:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:從美國聯邦最高法院次要行為人判決思考我國財報不實民事責任之規範
書刊名:臺灣財經法學論叢
作者:張心悌
作者(外文):Chang, Hsin-ti
出版日期:2020
卷期:2:1
頁次:頁1-54
主題關鍵詞:財報不實主要行為人次要行為人Lorenzo案Janus案False financial statementsPrimary actorSecondary actorLorenzo v. SECJanus
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:231
  • 點閱點閱:4
期刊論文
1.Prentice, R. A.(2009)。Scheme liability: Does it have a future after Stoneridge。Wisconsin Law Review,2009,351-419。  new window
2.Langevoort, Donald C.(2010)。Reading Stoneridge Carefully: A Duty-based Approach to Reliance。University of Pennsylvania Law Review,158(7),2125-2171。  new window
3.邵慶平(20130300)。證券交易法第20條第1項之民事責任主體不及於次要行為人?:以企業財報不實類型案例為中心。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,42(1),171-214。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Fedderke, Johannes W.、Ventoruzzo, Marco(2015)。Do Conservative Justices Favor Wall Street? Ideology and the Supreme Court's Securities Regulation Decisions。Florida Law Review,67,1211-1280。  new window
5.賴英照(20190100)。橫看從寬側從嚴--美國證券詐欺民事責任的司法論辯。臺灣財經法學論叢,1(1),1-98。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.蔡彥守(20110600)。從美國聯邦最高法院Stoneridge案看臺灣證券詐欺民事責任法制之未來。月旦民商法雜誌,32,135-152。  延伸查詢new window
7.曾宛如(20040900)。論證券交易法第二十條之民事責任--以主觀要件與信賴為核心。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,33(5),51-93。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.莊永丞(20050300)。證券交易法第二十條證券詐欺損害估算方法之省思。國立臺灣大學法學論叢,34(2),123-180。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Coates, John C. IV(2015)。Securities Litigation in the Roberts Court: An Early Assessment。Arizona Law Review,57(1),1-35。  new window
10.Power, Andrew(2012)。The Thirteenth Stroke: An Approach to "Ultimate Authority" after Janus。Suffolk University Law Review,45(4),1297-1320。  new window
11.Langevoort, Donald C.(1996)。The Reform of Joint and Several Liability under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Proportionate Liability, Contribution Rights and Settlement Effects。BUS. LAW.,51,1157+1159。  new window
12.Steinberg, Marc I.、Olive, Christopher D.(1997)。Contribution and Proportionate Liability under the Federal Securities Laws in Multi-defendant Securities Litigation after the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995。SMUL. REV.,50,337+345-346。  new window
13.Pritchard, Adam C.(2011)。Securities law in the Roberts Court: Agenda or indifference?。Journal of Corporate Law,37(1),105-145。  new window
14.張心悌(20040300)。證券交易法中虛偽陳述之民事責任--兼論大陸銀廣夏案。月旦民商法雜誌,3,167-176。  延伸查詢new window
15.Prentice, Robert A.(1997)。Locating That "Indistinct" and "Virtually Nonexistent" Line Between Primary and Secondary Liability under Section 10(b)。The North Carolina Law Review,75(3),691-780。  new window
16.Chaffee, Eric C.(2017)。The Supreme Court as Museum Curator: Securities Regulation and the Roberts Court。Case Western Reserve Law Review,67(3),847-896。  new window
研究報告
1.Turk, Matthew C.、Woody, Karen E.(20180907)。Justice Kavanaugh, Lorenzo v. SEC, he Future of Deference at the Post-Kennedy Supreme Court。  new window
圖書
1.余雪明(2000)。證券交易法。財團法人中華民國證券暨期貨市場發展基金會。  延伸查詢new window
2.賴英照(2014)。最新證券交易法解析。  延伸查詢new window
3.劉連煜(2018)。新證券交易法實例研習。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.曾宛如(2012)。證券交易法原理。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.余雪明(2016)。證券交易法比較證券法。  延伸查詢new window
6.賴源河(1997)。證券管理法規。  延伸查詢new window
7.賴英照(1996)。證券交易法逐條釋義。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.Groner, Samuel P.,David, Israel,Simmons, Peter L.(20181219)。Israel David and Peter L. Simmons, Roundup of Key Federal Securities Litigation Development,https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/12/19/roundup-of-key-federal-securities-litigation-developments。  new window
2.Morduchowitz, Daphne,Sama, Vincent A.,Callahan, Veronica E.(20180720)。Awaiting Supreme Court Clarification on Fraudulent Scheme Claims,https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2018/07/20/awaiting-supreme-court-clarification-on-fraudulent-scheme-claims/。  new window
3.Youngwood, Jonathan K.,Scarboro, Cheryl,Kreissman, James G.(20181223)。The Scope of Liability for Fraudulent Statements,https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu2018/12/23/the-scope-of-liability-for-fraudulent-statements/。  new window
4.Crisp, Martin J.,Hallward-Driemeier, Douglas,Hennes, David(20190106)。Oral Argument on Scheme Liability,https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/01/06/oral-argument-on-scheme-liability。  new window
5.Duffy, Marjorie P.(2019)。Supreme Court Expands Securities Fraud Scheme Liability,https://www.jonesday.com/supreme-court-expands-securities-fraud-scheme-liability-04-01-2019/。  new window
6.Cosenza, Todd G.,Cording, Charles Dean(20190327)。Supreme Court Expands "Scheme Liability" in Lorenzo v. SEC,https://www.willkie.com/~/media/Files/Publications/2019/03/Supreme_Court_Expands_Scheme_Liability_In_Lorenzo_v_Sec.pdf。  new window
7.Richman, Jonathan E.(20190329)。Supreme Court Holds that Persons Who Do Not "Make" Misstatements Can Nevertheless Be Liable for Other Securities Fraud Violations,https://www.natlawreview.com/article/supreme-court-holds-persons-who-do-not-make-misstatements-can-nevertheless-be-liable。  new window
8.Frankel, Alison(20190329)。Will Supreme Court's Lorenzo Ruling Spur Shareholder Class Actions?,https://www.reuters.com/article/us-otc-lorenzo/will-supreme-courtslorenzo-ruling-spur-shareholder-class-actions-idUSKCN1R92KM。  new window
9.Hurd, Susan E.(20190328)。Securities Litigation Advisory: Lorenzo v. SEC: The Supreme Court Rules on Scheme Liability under the Federal Securities Laws,https://www.alston.com/en/insights/publications/2019/03/the-supreme-court-rules-on-schemeliability。  new window
10.Crisp, Martin J.,Hennes, David,O'Conner, R. Daniel(20190414)。Lorenzo v. SEC: Expanded Scope of Securities Fraud Liability,https://corpgov.law.harvard.edu/2019/04/14/lorenzo-v-sec-expanded-scope-of-securities-fraud-liability/。  new window
11.陳慧菱(20181029)。上市櫃公司明年起強制投保董監責任險保額不足成隱憂,https://news.cnyes.com/news/id/4227321。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE