:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:臺灣糧商企業社會責任探討
書刊名:地理研究
作者:邱意涵郭乃文 引用關係
作者(外文):Chiu, Yi-hanKuo, Nae-wen
出版日期:2019
卷期:70
頁次:頁55-78
主題關鍵詞:企業社會責任企業社會責任報告書企業永續報告書糧商Corporate social responsibilityCorporate social responsibility reportGrain merchantCorporate sustainability report
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:31
  • 點閱點閱:4
「企業社會責任」(Corporate Social Responsibility,CSR)的概念為:企業除顧及股東(shareholders)利益外,還需將社會、社區、環境、上下游供應商等利害關係人(stakeholders)的權益納入企業發展脈絡,以利企業永續發展。臺灣稻米之產銷體系與其他農產品相異處在於:糧食管理法明定無糧商登記執照者不得從事稻米買賣,故大多數稻農需將稻穀賣給糧商加工後才得以進入消費市場。因此,糧商CSR的態度與作為十分重要,除了會影響農民的田間管理,更可能影響臺灣稻作農業發展。再者,國際各大糧商發布企業社會責任報告書(或企業永續報告書)已行之有年,反觀國內卻無糧商參與此類行動。因此,本研究之研究目的在於探討臺灣糧商對CSR的態度與看法,採用問卷調查法與深度訪談法並行,分別從CSR特定標準揭露之三大類別(經濟、環境與社會),分析臺灣糧商關注CSR 之態度與作為、探討影響糧商對CSR看法之因素,與其對於撰寫發表企業社會責任報告書的意願。研究結果顯示:臺灣糧商對CSR之概念雖各深淺不同,但已有許多糧商實際已從事CSR的作為。在經濟類別,糧商願意為了食品安全與獲得消費者信賴而投資於驗證、為了提升工作效率與提升產品品質而更新設備。在環境類別,糧商特別關注農藥檢測與田間環境維護。在社會類別,糧商認為對消費者提供優良安全的產品和良好溝通管道、為農民提供良好工作環境與維持良好契作關係是最重要的。糧商普遍肯定企業社會責任報告書的出版發表,但現階段考量知能與人力、財力,故意願不高。本研究亦發現,部分農會型糧商參與的意願較高,值得農政相關單位關注與協力,是首波可輔導的示範對象。
"Corporate Social Responsibility" (CSR) reflects the idea that a cooperation has to take not only shareholders but also stakeholders, such as society, community, environment, and suppliers, into consideration to have sustainable development. That is, all the stakeholders' benefits and rights should be considered and protected. Rice, as the most important food crop in Taiwan, differs from other agricultural products because it can only be sold if farmers are licensed by the Agriculture and Food Agency as stipulated by the Food Administration Act. Due to the Act, most of the farmers have to sell rough rice to grain merchants so that their rice can be milled and brought into the consumer market. Therefore, the viewpoints and practices of grain merchants greatly influence the paddy management and development of the rice industry in Taiwan. Increasingly, more and more international crop companies publish annual CSR reports (or Corporate Sustainability Report); however, Taiwanese grain merchants have never published any CSR reports till date. Hence, the purpose of this study is to investigate the perspectives and attitudes of grain merchants in Taiwan toward CSR. To do this, both questionnaire survey and in-depth interview methods were employed. According to the results, regardless of how the grain merchants in Taiwan think about CSR, they all have a lot of actual CSR practices. According to the G4 sustainability reporting guidelines published by the Global Reporting Initiative, the specific standard disclosure includes economic, environmental and social categories. In the economic category, the grain merchants tend to invest in product certifications to ensure food safety and to gain public trust. They also update their equipment to improve work efficiency and product quality. In the environmental category, they perceive themselves as influential in sustainable environmental management and they pay more attention to reducing pesticide use and intensive farmland environmental operations. In the social category, the grain merchants are convinced that it is important to provide safe products to customers, to have positive communication strategies, and to maintain good relationships and working environment for contracted farmers. In terms of writing CSR reports, due to the lack of relevant knowledge and human resources, the grain merchants are reluctant to do it for now. However, farmers' associations show a relatively higher willingness to participate and could potentially develop the first CSR model under the guidance and assistance of the agricultural administration.
期刊論文
1.張培新(20090900)。企業社會責任的理論與實踐:以美體小舖為例。美容科技學刊,6(2),85-102。  延伸查詢new window
2.康峰菁(20100900)。企業社會責任的整體認知與實際作為之研究:以臺灣服務業為例。企業管理學報,86,75-113。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.梁炳琨(20080900)。農業食物在地化--臺東縣池上鄉米食產業的探討。地理學報,53,85-117。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Elkington, John(1994)。Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development。California Management Review,36(2),90-100。  new window
5.王義基、謝明珊、湯奕華(20130900)。工業局推動CSR報告書之策略與方法介紹。永續產業發展,64,3-10。  延伸查詢new window
6.江素慧(20110700)。全球食物體系與人類健康暨公衛危機之關連:分析架構建立之初探。全球政治評論,35,81-110。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.陳吉仲(20130000)。臺灣稻米運銷體系分析。農業生技產業季刊,36,8-14。  延伸查詢new window
8.陳泳翰(20110311)。四大糧商掐住全球8成糧食。商業周刊,1216,94-97。  延伸查詢new window
9.陸雲(20071200)。提升臺灣稻米競爭力之制度面分析--契作關係與配套措施。農業與資源經濟,4(2),1-24。  延伸查詢new window
10.曾琪淑(20010900)。從礱穀機具之復原展示談臺灣碾米業的發展史。科技博物,5(5),35-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Heyder, M.、Theuvsen, L.(2012)。Determinants and Effects of Corporate Social Responsibility in German Agribusiness: A PLS Model。Agribusiness,28(4),400-420。  new window
12.Carroll, Archie B.(1999)。Corporate social responsibility: Evolution of a definitional construct。Business and Society,38(3),268-295。  new window
13.Carroll, Archie B.(1979)。A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance。Academy of Management Review,4(4),497-505。  new window
14.Carroll, Archie B.(1991)。The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders。Business Horizons,34(4),39-48。  new window
15.Carroll, Archie B.(2016)。Carroll's pyramid of CSR: taking another look。International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility,1(1),(3)1-(3)8。  new window
16.Dahlsrud, Alexander(2008)。How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions。Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management,15(1),1-13。  new window
研究報告
1.行政院農業委員會(2016)。農業生產。  延伸查詢new window
學位論文
1.陳舒雯(2014)。地產地消概念與休閒農業結合之研究(碩士論文)。國立臺灣師範大學。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.柴田明夫、孫玉珍(2009)。糧食爭奪戰。台北:商周。  延伸查詢new window
2.孫震(2009)。企業倫理與企業社會責任。臺北市:天下遠見。  延伸查詢new window
3.Patel, Raj、葉家興、謝伯讓、高薏涵、謝佩妏(2009)。糧食戰爭--市場、權力以及世界食物體系的隱形之戰。台北:高寶國際。  延伸查詢new window
4.World Business Council for Sustainable Development(1999)。Corporate Social Responsibility: Meeting Changing Expectations。World Business Council for Sustainable Development。  new window
5.八木宏典、周若珍(2015)。超圖解米的基礎知識:了解稻米的營養、飲食文化與產業經濟。臺北:晨星。  延伸查詢new window
6.王宏文、宮文祥、陳淳文(2016)。食安風暴下的農產品標章制度:臺灣實證研究。新北市:臺北市:華藝學術:臺大公共政策與法律研究中心。  延伸查詢new window
7.社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會(2014)。GRI G4永續性報告指南:實施手冊。臺北市:社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會。  延伸查詢new window
8.社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會、臺灣證券交易所股份有限公司、財團法人中華民國證券櫃檯買賣中心(2016)。2015臺灣企業社會責任報告書研析報告。臺北市:社團法人中華民國企業永續發展協會:臺灣證券交易所股份有限公司:財團法人中華民國證券櫃檯買賣中心。  延伸查詢new window
9.楊中介、遠足文化地理百科編輯組(2012)。稻米達人大挑戰:稻田生態及米知識問答集。臺北市:遠足文化。  延伸查詢new window
10.Sexty, R.(2010)。Canadian Business and Society: Ethics and Responsibilities。McGraw-Hill Ryerson Higher Education。  new window
11.李政義(1990)。企業社會責任論。巨流圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
12.高希均、林宜諄(2008)。企業社會責任入門手冊。台北市:天下遠見。  延伸查詢new window
13.Commission of the European Communities(2001)。Green Paper: Promoting a European Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility。Brussels:Commission of the European Communities。  new window
其他
1.中糧集團(2016)。中糧集團企業責任,http://www.cofco.com/cn/CSR/。  延伸查詢new window
2.天下雜誌(2016)。CSR天下企業公民,http://topic.cw.com.tw/CSR/。  延伸查詢new window
3.台達集團(2017)。2016企業社會責任報告書,https://www.deltaww.com/about/csr_Report.aspx?secID=5&pid=6&tid=9&hl=zh-TW。  new window
4.ADM(2016)。2015 Corporate Sustainability Report,https://www.adm.com/sustainability/downloads。  new window
5.Cargill(2016)。Sustainability Report 2015,https://www.cargill.com/sustainability/aquaculture/aquaculturesustainability-reporting。  new window
6.KPMG(2015)。The KPMG Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2015,Zurich:KPMG International。  new window
7.Louis Dreyfus Company(2016)。Sustainability Report 2015,http://www.ldc.com/global/en/sustainability/sustainability-reporting。  new window
圖書論文
1.久野秀二(2016)。多國籍農業綜合企業--對農業、糧食、種子的支配。食農社會學:從生命與地方的角度出發。臺北市:開學文化。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE