:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:聯合國「關切之人」與東南亞「人的安全」:以泰緬周遭之難民為例
書刊名:思與言
作者:蔡育岱李思嫺
作者(外文):Ts'ai, Yu-taiLee, Szu-hsien
出版日期:2018
卷期:56:4
頁次:頁71-97
主題關鍵詞:聯合國難民署關切之人國際難民人類安全泰緬邊境UNHCRPersons of concernInternational refugeesHuman securityThailand-Burma border
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:65
  • 點閱點閱:4
既使進入21世紀,世界難民問題依然嚴重。敘利亞內戰開始於2011年,截至2016年底造成了約1,200萬難民,當敘利亞衝突仍然方興未艾之時,據「聯合國難民署」估計,約19萬緬甸的羅興亞人,正漂流在泰國、菲律賓和馬來西亞海域,同時約有40萬克倫族人因受政治迫害,居住在泰緬邊境受聯合國與泰國政府保護。在國際法相關難民問題上,根據1951年「關於難民地位公約」和1967年「關於難民地位的議定書」定義,敘利亞難民、緬甸羅興亞人、克倫族人等無庸置疑可被歸類為國際難民,並予以庇護安置。而在人類安全研究中,國際社會所「關切之人」(Persons of Concern)是用來描述「聯合國難民署」所要保護與援助需求的遭難者總稱。「聯合國難民署」將其分類為一般的難民(公約定義)、境內難民、無國籍者、尋求庇護者與歸國難民等。爰本文主要目的先行從「聯合國難民署」定義下的「關切之人」概念分析,涉及東南亞「關切之人」部分,再循「以民為本」(people centered)的人類安全途徑詮釋國際難民議題與東南亞「人的安全」,進而以東南亞泰緬周遭之難民為個案探討,引導出東南亞的國際難民問題正挑戰「東協模式」,考驗著東協的團結;最後藉由東南亞難民問題,能有更深一層的認識與了解東南亞「人的安全」。
Even in the 21st century, the world refugee problem has remained acute. The Syrian civil war that began in 2011 created some 12 million international refugees by late 2016. As the conflict in Syria has continued to unfold, the UNHCR estimates that more than 190,000 people, mostly Rohingya, left on flimsy boats to countries such as Thailand, the Philippines, and Malaysia. Meanwhile, 400,000 Karen people are homeless and protected around the Thailand-Burma border by UN and government of Thailand. The Syrian refugees, Rohingya people, and Karen people fulfilled the requirements to be categorized as a refugee, based on the meaning of refugee in the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugee and the 1967 Protocol. Hence, the main purpose of this article is to evaluate the definition of "Persons of Concern and its relevance with Southeast Asia. Besides, the aim of the present research is to provide a thorough analysis of the issues of international refugees and Human Security in Southeast Asia underthe "people-centered" approach.
期刊論文
1.Goh, Gillian(2003)。The 'ASEAN Way': Non-Intervention and ASEAN's Role in Conflict Management。Stanford Journal of East Asian Affairs,3(1),113-118。  new window
2.楊昊(20080400)。新憲章規範下的東協區域主義:回顧與展望。臺灣東南亞學刊,5(1),147-179。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.蔡育岱(20150600)。從國際法的角度評議「羅興亞人」難民事件。戰略安全研析,122,4-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Bradley, Megan(2014)。Rethinking Refugeehood: Statelessness, Repatriation, and Refugee Agency。Review of International Studies,40(1),101-123。  new window
5.司徒宇、顧長永(20150900)。緬甸政府與少數民族之互動探析--以克欽族、撣族、克倫族、羅興亞族為例。國會月刊,43(9)=509,24-40。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Akaha, Tsuneo(2009)。Human Security in East Asia: Embracing Global Norms through Regional Cooperation in Human Trafficking, Labour-Migration, and HIV/AIDS。Journal of Human Security,5(2),11-34。  new window
7.Newman, Edward(2010)。Critical Human Security Studies。Review of International Studies,36(1),77-94。  new window
8.蔡育岱、李思嫺(20151200)。國際法下的難民權利:以羅興亞人為例。臺灣國際法季刊,12(4),73-97。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.Gunawan, Yordan、Priambodo, Gatot(2013)。Burma's Rohingya Case in International Law Perspective。Journal Media Hukum,20(1),171-177。  new window
10.李榮源(2012)。泰緬邊境難民--哪裡為家?又該何去何從?。臺灣人權促進會季刊,2012(冬季刊)。  延伸查詢new window
11.Ross, Eleanor(20170503)。Suu Kyi Rejects U.N. Inquiry into Rohingya Abuse。Newsweek,2017(May)。  new window
圖書
1.蔡育岱(2014)。人類安全與國際關係:概念、主題與實踐。臺北:五南圖書。  延伸查詢new window
2.Ellison, Christine S.、Smith, Alan、Smith, Christine(2013)。Education and Internally Displaced Persons。New York:Bloomsbury Academic。  new window
3.Rogers, Benedict(2012)。Burma: A Nation at the Crossroads。Rider。  new window
4.Nishikawa, Yukiko(2010)。Human Security in Southeast Asia: Viable Solution or Empty Slogan?。New York, NY:Routledge。  new window
5.Ba, Alice D.(2011)。Renegotiating East and Southeast Asia: Region, Regionalism and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations。California:Stanford University Press。  new window
6.Clad, James、McDonald, Sean M.、Vaughn, Bruce(2011)。The Borderlands of Southeast Asia: Geopolitics, Terrorism, and Globalization。Washington, DC:National Defense University Press。  new window
7.Feller, Erika、Türk, Volker、Nicholson, Frances(2003)。Refugee Protection in International Law。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
8.Ferris, Elizabeth G.(2011)。The Politics of Protection: The Limits of Humanitarian Action。Washington, DC:The Brooking Institution。  new window
9.陳隆志(20060000)。國際人權法文獻選集與解說。臺北:前衛出版社。new window  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.The Economist(20150613)。The Rohingyas: The most persecuted people on Earth?,http://www.economist.com/news/asia/21654124-myanmars-muslim-minority-have-been-attacked-impunity-stripped-vote-and-driven。  new window
2.Perlez, Jane(20140305)。Rise in Bigotry Fuels Massacre Inside Myanmar,http://cn.nytimes.com/asia-pacific/20140305/c05myanmar/zh-hant/#tabC_mostViewedWeek。  new window
3.Miller, Tracy(20091007)。Mapping the Global Muslim Population: A Report on the Size and Distribution of the World's Muslim Population,http://pewforum.org/newassets/images/reports/Muslimpopulation/Muslimpopulation.pdf。  new window
4.中華人權協會臺北海外和平服務團(2017)。泰國工作團,http://www.cahr.org.tw/tops/service_1.php。  延伸查詢new window
5.彭淮棟(20161230)。11位諾貝爾和平獎得主批翁山蘇姬未保護緬甸少數民族,https://udn.com/news/story/6809/2200671。  延伸查詢new window
6.貌強(20050607)。被世界遺棄的緬甸克倫尼族,http://www.epochtimes.com/b5/5/6/7/n947742.htm。  延伸查詢new window
7.ABS-CBN News(2017)。Malaysia Disputes Cayetano's ASEAN Chair Statement on Rohingya,http://news.abs-cbn.com/overseas/09/25/17/malaysia-disputescayetanos-asean-chair-statement-on-rohingya。  new window
8.Arakan Rohingya National Organization(2011)。Muslim Influence in the Kingdom of Arakan,http://www.rohingya.org/portal/index.php/scholars/65-nurul-islam-uk/293-muslim-influence-in-the-kingdom-of-arakan.html。  new window
9.ASEAN(2017)。ASEAN Overview,http://asean.org/asean/about-asean/overview/。  new window
10.ASEAN(2017)。ASEAN Socio-Cultural Community,http://asean.org/asean-socio-cultural/。  new window
11.Australian Karen Foundation(2017)。The Karen People,http://australiankarenfoundation.org.au/karen_people_18.html。  new window
12.Burmalink(2014)。Karenni Background,http://www.burmalink.org/background/burma/ethnicgroups/karenni/。  new window
13.Central Intelligence Agency(2017)。The World Factbook,https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/bm.html。  new window
14.Cook, Tonya L.,Shannon, Patricia J.,Vinson, Gregory A.,Letts, James P.,Dwee, Ehtaw(2015)。War Trauma and Torture Experiences Reported During Public Health Screening of Newly Resettled Karen Refugees: a Qualitative Study,http://bmcinthealthhumrights.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12914-015-0046-y。  new window
15.Dasgupta, Sanjeev(2015)。A New 'ASEAN Way': Finding a Regional Solution for Human Rights Violations in Rakhine State,http://kenan.ethics.duke.edu/humanrights/snowball/a-new-asean-wayfinding-a-regional-solution-for-human-rights-violations-in-rakhine-state/。  new window
16.Humanity & Inclusion UK(2016)。Mae La Refugee Camp in Thailand, a Difficult Place to be a Child,https://www.handicap-international.org.uk/news/mae-refugee-camp-in-thailand-difficult-place-to-be-child。  new window
17.Restless Beings(2017)。Refugee Rights: Rohingya,http://www.restlessbeings.org/projects/rohingya。  new window
18.Szczepanski, Kallie(2017)。Who Are the Rohingya?,http://asianhistory.about.com/od/Asian_History_Terms_N_Q/g/Who-Are-The-Rohingya.htm。  new window
19.Tan, Vivian(20170503)。Over 168,000 Rohingya Likely Fled Myanmar since 2012--UNHCR Report,http://www.unhcr.org/news/latest/2017/5/590990ff4/168000-rohingya-likely-fled-myanmar-since-2012-unhcr-report.html。  new window
20.UNHCR(2017)。With You,http://www.unhcr.org.hk/unhcr/en/get_involved/newsletter_list/newsletter_details.html?id=19。  new window
21.UNHCR(2017)。Beyond Detention: A Global Strategy to Support Governments to End the Detention of Asylum-seekers and Refugees 2014-2019,http://www.unhcr.org/protection/detention/57b579e47/unhcr-global-strategybeyond-detention-progress-report.html?query=August%202016%20Progress%20Report%20mid-2016。  new window
22.UNHCR(2017)。Civil status documentation,http://reporting.unhcr.org/node/11828。  new window
23.UNHCR(2017)。Myanmar Refugees/CAMPS,http://reporting.unhcr.org/node/10117。  new window
24.UNHCR(2017)。Voluntary Return,http://reporting.unhcr.org/node/11826。  new window
25.UNHCR(2017)。Global Trends Forced Displacement in 2016,http://www.unhcr.org/dach/wp-content/uploads/sites/27/2017/06/2016_Global_Trends_WEB-embargoed.pdf。  new window
26.UNHCR(2017)。Global Resettlement Need,http://www.unhcr.org/protection/resettlement/575836267/unhcr-projected-global-resettlement-needs-2017.html。  new window
27.UNHCR(2017)。UNHCR Global Appeal 2016-2017--Populations of Concern to UNHCR,http://www.unhcr.org/564da0e3b.html。  new window
28.UNHCR(2017)。Convention Relating to the Status of Stateless Persons,http://www.unhcr.org/protection/statelessness/3bbb25729/convention-relating-status-statelesspersons.html。  new window
29.UNHCR(2017)。Ministerial Meeting of States Parties to the 1951 Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees and UNHCR'S Global Consultations on International Protection,http://www.unhcr.org/protection/globalconsult/3c1622ab4/ministerial-meeting-states-parties-1951-convention-relating-status-refugees.html。  new window
30.Vatikiotis, Michael(20170909)。Asia's Palestine? Myanmar's Rohingya: Stateless, Persecuted and a New Cause for Religious Extremism,http://www.scmp.com/week-asia/politics/article/2110418/asiaspalestine-myanmars-rohingya-stateless-persecuted-and-new。  new window
圖書論文
1.Kerr, Pauline(2007)。Human Security。Contemporary Security Studies。Oxford:Oxford University Press。  new window
2.Thakur, Ramesh、Newman, Edward(2004)。Introduction: Non-traditional Security in Asia。Broadening Asia's Security Discourse and Agenda: Political, Social, and Environmental Perspectives。Tokyo:UN University Press。  new window
3.楊昊(20150000)。共同體在東亞與東亞的共同體:簡約制度主義及其超越?。東亞的理論與理論的東亞。臺北:洪葉文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.蔡育岱(20150000)。轉變中的區域秩序?人類安全概念在東亞的發展與「應用」。東亞的理論與理論的東亞。臺北:洪葉文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE