:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:「弘明集」所反映的佛教觀念
書刊名:中華佛學學報
作者:宋立道
作者(外文):Song, Lidao
出版日期:1999
卷期:12
頁次:頁35-51
主題關鍵詞:弘明集漢末佛教夷夏之辨本末之辨晉宋佛教The Hung-ming chiBuddhism in the later Han DynastyControversies for Buddhism in Jin & Song DynastiesBuddhist Status in the Jin & Song Dynasties
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(1) 博士論文(0) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:0
  • 點閱點閱:22
     本文根據( 弘明集)中所搜輯的資料,考察了從漢末到南北朝時中國佛教發展中 的重大事件。 對於以往先賢充分討論過的問題 -- 比如關於(理惑論)真偽和年代的討論 -- 不再覆述。 全文依據(弘明集)中的材料討論了三個問題:漢末三國時的佛教、晉宋佛 教的幾個主要理論爭論、晉宋的佛教形態。關於漢末三國的佛教,作者強調了佛教自我意識 的覺醒,它不再依傍於黃老祭祀之術,但在理論上它還要借傳統的老莊學說來說明自身。關 於晉宋佛教的理論爭論,本文依據(弘明集)本身,歸結為:(一)夷夏之辨和本末之辨; (二)魂滅與否的爭論。前者涉及了作為外來文化與中國固有文化如何相互適應且調整地位 的問題,這種爭論和辨析的哲學背景則是至魏晉才產生的本體論哲學; 魂滅與否的討論則涉 及了宗教倫理的存在前提。這也是中國佛教走向成熟的必經階段。經過晉宋的這場討論,中 國人認為這個問題已經解決。關於晉宋的佛教形態,本文認為同之前的佛教主要在宮廷和少 數貴族中流行不一樣,兩晉以降,佛教已經深入民間。其思想理論則主要依靠士大夫階層得 到闡揚。至於士大夫心目中的佛教價值觀,與社會文化風氣相關,也與他們自己的人生體驗 相關。
     Basing on the materials collected in the Hung-ming chi (the Collection of Highlighting), this paper makes a investigation of important events of Chinese Buddhism during the period (184 ∼ 265) from the later Han Dynasty to the Northern and Southern Dynasties. In the paper, the three issues are discussed: the status of the Buddhism in the period of the later Han Dynasty and the Three Kingdoms; Some controversies in the period of the Southern Dynasties; the Buddhist status in the period (317 ∼ 479) of Jin & Song Dynasties. As for Buddhism in the Three-Kingdoms period, this demonstrates that Buddhism has no longer clung to the indigenous beliefs such as Taoism and other worships, yet it had to make its theoretical exegeses with the help of the Xuan-xue (a metaphysics hybridizing Confucian and Taoist teachings). In regard with the controversies concerning Buddhism in the Jin & Song Dynasties period, the paper holds that the materials in the Hung-ming chi'provides us two fundamental issues: one is about the Yi-xa-zhi-bian (How to Make Distinction Between Chinese Tradition and Barbarism) and the Ben-mo-zhi-bian (Whatever is the Root of Chinese Culture); the other one is whether the soul is eternal or not. The former involves the integration of Buddhist culture and inherent culture in China, and eventually leads to the interest in the ontology of the Chinese philosophy; the latter deals with the very a critical presupposition for Buddhism and any religions in their theology. The great controversy in this period finally solved the theoretical problem at least to most the Chinese folk and hardly anyone doubted the soul exists eternally since then. As for the Buddhist status in the same period, three layers can be found among its believers: the emperor and people in his palace; the literati and the folk people in society. The Theoretical form of Buddhism is mainly concerned with both the literati's personal experiences and the social atmosphere they lived in.
圖書
1.釋慧皎(1996)。高僧傳。臺北:新文豐出版社。  延伸查詢new window
2.湯用彤(199601)。漢魏兩晉南北朝佛教史。臺北:駱駝出版社。  延伸查詢new window
3.(梁)釋寶唱。名是傳抄。名是傳抄。  延伸查詢new window
4.(隋)慧遠。明報應論。弘明集。  延伸查詢new window
5.(南朝宋)劉義慶。世說新語。世說新語。  延伸查詢new window
6.(唐)釋道宣。八關齋詩並序。廣弘明集。  延伸查詢new window
7.郗超。奉法要。奉法要。  延伸查詢new window
8.正齋經。正齋經。  延伸查詢new window
9.(晉)孫綽。喻道論。喻道論。  延伸查詢new window
10.(南朝宋)謝靈運。辯宗論。辯宗論。  延伸查詢new window
其他
1.(南朝梁)劉勰。滅惑論。  延伸查詢new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top