本論文以師大強暴案為研究對象，使用論述分析與意識形態批判來分析報紙新聞報導與評論如何呈現強暴議題。本論文的研究重點包括下列數項：(1)新聞消息來源；(2)新聞文本所顯示的意識形態運作機制；(3)比較師大案新聞報導、師大案評論、以及反性騷擾遊行新聞報導，探討此三者對相關議題的處理方式有何異同。本研究發現，報紙報導中的強暴論述默許男性行為自由度的擴張，而同時將限制自已、抗拒男性的行為責任加諸女性身上，形成兩性關係上行為自由與行為限制分配之不對等。

　　　　　Focusing on the news reports of a rape case concerning a university professor and his female student, this paper uses discourse analysis and ideological critique to explore in what ways the media's reports reinforce the unequal power relationship between the male professor and the female student. This paper includes three areas of inquiries: (1) news sources; (2) modes of operation of ideology in news stories; (3) comparisons of how issues related to rape and sexual interaction are represented in news reports and in social commentaries on the event. In news reports, preventing and resisting rape is considered entirely as women's responsibility, thus reinforcing the gender asymmetry of the distribution of behavioral restinctions between men and women.