:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣版孕期噁心嘔吐健康相關生活品質量表之信效度測試
書刊名:護理雜誌
作者:鍾宜樺蔡曉婷劉美君周汎澔 引用關係
作者(外文):Chung, Yi-huaTsai, Shiau-tingLiu, Mei-chunChou, Fan-hao
出版日期:2017
卷期:64:6
頁次:頁45-55
主題關鍵詞:懷孕噁心嘔吐生活品質信度效度PregnancyNausea and vomitingQuality of lifeValidityReliability
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:35
  • 點閱點閱:35
背景:孕期噁心嘔吐的症狀困擾衝擊著孕婦的生活品質,但具信效度且已被測試的評估工具很少。目的:檢測台灣版孕期噁心嘔吐健康相關生活品質量表之信效度。方法:橫斷性研究設計,採方便取樣,2011年11月15日至2013年6月15日於南部某醫學中心及區域教學醫院產檢門診,收集416位第一、二孕期懷孕婦女之資料,並以卡方檢定、項目分析及主軸分析檢測量表之建構效度,再以皮爾森積差相關鑑定此量表與世界衛生組織生活品質問卷台灣簡明版〔World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF in Taiwan, WHOQOL- BREF(TW)〕的同時效標效度。結果:原量表因素分析萃取4個因素,分別為「限制」(10題)、「生理症狀與惡化因素」(9題)、「情緒」(6題)、「疲憊」(4題),可解釋總變異量為67.45%。分量表與總量表的聚斂效度良好(r = .78- .85, p <.01),各分量表之間的區辨性效度佳(r = .48- .68, p < .01);總量表與WHOQOL-BREF(TW)有良好的效標關聯效度(r = -.37, p < .01)。量表的內在一致性良好,總量表的信度Cronbach's α值為.95,各分量表的Cronbach's α值皆達.70以上,總量表兩週再測信度佳、組內相關係數(intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC)值為.92(n = 37, p < .001)。結論/實務應用:本量表可做為日後研究和臨床孕期噁心嘔吐生活品質的評估工具,以協助適時提供孕婦合宜的護理措施、增進其生活品質。
Background: Symptom distress related to pregnancy-related nausea and vomiting is known to impact quality of life in pregnant women. However, few reliable and valid assessment tools are available for research use. Purpose: To test the reliability and validity of the Taiwan health-related quality of life for nausea and vomiting during pregnancy (NVPQOL) scale. Method: A cross-sectional study design was conducted. A convenience sample of 416 pregnant women in their first and second trimesters were recruited from the prenatal clinics of one medical center and one regional teaching hospital in southern Taiwan. Chi-square tests, item analysis, and principal axis factor analysis were used to examine construct validity. Pearson's correlation coefficient was then conducted to compare the concurrent validity of the scale against the Chinese-language version of the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment [WHOQOL-BREF (TW)]. Results: Four factors were extracted using factor analysis: "limitations" (10 items), "physical symptoms/aggravating factors" (9 items), "emotions" (6 items), and "fatigue" (4 items), which together accounted for 67.45% of the total variance. The NVPQOL showed good convergent (r = .78 ~ .85, p < .01), discriminate (r = .48 ~ .68, p < .01), and concurrent validities, with a -0.37 correlation coefficient between the WHOQOL-BREF (TW) and the NVPQOL (p < .01). The Cronbach's α of the NVPQOL was .95. The intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability of two weeks was .92 (n = 37, p < .001). Conclusions/Implications for Practice: The NVPQOL may be used in future research and clinical assessment to measure quality of life in women who experience nausea and vomiting during pregnancy in order to provide appropriate nursing interventions in a timely manner to improve quality of life.
期刊論文
1.Lacasse, A.、Rey, E.、Ferreira, E.、Morin, C.、Berard, A.(2008)。Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: What about quality of life?。An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology,115(12),1484-1493。  new window
2.Liu, M. C.、Kuo, S. H.、Lin, C. P.、Yang, Y. M.、Chou, F. H.、Yang, Y. H.(2014)。Effects of professional support on nausea, vomiting and quality of life during early pregnancy。Biological Research for Nursing,16(4),378-386。  new window
3.Chan, O. K.、Sahota, D. S.、Leung, T. Y.、Chan, L. W.、Fung, T. Y.、Lau, T. K.(2010)。Nausea and vomiting in health- related quality of life among Chinese pregnant women。The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology,50(6),512-518。  new window
4.Kuo, S. H.、Wang, R. H.、Tseng, H. C.、Jian, S. Y.、Chou, F. H.(2007)。A comparison of different severities of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy relative to stress, social support, and maternal adaptation。Journal of Midwifery and Women's Health,52(1),e1-e7。  new window
5.Lacasse, A.、Berard, A.(2008)。Validation of the nausea and vomiting of pregnancy specific health related quality of life questionnaire。Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,6,32-37。  new window
6.Magee, L. A.、Chandra, K.、Mazzotta, P.、Stewart, D.、Koren, G.(2002)。Development of a health-related quality of life instrument for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy。American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology,186(5 Suppl.),S232-S238。  new window
7.Munch, S.、Korst, L. M.、Hernandez, G. D.、Romero, R.、Goodwin, T. M.(2011)。Health-related quality of life in women with nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: The importance of psychosocial context。Journal of Perinatology,31(1),10-20。  new window
8.Vachkova, E.、Jezek, S.、Mares, J.、Moravcova, M.(2013)。The evaluation of the psychometric properties of a specific quality of life questionnaire for physiological pregnancy。Health and Quality of Life Outcomes,11,214-220。  new window
9.周汎澔、陳彰惠(20011200)。婦女孕期噁心嘔吐之內心感受與護理需求。長庚護理,12(4)=36,261-270。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.林佩欣(2008)。中風患者的成效測量--生活品質。台灣腦中風學會會訊,15(1),7-9。  延伸查詢new window
11.周汎澔(20131200)。孕期噁心嘔吐之症狀經驗評估與護理處置。護理雜誌,60(6),5-10。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.姚開屏(20020300)。健康相關生活品質概念與測量原理之簡介。臺灣醫學,6(2),183-192。  延伸查詢new window
13.Bustos, M.、Venkataramanan, R.、Caritis, S.(2017)。Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy--What's new?。Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic & Clinical,202,62-72。  new window
14.Bai, G.、Korfage, I. J.、Groen, E. H.、Jaddoe, V. W. V.、Mautner, E.、Raat, H.(2016)。Associations between nausea, vomiting, fatigue and health-related quality of life of women in early pregnancy: The generation R study。PLoS One,11(11),e0166133。  new window
15.鄭惠雯、林軍廷、郭詩憲、劉美君、周汎澔(20120400)。臺灣孕期噁心嘔吐婦女之終止妊娠意圖與其相關因素之探討。高雄護理雜誌,29(1),7-16。  延伸查詢new window
16.劉美君、周汎澔(20141200)。第一孕期噁心嘔吐婦女的健康生活品質及其相關因素。護理暨健康照護研究,10(4),314-322。new window  延伸查詢new window
17.Ferketich, S.(1991)。Focus on psychometrics. Aspects of item analysis。Research in Nursing & Health,14(2),165-168。  new window
18.Chou, F. H.、Kuo, S. H.、Wang, R. H.(2008)。A longitudinal study of nausea and vomiting, fatigue and perceived stress in, social support for, pregnant women through the three trimesters。Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences,24(6),306-314。  new window
19.Chou, F. H.、Avant, K. C.、Kuo, S. H.、Fetzer, S. J.(2008)。Relationships between nausea and vomiting, perceived stress, social support, pregnancy planning and psychosocial adaptation in a sample of mothers: A questionnaire survey。International Journal of Nursing Studies,45(8),1185-1191。  new window
20.Karimi, M.、Brazier, J.(2016)。Health, health-related quality of life, and quality of life: What is the difference?。PharmacoEconomics,34(7),645-649。  new window
21.Heitmann, K.、Nordeng, H.、Havnen, G. C.、Solheimsnes, A.、Holst, L.(2017)。The burden of nausea and vomiting during pregnancy: Severe impacts on quality of life, daily life functioning and willingness to become pregnant again Results from a cross-sectional study。BMC Pregnancy Childbirth,17(1),75。  new window
22.Rhodes, V. A.、McDaniel, R. W.(1999)。The index of nausea, vomiting, and retching: A new format of the index of nausea and vomiting。Oncology Nursing Forum,26(5),889-894。  new window
23.Mogos, M. F.、August, E. M.、Salinas-Miranda, A. A.、Sultan, D. H.、Salihu, H. M.(2013)。A systematic review of quality of life measures in pregnant and postpartum mothers。Applied Research in Quality of Life,8(2),219-250。  new window
24.臺灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷發展小組(20000800)。臺灣版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之發展簡介。中華公共衛生雜誌,19(4),315-324。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.李宜庭(2014)。不同孕期婦女之生活品質的比較(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃素微(2005)。台灣簡明版世界衛生組織生活品質問卷之效度再探(碩士論文)。國立台北師範學院。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉美君(2010)。專業支持介入方案對改善第一孕期婦女噁心嘔吐症狀與孕期生活品質的成效(碩士論文)。高雄醫學大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.邱皓政(2011)。量化研究與統計分析。五南圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.邱皓政(2010)。量化研究與統計分析--SPSS/PASW中文視窗版資料分析範例解析。五南。  延伸查詢new window
3.Gay, L. R.、Mills, G. E.、Airasian, P. W.(2012)。Educational research: Competencies for analysis and application。New York, NY:Pearson Education。  new window
4.Tabachnick, Barbara G.、Fidell, Linda S.(2013)。Using multivariate statistics。Pearson Education。  new window
5.吳明隆(2013)。SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計。易習圖書。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE