資料載入處理中...
臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統
:::
網站導覽
國圖首頁
聯絡我們
操作說明
English
行動版
(18.222.3.255)
登入
字型:
**字體大小變更功能,需開啟瀏覽器的JAVASCRIPT,如您的瀏覽器不支援,
IE6請利用鍵盤按住ALT鍵 + V → X → (G)最大(L)較大(M)中(S)較小(A)小,來選擇適合您的文字大小,
如為IE7以上、Firefoxy或Chrome瀏覽器則可利用鍵盤 Ctrl + (+)放大 (-)縮小來改變字型大小。
來源文獻查詢
引文查詢
瀏覽查詢
作者權威檔
引用/點閱統計
我的研究室
資料庫說明
相關網站
來源文獻查詢
/
簡易查詢
/
查詢結果列表
/
詳目列表
:::
詳目顯示
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆
/1
頁
來源文獻資料
摘要
外文摘要
引文資料
題名:
Communal Title and Indigenous Property Rights as a Challenge for Taiwan's Land Title Systems: Insights from the Australian Experience
書刊名:
地理研究
作者:
陳怡萱
/
Howitt, Richard
作者(外文):
Chen, Yi-shiuan
出版日期:
2017
卷期:
66
頁次:
頁31-46
主題關鍵詞:
共同所有權
;
托崙斯制度
;
原住民土地權
;
土地登記
;
Communal title
;
Torrens title
;
Native title
;
Land registry
;
Indigenous property right
原始連結:
連回原系統網址
相關次數:
被引用次數:期刊(
1
) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
排除自我引用:0
共同引用:
24
點閱:1
國家對於當代原住民土地權利的未充分回應和無解反映出了台灣現行土地登記制度的疏漏之處。該土地登記系統為中國國民黨政府在西元1945 年後引入台灣。在此系統中僅允許土地被登記為個人所有權,而非共同所有權、習慣所有權或集體所有權,並將所有未由個人登記持有的土地轉為公有地或國有地。台灣現行土地登記系統主要襲自澳洲托崙斯制度,而其核心為經由登記程序所取得的不容質疑的土地所有權。在台灣採行托崙斯制度形成只允許原住民族的土地權利訴求被登記為個人的土地所有權的情勢,這個結果導致原住民族對於祖居地或傳統領域的共同所有權未獲承認。反觀澳洲,在持續採用托崙斯制度的同時,業已發展出許多重要的法律和司法經驗來肯認原住民族對土地的共同所有權。本研究旨在探討澳洲經驗對於台灣原住民族土地權利訴求與共享公共財產利益的啟發。
以文找文
Inadequate and unresolved state responses to contemporary Indigenous land right claims in Taiwan reflect a deep flaw in the country’s current land registry. The land titling system, which was introduced by the KMT government after 1945, allows the registration of individual titles, but not communal, customary or collective titles, and effectively classifies all unregistered and untitled land as belonging to the state. The system is principally derived from Australia’s Torrens title system, for which the core element is an indefeasible title by registration. The adoption of the Torrens title system in Taiwan has allowed Indigenous claims only to be registered as individual titles. Therefore, tensions over the non-recognition of communal titles that are derived from Indigenous peoples’ ancestral domains or traditional territories are ongoing. In contrast, Australia has developed significant statutory and juridical experience that has resulted in the formal recognition of Indigenous peoples’ communal titles alongside continued operation of the Torrens title system. This paper discusses how this experience might inform and support future recognition of Indigenous land right claims and shared communal property interests in Taiwan.
以文找文
期刊論文
1.
Andrade, Tonio(2005)。Pirates, Pelts, and Promises: The Sino-Dutch Colony of Seventeenth Century Taiwan and the Aboriginal Village of Favorolang。The Journal of Asian Studies,64(2),295-321。
2.
Banner, Stuart(2005)。Why Terra Nullius? Anthropology and Property Law in Early Australia。Law and History Review,23(1),95-131。
3.
Barlett, R.(1997)。Wik: Equality and the Fallacy of 'Extinguishment。Indigenous Law Bulletin,4(1),11-13。
4.
Buck, C.(2006)。"Never Again": Kevin Gover's Apology for the Bureau of Indian Affairs。Wicazo Sa Review,21(1),97-126。
5.
Chen, H. M.(1986)。A Regional Study of Agricultural Land Utilization in the High-cold Regions of Northern Taiwan Mountains。Geographical Research,12,103-142。
6.
Chen, M. T.(2012)。The Legal Institution Analysis of the Land Register and Examination System in Germany--The Related Issues in Taiwan。Tunghai University Law Review,36,73-113。
7.
Cruickshank, J.(2013)。Treating history: New approaches to batman's treaty and indigenous dispossession in Colonial Victoria。Agora,48(1),11-15。
8.
Esposito, A.(2003)。A comparison of the Australian ('Torrens') system of land registration of 1858 and the law of Hamburg in the 1850s。Australian Journal of Legal History,7(2),193-229。
9.
Hsu, Minna(2016)。Lost, found and troubled in translation: Reconsidering imagined Indigenous "communities" in post-disaster Taiwan settings。AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples,12(1),71-85。
10.
Kuan, D. W.(2014)。Challenges for the Realization of Indigenous Land Rights in Contemporary Taiwan: A Regional Study of Indigenous Reserved Land Trade between Indigenous and Non-indigenous People。Journal of Archaeology and Anthropology,80,7-52。
11.
Langton, M.、Palmer, L.(2003)。Modern agreement making and Indigenous people in Australia: issues and trends。Australia Indigenous Law Reporter,8,1-32。
12.
Massie, E. C.(1917)。Perfection of the Torrens System。The Virginia Law Register,2(10),750-771。
13.
Nah, Alice M.(2006)。(Re)Mapping Indigenous 'Race'/Place in Postcolonial Peninsular Malaysia。Geografiska Annaler--Series B: Human Geography,88(3),285-297。
14.
Pearson, N.(2000)。Principles of Communal Native Title。Indigenous Law Bulletin,5(3),4-7。
15.
Petrow, S.(1992)。Knocking down the house? The Introduction of the Torrens System to Tasmania。University of Tasmania Law Review,11(2),167-181。
16.
Prill-Brett, J.(1994)。Indigenous Land Rights and Legal Pluralism among Philippine Highlanders。Law & Society Review,28(3),687-697。
17.
Secher, U.(2000)。Native Title: An exception to indefeasibility and a ground for invoking the deferred indefeasibility theory。James Cook University Law Review,7,17-73。
18.
Short, D.(2007)。The social construction of indigenous 'native title' land rights in Australia。Current Sociology,55,857-876。
19.
Taylor, G.(2008)。Is the Torrens System German?。The Journal of Legal History,29(2),253-285。
20.
Taylor, G.(2009)。The Torrens System--definitely not German。Adelaide Law Review,30(2),195-212。
21.
Tehan, M.(2003)。A Hope Disillusioned, an Opportunity Lost? Reflections on Common Law Native Title and Ten Years of the Native Title Act。Melbourne University Law Review,27(2),523-571。
會議論文
1.
Shih, C. S.(2005)。Special chapter for Indigenous Peoples in Constitution and Protection of the Rights of Indigenous Peoples。The Symposium on Constitutional Reform。Hualian。
學位論文
1.
Chiu, H. H.(2007)。The Colonial 'civilizing Process' in Dutch Formosa: 1624-1662(博士論文)。Leiden University,Leiden。
2.
Hsu, C. Y.(2009)。A study on Torrens Tiltle system--Comparison with the Taiwan Land Registration System(碩士論文)。National Chengchi University,Taipei。
3.
Lee, C. Y.(2009)。A study of the transition of land registration system in Taiwan(碩士論文)。National Chengchi University,Taipei。
4.
林淑雅(2007)。解╱重構台灣原住民族土地政策(博士論文)。國立臺灣大學。
延伸查詢
圖書
1.
Campbell, Rev. William(1903)。Formosa under the Dutch, Described from Contemporary Records, with Explanatory Notes and a Bibliography of the Island。London:Kegan Paul。
2.
Behrendt, L.(2012)。Indigenous Australia for dummies。Richmond:John Wiley & Sons。
3.
Butt, P.(2010)。Land law。Lawbook Company。
4.
Goodall, H.(1996)。Invasion to Embassy: Land in Aboriginal Politics in New South Wales, 1770-1972。Sydney:Allen & Unwin。
5.
Hiley, G.(1998)。The Wik case: issues and implications。Butterworths。
6.
Hinde, G. W.(1971)。The New Zealand Torrens System Centennial Essays。Wellington:Butterworths。
7.
Mantziaris, C.、Martin, D.(1999)。Guide to the design of native title corporations。Perth:National Native Title Tribunal。
8.
Ministry of the Interior(1992)。A review of the origin of Taiwan land registry system and land registry in early Taiwan retrocession。Taipei:Ministry of the Interior。
9.
Moreton-Robinson, A.(2015)。The White Possessive: Property, Power, and Indigenous Sovereignty。Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press。
10.
National Native Title Tribunal(2012)。Twenty Years of Native Title。Canberra:Commonwealth of Australia。
11.
Richardson, B.(1994)。People of Terra Nullius: Betrayal and Rebirth in Aboriginal North America。British Columbia:Douglas & McIntyre。
12.
Taylor, G.(2008)。The Law of the Land: the advent of the Torrens system in Canada。Toronto:University of Toronto Press。
13.
Toyne, P.、Vachon, D.(1984)。Growing up the country: The Pitjantjatjara struggle for their land。Melbourne:McPhee Gribble/Penguin。
14.
Wilkie, M.(1985)。Aboriginal Land Rights in NSW。Sydney:Alternative Publishing Cooperative。
其他
1.
Brooks, S.(2016)。Doubts cast on likelihood of referendum to recognize Indigenous Australians in the constitution by 2017,http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-21/doubts-cast-on-indigenous-australians-referendum/7434780。
2.
Castan, M.(2014)。Explainer: what Indigenous constitutional recognition means,http://theconversation.com/explainer-what-indigenous-constitutional-recognition-means-31770。
3.
Harris, S.(1979)。It's coming yet--an Aboriginal treaty within Australia between Australians,http://aiatsis.gov.au/collections/collections-online/digitised-collections/treaty/aboriginal-treaty-committee/its-coming-yet。
4.
Law Council of Australia(2011)。Constitutional Recognition of Indigenous Australians,https://www.lawcouncil.asn.au/lawcouncil/images/LCA-PDF/speeches/ConstitutionalRecognitionofIndigenousAustralians.pdf。
5.
Hung, K. C.。The survey outcome of Forest Classification (1925-1935),http://thcts.sinica.edu.tw/themes/rd03-3.php。
6.
Liou, W. Y.。The map frames of the Topographic Map of Indigenous Area (1907-1916),http://thcts.sinica.edu.tw/themes/rd13-1.php。
7.
NSW Law Reform Commission(1996)。Report 76--Torrens Title: Compensation for Loss,http://www.lawreform.justice.nsw.gov.au/Documents/report_76.pdf。
圖書論文
1.
Howitt, R.(2009)。Getting the scale right? A relational scale politics of Native title in Australia。Leviathan Undone? Towards a Political Economy of Scale。Vancouver:University of British Columbia Press。
推文
當script無法執行時可按︰
推文
推薦
當script無法執行時可按︰
推薦
引用網址
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用網址
引用嵌入語法
當script無法執行時可按︰
引用嵌入語法
轉寄
當script無法執行時可按︰
轉寄
top
:::
相關期刊
相關論文
相關專書
相關著作
熱門點閱
1.
Incessantly Colonized Border(s) : Mother-tongue Reading and Decolonial Reflection on Proverb 22:28
2.
當原住民族傳統慣習遇上國家治理:吉拉米代部落狩獵自主管理制度之橋接策略
3.
澳洲原住民族文化資產管理典範轉移的歷史過程
4.
多元文化國下管制原住民族獵人持有獵槍的憲法爭議:以現行槍砲彈藥刀械管制條例第20條第1項前段為例
5.
「蕃地」開發、「蕃人」控制及臺灣原住民族群性的展現:以蘭陽溪中上游地域為中心(上篇)
6.
夏威夷主權運動
7.
從蘭嶼東清七號地事件看原住民族土地治權面臨的困境
8.
從兩人權公約檢視原住民狩獵權
9.
族群主流化觀點下的原住民族轉型正義
10.
Ideas, Difficulties and Breakthrough of Maintaining Taiwan Indigenous People's Biodiversity Knowledge: Take the Accused Cases of "Thieving Forest By-product" as Example
11.
由生存權、文化權而來的狩獵權--從美國最高法院判決談臺灣原住民的狩獵權、漁權
12.
我國原住民保留地政策之當代課題與司法案例分析
13.
日治時期「平地蕃人」的出現及其法律上待遇(1895~1937)
14.
城市空間與山中歲月--論五都後的原住民族集體權
15.
國家法制高牆下實現原住民族土地與自然資源權利的困境--從美麗灣渡假村旅館的開發案及司馬庫斯櫸木案談起
1.
美、日土地信託在我國之繼受與發展
2.
「原漢分治」下的人群隔離與跨界(1930-1960s)
3.
Rgrgyax Hlahuy-解殖山林:大霸尖山視野下泰雅族人的空間重構
4.
公共理性與台灣的民主化進程
5.
劃界的政治: 山地治理下的傳統領域,1895-2005
6.
多元文化國家的公民教育──兼論台灣原住民族公民教育的困境
7.
臺灣原住民族政治主體建構之研究
8.
解╱重構台灣原住民族土地政策
1.
少年臺灣史:寫給島嶼的新世代和永懷少年心的國人
無相關著作
無相關點閱
QR Code