:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:標準必要專利FRAND權利金計算--兼論智慧財產法院105年度民專上字第24號判決
書刊名:交大法學評論
作者:莊弘鈺鍾京洲劉尚志
作者(外文):Chuang, Hung-yuChung, Ching-chouLiu, Shang-jyh
出版日期:2019
卷期:5
頁次:頁19-81
主題關鍵詞:標準必要專利公平合理無歧視合理權利金由上而下法可比較授權Standard essential patentSEPFairReasonableNon-discriminatoryFRANDReasonable royaltyTop down approachComparable license
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:24
  • 點閱點閱:2
期刊論文
1.王立達、鄭卉晴(20110700)。智慧財產權人擴張權利金收取標的之研究--以美國競爭規範之區別處理為中心。公平交易季刊,19(3),33-80。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.Lemley, Mark A.、Shapiro, Carl(2013)。A Simple Approach to Setting Reasonable Royalties for Standard-Essential Patents。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,28,1134-1166。  new window
3.楊宏暉(20151000)。標準關鍵專利之濫用與限制競爭。公平交易季刊,23(4),35-86。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Contreras, Jorge L.(2015)。Patent Pledges。Arizona State Law Journal,47(3),543-608。  new window
5.Kesan, Jay P.、Hayes, Carol M.(2014)。FRAND'S Forever: Standards, Patent Transfers, and Licensing Commitments。Indiana Law Journal,89,231-314。  new window
6.鈴木將文、陳皓芸(20150600)。日本の特許権侵害訴訟の最近の動向。成大法學,29,113-225。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.Asay, Clark D.(2016)。The Informational Value of Patents。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,31,259-324。  new window
8.吳靜怡(20171200)。美國專利侵權合理權利金之計算方式及發展趨勢。科技法學評論,13(2),187-264。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.沈宗倫(20170600)。標準必要專利之法定授權與專利權濫用--以誠實信用原則為中心。政大法學評論,149,1-83。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Li, Benjamin C.(2016)。The Global Convergence of FRAND Licensing Practices: Towards 'Interoperable' Legal Standards。Berkeley Technology Law Journal,31。  new window
11.Contreras, Jorge L.(2015)。A Market Reliance Theory for FRAND Commitments and Other Patent Pledges。Utah law review,2015(2),479-558。  new window
12.Siebrasse, Norman V.、Cotter, Thomas F.(2017)。The Value of the Standard。Minnesota Law Review,101,1159-1246。  new window
13.Sidak, J. Gregory(2016)。Apportionment, FRAND Royalties, and Comparable Licenses after Ericsson V. D-Link。University of Illinois Law Review,2016(4),1809-1869。  new window
14.王立達(20180400)。標準必要專利權行使之國際規範發展與比較分析--FRAND承諾法律性質、禁制令、權利金與競爭法規制。月旦法學,275,87-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.李素華(20030800)。技術標準制定之競爭法規範與調和。東吳法律學報,15(1),117-178。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.上池睦、小林和人、平塚三好(2015)。FRANDをめぐる裁判例にみる標準規格必須特許の実施料算定方法に関する研究。パテント,68(10),119-133。  延伸查詢new window
17.Li, Richard、Wang, Richard Li-Dar(2017)。Reforming and Specifying Intellectual Property Rights Policies of Standard-Setting Organizations: Towards Fair and Efficient Patent Licensing and Dispute Resolution。U.ILL. J.L. TECH. & POL'Y,2017。  new window
18.莊郁沁、曾鈺珺(20171000)。專利貢獻度之判斷與計算標準--我國專利侵權判決分析。全國律師,21(10),38-56。  延伸查詢new window
19.Golden, John M.(2010)。Principles for Patent Remedies。Texas Law Review,88。  new window
20.Stroup, Richard L.、Sanabria, Cecilia、Lu, Kelly C.、Chung, Daniel G.(2016)。Patentee's Monetary Recovery from an Infringer--A Revisit。Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society,98(4),727-808。  new window
21.Shen, Chung-Lun(2017)。Taiwan Supreme Court to Clarify Distinction between Patent Damages and Unjust Enrichment: Koninklijke Philips N. V. v. Gigastorage Corporation。NAIP IP OBSERVER,18。  new window
22.王仁君(20150700)。專利侵權的不當得利問題。全國律師,19(7),64-75。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.經濟部智慧財產局(2015)。通訊標準專利訴訟教戰手冊進階版。經濟部智慧財產局。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.陳秉訓(20171213)。不當得利返還請求權做為專利侵權行為補償手段之緣起,http://www.naipo.com/Portals/1/web_tw/Knowledge_Center/Infringement_Case/IPNC_171213_0501.htm。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Shapiro, Carl(2000)。Navigating the patent thicket, Cross licenses, patent pools, and standard setting。Innovation policy and the economy。  new window
2.吳靜怡(2017)。美國專利侵權合理權利金之計算方式及發展趨勢。台灣科技產業美國專利訴訟30年之回顧。元照。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關書籍
 
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE