:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:誰的政治思想﹖為何研究﹖--臺灣政治學界政治思想研究之初步回顧:1988∼1998
書刊名:思與言
作者:陳瑞崇
作者(外文):Chen, Jui-chung
出版日期:1999
卷期:37:3
頁次:頁141-208
主題關鍵詞:政治思想政治思想史方法論臺灣政治思想研究政治論述典範政治思想的政治性格Political thoughtMethodology of history of political thoughtStudy of political thought in TaiwanParadigm of political discoursePolitical character of political thought
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(3) 博士論文(1) 專書(1) 專書論文(0)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:3
  • 共同引用共同引用:10
  • 點閱點閱:25
     本文乃皙據政治思想史方法法論的提示針對近十年來臺灣地區政治學研究所學位論文、專業學報及中央研究院社科所的研討會論文,提出初步的描述與質問,因為絕大多的論文與臺灣政治歷史、論述、制度無關,明顯地偏重個別思想家常說的闡釋或批判,這些研與眼下的本地社會的相關性也顯得相當薄弱,解除戒嚴後的臺灣政治思想研並未見有面對政治現實及其歷史的企圖和具體行為,這樣的研究現況讓人不禁要問:政治思想研究者「到底為何研究」?
Abstract According to the substantial inspirations of methodology of history of political thought, this essay intends to proceed a preliminary overview on the conditions of the study of political thought in Taiwan last decade. It found that most works of political thought in Taiwan had little to do with Taiwan political history, institutions, actions, and the whole society. The introduction, interpretation, and critique of the masterpieces of western political philosophy seemed to become the only legitimate intention for the scholars to study political thought in Taiwanese political science. Based on the reliable materials, including dissertations of department of political science, journals, seminar papers of political thought, therefore, this essay tried to invite the members of the community of political science of Taiwan to encounter a set of provocative but challenging issue- “why and what do we study for in the area of so-called “political thought”? is it indispensible to study political thought for Taiwanese political science” “-for self­reflecting the history and current state of the study of political thought in Taiwan for ourselves and future scholars and students.
期刊論文
1.陳思賢(19980600)。創造一個人為秩序:史詩、悲劇、對話錄與希臘早期政治論述的興起。政治科學論叢,9,頁225-252。new window  延伸查詢new window
2.黃默、陳俊宏(19970900)。政治哲學要跨出去!論臺灣政治哲學研究的發展趨向。東吳政治學報,8,1-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Dryzek, John S.、Leonard, Stephen T.(1988)。History and Discipline in Political Science。The American Political Science Review,82,1245-1260。  new window
4.Sabia, Daniel R.(1984)。Political Education and the History of Political Thought。The American Political Science Review,78(4),985-999。  new window
圖書
1.Kuhn, Thomas、Tsen, Suh-der、Fu, Daiwie、Wang, Daw-hwan、Chien, Sechin Y.-S(1991)。科學革命的結構。臺北:遠流。  延伸查詢new window
2.Pocock, John Greville Agard(1989)。Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History。University of Chicago Press。  new window
3.Foucault, Michel、尚衡(1990)。性意識史:導論。台北:久大。  延伸查詢new window
4.Sabine, George、Thorson, Thomas L.(1973)。A History of Political Theory。Diyden Press。  new window
5.Skinner, Quentin(1998)。Liberty Before Liberalism。Cambridge University Press。  new window
6.Foucault, Michel、劉北成、楊遠嬰(1992)。規訓與懲罰:監獄的誕生。桂冠圖書股份有限公司。  延伸查詢new window
7.Aristotle(1997)。政治學。亞里士多德全集(9)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
8.Dunn, John(1980)。Political Obligation in its Historical Context。Political Obligation in its Historical Context。Cambridge。  new window
9.Marx, Karl、Englies, Friedrich(1965)。The German Ideology。馬克思恩格斯全集(3)。北京。  延伸查詢new window
10.Pocock, John G. A.(1985)。The Concept of a Language and the Metier d'historien: Some Considerations on Practice。The Language of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe。Cambridge。  new window
11.Skinner, Quentin(1978)。The Renaissance。The Foundations of Modern Political Thought(1)。Cambridge。  new window
12.Skinner, Quentin(1988)。Motives, Intentions and the Interpretation of Texts。Meaning and Context。Princeton, NJ。  new window
圖書論文
1.Skinner, Quentin(1988)。Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas。Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top