臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫系統

:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
第 1 筆 / 總合 1 筆   第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁
/1頁
題名：認真對待大法官解釋：論大法官解釋之落實
書刊名：國立臺灣大學法學論叢
作者：林建志
作者(外文)：Lin, Chien-chih
出版日期：2020
卷期：49:4
頁次：頁1777-1843
主題關鍵詞：臺灣憲法法院；大法官解釋之執行；單純違憲宣告；司法造法；定期失效；Taiwan Constitutional Court；Implementation of Judicial Yuan interpretations；Suspension order with no deadline；Judicial lawmaking；Suspension order with deadline
原始連結：連回原系統網址new window
相關次數：
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(0) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:67
  • 點閱點閱:2
期刊論文
1.法治斌(20010100)。與大法官共治，難嗎？。憲政時代，26(3)，75-92。  延伸查詢new window
2.Takács, Judit、Szalma, Ivett(2011)。Homophobia and Same-sex Partnership Legislation in Europe。Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal，30(5)，356-378。  new window
3.陳愛娥(20030100)。德國聯邦憲法法院裁判的拘束力。憲政時代，28(3)，98-117。  延伸查詢new window
4.楊子慧(20140500)。憲法法院法規違憲審査之裁判類型與效力--以德國法為中心，並談我國之改革。國立中正大學法學集刊，43，191-291。new window  延伸查詢new window
5.吳信華(20140100)。論大法官釋憲程序中之「執行」。國立中正大學法學集刊，42，1-79。new window  延伸查詢new window
6.Feeley, M. M.(1992)。Hollow hopes, flypaper, and metaphors。Law & Social Inquiry，17(4)，745-760。  new window
7.Powe, L. A. Jr.(1992)。The Supreme Court, social change, and legal scholarship。Stanford Law Review，44(7)，1615-1641。  new window
8.王金壽(20120600)。臺灣司法政治的興起。臺灣政治學刊，16(1)，61-119。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.溫豐文(20120600)。「不動產登記法」草案之評介。月旦法學，205，135-145。new window  延伸查詢new window
10.Kelsen, Hans(1942)。Judicial Review of Legislation: A comparative Study of the Austrian and the American Constitution。The Journal of Politics，4(2)，183-200。  new window
11.黃昭元(20141215)。法令「違憲但有效」宣告方式之再檢討。臺灣法學雜誌，262，39-54。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳英鈐(20030400)。憲法訴願的結構性變遷--從比較法論基本權利訴願的對象與判決拘束力。憲政時代，28(4)，70-125。  延伸查詢new window
13.吳信華(20130201)。大法官釋憲案件的審理與「執行」之諭知[實例研習]。臺灣法學雜誌，217，165-170。  延伸查詢new window
14.黃昭元(19960400)。從「違憲但不立即無效」的大法官解釋檢討我國的違憲審查制度。月旦法學，12，31-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.吳信華(20140400)。論大法官解釋的「效力」--基礎結構的釐清與體系化的觀察。東吳法律學報，25(4)，1-47。new window  延伸查詢new window
16.Hooghe, Marc、Meeusen, Cecil(2013)。Is Same-Sex Marriage Legislation Related to Attitudes Toward Homosexuality? Trends in Tolerance of Homosexuality in European Countries Between 2002 and 2010。Sexuality Research Social Policy，10(4)，258-268。  new window
17.Kuo, Ming-Sung(2016)。Moving Towards a Nominal Constitutional Court? Critical Reflections on the Shift from Judicial Activism to Constitutional Irrelevance in Taiwan's Constitutional Politics。Washington International Law Journal，25(3)，597-641。  new window
18.Kapiszewski, Diana、Taylor, Matthew M.(2013)。Compliance: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Explaining Adherence to Judicial Rulings。Law & Social Inquiry，38(4)，803-835。  new window
19.許宗力(20190900)。憲法法院作為積極立法者。中研院法學期刊，25，1-39。new window  延伸查詢new window
20.Mazmanyan, A.(2015)。Judicialization of Politics: The Post-Soviet Way。International Journal of Constitutional Law，13(1)，200-218。  new window
21.官曉薇(20190300)。婚姻平權與法律動員--釋字第748號解釋前之立法與訴訟行動。臺灣民主季刊，16(1)，1-44。new window  延伸查詢new window
22.吳信華(20140601)。釋憲裁判的「拘束力」與裁判書的「主筆顯名」。臺灣法學雜誌，249，147-152。  延伸查詢new window
23.陳美華(20190300)。性交易的罪與罰--釋字第666號解釋對性交易案件的法律效果。臺灣民主季刊，16(1)，45-88。new window  延伸查詢new window
24.Burke, J. C.(1969)。The Cherokee Cases: A Study in Law, Politics, and Morality。Stanford Law Review，21(3)，500-531。  new window
25.Carrubba, C. J.(2005)。Courts and Compliance in International Regulatory Regimes。The Journal of Politics，67(3)，669-689。  new window
26.Carrubba, C. J.(2009)。A Model of the Endogenous Development of Judicial Institutions in Federal and International Systems。The Journal of Politics，71(1)，55-69。  new window
27.Davis, M. H.(1987)。A Government of Judges: An Historical Re-View。The American Journal of Comparative Law，35(3)，559-580。  new window
28.Dixon, R.(2007)。Creating Dialogue about Socioeconomic Rights: Strong-Form versus Weak-Form Judicial Review Revisited。International Journal of Constitutional Law，5(3)，391-418。  new window
29.Hogg, P. W.、Bushell, A. A.(1997)。The Charter Dialogue between Courts and Legislatures (Or Perhaps the Charter of Rights Isn't Such a Bad Thing After All)。Osgoode Hall Law Journal，35(1)，75-124。  new window
30.Kuo, M.-S.(2019)。Between Choice and Tradition: Rethinking Remedial Grace Periods and Unconstitutionality Management in a Comparative Light。UCLA Pacific Basin Law Journal，36(2)，157-200。  new window
31.Leckey, R.(2016)。The Harms of Remedial Discretion。International Journal of Constitutional Law，14(3)，584-607。  new window
32.Lin, C.-C.、Hsu, C.-F.(2016)。An Inter-Court Struggle for Judicial Supremacy。University of Pennsylvania Asian Law Review，11(2)，294-336。  new window
33.Lin, T.-Y.、Kuo, M.-S.、Chen, H.-W.(2018)。Seventy Years on: The Taiwan Constitutional Court and Judicial Activism in a Changing Constitutional Landscape。Hong Kong Law Journal，48(3)，995-1028。  new window
34.Redman, S. M.(2018)。Effects of Same-Sex Legislation on Attitudes Toward Homosexuality。Political Research Quarterly，71(3)，628-641。  new window
35.Roach, K.(2004)。Dialogic Judicial Review and Its Critics。Supreme Court Law Review (2nd Series)，23，49-104。  new window
36.Spriggs, James F. II(1997)。Explaining Federal Bureaucratic Compliance with Supreme Court Opinions。Political Research Quarterly，50(3)，567-593。  new window
37.Tushnet, M.(2009)。Dialogic Judicial Review。Arkansas Law Review，61(2)，205-216。  new window
38.van den Akker, Hanneke、van der Ploeg, Rozemarijn、Scheepers, Peer(2013)。Disapproval of Homosexuality: Comparative Research on Individual and National Determinants of Disapproval of Homosexuality in 20 European Countries。International Journal of Public Opinion Research，25(1)，64-86。  new window
39.黃昭元(20031100)。司法違憲審查的正當性爭議--理論基礎與方法論的初步檢討。國立臺灣大學法學論叢，32(6)，103-151。new window  延伸查詢new window
40.蔡宗珍(20100315)。憲法疑義解釋程序之功能與存廢省思。臺灣法學雜誌，148，27-48。  延伸查詢new window
41.吳佳樺(20121200)。難以置信的真相--論釋字第666號解釋與社會變遷。臺北大學法學論叢，84，71-183。new window  延伸查詢new window
42.Schuck, Peter H.(1993)。Review: Public Law Litigation and Social Reform。Yale Law Journal，102(7)，1763-1786。  new window
43.Graber, Mark A.(1993)。The Nonmajoritarian Difficulty: Legislative Deference to the Judiciary。Studies in American Political Development，7(1)，35-73。  new window
圖書
1.Canon, B. C.、Johnson, C. A.(1999)。Judicial policies: Implementation and impact。Washington, D.C.：CQ Press。  new window
2.Hirschl, Ran(2004)。Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism。Cambridge, Massachusetts：Harvard University Press。  new window
3.Hall, M. E. K.(2011)。The Nature of Supreme Court Power。Cambridge, England：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Rosenberg, Gerald N.(2008)。The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring about Social Change?。Chicago, IL：University of Chicago Press。  new window
5.Sieder, R.、Schjolden, L.、Angell, A.(2005)。The Judicialization of Politics in Latin America。New York, NY：Palgrave Macmillan。  new window
6.Scheingold, Stuart A.(1974)。The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change。Yale University Press。  new window
7.吳庚(2004)。憲法的解釋與適用。臺北：吳庚。  延伸查詢new window
8.Fallon, Richard H. Jr.(2001)。Implementing the Constitution。Cambridge, MA：Harvard University Press。  new window
9.葉俊榮(2003)。民主轉型與憲法變遷。台北：元照。  延伸查詢new window
10.Sunstein, Cass R.(2005)。Radicals in Robes: Why Extreme Right-Wing Courts Are Wrong for America。New York, NY：Basic Books。  new window
11.Kommers, Donald P.、Miller, Russell A.(2012)。The Constitutional Jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany。Duke University Press。  new window
12.Black, R. C.、Owens, R. J.、Wedeking, J.、Wohlfarth, P. C.(2016)。U.S. Supreme Court Opinions and Their Audiences。Cambridge, England：Cambridge University Press。  new window
13.Dressei, B.(2014)。The Judicialization of Politics in Asia。Methuen, MA：Routledge。  new window
14.Gardbaum, S.(2013)。The New Commonwealth Model of Constitutionalism: Theory and Practice。Cambridge, England：Cambridge University Press。  new window
15.Helmke, G.、Rios-Figueroa, J.(2014)。Courts in Latin America。Cambridge, England：Cambridge University Press。  new window
16.Schultz, D. A.(1998)。Leveraging the Law: Using the Courts to Achieve Social Change。Pieterlen：Peter Lang。  new window
17.Tyler, T. R.(2006)。Why People Obey the Law。Princeton, NJ：Princeton University Press。  new window
18.Chandrachud, C.(2017)。Balanced Constitutionalism: Courts and Legislatures in India and the United Kingdom。Oxford University Press.。  new window
19.Constitutional Court of Korea(2018)。Thirty Years of the Constitutional Court of Korea: 1988-2018。The Constitutional Court。  new window
20.Epp, C. R.(1997)。The Rights Revolution: Lawyers, Activists, and Supreme Courts in Comparative Perspective。University of Chicago Press。  new window
21.Fallon, R. H. Jr.(2019)。The Nature of Constitutional Rights: The Invention and Logic of Strict Judicial Scrutiny。Cambridge University Press。  new window
22.Friedman, Lawrence M.(2016)。Impact: How Law Affects Behavior。Harvard University Press。  new window
23.Roach, K.(2001)。The Supreme Court on Trial: Judicial Activism or Democratic Dialogue。Irwin Law。  new window
24.Tushnet, M.(2008)。Weak Courts, Strong Rights: Judicial Review and Social Welfare Rights in Comparative Constitutional Law。Princeton University Press。  new window
25.Young, K. G.(2012)。Constituting Economic and Social Rights。Oxford University Press。  new window
26.Gibson, J. L.、Caldeira, G. A.(2009)。Citizens, Courts, and Confirmations: Positivity Theory and the Judgments of the American People。Princeton University Press。  new window
27.林子儀、葉俊榮、黃昭元、張文貞(2008)。憲法：權力分立。新學林出版股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
28.Ely, John Hart(1980)。Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review。Harvard University Press。  new window
29.McCann, Michael W.(1994)。Rights at work: Pay equity reform and the politics of legal mobilization。University of Chicago Press。  new window
30.Staton, Jeffrey K.(2010)。Judicial Power and Strategic Communication in Mexico。New York, MA：Cambridge University Press。  new window
31.Vanberg, George(2005)。The Politics of Constitutional Review in Germany。Cambridge University Press。  new window
其他
1.司法院(2007)。締造金字塔型之法院組織，http://jirs.judicial.gov.tw/judlib/EBookDownload.asp?pfid=0000046183&showType=1&lk=Y%2C20070500%2C0004。  new window
2.行政院主計總處(2012)。中華民國102 年度中央政府總預算案：總說明及主要附表，https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas01/102/102Btab/102B%E7%B8%BD%E8%AA%AA%E6%98%8E%E5%8F%8A%E4%B8%BB%E8%A6%81%E9%99%84%E8%A1%A8.PDF。  new window
3.行政院主計總處(2015)。總預算案籌編經過及主要內容，https://www.dgbas.gov.tw/public/data/dgbas01/105/105Btab/105參.doc。  延伸查詢new window
4.翁岳生(2017)。臺灣法治的發展，馬氏思上文教基金會。  延伸查詢new window
圖書論文
1.葉俊榮(2013)。違憲政治--司法院大法官附期限違憲解釋的實證分析。2011司法制度實證研究。臺北：中央研究院法律學研究所。  延伸查詢new window
2.Yap, Po Jen(2019)。Constitutional Remedies in Asia: An Overview。Constitutional Remedies in Asia。New York, NY：Routledge。  new window
3.Brinks, D. M.(2017)。Solving the Problem of (Non)compliance in Social and Economic Rights Litigation。Social Rights Judgments and The Politics of Compliance。Cambridge, England：Cambridge University Press。  new window
4.Langford, M.、Rodriguez-Garavito, C.、Rossi, J.(2017)。Introduction: From Jurisprudence to Compliance。Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance。Cambridge, England：Cambridge University Press。  new window
5.Yeh, Jiunn-rong、Chang, Wen-Chen(2018)。An Evolving Court with Changing Functions: The Constitutional Court and Judicial Review in Taiwan。Constitutional Courts in Asia: A Comparative Perspective。Cambridge：Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Butt, S.(2018)。Indonesia's Constitutional Court and Indonesia's Electoral Systems。Constitutional Courts in Asia: A Comparative Perspective。Cambridge University Press.。  new window
7.Butt, S.(2019)。Conditional Constitutionality and conditional Unconstitutionality in Indonesia。Constitutional Remedies in Asia。Routledge。  new window
8.Çali, B.、Koch, A.(2017)。Explaining Compliance: Lessons Learnt from Civil and Political Rights。Social Rights Judgments and the Politics of Compliance。Cambridge University Press。  new window
9.Chang, W.-C.、Lee, Y.-L.(2018)。Competition or Collaboration: Constitutional Review by Multiple Final Courts。Comparative Judicial Review。Edward Elgar。  new window
10.Chang, W.(2018)。Institutional Independence of the Judiciary: Taiwan's Incomplete Reform。Asia-Pacific Judiciaries: Independence, Impartiality and Integrity。Cambridge University Press。  new window
11.Deva, S.(2014)。The Indian Constitution in the Twenty-first Century: The Continuing Quest for Empowerment, Good Governance and Sustainability。Constitutionalism in Asia in the Early Twenty-First Century。Cambridge University Press.。  new window
12.Gawron, T.、Rogowski, R.(2016)。Implementation of German Federal Constitutional Court Decisions: Judicial Orders and the Federal Legislature。Constitutional Courts in Comparison: The U.S. Supreme Court and the German Federal Constitutional Court。Berghahn Books。  new window
13.Ginsburg, T.、EnhBaatar, C.(2018)。Avoiding Rights: The Constitutional Tsets of Mongolia。Constitutional Courts in Asia: A Comparative Perspective。Cambridge University Press。  new window
14.Hamilton, A.(2003)。The Federalist No. 78。The Federalist Papers。Bantam Dell。  new window
15.Rosenberg, G. N.、Bail, S.、Krishnaswamy, S.(2019)。Conclusion: Neither a Silver Bullet Nor a Hollow Hope。A Qualified Hope: The Indian Supreme Court and Progressive Social Change。Cambridge University Press。  new window
16.Schauer, F.(2012)。Comparative Constitutional Compliance: Notes Towards a Research Agenda。Practice and Theory in Comparative Law。Cambridge University Press。  new window
17.Su, Y.-T.(2019)。Regime Unchanged: The Organization and Failed Reorganization of Taiwan's Judicial Yuan。Judicial Reform in Taiwan: Democratization and the Diffusion of Law。Routledge。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
QR Code
QRCODE

臺灣人文及社會科學引文索引資料庫

目前上線人數：442（臺灣：436，外國：6） ／ 本年度總使用人次：1385896 ／ 訪客人次（自102年09月）：67197245
國家圖書館著作權聲明 Copyright © 2013 All rights reserved.
本館地址: 100201臺北市中山南路20號． 本館地圖及交通資訊．
總機：(02)23619132．最佳瀏覽解析度為1024x768以上