:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:翁山蘇姬解決羅興亞問題之可行性:緬甸憲政體制變革之探討
書刊名:樹德科技大學學報
作者:呂嘉穎
作者(外文):Lyu, Jia-ying
出版日期:2019
卷期:21:2
頁次:頁153-164
主題關鍵詞:羅興亞翁山蘇姬國務資政RohingyaAung San Suu KyiState counselor
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(0) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:0
  • 共同引用共同引用:107
  • 點閱點閱:25
對於緬甸而言,境內存在的「羅興亞」(Rohingya),除了被視為國內衝突的製造者外,另一方面也造成他國對緬甸產生「種族清洗」(Ethnic cleansing)的疑慮。故在翁山蘇姬政權全面執政後,世界各國紛紛要求妥善解決羅興亞「問題」,然而卻得不到相對應的回答。從根本論之,該問題產生的背景交織在歷史、文化、宗教、法律等各層面,並無法以二分法的方式試圖解決之。本文以國家憲政體制之變革做為發想,探討翁山蘇姬在就任國務資政後,能否藉由權力的正當性、完整性,妥善的解決羅興亞人在緬甸境內所產生的衝突,並嘗試從憲法規範面、制度面的高度,分析國務資政的定位與影響。
Rohingya crisis in Myanmar not only causes ethnic conflict but also raise international concerns of ethnic cleansing. After Aung San Suu Kyi won the presidential election and more than half seats in parliament, the international community has been maintaining pressure on her for solving Rohingya crisis; however, she is unable to respond to the crisis properly. The crisis involves multiple fundamental reasons, history, culture and religions. Thus, the crisis is impossible to be solved by simply separating Rohingya people out of non-Rohingya people. Inspiring by constitutional system, the study discusses if Aung San Suu Kyi can solve Rohingya crisis properly with the legitimacy of her power after taking the position of the State Counselor. Additionally, the author analyzes the position and influence of the State Counselor from the perspective of 2008 Constitution.
期刊論文
1.楊昊(20151200)。戒律式民主的脆弱轉型:緬甸2015年國會大選的意義。問題與研究,54(4),153-164。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃德福、蘇子喬(20070300)。大法官釋憲對我國憲政體制的形塑。臺灣民主季刊,4(1),1-49。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.沈有忠(20110300)。半總統制下行政體系二元化之內涵。政治科學論叢,47,33-64。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.Elgie, Robert(2004)。Semi-Presidentialism: Concepts, Consequences and Contesting Explanations。Political Studies Review,2(3),314-330。  new window
5.Yin, Maung Maung(20160600)。緬甸重大政治變遷:民主時代的來臨。臺灣人權學刊,3(3),89-94。  延伸查詢new window
6.孫釆薇(20160600)。緬甸內閣人事布局評析。問題與研究,55(2),157-168。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.蔡育岱(20150600)。從國際法的角度評議「羅興亞人」難民事件。戰略安全研析,122,4-11。new window  延伸查詢new window
8.金榮勇(20030500)。國際社會對於緬甸朝野對峙的困境與前景。問題與研究,42(3),103-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.司徒宇、顧長永(20151100)。緬甸大選局外人--羅興亞族的悲歌。戰略安全研析,127,30-37。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Duverger, Maurice(1980)。A New Political System Model: Semi-Presidential Government。European Journal of Political Research,8(2),165-187。  new window
11.宋鎮照、洪鼎倫(2017)。羅興亞難民悲歌--緬甸政府的挑戰或傑作。海峽評論,323,21-28。  延伸查詢new window
12.林錫星(2002)。緬甸歷史分期探析。東南亞研究,2002(5),69-75。  延伸查詢new window
13.林瓊珠(20160600)。踴躍的參與,改變成真。臺灣人權學刊,3(3),99-105。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.陳怡君、宋鎮照(20140400)。緬甸軍政府轉型與民主化發展:2012年國會補選前後的觀察與分析。全球政治評論,46,115-138。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.顏永銘(20150600)。羅興亞難民問題與東南亞區域安全。戰略安全研析,122,21-29。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Cheesman, N.(2017)。How in Myanmar "National Races" Came to Surpass Citizenship and Exclude Rohingya。Journal of Contemporary Asia,47(3),473-475。  new window
17.Hasan, M. M.(2017)。The Rohingya crisis: Suu Kyi's false flag and ethnic cleansing in Arakan。Irish Marxist Review,6(19),50-60。  new window
18.Jones, W. J.(2017)。Myanmar's Rohingya: Human Rights Abuses and Systemic Violence。Journal of Urban Culture Research,14,20-25。  new window
19.McCarthy, S.(2017)。Myanmar in 2016: Change and Slow Progress。Asian Survey,57(1),143-144。  new window
20.Szu-Tu, Y.、Ku, S. C.(2017)。Myanmar's Military Dictatorship Continuance: Old Wine in New Bottle。International Relations and Diplomacy,5(2),89-90。  new window
21.Steinberg, D. I.(2010)。Aung San Suu Kyi and U.S. Policy toward Burma/Myanmar。Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs,29(3),35-59。  new window
22.Tajuddin, A.(2018)。Statelessness and Persecution of the Rohingyas in Myanmar: Time for Serious International Intervention。Social Science Spectrum,3(3),135-137。  new window
23.黃德福(20001200)。少數政府與責任政治:臺灣「半總統制」之下的政黨競爭。問題與研究,39(12),1-24。new window  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.顧長永(2015)。緬甸:軍事獨裁五十年。八方文化創作室。  延伸查詢new window
2.Shugart, Matthew Søberg、Carey, John M.(1992)。Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics。Cambridge University Press。  new window
3.呂炳寬、徐正戎(20050000)。半總統制的理論與實際。臺北:鼎茂圖書。new window  延伸查詢new window
4.法治斌、董保城(2005)。憲法新論。元照。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.中央社(2018)。不只羅興亞:為爭自治權,緬克欽邦再爆衝突4千人逃難,https://www.thenewslens.com/article/94619。  延伸查詢new window
2.宋鎮照,洪鼎倫(2017)。鳥籠式民主羅興亞問題的幫兇,https://tw.news.yahoo.com/%E3%80%90yahoo%E8%AB%96%E5%A3%87%EF%BC%8F%E5%AE%8B%E9%8E%AE%E7%85%A7%E3%80%81%E6%B4%AA%E9%BC%8E%E5%80%AB%E3%80%91%E9%B3%A5%E7%B1%A0%E5%BC%8F%E6%B0%91%E4%B8%BB-%E7%BE%85%E8%88%88%E4%BA%9E%E5%95%8F-090041523.html。  new window
3.翁婉瑩(2018)。各自盤算的棋局?從總統碇喬辭職看緬甸情勢,https://asean.thenewslens.com/article/92428。  延伸查詢new window
4.陳佩修(20151127)。超A評論》民主女神與人間政治:緬甸大選觀選後有感,https://talk.ltn.com.tw/article/breakingnews/1522302。  延伸查詢new window
5.國際中心(20170905)。漠視洛興雅危機 翁山蘇姬成穆斯林國家公敵,https://www.nownews.com/news/20170905/2604223。  延伸查詢new window
6.潘毅(20171218)。掌權超過20年! 明年俄大選普丁當選成定局,http://newtalk.tw/news/view/2017-12-18/107512。  延伸查詢new window
7.鍾玉玨(20180328)。溫敏當選緬甸新總統,http://www.chinatimes.com/realtimenews/20180328002876-260408。  延伸查詢new window
8.聯合報主筆室(2017)。【重磅快評】羅興亞人讓人權女神翁山蘇姬走下神壇,https://udn.com/news/story/6809/2689703。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.Elgie, Robert(1999)。The Politics of Semi-Presidentialism。Semi-Presidentialism in Europe。Oxford University Press。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE