:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:高通行動通訊標準必要專利授權與競爭法:大陸、南韓、歐盟、美國、臺灣裁罰案之比較
書刊名:公平交易季刊
作者:楊智傑
作者(外文):Yang, Chih-chieh
出版日期:2018
卷期:26:2
頁次:頁1-54
主題關鍵詞:美商高通標準必要專利FRAND承諾沒授權沒晶片競爭法QualcommStandard essential patentFRAND license commitmentNo license no chipAntitrust laws
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(5) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:5
  • 共同引用共同引用:36
  • 點閱點閱:18
期刊論文
1.吳秀明(20091100)。專利聯盟(Patent Pool)與公平法之聯合行為管制--以「飛利浦光碟案」中弔詭的競爭關係為核心。月旦法學雜誌,174,120-135。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Cary, George S.、Nelson, Mark W.、Kaiser, Steven J.、Sistla, Alex R.(2011)。The Case for Antitrust Law to Police the Patent Holdup Problem in Standard Setting。Antitrust Law Journal,77,913-945。  new window
3.吳秀明(20091200)。專利聯盟(Patent Pool)與公平法之聯合行為管制--以「飛利浦光碟案」中弔詭的競爭關係為核心。月旦法學雜誌,175,85-101。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.王立達、江國泉(20090200)。不同標準,合理齟齬?--評臺北高等行政法院飛利浦可錄式光碟專利特許實施案判決。月旦法學,165,174-201。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.Farrell, Joseph、Hayes, John、Shapiro, Carl、Sullivan, Theresa(2007)。Standard Setting, Patents, and Hold-Up。Antitrust Law Journal,74(3),603-670。  new window
6.葉雲卿(20150600)。美國Microsoft案後續發展及其對計算標準專利合理權利金之影響。智慧財產評論,13(1),1-53。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.李素華(20170100)。除去或防止侵害請求權與競爭法規範--從德國Spundfass及橘皮書案談技術標準專利權之行使。公平交易季刊,25(1),37-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.沈宗倫(20170600)。標準必要專利之法定授權與專利權濫用--以誠實信用原則為中心。政大法學評論,149,1-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.陳皓芸(20170100)。標準必要專利權之行使、權利濫用與獨占地位濫用。公平交易季刊,25(1),81-130。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.黃惠敏(20161100)。標準必要專利之戰爭--禁制令行不行?。月旦財經法雜誌,39,157-180。  延伸查詢new window
11.黃惠敏(20160600)。標準必要專利與競爭法之管制--以違反FRAND/RAND承諾為中心。中原財經法學,36,171-243。new window  延伸查詢new window
12.周源祥(2016)。RAND許可原則的最新立法與案例發展趨勢分析。科技與法律,2016(3)。  延伸查詢new window
13.趙慶泠(20161000)。從歐盟法院華為v.中興案判決談歐盟SEP禁制令與競爭法的FRAND抗辯。專利師,27,97-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.劉憶成(20160800)。標準必要專利法制發展及對應策略。科技法律透析,28(8),51-72。  延伸查詢new window
15.Beach, Julian M.(2016)。Transatlantic (F)RANDs and Converging Standards: Finding Balance Between Jurisdictions in International Standard Setting。Columbia Journal of Transnational Law,54。  new window
16.Cappuyns, Patricia(2015)。The Scoop From Europe: The CJEU Offers Guidance in the Huawei/ZTE Judgment on the Proper Way to Conduct FRAND Negotiations. 50 Les Nouvelles。Les Nouvelles,50。  new window
17.Fumagalli, Chiara、Motta, Massimo(2017)。On the Use of Price-Cost Tests in Loyalty Discounts and Exclusive Dealing Arrangements: Which Implications from Economic Theory Should be Drawn?。Antitrust Law Journal,81。  new window
18.Huang, Yong、Wang, Elizabeth Xiao-Ru、Zhang, Roger Xin(2015)。Essential Facilities Doctrine and its Application in Intellectual Property Space under China's Anti-Monopoly Law。George Mason Law Review,22。  new window
19.Kattan, Joseph(2013)。FRAND Wars and Section 2。Antitrust,2013。  new window
20.Lee, Jyh-An(2016)。Implementing the FRAND Standard in China。Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law,19,37-86。  new window
21.Li, Benjamin C.(2016)。The Global Convergence of FRAND Licensing Practices: Towards 'Interoperable' Legal Standards。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,31。  new window
22.Poulton, Victoria(2008)。All's Fair in Love and...Standard-Setting?! The Third Circuit Says 'No' to Deception and 'Yes' to Antitrust Actions in Broadcom Corp. v. Qualcomm, Inc。Villanova Law Review,53。  new window
23.Rill, James F.、Kress, James G.、Kallay, Dina、Hollman, Hugh M.(2015)。Antitrust and FRAND Bargaining: Rejecting the Invitation for Antitrust Overreach into Royalty Disputes。Antitrust Magazine,30。  new window
24.Sidaka, J. Gregory(2016)。Apportionment, FRAND Royalties, and Comparable Licenses After Ericsson Von D-Link。University of Illinois Law Review,2016。  new window
25.李素華(20080400)。專利權行使與公平交易法--以近用技術標準之關鍵專利為中心。公平交易季刊,16(2),85-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.黃銘傑(2006)。競爭法與智慧財產法之交會--相生與相剋之間。台北:元照出版公司。  延伸查詢new window
2.劉孔中(2007)。智慧財產權法制的關鍵革新。臺北:元照。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE