:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:說理或詭辯--判決引用外國法的爭論
書刊名:中原財經法學
作者:賴英照 引用關係
作者(外文):Lai, In-jaw
出版日期:2017
卷期:38
頁次:頁1-108
主題關鍵詞:外國法司法判決民主正當性選擇適用問題法制移植Foreign lawJudicial decisionDemocratic legitimacyCherry-picking problemLegal transplant
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:358
  • 點閱點閱:8
期刊論文
1.Cohen-Eliya, Moshe、Porat, Iddo(2009)。The Hidden Foreign Law Debate in Heller: The Proportionality Approach in American Constitutional Law。San Diego Law Review,46,367-413。  new window
2.Ackerman, Bruce(1997)。The Rise of World Constitutionalism。Virginia Law Review,83,771-797。  new window
3.Koh, Harold Hongju(2004)。International law as part of our law。American Journal of International Law,98,43-57。  new window
4.Kahn-Freund, Otto(1974)。On uses and misuses of comparative law。Modern Law Review,37(1),1-27。  new window
5.Jackson, Vicki C.(2005)。Constitutional Comparisons: Convergence, Resistance, Engagement。Harvard Law Review,119,109-128。  new window
6.Teubner, Gunther(1998)。Legal irritants: Good faith in British law or how unifying law ends up in new divergences。Modern Law Review,61(1),11-32。  new window
7.Legrand, Pierre(1997)。The Impossibility of Legal Transplants。Maast. J. EUR. & COMP. L.,4,111-124。  new window
8.Watson, Alan(1983)。Legal Change: Sources of Law and Legal Culture。U. of Penn. L. Rev.,131,1121-1157。  new window
9.Pound, Roscoe(1912)。The Scope and Purpose of Sociological Jurisprudence。Harvard Law Review,25(6),489-516。  new window
10.陳愛娥(20040600)。繼受法國家中的法比較--以憲法解釋作為觀察對象。月旦民商法雜誌,4,5-15。  延伸查詢new window
11.劉尚志、林三元、宋皇志(20061000)。走出繼受,邁向立論:法學實證研究之發展。科技法學評論,3(2),1-48。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.陳清秀(20160600)。比較法之功能及其與行政法之關係。月旦法學,253,69-90。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.賴英照(20170100)。歷史解釋法的強制與疏離。檢察新論,21,158-173。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.Alford, Roger P.(2005)。In Search of a Theory for Constitutional Comparativism。UCLA L. Rev.,52,639-714。  new window
15.Anker, Deborah E.(2013)。Grutter v. Bollinger: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg's Legitimization of the Role of Comparative and International Law in U.S. Jurisprudence。Harvard Law Review,127,425-428。  new window
16.Black, Ryan C.、Epstein, Lee(2007)。(Re-)Setting the Scholarly Agenda on Transjudicial Communication。L. & SOC. INQUIRY,32,791-807。  new window
17.Black, Ryan C.、Owens, Ryan J.、Walters, Daniel E.、Brookhart, Jennifer L.(2014)。Upending a Global Debate: An Empirical Analysis of the U.S. Supreme Court's Use of Transnational Law to Interpret Domestic Doctrine。GEO. L. J.,103,1-46。  new window
18.Boyer, Ryan H.(2013)。"Unveiling" Kansas's Ban on Application of Foreign Law。KAN. L.,61,1061-1087。  new window
19.Bryant, A. Christopher(2011)。Foreign Law as Legislative Fact in Constitutional Cases。BYU L. REV.,2011,1005-1040。  new window
20.Chaudhry-Kravitz, Amara S.(2013)。The New Facially Neutral "Anti-Shariah" Bills: A Constitutional Analysis。WASH. & LEE J. CIVIL RTS. & SOC. JUST.,20,25-44。  new window
21.Cleveland, Sarah H.(2006)。Our International Constitution。Yale Journal of International Law,31,1-125。  new window
22.Dalton, Laura(1990)。Stanford v. Kentucky and Wilkins v. Missouri: A Violation of an Emerging Rule of Customary International Law。WM. & MARY L. REV.,32,161-205。  new window
23.Davis, D. M.(2003)。Constitutional Borrowing: The Influence of Legal Culture and Local History in the Reconstitution of Comparative Influence: The South African Experience。INT'L J. CONST. L.,1,181-195。  new window
24.Davis, Martha F.、Kalb, Johanna(2012)。Oklahoma and Beyond: Understanding the Wave of State Anti-Transnational Law Initiatives。IND. L. J.,87(Suppl.),1-16。  new window
25.Delahunty, Robert J.、Yoo, John(2005)。Against Foreign Law。HARV. J. L. & PUB. POL'Y,29,291-330。  new window
26.Dorsen, Norman(2005)。The Relevance of Foreign Legal Materials in the U.S. Constitutional Cases: A Conversation Between Justice Antonin Scalia and Justice Stephen Breyer。INT'L J. CONST. L.,3,519-541。  new window
27.Ewald, William(1995)。Comparative Jurisprudence (II): The Logic of Legal Transplants。AM. J. COMP. L.,43(4),489-510。  new window
28.Farber, Daniel A.(2007)。The Supreme Court, the Law of Nations, and Citations of Foreign Law: The Lessons of History。CAL. L. REV.,95,1335-1366。  new window
29.Ginsburg, Ruth Bader(2004)。Looking Beyond Our Borders: The Value of a Comparative Perspective in Constitutional Adjudication。YALE L. POL'Y REV.,22,329-337。  new window
30.Ginsburg, Ruth Bader(2011)。"A Decent Respect to the Opinions of [Human] Kind": The Value of a Comparative Perspective in Constitutional Adjudication。AM. U. INT'L L. REV.,26,927-934。  new window
31.Gray, David C.(2007)。Why Justice Scalia Should Be a Constitutional Comparativist… Sometimes。STAN. L. REV.,59,1249-1280。  new window
32.Grunert, Jeremy(2013)。How Do You Solve a Problem Like Sharia? Awad v. Ziriax and the Question of Sharia Law in America。PEPP. L. REV.,40,695-734。  new window
33.Jackson, Vicki C.(2004)。Comparative Constitutional Federalism and Transnational Judicial Discourse。INT'L J. CONST. L.,2,91-138。  new window
34.Zaring, David(2006)。The Use of Foreign Decisions by Federal Courts: An Empirical Analysis。Journal of Empirical Legal Studies,3(2),297-331。  new window
35.Yeazell, Stephen(2009)。When and How U.S. Courts Should Cite Foreign Law。CONST. COMMENT.,26,65-72。  new window
36.Tushnet, Mark V.(2006)。When Is Knowing Less Better than Knowing More? Unpacking the Controversy over Supreme Court Reference to Non-U.S. Law。MINN. L. REV.,90,1275-1302。  new window
37.Tushnet, Mark V.(2006)。The "Constitution Restoration Act" and Judicial Independence: Some Observations。CASE W. RES. L. REV.,56,1071-1082。  new window
38.Twining, William(2004)。Diffusion of Law: A Global Perspective。J. LEGAL PLURALISM & UNOFFICAL L.,36,1-45。  new window
39.Watson, Alan(2000)。Legal Transplants and European Private Law。ELEC. J. COMP. L.,4(4),1-13。  new window
40.Kahn, Ronald(2006)。The Constitution Restoration Act, Judicial Independence, and Popular Constitutionalism。W. RES. L. REV.,56,1083-1118。  new window
41.Kroncke, Jedidiah(2012)。Law and Development as Anti-Comparative Law。VAND. J. TRASNAT'L L.,45,477-555。  new window
42.Kim, Eun-Jung Katherine(2014)。Islamic Law in American Courts: Good, Bad, and Unsustainable Uses。Notre Dame J. L. Ethics & Pub. Pol'y,28,287-307。  new window
43.Larsen, Joan L.(2004)。Importing Constitutional Norms from a "Wider Civilization": Lawrence and the Rehnquist Court's Use of Foreign and International Law in Domestic Constitutional Interpretation。OHIO ST. L. J.,65,1283-1327。  new window
44.Michael, Robert E.(2002)。The Anti-Shari'a Movement and Oklahoma's Save Our State Amendment--Unconstitutional Discrimination or Homeland Security?。ILSA J. INT'L & COMP. L.,18,347-368。  new window
45.Murray, John L.(2008)。Judicial Cosmopolitanism。JUD. STUD. INST. J.,2,1-17。  new window
46.O'Brien, David M.(2006)。More Smoke Than Fire: The Rehnquist Court's Use of Comparative Judicial Opinions and Law in the Construction of Constitutional Rights。J. L. & POL.,22,83-111。  new window
47.O'Connor, Sandra Day(1997)。Broadening Our Horizons: Why American Judges and Lawyers Must Learn About Foreign Law。INT'L JUD. OBSERVER,4,1-4。  new window
48.Parrish, Austen L.(2007)。Storm in a Teacup: The U.S. Supreme Court's Use of Foreign Law。U. ILL. L. REV.,2007,637-680。  new window
49.Prasatik, Sara(2013)。Assessing the Viability of State International Law Prohibitions。HOUS. J. INT'L L.,35,465-502。  new window
50.Rahdert, Mark C.(2007)。Comparative Constitutional Advocacy。AM. U. L. REV.,26,553-665。  new window
51.Saunders, Cheryl(2006)。Comparative Constitutional Law in the Courts: Is There a Problem?。Current Legal Problems,59,91-127。  new window
52.Sheeder, Renee(2013)。Awad v. Ziriax: The Tenth Circuit's Defense Against the Power of Religious Majority Factions。DENV. U. L. REV.,90,801-823。  new window
53.Turner, Elizabeth Bulat(2006)。The Relevancy of Foreign Law as Persuasive Authority and Congress's Response to its Use: A Preemptive Attack on the Constitution Restoration Act。GA. ST. U. L. REV.,23,455-480。  new window
54.Tushnet, Mark V.(2004)。Interpreting Constitutions Comparatively: Some Cautionary Notes, with Reference to Affirmative Action。CONN. L. REV.,36,649-663。  new window
55.黃舒芃(20050500)。比較法作為法學方法:以憲法領域之法比較為例。月旦法學,120,183-198。new window  延伸查詢new window
56.Law, David S.、Chang, Wen-Chen(2011)。The Limits of Global Judicial Dialogue。Washington Law Review,86(3),523-577。  new window
57.蔡明誠(2011)。外國立法例在立法及法律適用上之運用--以智慧權法為例。司法新聲,99,5-11。  延伸查詢new window
58.Calabresi, Steven G.、Zimdahl, Stephanie Dotson(2005)。The Supreme Court and Foreign Sources of Law: Two Hundred Years of Practice and the Juvenile Death Penalty Decision。William and Mary Law Review,47(3),743-909。  new window
會議論文
1.Rehnquist, William H.(1993)。Constitutional Courts--Comparative Remarks (1989)。Baden-Baden:Nomos。  new window
圖書
1.王澤鑑(2002)。民法學說與判例研究。台北:王澤鑑。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Loss, Louis、Seligman, Joel(2005)。Securities Regulation。Wolfers Kluwer。  new window
3.Posner, Richard A.(2008)。How Judges Think。Harvard University Press。  new window
4.司法院(2009)。司法院大法官解釋。司法院。  延伸查詢new window
5.林超駿(2006)。超越繼受之憲法學:理想與現實。臺北:林超駿。  延伸查詢new window
6.吳從周(2007)。民事法學與法學方法。台北:吳從周。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.吳庚(2004)。憲法的解釋與適用。臺北:吳庚。  延伸查詢new window
8.司法院(2006)。司法院大法官解釋續編。司法院。  延伸查詢new window
9.司法院(2008)。司法院大法官解釋續編。司法院。  延伸查詢new window
10.司法院(2011)。司法院大法官解釋。司法院。  延伸查詢new window
11.陳新民(2015)。行政法學總論。陳新民。  延伸查詢new window
12.翁岳生(2000)。司法院大法官解釋關係法令檢索。司法院。  延伸查詢new window
13.Borgen, Christopher J.(2007)。"A Decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind…": Selected Speeches by Justices of the U.S. Supreme Court on Foreign and International Law。Washington, DC:The American Society of International Law。  new window
14.Watson, Alan(1993)。Legal Transplants: An Approach to Comparative Law。University of Georgia Press。  new window
圖書論文
1.張文貞(2009)。憲法與國際人權法的匯流:兼論我國大法官解釋之實踐。憲法解釋之理論與實務。中央研究院法律學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
2.張文貞(2010)。跨國憲法對話:大法官解釋引用外國法的總體實證研究。憲法解釋之理論與實務。臺北:中央研究院法律學研究所籌備處。  延伸查詢new window
3.Minow, Martha(2015)。The Controversial Status of International and Comparative Law in the United States。Courts and Comparative Law。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
4.Rautenbach, Christa(2015)。South Africa: Teaching an "Old Dog" New Tricks? An Empirical Study of the Use of Foreign Precedents by South African Constitutional Court (1995-2010)。Courts and Comparative Law。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
5.Resnik, Judith(2015)。Constructing the 'Foreign': American Law's Relationship to Non- Domestic Sources。Courts and Comparative Law。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
6.Unberath, Hannes、Stadler, Astrid(2015)。Comparative Law in the German Courts。Courts and Comparative Law。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
7.Waldron, Jeremy(2015)。Foreign Law and the Modern Ius Gentium。Courts and Comparative Law。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
8.Albarian, Alexis(2015)。The Use of Comparative Law before the French Cour de Cassation--The View from Academia。Courts and Comparative Law。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
9.Canivet, Guy(2015)。The Use of Comparative Law before the French Private Law Courts。Courts and Comparative Law。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
10.Gelter, Martin、Siems, Mathias(2015)。Networks, Dialogue or One-Way Traffic? An Empirical Analysis of Cross-Citations Between Ten of Europe's Highest Courts。Courts and Comparative Law。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
11.Gentili, Gianluca(2015)。Enhancing Constitutional Self-Understanding through Comparative Law--An Empirical Study of the Foreign Case Law by the Supreme Court of Canada (1982-2013)。Courts and Comparative Law。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
12.Graziano, Thomas Kadner(2015)。Is it Legitimate and Beneficial for Judges to Compare?。Courts and Comparative Law。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
13.Andenas, Mads、Fairgrieve, Duncan(2015)。Courts and Comparative Law--In Search of a Common Language for Open Legal Systems。Courts and Comparative Law。New York, NY:Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE