臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：社交焦慮者的解釋性偏誤--以「句詞關聯作業」進行探討
書刊名：中華心理衛生學刊
作者：賴怡臻／馮雅群／許文耀
作者(外文)：Lai, Yi-jen／Feng, Ya-chun／Hsu, Wen-yau
出版日期：2018
卷期：31:2
頁次：頁167-199
主題關鍵詞：社交焦慮；解釋性偏誤；Social anxiety；Interpretative bias
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:126
  • 點閱點閱:15
研究目的：本研究欲驗證經過修改後的「句詞關聯作業(sentence word association paradigm, SWAP)」此一實驗派典，嘗試以此作業探討社交焦慮者的解釋性認知偏誤歷程。研究方法：本研究選取86名高社交焦慮與59名低社交焦慮之大學校內學生，所有受試者皆完成句詞關聯作業和七份有關社交焦慮、情緒、解釋性偏誤之量表。採用變異數分析與相關分析進行探討。研究結果：本研究發現SWAP的反應時間結果顯現高社焦組接受良善的反應時間顯著地高於低社焦組，高社焦組拒絕威脅的反應時間顯著地高於低社焦組；而在接受百分比率上，高社焦組比低社焦組具有較多的威脅解釋偏誤及較少的正向解釋偏誤。組內比較方面，於組內比較時，低社焦組拒絕威脅句詞顯著比拒絕良善句詞快，然而，高社焦組的拒絕威脅或良善句詞配對的反應時間沒有差別。此外，相關分析的結果顯示，於社交句型中，當受試者的社交焦慮程度越高，其於SWAP中的社交威脅解釋偏誤程度越高、社交良善解釋偏誤程度越低。研究結論：針對社交焦慮者的解釋性偏誤情形，建議未來研究可考慮將句詞關聯作業進一步應用於輔助性評估工具。
Purpose: We explored the interpretative cognition processes of socially-anxious individuals using the sentence word association paradigm (SWAP), which was modified from the word sentence association paradigm (WSAP; Beard & Amir, 2009). Methods: We selected 86 high and 59 low socially-anxious students from a college. All of them completed the SWAP measure and 7 questionnaires about social anxiety, emotion, and interpretative bias. Analysis of variance and correlation analysis were applied to investigate the interpretative cognition processes of socially-anxious individuals. Results: The between-group results showed that high socially-anxious individuals had a higher reaction time to accepting and endorsing benign interpretations and rejecting threatening interpretations as compared to low socially-anxious individuals. In endorsement rate, high socially-anxious individuals had more threaten interpretation and lower benign interpretation than low socially-anxious individuals. Moreover, the within-group reaction time data revealed that low socially-anxious individuals easily reject threatening interpretations, but high socially-anxious individuals did not show any significant difference in rejection of threatening or benign interpretations. In addition, the correlational data revealed that those with higher social anxiety had significantly more positive correlations with threatening interpretative bias and significantly more negative correlations with benign interpretative bias in social situations. Conclusions: SWAP has the potential to become an assistive assessment tool.
期刊論文
1.Rodd, J. M.、Davis, M. H.、Johnsrude, I. S.(2005)。The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity。Cerebral Cortex，15(8)，1261-1269。  new window
2.Amir, N.、Foa, E. B.、Coles, M. E.(1998)。Automatic activation and strategic avoidance of threat-relevant information in social phobia。Journal of Abnormal Psychology，107，285-290。  new window
3.Collins, K. A.、Westra, H. A.、Dozois, D. J. A.、Stewart, S. H.(2005)。The validity of the brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale。Anxiety Disorders，19，345-359。  new window
4.Hirsch, C. R.、Mathews, A.(2000)。Impaired positive inferential bias in social phobia。Journal of Abnormal Psychology，109(4)，705-712。  new window
5.Liebowitz, M. R.(1987)。Social phobia。Modern Problems of Pharmacopsychiatry，22，141-173。  new window
6.Rapee, R. M.、Heimberg, R. G.(1997)。A cognitive-behavioral model of anxiety in social phobia。Behaviour Research and Therapy，35，741-756。  new window
7.Rodebaugh, T. L.、Woods, C. M.、Thissen, D. M.、Heimberg, R. G.、Chambless, D. L.、Rapee, R. M.(2004)。More information from fewer questions: The factor structure and item properties of the original and Brief Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale。Psychological Assessment，16(2)，169-181。  new window
8.Hallion, L. S.、Ruscio, A. M.(2011)。A meta-analysis of the effect of cognitive bias modification on anxiety and depression。Psychological Bulletin，137(6)，940-958。  new window
9.Leary, Mark R.(1983)。A brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale。Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin，9(3)，371-375。  new window
10.盧孟良、車先蕙、張尚文、沈武典(20021200)。中文版貝克憂鬱量表第二版之信度和效度。臺灣精神醫學，16(4)，301-310。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Beard, C.、Weisberg, R. B.、Amir, N.(2011)。Combined cognitive bias modification treatment for social anxiety disorder: A pilot trial。Depression and Anxiety，28，981-988。  new window
12.Amir, N.、Foa, E. B.、Coles, M. E.(1998)。Negative interpretation bias in social phobia。Behaviour Research and Therapy，36(10)，945-957。  new window
13.Amir, N.、Prouvost, C.、Kuckertz, J. M.(2012)。Lack of a benign interpretation bias in social anxiety disorder。Cognitive Behaviour Therapy，41(2)，119-129。  new window
14.Amir, N.、Taylor, C. T.(2012)。Interpretation training in individuals with generalized social anxiety disorder: a randomized controlled trial。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，80(3)，497-511。  new window
15.Baker, S. L.、Heinrichs, N.、Kim, H. J.、Hofmann, S. G.(2002)。The Liebowitz social anxiety scale as a self-report instrument: a preliminary psychometric analysis。Behaviour Research and Therapy，40，701-715。  new window
16.Beard, C.、Amir, N.(2009)。Interpretation in social anxiety: when meaning precedes ambiguity。Cognitive Therapy and Research，33(4)，406-415。  new window
17.Constans, J. I.、Penn, D. L.、Ihen G. H.、Hope, D. A.(1999)。Interpretive biases for ambiguous stimuli in social anxiety。Behaviour Research and Therapy，37，643-651。  new window
18.Dryman, M. T.、Heimberg, R. G.(2015)。Examining the relationships among social anxiety, fears of evaluation, and interpretation bias。Cognitive Therapy and Research，39，646-657。  new window
19.Fresco, D. M.、Coles, M. E.、Heimberg, R. G.、Liebowitz, M. R.、Hami, S.、Stein, M. B.、Goetz, D.(2001)。The Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale: a comparison of the psychometric properties of self-report and clinician-administered formats。Psychological Medicine，31，1025-1035。  new window
20.Gottlob, L. R.、Goldinger, S. D.、Stone, G. O.、Van Orden, G. C.(1999)。Reading homographs: orthographic, phonological, and semantic dynamics。Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance，25，561-574。  new window
21.Hirsch, C. R.、Mathews, A.(1997)。Interpretative inferences when reading about emotional events。Behaviour Research and Therapy，35(12)，1123-1132。  new window
22.Huppert, J. D.、Foa, E. B.、Furr, J. M.、Filip, J. C.、Mathews, A.(2003)。Interpretation bias in social anxiety: a dimensional perspective。Cognitive Therapy and Research，27，569-577。  new window
23.Huppert, J. D.、Pasupuleti, R. V.、Foa, E. B.、Mathews, A.(2007)。Interpretation biases in social anxiety: response generation, response selection, and self-appraisals。Behaviour Research and Therapy，45(7)，1505-1515。  new window
24.Jalal, B.、Amir, N.(2014)。Semantic priming and interpretation bias in social anxiety disorder。Cognitive Therapy and Research，38，23-32。  new window
25.Jones, E. B.、Sharpe, L.(2017)。Cognitive bias modification: a review of meta-analyses。Journal of Affective Disorders，223，175-183。  new window
26.Kingsbury, M.、Coplan, R. J.(2016)。RU mad @ me? Social anxiety and interpretation of ambiguous text messages。Computers in Human Behavior，54，368-379。  new window
27.MacLeod, C.、Cohen, I. L.(1993)。Anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguity: a text comprehension study。Journal of Abnormal Psychology，102，238-247。  new window
28.Mennin, D. S.、Fresco, D. M.、Heimberg, R. G.(2002)。Screening for social anxiety disorder in the clinical setting: using the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale。Anxiety Disorders，16，661-673。  new window
29.Menne-Lothmann, C.、Viechtbauer, W.、Hohn, P.、Kasanova, Z.、Haller, S. P.、Drukker, M.、Lau, J. Y. F.(2014)。How to boost positive interpretations? A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of cognitive bias modification for interpretation。PLOS ONE，9，e100925。  new window
30.Sears, C. R.、Bisson, M. A. S.、Nielsen, K. E.(2011)。Dysphoria and the immediate interpretation of ambiguity: evidence for a negative interpretive bias in error rates but not response latencies。Cognitive Therapy and Research，35，469-476。  new window
31.Stopa, L.、Clark, D. M.(2000)。Social phobia and interpretation of social events。Behaviour Research and Therapy，38(3)，273-283。  new window
32.Vassilopoulos, S. P.(2006)。Interpretation and judgmental biases in socially anxious and nonanxious individuals。Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy，34，243-254。  new window
33.Watson, David、Friend, Ronald(1969)。Measurement of Social Evaluative Anxiety。Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology，33(4)，448-457。  new window
34.鍾思嘉、龍長風(19840100)。修訂情境與特質焦慮量表之研究。測驗年刊，31，27-36。new window  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.劉瑞楨(1999)。憂鬱者與社會焦慮者的自我關注特性--偏好性、持續性與彈性的探討(碩士論文)。國立臺灣大學，臺北市。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.Beck, A. T.、Steer, R. A.、Brown, G. K.(1996)。Manual for Beck Depression Inventory。Psychological Corporation。  new window
2.Spielberger, C. D.、Gorsuch, L. G.、Lushene, R. E.(1970)。STAI manual for the state-trait anxiety inventory (''self-evaluation questionnaire'')。Consulting Psychologists Press。  new window
3.American Psychiatry Association(1994)。Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders。Washington, DC：American Psychiatric Association。  new window
4.Beck, A. T.、Emery, G.、Greenberg, R. L.(1985)。Anxiety Disorders and phobias: A cognitive perspective。New York：Basic Books。  new window
5.McNamara, T. P.(2005)。Semantic priming: perspectives from memory and word recognition。Psychology Press。  new window
6.Robinson, John P.、Shaver, Phillip R.、Wrightsman, Lawrence S.、楊宜音、張志學、彭泗清、楊中芳(1997)。性格與社會心理測量總覽。臺北市：遠流出版事業股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Beck, A. T.、Brown, G. K.、Steer, R. A.、陳心怡(2000)。貝克憂鬱量表第二版指導手冊。中國行為科學社。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Amir, N.、Foa, E. B.(2001)。Cognitive biases in social phobia。From social anxiety to social phobia: multiple perspectives。Needham Heights, MA：Allyn & Bacon。  new window
2.Clark, D. M.、Wells, A.(1995)。A cognitive model of social phobia。Social phobia: diagnosis, assessment and treatment。Guilford Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：826（臺灣：812，外國：14） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1725833 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67533832
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上