin, J. W.、Fleming, L.(2006)。Complexity, Networks and Knowledge Flow。Research Policy，35(7)，994-1017。  new window
會議論文
1.Szymanski, Ann-Marie(1997)。Dry Compulsions: Prohibition and the Creation of State-Level Enforcement Agencies。The annual meeting of the American Political Science Association，(會議日期: 1997/08/28-31)。Washington, DC。  new window
研究報告
1.吳宗憲(2016)。我國動物保護人員之人事管理制度研究 (計畫編號：105農管-04.01-牧-08)。  延伸查詢new window
2.吳宗憲(2010)。我國動物保護政府行政組織政策執行力之研究 (計畫編號：98農管-04.01-牧-05)。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉珈延(2004)。動物保護法立法前後公私協力關係之研究--以棄犬問題處理為個案分析(碩士論文)。國立東華大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.鄭正郎(2004)。郵政組織結構變革與組織績效之研究(碩士論文)。東海大學。  延伸查詢new window
3.戴正道(2006)。行政院客家委員會組織再造之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺北大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Robbins, S. P.(1990)。Organization Theory: Structures, Designs, and Applications。Prentice-Hall。  new window
2.Weisbord, M. R.(1978)。Organizational diagnosis: A workbook of theory and practice。Addison-Wesley Publishing Company。  new window
3.O'Sullivan, E. L.(1991)。Marketing for Parks, Recreation, and Leisure。State College, PA：Venture。  new window
4.Chandler, Alfred D.(1962)。Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the american enterprise。Cambridge, Mass.：MIT Press。  new window
5.Jones, Gareth、劉韻僖、卓秀足、俞慧芸、楊仁壽(2012)。組織理論與管理。臺北：雙葉。  延伸查詢new window
6.Harrison, Michael I.、龍筱紅、張小山(2007)。組織診斷--方法、模型與過程。重慶：重慶大學。  延伸查詢new window
7.Daft, R. L.(2004)。Organization Theory and Design。Thomson South-Western。  new window
8.Burton, R. M.、DeSanctis, G.、Obel, B.(2006)。Organizational design: A step-by-step approach。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Jones, G. R.(2012)。Organizational Theory, Design, and Change。Pearson。  new window
10.Harrison, M. I.(1994)。Diagnosing organizations: Models, methods, and processes。London：SAGE。  new window
11.Meier, K. J.(1994)。The Politics of Sin。M. E. Sharpe。  new window
12.Mintzberg, H.(1983)。Structures in Fives。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice Hall。  new window
13.Nadler, D.(1977)。Feedback and Organization Development: Using Data-based Methods。Reading, MA：Addison-Wesley。  new window
14.Scott, W. R.(1998)。Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems。Englewood Cliffs, NJ：Prentice Hall。  new window
15.Roberts, J.(2004)。The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth。New York：Oxford University Press。  new window
16.Thompson, J. D.(1967)。Organizations in Action。Oxford：Oxford University Press。  new window
17.彭文賢(1983)。組織原理。三民書局。  延伸查詢new window
18.Sharp, E. B.(2005)。Morality Politics in American Cities。Lawrence：University Press of Kansas。  new window
19.Woodward, Joan(1965)。Industrial Organization: Theory and Practice。Oxford University Press。  new window
其他
1.吳宗憲(2016)。【動物當代思潮】吳宗憲：台灣動物保護行政的困境，https://goo.gl/CxQZ2e。  延伸查詢new window
2.翁嬿婷(2015)。食安稽查人力荒 盼募3000名志工當「神秘客」，http://www.ettoday.net/news/20150708/532001.htm。  延伸查詢new window
3.林良昇(2016)。動保人力不足 逾半檢查員由公務員兼職，https://goo.gl/pfk0Vh。  延伸查詢new window
4.李樹人(2016)。邊境稽查僅76人 藍委憂心食難安，https://udn.com/news/story/10582/2109596。  延伸查詢new window
5.李娉婷(2016)。動保機關人力缺額 不只是數字問題，http://www.tanews.org.tw/info/11675。  延伸查詢new window
6.李娉婷(2015)。消防隊撤手 動物救援出現空窗期？，http://www.tanews.org.tw/info/7256。  延伸查詢new window
7.湯雅雯，杜宜諳(2014)。動保萬人遊行 盼「十二夜」悲歌落幕，https://goo.gl/txktPf。  延伸查詢new window
8.許俊偉(20170403)。別走回頭路 勞檢問題在人力，https://money.udn.com/money/story/5648/2380677。  延伸查詢new window
9.章明哲(2017)。台東醫師缺 醫界向衛福部長要求增加人力，http://news.pts.org.tw/article/351526。  延伸查詢new window
10.蔡永彬(2016)。立委質疑勞檢員都過勞 勞部：增至1000人，https://goo.gl/bLhmsS。  延伸查詢new window
11.葉冠妤(2016)。動物救援誰接手 動保處消防局僵持不下，http://news.ltn.com.tw/news/local/paper/1052504。  延伸查詢new window
12.謝佳君，張軒哲，謝文華(2014)。重摔肺臟掉腹腔 河馬「阿河」走了，https://goo.gl/yn2sg5。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Burke, W. W.、Coruzzi, C. A.、Church, A. H.(1996)。The organizational survey as an intervention for change。Organizational surveys: Tools for assessment and change。San Francisco, CA：Jossey-Bass。  new window
2.Lowi, T. J.(1998)。Foreword: New dimensions in policy and politics。Moral Controversies in American Politics。New York：M. E. Sharpe。  new window
3.Mylchreest, I.(2001)。Avoiding the Issue Down Under: The Politics of Legalizing Abortion Australia。The Public Clash of Private Values。New York：Chatham House。  new window
4.Vergari, S.(2001)。Morality politics and the implementation of abstinence-only sex education: A case of policy comprise。The public clash of private values。New York：Chatham House。  new window
5.Studlar, D. T.(2001)。What Constitutes Morality Policy? A Cross-National Analysis。The Public Clash of Private Values。New York：Chatham House。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：689（臺灣：682，外國：7） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1366978 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67174037
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上