:::

詳目顯示

回上一頁
題名:跨世紀政治學發展趨勢之探討
書刊名:政治科學論叢
作者:高永光 引用關係郭中玲
作者(外文):Kao, Yuang-kuangKuo, Chung-ling
出版日期:2000
卷期:12
頁次:頁59-99
主題關鍵詞:政治科學行為主義科學主義典範典範革命新國家主義本土化Political scienceBehavioralismScientismParadigmParadigm revolutionNeo-statismTaiwanization
原始連結:連回原系統網址new window
相關次數:
  • 被引用次數被引用次數:期刊(2) 博士論文(2) 專書(0) 專書論文(2)
  • 排除自我引用排除自我引用:1
  • 共同引用共同引用:48
  • 點閱點閱:37
     政治學經過了一百多年的發展,二十一世紀究竟會有什麼變化?政治學 者在跨世紀時正在思考建立政治學的學科歷史。本文以為這種趨勢一方面是為建 立起一個專門且獨立的學科所共有的價值與認同之外,另一方面也有意為政治科 學及學者所肩負的責任,找出合法性或正當性基礎。 其次,一門獨立的學科必有其典範,但典範卻經常在改變。跨世紀的政治學既有 的典範為何,是否正在位移?本文認為,政治學典範的整理,不僅要從學科歷史 中去整理,也需要從方法上去檢驗。 政治學的發展和每個國家的政權性質有關。例如在民主國家,政治學的發展猶如 該國的民主化歷史。因此,政治學與政權的關係為何?是跨世紀政治學發展的另 一個思考趨勢。 二十一世紀政治學的新趨勢,對台灣政冶學界有何影響?我們必須思考台灣政治 學的主體性、歷史性、政治性與現實性,才能為二十一世紀台灣政治科學的發展 找出方向。
     In retrospect to its past more than one hundred years developing, whatprospect does political science has in twenty-first century? Political scientistsare seeking to identify a specific history for political science recent yearsaround millennium. The striving of building the disciplinary history ishelpful to political scientists to share its value and identity in common. Also,this attempt is to endorse the legitimacy and to embed the responsibility intothe political science community. Moreover, as a salient discipline, political science must have its ownparadigms; however, as Kuhn said, paradigms have usually been shifting.What paradigms have political science had this time around millennium?How will these paradigms be shifting toward twenty-first century? It is themoment right now to examine all the paradigms of political science not onlyfrom the history but also from the methods. The development of political science in any country is related to itspropensity of regime. In a democratic state, for example, its developing ofpolitical science is as well as its democratization process. Along this line,what the real relationship between political science and regime is the majorthinking tendency in developing political science around millennium. What will this new tide of political science develop when into twenty-first century affect Taiwan's political science community? The authorsbelieve that the sooner to investigate the actuality, history and itsrelationship with political regime of Taiwan's political science, the better tobuild up the discipline's status. Then, Taiwan's political science developingwill be on the right track toward the twenty-first century.
期刊論文
1.Skinner, Quentin(1969)。Meaning and Understanding in the History of Ideas。History and Theory,8(1),3-53。  new window
2.黃默、陳俊宏(19970900)。政治哲學要跨出去!論臺灣政治哲學研究的發展趨向。東吳政治學報,8,1-45。new window  延伸查詢new window
3.Krasner, Stephen D.(19840100)。Review Article: Approaches to the State: Alternative Conceptions and Historical Dynamics。Comparative Politics,16(2),223-246。  new window
4.高永光(19981200)。從政治學新國家主義論臺灣研究的新趨勢。中山人文社會科學期刊,6(2)=15,11-22。  延伸查詢new window
5.石之渝(19991000)。為誰推動政治學的本土化。中國大陸研究教學通訊,34,1-2。  延伸查詢new window
6.魏鏞(19921200)。中國政治學會之成立及其初期學術活動--紀念中國政治學會成立六十周年。政治學報,20,1-28。new window  延伸查詢new window
7.蕭全政(1998)。讓政治科學回到政治的科學。暨大學報,2(1),103-132。  延伸查詢new window
8.羅致政(1997)。網際網路與政治學研究。東吳政治學報,7,169-189。new window  延伸查詢new window
9.詹文雄(1994)。論政治學的界說、範圍與定向。中國文化大學政治學研究所學報,3,1-24。  延伸查詢new window
10.黃紀(1997)。政治學簡介。通識教育(清華大學),4(2),1-11。  延伸查詢new window
11.彭懷恩(1993)。當代政治學的發展-科學史的觀點。世界新聞傳播學院學報,3,1-12。  延伸查詢new window
12.陳瑞崇(1994)。時間、空間與記憶中的搜尋-一項安置本土政治學社群的討論提綱。東吳政治學報,3,391-406。new window  延伸查詢new window
13.郭仁孚(1997)。對傳統經典政治理論的基本認識。東吳政治學報,8,87-116。new window  延伸查詢new window
14.郭仁孚(1996)。政治的概念:歷史探討與比較研究大綱。東吳政治學報,6,91-121。new window  延伸查詢new window
15.朱雲漢(1999)。對社會科學本土化的基本要求。中國大陸研究教學通訊,34,3-5。  延伸查詢new window
16.Dahl, Robert A.(1996)。半世紀以來政治學的反思。二十一世紀,35,152-158。  延伸查詢new window
17.Almond, Gabriel A.(1966)。Political Theory and Political Science。American Political Science Review,60,869-879。  new window
18.(1987)。The Evolution of Political Science: Selected Case Studies。International Political Science Review,8(1)。  new window
19.Dahl, Robert(1961)。The Behavioural Approach in Political Science: Epitaph for a Monument to a Successful Protest。American Political Science Review,55,763-772。  new window
20.Diggins, John Patrick(1984)。The Oyster and the Pearl: the Problem of Contextualism in Intellectual History。History and Theory,23,151-169。  new window
21.Dryzek, John、Leonard, Stephen(1988)。History and discipline in political science。American Political Science Review,82(4),1245-1260。  new window
22.Easton, David(1969)。The New Revolution in Political Science。American Political Science Review,63(4),1051-1061。  new window
23.Easton, David(1981)。The Political System Besieged by the State。Political Theory,9,303-325。  new window
24.Farr, James(1988)。The History of Political Science。American Journal of Political Science,32,1175-1195。  new window
25.Farr, James(1988)。Political Science and the Enlightenment of Enthusiasm。American Political Science Review,82。  new window
26.Friedrich, C. J.(1947)。Political Science in the United States in Wartime。American Political Science Review,41,978-989。  new window
27.Galtung, J.(1981)。Structure, Culture, and Intellectual Style: an Essay Comparing Saxonic, Teutonic, Gallic and Nipponic Approaches。Social Science Information,20,817-856。  new window
28.Graziao, L.(1987)。The Development and Institutionalization of Political Science in Italy。International Political Science Review,8,41-57。  new window
29.Gunnell, John G.(1969)。Deduction, Explanation, and Social Scientific Inquiry。American Political Science Review,68,1233-1246。  new window
30.Huntington, Samuel P.(1974)。Paradigms of American Politics: Beyond the One, the Two and the Many。Political Science Quarterly,89(1),1-26。  new window
31.Huntington, S. P.(1988)。One Soul at a Time: Political Science and Political Reform。American Political Science Review,82(1),3-10。  new window
32.Jacobson, Norman(1963)。Political Science and Political Education。American Political Science Review,57,561-569。  new window
33.Jinadu, L. A.(1987)。The Institutional Development of Political Science in Nigeria: Trend, Problems, and Prospect。International Political Science Review,8,59-72。  new window
34.Jones, Robert Alun(1977)。On Understanding a Sociological Classic。American Journal of Sociology,83,279-319。  new window
35.Jones, Robert Alun(1978)。Subjectivity, Objectivity and Historicity: A Response to Johnson。American Journal of Sociology,84,175-181。  new window
36.Jones, Robert Alun(1981)。On Quentin Skinner。American Journal of Sociology,83,279-319。  new window
37.Kastendiek, H.(1987)。Political Development and Political Science in West Germany。International Political Science Review,8,25-40。  new window
38.Kuklick, Henrika(1980)。Restructuring the Past: Toward an Appreciation of the Social Context of Social Science。Sociological Quarterly,21,5-21。  new window
39.Morgenthau, Hans(1955)。Reflection on the State of Political Science。Review of Politics,17,431-460。  new window
40.Reford, Emmet(1961)。Reflection on a Discipline。American Political Science Review,55,755-762。  new window
41.Ross, Dorothy(1978)。Professionalism and the Transformation of American Social thought。The Journal of Economic History,38,494-499。  new window
42.Schuyler, R. L.(1941)。The Usefulness of Useless History。Political Science Quarterly,56,23-37。  new window
43.Truman, David(1965)。Disillusion and Regeneration: the Quest for a Discipline。American Political Science Review,59,867-873。  new window
44.Wolin, Sheldon(1969)。Political Theory as a Vocation。American Political Science Review,68,1062-1082。  new window
研究報告
1.包宗和、劉義周、彭錦鵬、吳玉山(1994)。政治學門人力資源現況調查分析研究。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
2.黃紀(1998)。國內政治學專業期刊評比通識教育。臺北。  延伸查詢new window
圖書
1.行政院國家科學委員會(1999)。我國人文學及社會科學各學門期刊評比排序。臺北:行政院國家科學委員會編印。  延伸查詢new window
2.Key, V. O. Jr.(1949)。Southern Politics in State and Nation。New York, NY:Alfred A. Knopf。  new window
3.Pocock, J. G. A.(1971)。Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History。Politics, Language, and Time: Essays on Political Thought and History。NY:Atheneum。  new window
4.Storing, Herbert. ed.,(1962)。Essays on the Scientific Study of Politics。New York, NY:Holt, Rinehart and Winston。  new window
5.Ricci, David M.(1984)。The Tragedy of Political Science: Politics, Scholarship, and Democracy。New Haven:Yale University Press。  new window
6.Eulau, Heinz(1963)。The Behavioral Persuasion in Politics。New York, NY:Random House。  new window
7.Chicote, Ronald H.(1981)。The Theories of Comparative Politics: The Search for a Paradigm。Boulder, Colorado:Westview Press, Inc.。  new window
8.Almond, Gabriel A.、Powell, G. Bringham(1966)。Comparative Politics: A Developmental Approach。Boston:Little Brown and Company。  new window
9.Janos, Andrew C.(1986)。Politics and Paradigms--Changing Theories of Change in Social Science。Stanford, California:Stanford University Press。  new window
10.高永光(1995)。論政治學中國家研究之新趨勢。臺北:永然文化。new window  延伸查詢new window
11.Huntington, Samuel P.(1968)。Political Order in Changing Societies。Yale University Press。  new window
12.賴澤涵(1987)。三十年來我國人文及社會科學之回顧與展望。台北:東大圖書公司。  延伸查詢new window
13.Kuhn, Thomas Samuel(1970)。The Structure of Scientific Revolutions。University of Chicago Press。  new window
14.Lasswell, H. D.、Kaplan, A.(1950)。Power & Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry。Power & Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry。New Haven。  new window
15.(1982)。International Handbook of Political Science。International Handbook of Political Science。Westport, CT。  new window
16.Burrow, John W.、Winch, Donald、Collini, Stefan(1983)。That noble science of politics: A study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History。That noble science of politics: A study in Nineteenth-Century Intellectual History。Cambridge:Cambridge University Press。  new window
17.Crick, Bernard(1959)。The American Science of Politics: Its Origins and Conditions。The American Science of Politics: Its Origins and Conditions。Berkeley。  new window
18.(1991)。The Development of Political Science: A Comparative Survey。The Development of Political Science: A Comparative Survey。New York, NY。  new window
19.(1995)。Regime and Discipline: Democracy and the Development of Political Science。Regime and Discipline: Democracy and the Development of Political Science。Ann Arbor, MI。  new window
20.(1993)。Discipline and History: Political Science in the United States。Discipline and History: Political Science in the United States。Ann Arbor, MI。  new window
21.(1983)。Political Science: The State of the Discipline。Political Science: The State of the Discipline。Washington, DC。  new window
22.(1977)。Foundation of Political Science: Research, Methods, and Scope。Foundation of Political Science: Research, Methods, and Scope。New York, NY。  new window
23.Kirkpatrick, Evron(1977)。From Past to Present。Foundation of Political Science: Research, Methods, and Scope。New York, NY。  new window
24.Merriam, Chlarles E.(1925)。New Aspects of Politics。New Aspects of Politics。Chicago, IL。  new window
25.(1995)。分析社會的方法論文集。分析社會的方法論文集。屏東。  延伸查詢new window
26.(1998)。全國人文社會科學會議會前會:社會科學組。全國人文社會科學會議會前會:社會科學組。沒有紀錄。  延伸查詢new window
27.Rogow, A. A.(1969)。Politics, Personality, and Social Science in Twentieth Century: Essays in Honour of Harold D. Lasswell。Politics, Personality, and Social Science in Twentieth Century: Essays in Honour of Harold D. Lasswell。Chicago, IL。  new window
28.Roskin, Michael、Cord, Robert L.、Medeiros, James A.、Jones, Walter S.(1997)。Political Science: An Introduction。Political Science: An Introduction。NJ。  new window
29.Seidelman, Raymond、Harpham, Edward J.(1985)。Disenchanted Realists: Political Science and the American Crisis, 1884-1984。Disenchanted Realists: Political Science and the American Crisis, 1884-1984。Albany。  new window
30.Somit, A.、Tanenhaus, J.(1967)。The Development of American Political Science: from Burgess to Behavioralism。The Development of American Political Science: from Burgess to Behavioralism。Boston, MA。  new window
31.Stein, Michael B.(1995)。Major Factors in the Emergence of Political Science as a Discipline in Western Democracies: A Comparative Analysis of the United States, Britain, France and Germany。Regime and Discipline: Democracy and the Development of Political Science。Ann Arbor, MI。  new window
32.(1986)。Political Science: The Science of Politics。Political Science: The Science of Politics。NY。  new window
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
:::
無相關著作
 
無相關點閱
 
QR Code
QRCODE